US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
How rigged do you all think 2024 is going to be against both Trump and Kayne and in favor of Biden



At this point, I'd welcome a collapse, I've had enough of being mocked, belittled and subject to humiliation to a people who view me as nothing more that a tax cattle to be abused and sacrificed for their sick projects
People who think a collapse will happen has consoomed too much media. Our country will just get browner and shittier. Home ownership is increasingly inaccessible. Car ownership will soon be seen as a luxury. Swathes of the country does not have reliable electricity during moments when it’s needed the most. The entire Southwest is about to lose access to drinking water or hydroelectric power thanks to the Colorado River drying up. Lots of things we used to take for granted are going away.
Can't PL, but the GOP's religious conservative base is beyond retarded when it comes to regarding women as angels who are only ever lured into trouble by malicious men.
Yep. It’s been standard amongst evangelicucks since the 1990s that women are to be worshiped and never questioned. I’ve seen skanks load up on kids from different baby daddies and then become born again virgins and some guy falls for it. I’ve actually attended several of these weddings over the years.

The prevailing orthodoxy amongst religious conservatives is to own da libs by how much they love women and minorities. Able to convert a literal meth whore with three kids into a housewife? Take that, libtard! Think we’re racist? Take that San Francisco, we have a large family: one bio kid and three signal niglets! This isn’t an assumption I’ve made, I’ve heard these poor suckers say these words verbatim. They truly think they’re sticking it to California (or Chicago or whatever), land of the fruits and nuts, by pushing their son to marry some tatted up skank. It’s a crazy world out there.
 
Yep. It’s been standard amongst evangelicucks since the 1990s that women are to be worshiped and never questioned. I’ve seen skanks load up on kids from different baby daddies and then become born again virgins and some guy falls for it. I’ve actually attended several of these weddings over the years.

The prevailing orthodoxy amongst religious conservatives is to own da libs by how much they love women and minorities. Able to convert a literal meth whore with three kids into a housewife? Take that, libtard! Think we’re racist? Take that San Francisco, we have a large family: one bio kid and three signal niglets! This isn’t an assumption I’ve made, I’ve heard these poor suckers say these words verbatim. They truly think they’re sticking it to California (or Chicago or whatever), land of the fruits and nuts, by pushing their son to marry some tatted up skank. It’s a crazy world out there.
Normally I'd agree, but this crazy bitch has straight up stated her intent to troon out her kid.

I am entirely unsold that even conservacucks or neocons would buy into that one. I am willing to hear out any contradicting evidence you have, though.
 
Normally I'd agree, but this crazy bitch has straight up stated her intent to troon out her kid.

I am entirely unsold that even conservacucks or neocons would buy into that one. I am willing to hear out any contradicting evidence you have, though.


It’s too easy to go to the National Review but conservacucks are in favor of faggotry so this is just around the corner.
 


It’s too easy to go to the National Review but conservacucks are in favor of faggotry so this is just around the corner.
Not quite the same, and it IS National Review, which has pretty much done everything but say 'Thank you sir, can we have some more girldick to suck?'.

I suspect forcible/groomed trooning may only sit well with the likes of David French and Max Boot. But I guess we'll find out one way or the other.
 
Have you read Glubb's essay that the list is taken from? Just because the Roman Republic started in 500 BC doesn't mean it was an Empire, by the definition Glubb uses, in 500 BC. Helps if you read the primary source so you understand what the list is actually about, I know that's a lot to ask on the Internet and all.
No, I didn't read the primary source on a screenshot. I'll give it a look. I can guess they make an argument that when a state goes from a regional power to a great power it's a ticking clock until it collapses.

In which case I'd at least personally argue that was somewhere around 1918 for the US. That's just my take. These things are highly subjective.

Regardless, it's hard to determine if the same aspects of overexpansion that crumbled older empires will hold true in the digital era. The internet is a gamechanger.
 
No, I didn't read the primary source on a screenshot. I'll give it a look. I can guess they make an argument that when a state goes from a regional power to a great power it's a ticking clock until it collapses.

In which case I'd at least personally argue that was somewhere around 1918 for the US. That's just my take. These things are highly subjective.

Regardless, it's hard to determine if the same aspects of overexpansion that crumbled older empires will hold true in the digital era. The internet is a gamechanger.
Specifically, you're looking for John Glubb and his essay The Fate of Empires and Search for Survival. Rome got two rounds as Octavian's Empire was geographically unchallengeable at the crisis point, but the Glubb Cycle is more of a guideline than a hard and fast rule, but it's more about the changing nature of the people ruled by the Empire and the mismatch between the people and the system of government itself. The Constitution of the United States was designed and written for a particular group of people that no longer exist, and Glubb's point is that it takes about 10-12 generations before the difference becomes too much.
 
Normally I'd agree, but this crazy bitch has straight up stated her intent to troon out her kid.

I am entirely unsold that even conservacucks or neocons would buy into that one. I am willing to hear out any contradicting evidence you have, though.
What is the GOP doing to fight against this? Parental rights advocates?

That's right, shitting their pants and fuck all. Because it could never happen to them. They're good people. They do the right things.

Never mind that the schools are actively against the innocence of children.
 
00102.png

This is the new talking point from ConInc, and you can feel the forced panic even though it's only the 1st of the year. Trump is clearly talking about the idiots like Lindsey Graham who wanted to push an abortion ban instead of leaving it to the states fresh off the heels of a big legal win. And it sure did seem the people who got what they wanted thanks to Trump then just smiled and did nothing when it came time for November. Stop with the reflexive attack, please come up with better reasons to be against Trump in '24 than him calling out the RINOs who snatch defeat from the jaws of victory every time.


Bolsnaro is in Florida right now as Lula is sworn in in Brazil (another martial law no-go, cowards), with this possibly being something:

00103.png

A strongly worded letter or saying "lol fuck off" to the feds as long as Bolsnaro stays in FL?
 


It’s too easy to go to the National Review but conservacucks are in favor of faggotry so this is just around the corner.

Eventually, there will be a prominent "conservative" with a "trans kid," and then everyone will fall in line.
 
View attachment 4175388

This is the new talking point from ConInc, and you can feel the forced panic even though it's only the 1st of the year. Trump is clearly talking about the idiots like Lindsey Graham who wanted to push an abortion ban instead of leaving it to the states fresh off the heels of a big legal win. And it sure did seem the people who got what they wanted thanks to Trump then just smiled and did nothing when it came time for November. Stop with the reflexive attack, please come up with better reasons to be against Trump in '24 than him calling out the RINOs who snatch defeat from the jaws of victory every time.


Bolsnaro is in Florida right now as Lula is sworn in in Brazil (another martial law no-go, cowards), with this possibly being something:

View attachment 4175413

A strongly worded letter or saying "lol fuck off" to the feds as long as Bolsnaro stays in FL?
Hey, at least our government saved a bunch of fetuses! Priorities.
 
What is the GOP doing to fight against this? Parental rights advocates?

That's right, shitting their pants and fuck all. Because it could never happen to them. They're good people. They do the right things.

Never mind that the schools are actively against the innocence of children.
You have to play offense at all times. The leftists play to win. The GOP are going to sit on their hands and do nothing except write a strongly-worded letter and screech about "Look at those double standards! We'd be in jail if we were doing this!" as the FBI continues to investigate parents for bringing what you brought up at school board meetings or as more elementary school kids are taken to gay bars for field trips. It doesn't help that woke people scream about Nazi Germany this and Mussolini that when a school in a red county pulls a book from their library for having explicit gay porn.
Eventually, there will be a prominent "conservative" with a "trans kid," and then everyone will fall in line.
  • 2016: "Democrats are the REAL racists!"
  • 2030: "Neo-Leninists are the REAL transphobes!"
 
How can Texas state officials arrest and extradite someone living in California?
When did I say that? Issue the warrant, and next time the police run her name through the system, they'll see she has an outstanding warrant for child abuse in Texas.
It's something better than nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom