UN US Midterm Elections 2018 Megathread - Blue Wave or Red Tsunami? Because you know we need one.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
November 6th, 2018.
You have less than one month to sperg about the midterm elections.

Hot Takes :
Tis the end of Drumpf!
It's been an inauspicious beginning to the voting season for Mr Trump and his Republican Party, which continue to struggle under the weight of near-constant self-imposed crises and chaos.

http://archive.is/1rEYe
Could the US midterm elections break Trump's presidency?

President Donald Trump. Source: AAP


Voting in the US midterm elections is now underway.

UpdatedUpdated 27 September
By Rashida Yosufzai, Nick Baker
In this article...
Americans have started to cast their ballots in a vote that could shape the rest of Donald Trump's presidency.

Although the US midterm elections are technically held on 6 November, early voting has already started in a handful of states.

Minnesota was the first state to allow early in-person voting on 21 September, with a handful of key states following, including New Jersey, California and Arizona.


Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia offer some form of early voting, meaning every day until 6 November counts for Democrats and Republicans.

It's been an inauspicious beginning to the voting season for Mr Trump and his Republican Party, which continue to struggle under the weight of near-constant self-imposed crises and chaos.

80 per cent chance of winning back the chamber.

Republicans have a 1 in 5 chance of keeping control of the House, while Democrats have about a 4 in 5 chance of winning control of the House. https://t.co/lyNh30TEIw pic.twitter.com/O38qtMPpIz

— FiveThirtyEight (@FiveThirtyEight) September 25, 2018
The Senate though is likely to be retained by the Republicans.

According to CNN, the Democrats are defending some two dozen seats, including 10 in states where Mr Trump secured victory in 2016, and five of those where he won resoundingly.

FiveThirtyEight gives the Democrats just a 30 per cent chance of taking the Senate.

Trump's election one year on: What do Americans think of him now?[/paste:font]


The Democrats could also use their numbers to set up House select committees targeting the president.

"They will have an opportunity to set up special panels and committees to essentially smear President Trump," United States Studies Centre research fellow Dougal Robinson told SBS News in April.

Mr Robinson pointed to the Benghazi committee set up by the Republicans against Hillary Clinton in 2014 to further investigate the fatal 2012 terrorist attack on two US government facilities in Libya.

Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Once seen as cruising to an easy vote - fulfilling Mr Trump's key promise to stack the Supreme Court with conservative justices - a string of sexual assault allegations has turned the Kavanaugh decision into all-out political war.

According to CNN's national political reporter Eric Bradner, the scandal and lukewarm response from some Republicans to Mr Kavanaugh's accusers could "drive suburban women away in midterms".

I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 21, 2018
Analysts also point to Robert Mueller's investigation as an ongoing potential source of political curveballs.

Mr Mueller has already indicted more than 30 people in connection with his probe into whether members of Mr Trump's campaign colluded with Russia to help get the real estate tycoon elected.

And speculation has swirled in recent days that Mr Trump may fire embattled deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein - who oversees the Russia collusion probe.

Doubts over how long Mr Rosenstein can keep the job have swirled since shock media reports that he once suggested secretly recording Mr Trump to collect evidence for ousting him under a constitutional amendment for presidents unfit to remain in office.

Mr Rosenstein's firing - and Mr Trump possibly putting someone more pliable in his place - would set off alarm bells over the future independence of a probe, which has the potential to rock both the midterms and the entire Trump presidency.

US wants ‘partnership, not domination’ in Australia and region[/paste:font]


A report co-authored by Mr Robinson predicted after the midterms, Congress would be highly unlikely to support a US re-entry to the Trans-Pacific Partnership - a trade deal between 11 Pacific nations including Australia and New Zealand which Mr Trump pulled the US out of last year.

Another issue that may affect Australia is that if the Democrats retake the House, it is likely to lead to lower defence spending.

Additional reporting: AAP, AFP

This article was originally published in April 2018 and updated in September 2018.

How will Trump keep his voter base energized? "More Winning."
http://archive.fo/VkaHH

TRUMP HAS A TWO WORD RESPONSE WHEN REPORTER ASKS HIM HOW HE WILL KEEP GOP BASE ENERGIZED
5:52 PM 10/10/2018
Benny Johnson | Reporter At Large

President Donald Trump made portions of the White House press corps chuckle with his response on how he intends to keep Republican voters fired up after the ultimately successful confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

“How do you keep your base energized now that you have this Kavanaugh victory?” one reporter asked. Tuesday was the first day that Kavanaugh sat on the court after a contentious battle over his nomination.

“More winning,” Trump said.

Trump was leaving the White House on his way to a campaign rally Tuesday night when he took questions from reporters in the White House driveway.

The president was also asked about the mobs of paid progressive protesters that took over Capitol Hill during the contentious debate over Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Trump was specifically asked about the intense “energy” of the protesters.

“A lot of those were paid protesters. You saw that they are all unhappy because they haven’t been paid yet,” Trump alleged about the protesters. (RELATED: Trump Has A Theory Why The Anti-Kavanaugh Protesters Are So Mad)


Trump brought up his new trade deal with Canada and Mexico as a major policy win. “Our deal with Mexico and Canada was fantastic,” Trump said. “China wants to make a deal so badly. We will see where it goes. But I don’t think they are ready.”

Trump Will Lose 60 Seats in the house... Unless... Please Visit My Site
http://archive.fo/zHe4o

MATT DRUDGE WARNS OF MIDTERM BLOODBATH: TRUMP TO LOSE ’60 SEATS IN THE HOUSE LIKE OBAMA DID’
2:41 PM 09/14/2018
Peter Hasson | Reporter

Conservative news giant Matt Drudge on Friday made a somber prediction about Republicans’ chances in the November midterm elections, predicting President Donald Trump will see his party lose 60 seats in the House of Representatives.

Drudge, who runs the influential Drudge Report, compared the upcoming midterms to the electoral bloodbath Democrats suffered in the 2010 midterm elections under former President Barack Obama.

Matt-Drudge-Tweet-620x298.jpg

Screenshot/Twitter

“Trump and Obama both have 47% approval at this time of presidency, according to Rasmussen. Trump will also lose 60 seats in the House like Obama did during first midterm!” Drudge wrote on Twitter. (RELATED: Democrats Should Immediately Abolish ICE After Retaking Congress)

He added cryptically: “Unless…”

Democrats have to gain 23 House seats in November in order to flip the lower chamber. Democrats have an 83 percent chance of retaking the House, according to FiveThirty Eight.

Follow Hasson on Twitter @PeterJHasson

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


The Weird :
Mark Taylor "Red Tsunami Prophecy"
http://archive.fo/KJjj2

Mark Taylor (The Trump Prophecies): Most Important Midterm Elections In All Of US History
July 30, 2018 29 3159


Mark Taylor says the upcoming 2018 elections are the most important mid-term elections in all of America’s history. Here’s why…

Mark Taylor interviewed by Greg Hunter on USA Watchdog

Mark Taylor, author of the popular book “The Trump Prophecies,” contends, “If you are part of the army of God, you need to be ready also because there are going to be politicians that are going to resign. We have had the biggest number of resignations probably in history. This midterm election is going to be huge. This is going to be a red tsunami. They keep talking about the blue wave. I think it’s going to be a blue drip, a leaky faucet, and that is all they are going to get. You have had more resignations than we have ever seen. Now is the time to go in and capture this ground and hold it for the Kingdom of God. . . . It’s not a left or right thing. God is moving us towards a place of righteousness. That’s what’s happening right now. So, he’s going to be replacing these people. If you are called to be a judge, senator, congressman or a council person, I don’t care what level local, state or federal, take your place and get ready. If you are in the Army of God and you don’t vote, you need to get off your behind and register to vote. These are going to be the most important midterm elections in America’s history—period.”

In closing, Taylor says, “I don’t think there is going to be another Democrat in the White House for a long time, if ever again. I believe you are seeing the death of the Democrat party right now.”

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Mark Taylor, co-author of “The Trump Prophecies,” which has been made into a movie that is releasing in early October.

Donations: https://usawatchdog.com/donations/
 
FL election worker signed a sworn affidavit alleging MAJOR election fraud (PJW voice imagine my shock)

steal-1.jpg
steal-2.jpg
That's from--or at least loosely related to? I can't remember the specifics--the fiasco that got Snipes into hot water back in 2016, though. It's important to keep it in mind, since the fact that Snipes was even allowed to keep her job after that whole "destroying ballots" thing is astonishing, but it's also important to note that this affidavit has nothing to do with the 2018 Midterms, and I don't remember if anything ever came from this or not.
 
Last edited:
FL election worker signed a sworn affidavit alleging MAJOR election fraud (PJW voice imagine my shock)

steal-1.jpg
steal-2.jpg

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politi...uncover-massive-voter-fraud-and-other/2301902

The temp, Chelsey Marie Smith, reported seeing workers at the Broward County Board of Elections filling out blank ballots en masse - a scene that she assumed meant they were tampering with the election. As the Sun-Sentinel has reported, however, the State Attorney's Office looked into her allegations and found no evidence anything "illegal or improper" was going on. In a statement to the conservative news site Independent Journal Review, the office elaborated:

"It was determined that the ballots were being completed by SOE staff on behalf of overseas military personnel who had voted by faxing their ballots to the election office. The fax paper does not scan into the voting machines and the votes must be transferred onto a ballot that can be scanned. State law allows such a transfer of vote to a computer ballot."

Though I suppose that's all just a cover up.
 
I've been seeing a lot of talk and graphics and charts centering around this idea lately
Drs17euUcAAMtTl.jpg


Senators don't represent people. They represent states. And in two years these disingenuous, flighty, hypocrites and tantrum-throwers will have moved on to a completely unrelated agitprop offensive. I guess it's cool to see the CIA Party going hard on the political-science version of flat-Eartherism, though. Bring some balance to the debate.

No, really, the Dems are the CIA party now. It's kinda weird that they're doing it so openly, but I guess with everything on fire anyway, who is going to notice?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...a-officers-running-for-congress-as-democrats/
 
I've been seeing a lot of talk and graphics and charts centering around this idea lately
Drs17euUcAAMtTl.jpg


Senators don't represent people. They represent states. And in two years these disingenuous, flighty, hypocrites and tantrum-throwers will have moved on to a completely unrelated agitprop offensive. I guess it's cool to see the CIA Party going hard on the political-science version of flat-Eartherism, though. Bring some balance to the debate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...a-officers-running-for-congress-as-democrats/

The left's thirst for tyranny gets more naked all the time.
 
That's from--or at least loosely related to? I can't remember the specifics--the fiasco that got Snipes into hot water back in 2016, though. It's important to keep it in mind, since the fact that Snipes was even allowed to keep her job after that whole "destroying ballots" thing is astonishing, but it's also important to note that this affidavit has nothing to do with the 2018 Midterms, and I don't remember if anything ever came from this or not.

Wow. I totally just got hoaxed. That's... humbling.
I didn't fact check. I was in a hurry. Kill me.

This is exactly how these stories get pushed, half the time. Some eager little shit in an effort to impress peers and excited they've found a piece of information critical to their narrative rushes it through without vetting it.

A teachable moment.
 
Last edited:
I've been seeing a lot of talk and graphics and charts centering around this idea lately
Drs17euUcAAMtTl.jpg


Senators don't represent people. They represent states. And in two years these disingenuous, flighty, hypocrites and tantrum-throwers will have moved on to a completely unrelated agitprop offensive. I guess it's cool to see the CIA Party going hard on the political-science version of flat-Eartherism, though. Bring some balance to the debate.

No, really, the Dems are the CIA party now. It's kinda weird that they're doing it so openly, but I guess with everything on fire anyway, who is going to notice?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...a-officers-running-for-congress-as-democrats/
So more "muh popular vote" nonsense, basically.
 
I've been seeing a lot of talk and graphics and charts centering around this idea lately
Drs17euUcAAMtTl.jpg


Senators don't represent people. They represent states. And in two years these disingenuous, flighty, hypocrites and tantrum-throwers will have moved on to a completely unrelated agitprop offensive. I guess it's cool to see the CIA Party going hard on the political-science version of flat-Eartherism, though. Bring some balance to the debate.

No, really, the Dems are the CIA party now. It's kinda weird that they're doing it so openly, but I guess with everything on fire anyway, who is going to notice?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...a-officers-running-for-congress-as-democrats/
I saw some idiot on reddit saying unironically that the electoral college should be abolished and, I quote, "who cares if California and New York run everything?" The left gets more and more open about their desire to rule non-coastal states like territories every year.
 
I saw some idiot on reddit saying unironically that the electoral college should be abolished and, I quote, "who cares if California and New York run everything?" The left gets more and more open about their desire to rule non-coastal states like territories every year.

Every time I've ever asked one of those "Would you still feel the same way if California and New York voted Republican?" they just parrot back "The most votes should get the most say" without actually saying "yes". And they wonder why they get called NPCs.
 
Every time I've ever asked one of those "Would you still feel the same way if California and New York voted Republican?" they just parrot back "The most votes should get the most say" without actually saying "yes". And they wonder why they get called NPCs.
It's because they know that those states have almost zero chance of ever going Republican because of their large urban population centers. It's interesting: the major cities in those states rule over the rest of the population when it comes to presidential elections, and they want that same power to be able to override other states. They've figured out a way to hide their political bias behind the thinnest veneer of "just wanting to be fair."
 
Remember that Wendy Davis chick? With the pink sneakers that was gonna totally turn Texas blue with her inspiring abortion rhetoric before completely disappearing? Pretty sure if the DNC runs out of uses for Beto he's gonna get exiled to whatever hole in Texas they left her in.
 
I've been seeing a lot of talk and graphics and charts centering around this idea lately
Drs17euUcAAMtTl.jpg


Senators don't represent people. They represent states. And in two years these disingenuous, flighty, hypocrites and tantrum-throwers will have moved on to a completely unrelated agitprop offensive. I guess it's cool to see the CIA Party going hard on the political-science version of flat-Eartherism, though. Bring some balance to the debate.

No, really, the Dems are the CIA party now. It's kinda weird that they're doing it so openly, but I guess with everything on fire anyway, who is going to notice?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...a-officers-running-for-congress-as-democrats/
You mean to tell me that several cherrypicked states combined have more senators than a bloated metropolis full of spoiled elites? Say it ain’t so!

Also isn’t this precisely why the US government has a Senate and a House of Representatives? To have one governing body where every state has the same amount of representatives and one where the number of representatives is proportionate to their state’s population? That’s like 3rd grade shit right there.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who thinks California needs a much bigger voice in politics is clearly insane and not worth paying attention to, nothing new to see here really.
 
Well these people erroneously think more people = more importance. In reality 1 farmer providing dozens of acres of food is far more important than every single tech blogger and game dev combined.
 
Back
Top Bottom