Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Until then we’re all counting the days for someone to write an expose on Brianna’s past which would crash the whole house of cards she built.

I don't think we'll ever see a full expose on her. She's still small potatoes and only used by the media as a puppet to advance a narrative.

The closest we got was this Paste piece that exposes her politics a bit. Behind the bumper sticker rhetoric she throws around, her policies are not progressive at all. She wants to take basic services (healthcare, food stamps) from the poor to stick it to her political enemies. Her education policy centers around getting tech degrees as if there is no other reason to attend school. And she wants to use taxpayer money to bring tech companies to her district which would only push out her largely working class constituents. And for someone who claims to be all about women and minorities, she sure wants to prop up an industry that is almost entirely white males.
 
Alright, few points of order:

- @Jaimas has done more for organizing and establishing the background and truth of Brianna's claims than any person living. He's been at it for fucking years and shows a level of devotion to accurate sourcing and archival that sincerely impresses/concerns half of us. Trying to smokescreen fact by mocking the messenger is a textbook Trump move, so bravo on that.

- @W person cow, while overall pleasant to interact with, has done nothing to indicate any level of awareness or intellect that would justify the level of effort expended to "wake him up". Half this chat is expending effort trying to force knowledge on the willfully ignorant. Our archives are meticulously kept and publicly available. If he hasn't bothered to check the sourcing himself, or indeed even to read it, he deserves his position as the latest well-meaning dipshit to ride the Wu grift train.

-Every part of Wu's backstory is an elaborately maintained sack of bullshit. This is long settled matter of public record for anyone who bothers to look. Arguing about the veracity of demonstrated fact is an exercise in futility. It is what it is. Anyone who claims it's otherwise isn't going to be swayed by proof. You're fighting a flat earther here.

-The Kiwi Farms exists to document eccentrics on the internet. We are not an autistic illuminati, a hive mind, a troll group, or a coordinated jihad. We don't get involved in shit, we simply keep records of the people who do. We record things and dig up info, then publish it. People like Brianna despise us because having an accurate accounting of their background and activity isn't something they can suffer while they're trying to create an idealized figment of themselves. Demonstrating that our information is accurate isn't the problem; the problem is that we present information inconvenient to the desired narrative.

-Brianna Wu hasn't the slightest chance of winning the election or pushing anyone left. Lynch has yet to so much acknowledge her existence because he's been in politics long enough to know he can kill her off simply by ignoring her entirely insignificant presence. No amount of grassroots canvassing or paid promotion will change the fact that she simply doesn't resonate with her proposed constituents enough for anyone to give a shit. This is a futile gesture performed to satisfy the ego of a pair of emotionally stunted limousine liberals. The only tragedy is that it's performed on the back of well-intentioned but naive people like Warren.

-While indeed she may, in certain views, be the least of the possible evils running for election, that does not make her a viable candidate. In every election, there are individuals far better equipped to serve the public good than the two or three who actually stand a chance of winning. Politics is not about the best man. It's a contest to determine the most well-connected, well-funded, and charismatic sociopath. Her small time bullshit is profoundly, hilariously, hopelessly outgunned in this matter.
Grow the fuck up. She could be the greatest human being ever to walk the earth, and she'd still lose because she simply doesn't have the brass for this kind of fight.

We can go back and forth on this shit for another 300 pages, but the facts of this matter are pretty straightforward. We all know where this ends, and we know how it's going to work out for Mr. Lynch here. Why fight the inevitable?
 
Last edited:
You can give to my patreon. I checked with the OCPF, and non tax deductible gifts and donations to my art career, video game hobby or personal non-group-affiliated political activism, before I officially declare and announce a campaign, can be done anonymously in any amount. Seems ripe for abuse but that's the law currently. I probably can't spend it on campaign materials but I can live off it while prepping to campaign.
But I am not a very objective person, and I'm not sure I can look at anything objectively. https://youtube.com/watch?v=nSXyZ75lnuU

IMO Vermin Supreme is an order of magnitude more serious a candidate than Wu, a better person, and contributes more to the democratic process than Wu ever will.
 
I already said above that the first time I met Brianna was in an unscripted attack interview. There were no softball questions.

Was this one of the 'Young Jurks' interviews?

You said there were three TYJ interviews with Wu. I've only found two. 2/24/2017 and 1/13/2018. Google results indicate there was an April 1 2017 TYJ tweet saying Bri would be on, but the tweet was apparently deleted, and skipping through the 4/1 podcast, she wasn’t on. I've listened to the 1/13 one, and am part way through 2/24 (pray for me, kiwis), and so far neither have posed anything remotely close to a "tough" question, or actually challenged Wu on any answers. These aren't softball questions... they're freakin' Nerf questions.

And sorry, but these TYJ people are fucking serious bush league. Wu gets a question, she gives one sentence of vague platitude response, and then veers off into some unrelated crap, and the hosts don't even notice and just let it go. Wu might as well just point and yell "Squirrel!" whenever she gets asked something and you'd have almost the same show.
 
So y'all don't attack people and are just here to "document"? Well document away then! Did you document the pics I uploaded today from Norwood? I guess she wasn't "too snobby" for Norwood after all, huh?
 
So y'all don't attack people and are just here to "document"? Well document away then! Did you document the pics I uploaded today from Norwood? I guess she wasn't "too snobby" for Norwood after all, huh?
You're barking up the wrong tree, my friend.
As I said, we're not a hivemind. KF is remarkably diverse. You'll find people here who hate, threaten, and dox you right alongside well meaning people who try to show you why this little crusade of yours is a scam you've bought into because you're just young and idealistic enough to think that superheroes exist and are going to swoop in and stop Big Bad Daddy Lynch.
I'm of a more pragmatic mindset. Judging by the Wu's previous marks, the next few years will do more to illuminate you than anything I'm going to say ever would.
Personally, I'm of the opinion Brianna is a grifter. No, she's not "too snobby" for anything, that would imply a level of dignity she provably doesn't possess. We indeed document everything. Pity you won't bother to pay attention until after the fact, but c'est la vie.

I'm more interested in your own motivations and reasoning for being here than any ill-advised attempt to dissuade you. You take substantial risk of being ostracized simply by posting here. Be honest, what is your actual goal for these little chats? Simple curiosity? Trying to sway us? Boredom?
 
You're barking up the wrong tree, my friend.
As I said, we're not a hivemind. KF is remarkably diverse. You'll find people here who hate, threaten, and dox you right alongside well meaning people who try to show you why this little crusade of yours is a scam you've bought into because you're just young and idealistic enough to think that superheroes exist and are going to swoop in and stop Big Bad Daddy Lynch.
I'm of a more pragmatic mindset. Judging by the Wu's previous marks, the next few years will do more to illuminate you than anything I'm going to say ever would.
Personally, I'm of the opinion Brianna is a grifter. No, she's not "too snobby" for anything, that would imply a level of dignity she provably doesn't possess. We indeed document everything. Pity you won't bother to pay attention until after the fact, but c'est la vie.

I'm more interested in your own motivations and reasoning for being here than any ill-advised attempt to dissuade you. You take substantial risk of being ostracized simply by posting here. Be honest, what is your actual goal for these little chats? Simple curiosity? Trying to sway us? Boredom?
Maybe vanity. Curiosity about why there would be a now 52-page "shitpost general" about me. Curiosity about what the oppo this week is about Brianna. I had heard before that people said she was a "Neera Tanden candidate" who was all about social issues and didn't understand economic issues. I've heard her campaign is "fake" and that she's "not trying to win, just raise money and get attention". It seems that some folks here believe those two things to almost a religious-like level. I keep hearing that characterizations and opinions about Brianna are "incontrovertible facts".
I disagree on both points because of my personal experiences, but I don't expect to convince anybody. But it's good to know those are still the main criticisms. And it's good to know people think I do not have those flaws myself. I can be an egotistical snob, like almost any person in politics, but I try not to be. And I have a short enough temper and crazy enough opinions to be a shitpost thread I guess? Cheers to anybody who bizarrely became fans of me during this exchange. Life is weird I guess.
 
Maybe vanity. Curiosity about why there would be a now 52-page "shitpost general" about me. Curiosity about what the oppo this week is about Brianna. I had heard before that people said she was a "Neera Tanden candidate" who was all about social issues and didn't understand economic issues. I've heard her campaign is "fake" and that she's "not trying to win, just raise money and get attention". It seems that some folks here believe those two things to almost a religious-like level. I keep hearing that characterizations and opinions about Brianna are "incontrovertible facts".

Yes, we have a lot of opinions about Brianna, but they're opinions based on years of observation and fact. You can fairly easily demonstrate Wu's character to yourself if you're willing to give it a try.

Try this. I think you'd agree that central to Brianna's character is the claim that she's a software engineer. There's barely a day goes by that she doesn't begin a sentence "As a software engineer..." and her campaign is largely based around the characterisation of Wu as a "cybersecurity expert." I suspect until you came here, you never had any reason to ever question these things, but now consider the possibility that that isn't true. Ask yourself, what exactly do you know for sure about Wu that qualifies her as a software engineer and cybersecurity expert? Do you know her educational background, do you know where she's worked to hone her skills in these disciplines? Now, admitting that you know nothing, try to fill the void in your knowledge. You're well placed to do it, you can simply ask Brianna. Try to find out who she worked for and on what dates. See if what she tells you seems reasonable to you and stands up to scrutiny when placed in the context of the rest of her life. Do that and you're well on your way to discovering what everyone here discovered, that Brianna's life is a tissue of lies and half-truths.
 
Did you document the pics I uploaded today from Norwood?

Don't come at me like that bro, I'm just a corgi with a computer:

dem.jpg


dem1.jpg

Warren, the ultimate proof that we're not just a bunch of nerds with a hateboner (except @AnOminous ) is that we're willing to talk even though it's becoming clear that you're not willing to change your mind. We're not throwing sneering opinions at a wall and hoping that they stick: these are conclusions that we have drawn based on observations. And yes, we are biased. There are many of us here - and this time I'll count myself - who recoil as a knee-jerk reaction to anyone espouses social justice bullshit because we see the road that that leads to. That being said, you cannot just wave away the key aspects of John's past with a "lol that's your opinion". On some level, yeah, it is. But you have to really ask yourself how you can reconcile all of those lies and mistreatment and square it with your notion that "Brianna is a nice person". I forget who said this, but if you really think you have balls of steel, ask John why he's still collecting money via Patreon for Natalie O'Brien. Do it.

Anyway, I'm still going to try and change your mind, and if you don't want to, keep stopping by, it's been pretty fun tbh.
 
K well Brianna admits mistakes more readily than any politician I've run into. How many politicians do you know who did a 180 on Bernie and then SAID THEY WERE WRONG in those words

The point isn’t that she did that. It’s that this is all a cosplay to feed her ego. She did the same thing when she left the Republican Party. Ten years ago, she blasted Hillary and hated her guts. Then, she fell in love with Hillary and hated Bernie. She has no dog in this fight because she fully intends to switch “careers” when she can’t gain anything from this one anymore.

When she was still a republican, she wrote an op-ed calling Monica Lewinsky a literal whore.

What you see as an authentic, humble, brave action isn’t what it seems. She goes all in because no one calls her out. She completely reinvents herself every 5 years if she thinks she can make money and friends.
 
Last edited:
Hey Warren, where do you think you'd be if you'd transitioned instead of overcoming your gender dysphoria? I thought you looked cute as a maid.
 
(Brianna's tech qualifications)
Brianna is better at tech than me, and helps me with tech. She knows a heck of a lot more about computers than me, than Stephen Lynch or Chris Voehl. I think she will genuinely bring more tech knowledge to the congress. Go look at the Zuckerberg hearings if you think I am wrong. These guys are no geniuses. If Brianna isn't some super-star programmer, I don't think she ever claimed she was. She's just more tech savvy than most of the rest of those yahoos.

I understand that we ask many questions, but I will insist on addressing this specific point. You see, Brianna Wu presents herself as a woman in tech, and although hardly anyone in the field would treat her seriously, she attempts to represent this group continuously reinforcing the worst possible stereotypes (women without actual knowledge trying to blackmail their way into lucrative field solely on oppression points).

It's not about her not being "star programmer", it's about her not being programmer at all. She didn't write code for her game, she didn't write any mobile app, or web app, and she is not even capable of writing a simple functional website. Her knowledge of programming is on a level of a high school kid who digs some tutorials between his Fortnite sessions. It might impress you, but if Brianna is a programmer then everyone is a programmer and cyber security expert, and you can also become one after reading Wikipedia for few hours.

You might think that Kiwi Farms is a website that exists only to make fun of other people. However, I think there are many people here who genuinely care about words, and insist on words having a meaning. Software engineering is one of the few fields that appears to be meritocratic, and for people who spent countless hours on honing their skills, and understand the effort and dedication needed to achieve these skills, it is clear that Brianna had excellent opportunity to just sit and learn as a person from a wealthy family, without family obligation or the need to earn a living, and she frittered away all these opportunities and learnt nothing of value.

I don't pity Brianna as she lives on easy mode, but come to think about it her life is completely wasted. Phony credentials, phony (in)fame, phony wealth, and all for naught, because nobody will remember her in 20 years, and there will be no legacy of Brianna for future generations.
 
This has been a fascinating read. Warren is coming off as the adult in the room in contrast to all the giant antibrianna "redpill" hatenovels.

watching his posts take ever more solid hold within this thread is like watching dropperfuls of some reagent be introduced into a petri dish. Around the time i read a K-Farmer conceding that Brianna might in fact be the lesser-evil candidate within whatever this idiotic local election is, i knew in my blood that i was watching the fearsome farms taking a big, rare collective L

Kind of amazing
 
This has been a fascinating read. Warren is coming off as the adult in the room in contrast to all the giant antibrianna "redpill" hatenovels.

watching his posts take ever more solid hold within this thread is like watching dropperfuls of some reagent be introduced into a petri dish. Around the time i read a K-Farmer conceding that Brianna might in fact be the lesser-evil candidate within whatever this idiotic local election is, i knew in my blood that i was watching the fearsome farms taking a big, rare collective L

Kind of amazing

I think it makes no sense to try to convince Warren that Bri is oh-so-evil with lots of text, as he doesn't seem to have a long enough attention span. He doesn't strike me as a guy who would read some Russian novels or even Wallace novels willingly. He might be a lovable goof, but he is not an intellectual.

As a side note this entire interaction with Warren made it abundantly clear that KF is easily dismissed as a "troll site" no matter how solid is the evidence gathered and how articulate and intelligent the posters are. It struggles like any other media source with a credibility issue. Post-truth society and all that magnified by anonymity and rampant shitposting.

As much as we personally enjoy it we need to remember, that only people capable of critical thinking can get some value from KF. The wide masses will continue to indulge their opiums of choice, and echo chambers will still be void of common sense.
 
Back
Top Bottom