Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
David_cadbury said:
Hey warren! I was wondering if you ever had plans to return to film making. I actually thought Pony Trouble was fun and campy in a Tromaville sort of way. Not long before you two started working together I mentioned somewhere in her official thread that Brianna always reminded me of a cult film actress, like if Mink Stole had a child with Tura Satana.

So here’s my question: Would you consider making a movie in the spirit of Pony Trouble with Brianna as your leading lady?
Click to expand...
Sure if you fund it lol. Why not?
 
ENJOY YOUR CROWN OF DICKS, FAGGOT!

dicks.jpg
 
So Warren gives a friend good advice, and then says? Well it helped my friend and his suffering is from not listening to my good advice, well THAT CANT APPLY TO ME TOO!
 
W person cow said:
Are you saying that I was right, and that the trolls here are just jealous, and are better off ignored?
But some of the jokes about me are funny! (if mean)
Click to expand...

Finally Warren, after so many years of struggle you became famous! Granted it's a small website of freaks, but the fame here is genuine and prime quality. Enjoy while it lasts!
 
W person cow said:
Are you saying that I was right, and that the trolls here are just jealous, and are better off ignored?
But some of the jokes about me are funny! (if mean)
Click to expand...
Some people are being rather agressive and trolling not all, it's best to ignore, if you want to say jealous is why that's on you. But yes, if you ignore trolls, they move on. You were right and gave a friend good advice, so why don't you use it yourself?
 
Gorilla Tessellator said:
Finally Warren, after so many years of struggle you became famous! Granted it's a small website of freaks, but the fame here is genuine and prime quality. Enjoy while it lasts!
Click to expand...
Weird! I've had some small "cult fame" before due to all of my "wacky adventures" or whatever, but I've never really had "hater fame". My friend Robby had a massive amount of haters because he was a blue collar guy making fancy TV shows with rich people. His blue collar friends were like "you sold out" and his rich friends were like "you have no manners". And he did insult comedy, so of course that draws haters. I was amazed by what he went through day to day with all the trolls making GIFs of him with dicks on them and whatnot.
But he had like 1/10th the amount of haters that Brianna has, or less.
Who woulda thunk that I'd be in Robby's shoes someday? On a smaller scale though, of course. I'm just Warren the Naive Idiot Spaz Brianna Cultist. Probably a flash in the pan deal, right? Although, there are ponies involved, and ponies tend to make people really supremely angry on the Internet for some reason.
 
Bronys are kinda gone and hating on bronys is too main stream for us cutting edge cyber bullies.

So I'd say you are pretty safe on the MLP stuff Warren. You are correct, success brings detractors, and as you said insult humor does as well (hmm what do both of those things share with this very active site?) Even you said we aren't all bad even though you admit you were told and thought this was devil's den.

Now you may say we earn our hate, but look at some of the events the farms have been victimized, server shutting down legal problems someone who showed up armed to Nulls house.... I'm not talking Jace street racing, I'm talking an adult man, showed up with a weapon at this site's owner/admin's place.

Not all hate is jealously tho, don't let yourself be told that in regards to how we feel about some cows. Some people on this site are truly detestable, and have harmed children etc,others are scam artists, but most are just harmless weirdos.

Your buddy had a TV gig, tons of people love the industry and would be jealous, I'm sure a few people honestly just disliked his style also. When you put yourself out there, people are gonna say what they think.
 
NotAKitty said:
That’s so inaccurate it’s not even funny. Democratic socialists are old school socialists who believe in using the state to establish a communist society. And Bernie is by no means capitalist.
Click to expand...
There are widely different people who call themselves Democratic Socialists. Hugo Chavez is like you describe. Whereas Jon Stewart is pretty much an ordinary middle of the road guy in many respects, who wants to help the working families and have New Deal programs within our existing democratic system. Whether you want to call that capitalist or not is up to you. But Bernie pretty much agrees with Jon Stewart, like I do. Bernie just talks about it loudly and boldly. And people like it when he does that, I hear tell :)
 
W person cow said:
Weird! I've had some small "cult fame" before due to all of my "wacky adventures" or whatever, but I've never really had "hater fame". My friend Robby had a massive amount of haters because he was a blue collar guy making fancy TV shows with rich people. His blue collar friends were like "you sold out" and his rich friends were like "you have no manners". And he did insult comedy, so of course that draws haters. I was amazed by what he went through day to day with all the trolls making GIFs of him with dicks on them and whatnot.
But he had like 1/10th the amount of haters that Brianna has, or less.
Who woulda thunk that I'd be in Robby's shoes someday? On a smaller scale though, of course. I'm just Warren the Naive Idiot Spaz Brianna Cultist. Probably a flash in the pan deal, right? Although, there are ponies involved, and ponies tend to make people really supremely angry on the Internet for some reason.
Click to expand...

You keep bringing it up.... How badly do you want us to draw dicks all over your pictures?

You're only partly famous as the latest piece of toilet paper for Brianna Wu. And I mean if pointing you to the truth is trolling... Well, I'd say hop aboard the Sonic Chu chu Express, cause we're all rollin' and trollin' . But I seriously doubt anyone here is going to do your dick fetish porn inserts for you..


EDIT: Ah, what the hell, you've earned this one buddy. And you need a profile pic anyway.

dick1.jpg


EDIT 2: Oh yeah, you said "dicks", as in multiple. Sorry, I wasn't paying close enough attention to your open desires.

dick2.jpg
 
Last edited:
W person cow said:
There are widely different people who call themselves Democratic Socialists. Hugo Chavez is like you describe. Whereas Jon Stewart is pretty much an ordinary middle of the road guy in many respects, who wants to help the working families and have New Deal programs within our existing democratic system. Whether you want to call that capitalist or not is up to you. But Bernie pretty much agrees with Jon Stewart, like I do. Bernie just talks about it loudly and boldly. And people like it when he does that, I hear tell :)
Click to expand...
But does your boss do that? When was the last time he actually did something progressive?
 
I keep bringing up the real question about Brianna’s extreme flips on politics every five years and her hatred of gay men and drag queens, all of which is sourced and easy to verify, and you keep ignoring it and other legitimate questions. You see all of us we trolls. Maybe some have gone this way because it’s more fun to laugh at Brianna than be annoyed that she keeps getting away with lies.

YOLO, right? Why hate her when we can laugh?
 
Now Warren mania has died down a bit, meta talk - that was all really weird.

I suppose it would always be difficult to convince someone of the truth about Wu, especially if they were inclined to believe otherwise, she behaves in a lot of ways very contrary to the normal rules of civilised society. She only really gets away with it to the extent she does because she has no attachments to society like a job or close friends.

Warren though... It's not like he was saying that he didn't believe us, which would be understandable, he was just completely refusing to engage with what we presented him. Even simple things to verify, like he told us that friends of his had been paid by Wu to accompany him to collect signatures. I told him that those payments weren't logged in Wu's accounts, and his response was "I'm sure they are" as if we were too incompetent to read public documents. Obviously Wu has no intent to actually defraud by failing to keep her accounts properly, it's just another symptom of the general laziness and chaos that surrounds her record keeping. The sums involved are almost certainly too trivial for the FEC to ever take her to court, so you'd think the response would be "oh, I'll check that out and we'll file a correction if mistakes were made." Instead it's complete denial without taking the five minutes it would take to see if the facts were on his side.

He really does seem to believe that watching Wu talk at a few dozen events over 6 months means he knows everything he would ever need to know about her. That her conversion to true believer "Berniecrat" is unquestionable, despite just a few short months ago she was saying that Bernie supporters were children unfit to sit at political table with the adults. That being able to supply some trivial answers to questions which basically boil down to "do you agree with me?" constitute rock solid, well thought out political positions that it would be completely impossible to fake.

I can see now why Warren is Wu's chief and really only supporter. He seems like he's a really easy mark. I guess he's lucky he doesn't really own anything, because his blind spot would make him very easy to take if a more malicious con artist were to latch on to him.
 
Norvic said:
Now Warren mania has died down a bit, meta talk - that was all really weird.

I suppose it would always be difficult to convince someone of the truth about Wu, especially if they were inclined to believe otherwise, she behaves in a lot of ways very contrary to the normal rules of civilised society. She only really gets away with it to the extent she does because she has no attachments to society like a job or close friends.

Warren though... It's not like he was saying that he didn't believe us, which would be understandable, he was just completely refusing to engage with what we presented him. Even simple things to verify, like he told us that friends of his had been paid by Wu to accompany him to collect signatures. I told him that those payments weren't logged in Wu's accounts, and his response was "I'm sure they are" as if we were too incompetent to read public documents. Obviously Wu has no intent to actually defraud by failing to keep her accounts properly, it's just another symptom of the general laziness and chaos that surrounds her record keeping. The sums involved are almost certainly too trivial for the FEC to ever take her to court, so you'd think the response would be "oh, I'll check that out and we'll file a correction if mistakes were made." Instead it's complete denial without taking the five minutes it would take to see if the facts were on his side.

He really does seem to believe that watching Wu talk at a few dozen events over 6 months means he knows everything he would ever need to know about her. That her conversion to true believer "Berniecrat" is unquestionable, despite just a few short months ago she was saying that Bernie supporters were children unfit to sit at political table with the adults. That being able to supply some trivial answers to questions which basically boil down to "do you agree with me?" constitute rock solid, well thought out political positions that it would be completely impossible to fake.

I can see now why Warren is Wu's chief and really only supporter. He seems like he's a really easy mark. I guess he's lucky he doesn't really own anything, because his blind spot would make him very easy to take if a more malicious con artist were to latch on to him.
Click to expand...
It reminded me a lot of how my family would deal with a close family member who has started to believe all those conspiracies (gang stalking, radio waves causing cancer, etc). It goes like this, and it's really frustrating:

3 times 3 = 9? :agree:
x^2 = x times x? :agree:
3^2 = 9? :disagree:

They follow your words, agreeing with them, but once it leads to a conclusion that is against what they believe they refuse it. They'll agree with 500 statements, but that 501th one that concludes the proof? Nah man that's crazy talk. If you try to push the issue, they start with name-calling, questioning the veracity of your claims and (if you're referencing someone) the veracity of the authority's words. They then, if you challenge them with evidence, bring stuff about others' words.

Warren's a bit different in that it involves a person rather than a specific conspiracy, but as I was reading it hit pretty close to home. It actually made me a bit angry and frustrated tbh, which was why after that first post I didn't say anything. I've read that to attack it you have to figure out why they believe it, their emotions behind it. I can't really advise that, though, since I'm still working on that myself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom