US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
I have a suspicion that jill and joe called in the baher interview. Nice stab in the back for kamala that was likely sold to her as a puff piece. Ole Joe is probably chucklin over some chocolate chocolate chip right now
It was Karl Rove who set up.

He arrogantly believed that if she would just plainly state her policies to the "reasonable" TDS Republicans she would get an easy "W". Unfortunately for Karl Rove, Kamala Harris is a retard.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=tqsvQOOCaSQ
He already did a video one a few days ago and it went about how you'd expect.
if Harris could just give bullshit answers that border on lying the same way Walz did here (and let's not kid ourselves, like pretty much all politicians) she'd be up in every battleground state

also, here's an archive
 

"He's gonna use troops on Americans!!!!"

Can someone fill me in where this new asinine talking point originated and with whom it did? I see this everywhere now.
They're projecting and the administrative state is scared af that they might have to face accountability for once after fucking with him during his entire first term.
 
image-233.png
Do you think gamblers:
A. Are more likely to go with the crowd
B. Are more likely to go with high-odds bets
C. Have secret insight into the state of the race

Everyone I talk to says C, and I always feel like a crazy person because I don't think of gambling addicts as people guided by reason. :lossmanjack: What do you guys think?
 
View attachment 6532764
Do you think gamblers:
A. Are more likely to go with the crowd
B. Are more likely to go with high-odds bets
C. Have secret insight into the state of the race

Everyone I talk to says C, and I always feel like a crazy person because I don't think of gambling addicts as people guided by reason. :lossmanjack: What do you guys think?
D. The gamba speaks to them in their dreams.
 

"He's gonna use troops on Americans!!!!"

Can someone fill me in where this new asinine talking point originated and with whom it did? I see this everywhere now.
They're not really worried about him using troops to go after Americans, as in, the Average Joe (they've already sic'd them on us). She concerned that he will go after them, which he fucking should after what they did.
 
I've literally seen a case of sparkling water listed on Amazon be "SNAP EBT eligible."
A bit late to the party on this but there are parts of the country where tap water is not safe to drink. Not just high profile urban centers with lead pipes like Flint, but large swaths of the rural South and Appalachia where the plumbing infrastructure has been totally neglected or just plain doesn't exist. So yes, bottled water can and should be SNAP eligible. It's easy to forget just how deep poverty in America goes.
 
View attachment 6532764
Do you think gamblers:
A. Are more likely to go with the crowd
B. Are more likely to go with high-odds bets
C. Have secret insight into the state of the race

Everyone I talk to says C, and I always feel like a crazy person because I don't think of gambling addicts as people guided by reason. :lossmanjack: What do you guys think?

Well, the main difference is that if you're betting on baseball, you're not supposed to have inside information or be on the actual team.

Polymarket encourages direct insider trading, which at least theoretically could create a market based on real insider knowledge. However, it can also lead to market manipulation or even the manipulation of politicians by their advisers. Imagine if someone advising Harris had put a million dollar bet on Walz as VP at 15:1 before the decision was final, now imagine that person advising. People will now put ideas into the heads of every decision-maker based on an unrevealed financial stake in the outcome.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom