UN US Midterm Elections 2018 Megathread - Blue Wave or Red Tsunami? Because you know we need one.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
November 6th, 2018.
You have less than one month to sperg about the midterm elections.

Hot Takes :
Tis the end of Drumpf!
It's been an inauspicious beginning to the voting season for Mr Trump and his Republican Party, which continue to struggle under the weight of near-constant self-imposed crises and chaos.

http://archive.is/1rEYe
Could the US midterm elections break Trump's presidency?

President Donald Trump. Source: AAP


Voting in the US midterm elections is now underway.

UpdatedUpdated 27 September
By Rashida Yosufzai, Nick Baker
In this article...
Americans have started to cast their ballots in a vote that could shape the rest of Donald Trump's presidency.

Although the US midterm elections are technically held on 6 November, early voting has already started in a handful of states.

Minnesota was the first state to allow early in-person voting on 21 September, with a handful of key states following, including New Jersey, California and Arizona.


Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia offer some form of early voting, meaning every day until 6 November counts for Democrats and Republicans.

It's been an inauspicious beginning to the voting season for Mr Trump and his Republican Party, which continue to struggle under the weight of near-constant self-imposed crises and chaos.

80 per cent chance of winning back the chamber.

Republicans have a 1 in 5 chance of keeping control of the House, while Democrats have about a 4 in 5 chance of winning control of the House. https://t.co/lyNh30TEIw pic.twitter.com/O38qtMPpIz

— FiveThirtyEight (@FiveThirtyEight) September 25, 2018
The Senate though is likely to be retained by the Republicans.

According to CNN, the Democrats are defending some two dozen seats, including 10 in states where Mr Trump secured victory in 2016, and five of those where he won resoundingly.

FiveThirtyEight gives the Democrats just a 30 per cent chance of taking the Senate.

Trump's election one year on: What do Americans think of him now?[/paste:font]


The Democrats could also use their numbers to set up House select committees targeting the president.

"They will have an opportunity to set up special panels and committees to essentially smear President Trump," United States Studies Centre research fellow Dougal Robinson told SBS News in April.

Mr Robinson pointed to the Benghazi committee set up by the Republicans against Hillary Clinton in 2014 to further investigate the fatal 2012 terrorist attack on two US government facilities in Libya.

Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Once seen as cruising to an easy vote - fulfilling Mr Trump's key promise to stack the Supreme Court with conservative justices - a string of sexual assault allegations has turned the Kavanaugh decision into all-out political war.

According to CNN's national political reporter Eric Bradner, the scandal and lukewarm response from some Republicans to Mr Kavanaugh's accusers could "drive suburban women away in midterms".

I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 21, 2018
Analysts also point to Robert Mueller's investigation as an ongoing potential source of political curveballs.

Mr Mueller has already indicted more than 30 people in connection with his probe into whether members of Mr Trump's campaign colluded with Russia to help get the real estate tycoon elected.

And speculation has swirled in recent days that Mr Trump may fire embattled deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein - who oversees the Russia collusion probe.

Doubts over how long Mr Rosenstein can keep the job have swirled since shock media reports that he once suggested secretly recording Mr Trump to collect evidence for ousting him under a constitutional amendment for presidents unfit to remain in office.

Mr Rosenstein's firing - and Mr Trump possibly putting someone more pliable in his place - would set off alarm bells over the future independence of a probe, which has the potential to rock both the midterms and the entire Trump presidency.

US wants ‘partnership, not domination’ in Australia and region[/paste:font]


A report co-authored by Mr Robinson predicted after the midterms, Congress would be highly unlikely to support a US re-entry to the Trans-Pacific Partnership - a trade deal between 11 Pacific nations including Australia and New Zealand which Mr Trump pulled the US out of last year.

Another issue that may affect Australia is that if the Democrats retake the House, it is likely to lead to lower defence spending.

Additional reporting: AAP, AFP

This article was originally published in April 2018 and updated in September 2018.

How will Trump keep his voter base energized? "More Winning."
http://archive.fo/VkaHH

TRUMP HAS A TWO WORD RESPONSE WHEN REPORTER ASKS HIM HOW HE WILL KEEP GOP BASE ENERGIZED
5:52 PM 10/10/2018
Benny Johnson | Reporter At Large

President Donald Trump made portions of the White House press corps chuckle with his response on how he intends to keep Republican voters fired up after the ultimately successful confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

“How do you keep your base energized now that you have this Kavanaugh victory?” one reporter asked. Tuesday was the first day that Kavanaugh sat on the court after a contentious battle over his nomination.

“More winning,” Trump said.

Trump was leaving the White House on his way to a campaign rally Tuesday night when he took questions from reporters in the White House driveway.

The president was also asked about the mobs of paid progressive protesters that took over Capitol Hill during the contentious debate over Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Trump was specifically asked about the intense “energy” of the protesters.

“A lot of those were paid protesters. You saw that they are all unhappy because they haven’t been paid yet,” Trump alleged about the protesters. (RELATED: Trump Has A Theory Why The Anti-Kavanaugh Protesters Are So Mad)


Trump brought up his new trade deal with Canada and Mexico as a major policy win. “Our deal with Mexico and Canada was fantastic,” Trump said. “China wants to make a deal so badly. We will see where it goes. But I don’t think they are ready.”

Trump Will Lose 60 Seats in the house... Unless... Please Visit My Site
http://archive.fo/zHe4o

MATT DRUDGE WARNS OF MIDTERM BLOODBATH: TRUMP TO LOSE ’60 SEATS IN THE HOUSE LIKE OBAMA DID’
2:41 PM 09/14/2018
Peter Hasson | Reporter

Conservative news giant Matt Drudge on Friday made a somber prediction about Republicans’ chances in the November midterm elections, predicting President Donald Trump will see his party lose 60 seats in the House of Representatives.

Drudge, who runs the influential Drudge Report, compared the upcoming midterms to the electoral bloodbath Democrats suffered in the 2010 midterm elections under former President Barack Obama.

Matt-Drudge-Tweet-620x298.jpg

Screenshot/Twitter

“Trump and Obama both have 47% approval at this time of presidency, according to Rasmussen. Trump will also lose 60 seats in the House like Obama did during first midterm!” Drudge wrote on Twitter. (RELATED: Democrats Should Immediately Abolish ICE After Retaking Congress)

He added cryptically: “Unless…”

Democrats have to gain 23 House seats in November in order to flip the lower chamber. Democrats have an 83 percent chance of retaking the House, according to FiveThirty Eight.

Follow Hasson on Twitter @PeterJHasson

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


The Weird :
Mark Taylor "Red Tsunami Prophecy"
http://archive.fo/KJjj2

Mark Taylor (The Trump Prophecies): Most Important Midterm Elections In All Of US History
July 30, 2018 29 3159


Mark Taylor says the upcoming 2018 elections are the most important mid-term elections in all of America’s history. Here’s why…

Mark Taylor interviewed by Greg Hunter on USA Watchdog

Mark Taylor, author of the popular book “The Trump Prophecies,” contends, “If you are part of the army of God, you need to be ready also because there are going to be politicians that are going to resign. We have had the biggest number of resignations probably in history. This midterm election is going to be huge. This is going to be a red tsunami. They keep talking about the blue wave. I think it’s going to be a blue drip, a leaky faucet, and that is all they are going to get. You have had more resignations than we have ever seen. Now is the time to go in and capture this ground and hold it for the Kingdom of God. . . . It’s not a left or right thing. God is moving us towards a place of righteousness. That’s what’s happening right now. So, he’s going to be replacing these people. If you are called to be a judge, senator, congressman or a council person, I don’t care what level local, state or federal, take your place and get ready. If you are in the Army of God and you don’t vote, you need to get off your behind and register to vote. These are going to be the most important midterm elections in America’s history—period.”

In closing, Taylor says, “I don’t think there is going to be another Democrat in the White House for a long time, if ever again. I believe you are seeing the death of the Democrat party right now.”

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Mark Taylor, co-author of “The Trump Prophecies,” which has been made into a movie that is releasing in early October.

Donations: https://usawatchdog.com/donations/
 
We're their biggest geopolitical threat since the Mongols, our government is openly hostile to them and seeks to subvert the governments of pretty much all their established allies, they are in what's basically a generation of recession since the Soviet Union broke up, and their relevance dwindles as China's basically supplanted them as the resident #2 power.

I don't doubt for a minute there's truth to the idea of Russia deliberately inciting division among Americans to sabotage the country, I doubt the effectiveness of that tactic on your average voter as opposed to tribalist morons eager for a scapegoat for their tribe's numerous failings.

Imagine thinking that Russia is capable of doing anything competently.
 
Lol, two branches of the government being opposite parties is never productive- and that barely even happened.

Normally I'd agree with you, but this Congress - both chambers controlled by the GOP with the administration's backing - didn't seem interested in doing much of anything aside from cutting corporate taxes by 14%. They even got into an argument with themselves over the budget. That was impressive.

So a new House riding popular sentiment and hungry for change will, I assume and I think it's logical to do so, push a lot of legislation in two years.
 
Normally I'd agree with you, but this Congress - both chambers controlled by the GOP with the administration's backing - didn't seem interested in doing much of anything aside from cutting corporate taxes by 14%. They even got into an argument with themselves over the budget. That was impressive.

So a new House riding popular sentiment and hungry for change will, I assume and I think it's logical to do so, push a lot of legislation in two years.
Uh....how is that possible with a Republican controlled senate. Keep in mind you have people who ran on not pushing for things like gun control. The dems can try all their shit but it will probably not get passed unless it's like "Flags for war widows" or something that nobody would vote against.
 
Uh....how is that possible with a Republican controlled senate. Keep in mind you have people who ran on not pushing for things like gun control. The dems can try all their shit but it will probably not get passed unless it's like "Flags for war widows" or something that nobody would vote against.

The Senate races in 2020 are lining up to be more favorable for the Democrats than they were this year (different seats up for elec). The agenda of the new House will be popular with the people (they'll be doing what the voters want). GOP senators that want to keep their seats in 2020 will be more conducive to make compromises - they don't want to end up like all of those GOP House members that lost their seats because they voted to appeal the ACA, for example. They're also aware that Trump's approval ratings in key demos are dragging them all down - they're going to need to appeal to more than their base in 2020.

All that said/typed, I don't think McConnell is going to be able to force so many GOP senators into line like he did the previous two years.
 
Yeah, but what have they done lately?
They beat the shit out of gays and gay rights fags. I mean...that's good.
Gays aren't really human so kill them all. Kill all breeders too. Let's do the whole planet! For Manny and Sal!
That's how the earthling laughs at you man! Holy fecal matter, Xilais, you ever seen a cranial unit come apart like that?
 
The Senate races in 2020 are lining up to be more favorable for the Democrats than they were this year (different seats up for elec). The agenda of the new House will be popular with the people (they'll be doing what the voters want). GOP senators that want to keep their seats in 2020 will be more conducive to make compromises - they don't want to end up like all of those GOP House members that lost their seats because they voted to appeal the ACA, for example. They're also aware that Trump's approval ratings in key demos are dragging them all down - they're going to need to appeal to more than their base in 2020.

All that said/typed, I don't think McConnell is going to be able to force so many GOP senators into line like he did the previous two years.
Even if what you're saying is true (which I'm strongly doubting on the dems winning as much), it is highly unlikely they'll get a veto-proof majority in Congress. Trump stopping a leftwing nutjob congress would be a godsend. Notice he wants to help get Pelosi as speaker. Because they're buddies? Fuck no, because her as speaker makes it a rallying point for him and his party. Democrats are in need of flushing out the crazy lefty tards out of their party for the long run. Look at that dipshit Ocasio. Already she is acting like she owns the fucking place and stepping on people's toes.

Oh, so you're just making shit up.
My thoughts exactly. That or a shill for commie fucks.
 
Even if what you're saying is true (which I'm strongly doubting on the dems winning as much), it is highly unlikely they'll get a veto-proof majority in Congress. Trump stopping a leftwing nutjob congress would be a godsend. Notice he wants to help get Pelosi as speaker. Because they're buddies? Fuck no, because her as speaker makes it a rallying point for him and his party. Democrats are in need of flushing out the crazy lefty tards out of their party for the long run. Look at that dipshit Ocasio. Already she is acting like she owns the fucking place and stepping on people's toes. As January approaches they'll vote for her.


My thoughts exactly. That or a shill for commie fucks.

The GOP would turn any Speaker of the House into a lightning rod - it's US politics, it's what both sides do. Pelosi will be named Speaker regardless, she has the experience and I think those new Democrat members are just grandstanding for their right-leaning states.

Commie shill, yep, that's me. I want a stateless government with one social class and give up my high paying white collar job so I can work with comrades on the farm. Drats. I've been found out.
 
You think they'll be elected and then do the opposite of what they campaigned on? That would be a bold strategy, Cotton.
You've never seen them do it?

Besides, what appealed to their districts isn't necessarily going to have broader appeal.

I'm mostly thinking you're disingenuous at this point, but who knows, maybe you're just an idiot. Either way my response is the same. Toodles, poodle.
 
You've never seen them do it?

Besides, what appealed to their districts isn't necessarily going to have broader appeal.

I'm mostly thinking you're disingenuous at this point, but who knows, maybe you're just an idiot. Either way my response is the same. Toodles, poodle.

Disagreeing = that poster must be disingenuous, wahhh. Sorry I hurt your feeling miss. :heart-full:
 
Disagreeing = that poster must be disingenuous, wahhh. Sorry I hurt your feeling miss. :heart-full:
Incredibly dumb arguments are most probably explained by either disingenuosity or stupidity, yes. But thanks for lying about what I said. Helps confirm my decision.
 
The GOP would turn any Speaker of the House into a lightning rod - it's US politics, it's what both sides do. Pelosi will be named Speaker regardless, she has the experience and I think those new Democrat members are just grandstanding for their right-leaning states.

Commie shill, yep, that's me. I want a stateless government with one social class and give up my high paying white collar job so I can work with comrades on the farm. Drats. I've been found out.
I knew you were a commie when you wouldn't drink a duff with me! I'm reporting you to the Committee of Unamerican Activity. Commie!
I found footage of you working as a mall santa.
 
Normally I'd agree with you, but this Congress - both chambers controlled by the GOP with the administration's backing - didn't seem interested in doing much of anything aside from cutting corporate taxes by 14%.
You got it wrong. They're cutting taxes for everyone, period.

They even got into an argument with themselves over the budget. That was impressive.
What's wrong with debating what the budget should be?

So a new House riding popular sentiment and hungry for change will, I assume and I think it's logical to do so, push a lot of legislation in two years.
What "popular sentiment" is the new House riding again?

The Senate races in 2020 are lining up to be more favorable for the Democrats than they were this year (different seats up for elec). The agenda of the new House will be popular with the people (they'll be doing what the voters want). GOP senators that want to keep their seats in 2020 will be more conducive to make compromises - they don't want to end up like all of those GOP House members that lost their seats because they voted to appeal the ACA, for example. They're also aware that Trump's approval ratings in key demos are dragging them all down - they're going to need to appeal to more than their base in 2020.

All that said/typed, I don't think McConnell is going to be able to force so many GOP senators into line like he did the previous two years.
I keep hearing this "Trump's approval ratings are lowering" talking point, yet nobody's forthcoming with a source.
 
Back
Top Bottom