US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
This thread is 24/7 cope to the point I believe there are likely unironic QTards here.

I've been thinking of dropping a cool thousand on Kamala. Honestly I should since I have nothing to lose. My crypto investments will moon if Trump wins, if the election is stolen then my crypto will be down for a year or two but I get a nice immediate profit.
Now's the time to do it for sure. I expect these to tighten to Trump +5-6 this week. He'll win, but the odds now are best on the markets for her.

Screenshot 2024-10-17 173501.png
 
Some jogger claims they were fired for supporting 🍊 Man
Vu6hMfaD2ea1Yqya.mp4
So was this nigger the right-wing version of that vape shop clerk who had an apocalyptic tardrage over a MAGA hat last election? Nobody wants to hear about your politics at work, regardless of what they are.
 
Last edited:
looks like the shits going down in Indiana too. 585k people registered to vote without ID and Todd is only noticing now it's too late to do anything about it.
 

Attachments

  • 1729204660636.png
    1729204660636.png
    148.1 KB · Views: 15
Why stop at 1k? Why not drop 10, 20, 50, or even 100k since the election is 100% over? For literal free money, 1k is complete pocket change.

This is why no one takes doomniggers seriously. You won't even put your money where your mouth is. If I was 100% convinced of an outcome, I'd put my entire life savings into it, not a measly 1 grand.
Because I'm not 100% convinced the election fraud will work this time? I'd say the odds are 0.1% legit Democrat win, 89.9% Democrat steal, 10% Trump wins. I'm not BossmanJack here.
looks like the shits going down in Indiana too. 585k people registered to vote without ID and Todd is only noticing now it's too late to do anything about it.
Oh shit, is Indiana in play too? And isn't "Rokita" literally just another spelling of "Rekieta?"
 
Why stop at 1k? Why not drop 10, 20, 50, or even 100k since the election is 100% over? For literal free money, 1k is complete pocket change.

This is why no one takes doomniggers seriously. You won't even put your money where your mouth is. If I was 100% convinced of an outcome, I'd put my entire life savings into it, not a measly 1 grand.
If I was a doomer, I would bet assets. My car, house (if you have one), and literally anything else of worth. It's apparently so rigged that nobody is doing this.
 
View attachment 6534042
All they do is lie, even to the people they need to be on their side. Do not let these people into your life.
Ah, a new stage!

1. didn't happen
2. did happen, but only a little bit. not a big deal
3. happened more than i thought, but still not a big deal <--- you are here
4. did happen and it's a gud thing
5. chris rufo bringing it up is the real problem
 
Anyone who thinks Kamala has a chance at winning this election is mentally deranged. I’m in blue liberal Los Angeles and have not see a single Harris-Walz sign at all. Meanwhile I have actually seen Trump signs.
 
Biden envoy told aid groups Israel too close an ally for US to suspend arms
Politico (archive.ph)
By Erin Banco, Nahal Toosi, and Robbie Gramer
2024-10-16 21:50:00GMT
The top U.S. official working on the humanitarian situation in Gaza told aid groups in August that the U.S. would not consider withholding weapons from Israel for blocking food and medicine from entering the enclave — a rare admission by someone in the administration.

At the Aug. 29 meeting in Washington, Lise Grande told the leaders of more than a dozen aid organizations that the U.S. could potentially consider other tactics to convince Israel to allow life-saving aid into Gaza — such as applying pressure through the United Nations, but stressed that the administration would continue to support Israel and would not delay or stop weapons shipments.

That account is based on conversations with three people in the meeting and two others who were briefed on it, along with a set of detailed notes from the encounter reviewed by POLITICO. The people were granted anonymity in order to speak more freely about Grande’s assessment and because they feared their organizations’ work might be further interrupted in Gaza.

A humanitarian aid official who attended the meeting said Grande noted that Israel is one in a “tight circle of very few allies” that the U.S. will not oppose, nor will it “hold anything back that they want.”

“She was sort of saying, with certain allies, we can’t play bad cop,” the aid official said.

While Grande’s statements were made more than a month ago, her candid assessment of the odds of the U.S. taking action on weapons for Israel raises questions about the seriousness of recent Biden administration threats to do just that.

On Sunday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin sent a letter to Israel in which they threatened to withhold weapons to Israel if it does not drastically improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza. The administration is giving Israel 30 days to correct course.

When reporters pressed the administration on Monday as to why the ultimatum to Israel in Sunday’s letter included a grace period, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said: “We believe it’s appropriate to give them a chance to cure the problem.”

An Israeli official said the country is taking the letter seriously and that it “intends to address the concerns raised in this letter with our American counterparts.”

But the August meeting has aid organizations skeptical that any action is coming now.

In the nearly two-hour long meeting, aid representatives detailed the ways in which Israel was blocking access in Gaza and raised concerns about the U.S. refusing to restrict weapons shipments. They also argued to Grande that Israel was violating international humanitarian law, which broadly prohibits countries from restricting or blocking humanitarian aid or the movement of humanitarian workers in conflict zones.

“She was saying that the rules don’t apply to Israel,” one person who attended the meeting said.

Multiple attendees described Grande’s words as alarmingly blunt and forthcoming, surprising many in the room.

The U.S. has not made an official determination as to whether Israel is violating international humanitarian law. A State Department report from May stated that it is “reasonable to assess” that Israel is violating the laws in Gaza but it stopped short of making a final determination.

The State Department and the National Security Council declined to comment on the August meeting or its interpretation by aid organizations. The Israeli embassy did not respond to a request for comment on its actions regarding aid in Gaza.

Several people who attended the August meeting said Grande was not expressing her own opinions, but rather explaining U.S. policy toward Israel.

Grande has a long history working in the humanitarian field and was the CEO of the U.S. Institute of Peace prior to joining the Biden administration in April as the special envoy for Middle East humanitarian issues.

Several of the people who spoke to POLITICO also expressed support for Grande.

“It’s unfortunate she is the person representing this duplicity in American policy when she’s not the one responsible for it,” said another humanitarian aid official. “Lise has been a breath of fresh air and supported humanitarian professionals in the U.S. government to get the senior folks to understand the importance of ongoing humanitarian access priorities” in Gaza.

The meeting with Grande and the groups came following her return from the region and during a time in which the Biden administration was growing increasingly skeptical about the chances for a cease-fire in Gaza, where Israel has been battling Hamas militants since last October.

Some group leaders said they felt as though they had done all they could to come up with creative solutions to getting more aid into the enclave. None of those solutions have worked, they said. Others said they were considering pulling out of Gaza over rising fears for their staff’s safety.

Grande also said that if aid groups chose to pull out, Israel had a plan to use the commercial sector to deliver aid and that neighboring countries would help coordinate.

Aid groups allege that Israel is preventing their organizations from taking alternate trucking routes through Gaza — pathways that would avoid crowds and gangs inside the enclave known to steal food and medicine packages.

According to the detailed note document obtained by POLITICO, Grande told attendees of the meeting that Israel had passed intelligence to the U.S. that indicated that Hamas was stealing some aid and using it to bolster its ranks. The administration believes in that assessment, she said.

Grande said that as long as international organizations were overseen by COGAT, Israel’s government office in charge of overseeing aid disbursement in Gaza, they will have a difficult time changing operations on the ground.

COGAT, Grande said, was a “mailbox” for the IDF, according to the notes from the meeting. It received its instructions from the IDF, the war cabinet and the Israeli intelligence branches — each of which had its own requests on how to conduct humanitarian operations in Gaza.

The U.S. has tried to move the international aid groups’ work in Gaza out from under COGAT to be overseen by Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

It’s unclear where those efforts stand.

A spokesperson for COGAT declined to comment. A State Department official who was granted anonymity to speak freely about the administration’s thinking said COGAT and the IDF are “vital partners” and “integral to the success of humanitarian efforts.”
 
This turned out to more or less be bullshit. It was basically a Republican oppo group funding the whole thing.
I mean, when a Democrat talks about their Vietnam service, it never hurts to bet on some or all of it being lies and exaggerations, as is their way. In general that's true for a lot of Vietnam-era vets though. I wouldn't credit him as some badass though, especially when he came back and started jumping in with the anti-war movement and their spurious claims and such. That and he's fully on board with Globohomo and making you plebes suffer for "The Climate." He's an elitist piece of shit with the charisma of a block of wood who has talked about wanting to restrict the 1st Amendment, so whatever he was, he's a treasonous piece of shit now and should be treated as such.

Maybe the Swifties were full of shit, but they were Spiritually Correct about that worthless motherfucker.
 
They blame Stein for Trump’s 2016 victory because she kind of made the difference in PA, MI, and WI. Looks like she’s slated to do it again, at least in Michigan.

Jill Stein: The Grifter Who May Hand Trump the White House Again

In 2016, Hillary Clinton lost Wisconsin to Trump by 22,748 votes; Stein carried 31,072 votes. In Michigan the story was similar: Clinton lost to Trump by 10,704 votes while Stein carried 51,463. Ditto for Pennsylvania, where Trump won by 44,292 votes and Stein pulled in 49,941 votes.

she didnt really make a difference tho, gary johnson got like 3 times as many votes as her in 2016
 
Crazy thing is if he had campaigned on being a bad ass combat veteran (the guy saw active combat, which is pretty bad ass no matter how you feel about him)
There’s nothing “badass” about being dumb enough to sign up for a pointless war on the other side of the world.

Shit, McNamara started recruiting legit retards for the military, because anyone with a half a brain had figured out that they were being taken for a ride by (ur)Globohomo.
 
Anyone who thinks Kamala has a chance at winning this election is mentally deranged. I’m in blue liberal Los Angeles and have not see a single Harris-Walz sign at all. Meanwhile I have actually seen Trump signs.
So you're just randomly trolling I guess?
 
My concern with Trump is that the dude barely sleeps, which is directly correlated with dementia/Alzheimer's. I don't think he's losing his mind now, but I worry it could happen due to his lifestyle of getting little sleep, and that it could happen rapidly.

I was going to point out earlier in this thread how I keep catching you talking out of your ass, and with such confidence, about several subjects - especially the fan-fiction about Nixon vs Kennedy in the first televised debate where you completely omitted the reason Nixon looked so ghastly was his refusal to wear TV powder make-up. The non-LED lights of the time literally cooked people in the spotlights and Nixon was sweaty to begin with. BUT - you actually admitted that you "talk out of your ass", which was a little funny. That fact was chapter one of what used to be Mass Media courses and is still referenced in Public Speaking classes to this day, which most colleges still require to graduate.

Here you go again spitting half-truths. Those studies reference individuals who do not attain their baseline sleep levels due to medical issues, stress, environment and/or work aka "sleep deprivation". Trump is a member of the .03% of unique individuals currently called "short sleepers" who require less than 4 hours of sleep in a 24 hours cycle and remain mentally and physically healthy. It was recently discovered that it is a genetic mutation.

This one actually references the Orange Man. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-03-short-sleepers-hours-night-fine.html

Trump has been a short sleeper his entire life and this has been documented and corroborated by multiple people, articles and his own books. That's how he kept hotel staff and construction sites on their toes, he could show up at 4am or 4pm with no warning - every single day.

You mostly seem like a decent contributor here, can you please make an effort to talk less from your ass?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom