Vinesauce

  • Thread starter Thread starter YI 457
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Even assuming all of it is 100% true, a lot of this shit just reads like Vinny is a weird introvert who has no idea how to talk to women. Where is the crime? Where is the horrendous behavior?
 
Even assuming all of it is 100% true, a lot of this shit just reads like Vinny is a weird introvert who has no idea how to talk to women. Where is the crime? Where is the horrendous behavior?
The crime is not fucking a girl over 25. That's the new rule. Oh yeah, and the age gap has to be a 5 year minimum.
 
you're still a child under the age of 24, you shouldnt have sex or consume the alcohol even if you are 18
Ah i get it now, the progressive crowd values align with...*checks notes* the American conservative party???
 
Again, it's spliced where parts of the call are cut up, and/or they are different calls.
You're positing a possible explanation and insisting it's the only explanation, retard.
Again, WHEN and why would Vinny ever bring up Holly Conrad?
Why would Vinny ever bring up the ex-wife of a friend and associate? One who was also involved in the gaming sphere? Double retard.
Yeah, there's fangames where Vinny says shit, but no way can you get a conversation this real from an AI generated deepfake. How many fucking videos would you have to sort through to find words like that? How dedicated would you have to be to scrub HOURS AND HOURS of content to find words to fit a narrative you're trying to produce?
Again, you're showing how much you lack technical knowledge on something you're trying to act knowledgeable about. I never insinuated it's an "AI deepfake", but there exist countless Vinny soundboards, premade, to pull all sorts of voice clips. Seriously, google "vinesauce soundboard". Search it on google play or whatever app store. You're also overstating how hard it is to do a shitty audio chopjob, which is "moreso than the screenshot fuckery, but not by a large margin". Triple retard.

This is also, of course, ignoring the Occam's Razor answer of a potential impersonator, which the following point would assist in covering for massively.
Again, the poor audio quality speaks to this being a recording of a phone conversation on speaker.
Again, assuming one potential answer must be the only possible one. Quad retard. Plus, again, perfect for covering imperfections in an impersonator.
Absolutely beyond plausible.
And yet again, plausible does not equal definite, or even likely. Quintuple retard.

In short, you are making a positive claim, and ergo the burden of proof is on you. You did an astoundingly shit job at it. You dense motherfucker.
1603244087479.png
 
Back
Top Bottom