US USDA withdraws proposed Salmonella framework - USDA pulls plan to limit salmonella levels in chicken and turkey after numerous complaints from companies, councils, and stakeholders

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.meatpoultry.com/articles/31802-usda-withdraws-proposed-emsalmonella-em-framework

WASHINGTON – The US Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) withdrew the proposed “Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products,” which targeted reductions in illnesses associated with poultry products contaminated by the pathogen.

“While FSIS continues to support the goal of reducing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products, the agency believes that the comments have raised several important issues that warrant further consideration,” USDA-FSIS said in an unpublished Federal Register notice linked to the agency’s Constituent Update. “Therefore, FSIS is withdrawing the ‘Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products’ proposed rule and proposed determination to allow the agency to further assess its approach for addressing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products.”


The notice is scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on April 25, 2025.

The agency based its decision to withdraw the proposed framework based on feedback received during the public comment period, which closed on Jan. 17, 2025. FSIS said the agency received 7,089 comments on the proposed framework during the comment period. Most of the comments were submitted as part of organized letter writing campaigns, while 1,415 were unique comment letters, according to the agency.

“The issues that generated the most comments, both positive and negative, included those associated with FSIS’ legal authority to propose the final product standards, the proposed Salmonella levels and serotypes for the final product standards, the proposed use of SPC monitoring, the scientific and technical information used to support the proposed framework, the potential economic impacts of the proposed framework, and the potential impact of the proposed framework on small poultry growers and processors,” the agency said. “Several comments also suggested alternative approaches other than the proposed framework for addressing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products.”

A wide-ranging group of stakeholders submitted comments on the agency’s proposed strategy to reduce Salmonella illnesses related to poultry products. Among them, the National Chicken Council (NCC) came out against the proposed framework, arguing that, as written, the framework:

  • Was legally unsound;
  • Relied on misinterpretations of the science;
  • Would have had no meaningful impact on public health;
  • Would have led to an extraordinary amount of food waste; and
  • Would have increased costs for producers and consumers.
“We appreciate today’s announcement by FSIS and share their goal of protecting public health,” said Ashley Peterson, PhD, NCC’s senior vice president of scientific and regulatory affairs. “We look forward to working with the agency on an approach to build on the industry’s tremendous progress in reducing Salmonella on chicken products through policy that is based on sound science, is implementable, and will have a meaningful and measured impact on public health.”

In July 2024, FSIS proposed a new framework that established protocols to keep the final product’s Salmonella levels below 10 colony-forming units, and any detectable Salmonella serotype of public health significance would be prohibited from entering commerce.

Based on this proposed determination, FSIS intended to implement verification procedures, including sampling and testing of the chicken component of the product prior to stuffing and breading, to ensure processors controlled Salmonella in these products. The proposed framework would have required poultry processors to develop, implement and maintain written procedures to prevent contamination by enteric pathogens throughout the entire poultry processing operation, and the procedures must include a microbial monitoring program (MMP). FSIS determined this and other requirements would be burdensome to small poultry processors and producers.

The agency also sought to control Salmonella levels in some breaded chicken products. In April 2024, FSIS declared Salmonella an adulterant in raw breaded stuffed chicken products when they exceed a threshold of 1 colony forming unit (CFU) per gram or higher for Salmonella contamination. But the agency delayed implementing a sampling program of not-ready-to-eat (NRTE) breaded stuffed chicken products to Nov. 3, 2025. The sampling program initially was set to begin on May 1, 2025.

FSIS said the agency needed more time to finalize its instructions to inspectors and prepare inspection program personnel (IPP) and laboratories for the new sampling and testing. FSIS also needed more time to provide industry with guidance on holding and controlling products pending sampling results.
 
Considering dish soap kills bacteria, maybe blacks were onto something after all.

I know this is a joke, however I am going to be autistic here:

Dish soap (and soaps or other surfactants in general) do not kill bacteria. They just make it easier for the crud that's on something (your hands, your dishes, whatever) to be washed away by water. The water is doing the work of streaming away the vast majority of microbes. Antibacterial soaps exist but they have other issues with safety, and most people's dish soap won't be antibacterial. Which is why dishes should always involve a lot of rinsing. Met too many Zoomers who believe the soap is what does the work, not the water.
 
Is there a serious need to up standards? Salmonella is killed by proper cooking, so Salmonella in chicken shouldn't be a disaster compared to say Listeria in ice cream.
The issue is improper handling when it comes to raw meats vs cooking.

While a Jack Scalfani situation can happen, it's more likely that improper handling of the raw meats causes cross contamination. It can be as simple as a leaky pack of chicken placed on a countertop, then that same countertop coming into contact with other foods that one consumes without sanitation.
 
So those with financial interests opposed making food safer and the USDA cucked? First big RFK fuck up.
Not sure if you’re joking, but this was an obvious Biden-era move to regulate the industry just because it can, based on junk science. Salmonella is a living organism and the more you try to eradicate it, the more it will become resistant and spread farther.

So much of the Federal government’s health and environmental policy is based on shitty science. Now if only we can get RFK to nuke the egg washing regulations.
 
Not sure if you’re joking, but this was an obvious Biden-era move to regulate the industry just because it can, based on junk science. Salmonella is a living organism and the more you try to eradicate it, the more it will become resistant and spread farther.

So much of the Federal government’s health and environmental policy is based on shitty science. Now if only we can get RFK to nuke the egg washing regulations.
I want to be able to safely eat raw eggs in rice just like in my Japanese animes.
 
Met too many Zoomers who believe the soap is what does the work, not the water.
I blame a lot of that on the absolutely shit messaging during 2020. Even a family member with a degree in Epidemiology and works in lab settings was confused on what people were trying to communicate. Zoomers had just figured out you shouldn't eat Tide Pods by then so I don't blame them for being a little stunted.
 
If we want any chance at a successful, livable country and future.. The kind of people and forces (market parasites and libertardians) pushing shit like this probably need to get the communist revolutionary treatment. At the very least on the level of the most severe corruption offenses. They are every bit as dangerous. If given their way, we will be living in a first world version of a failed state, ruled over by regional (elite) lords.

Health agencies shouldn't even be legally allowed to take economic "impacts" into account. If there is one hing we need to realize as a society and ENFORCE on industry and government.. It's somethings shouldn't even take money into consideration. Profit isn't the most important thing, especially in a market "inf growth" sense.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom