Lovequest Updated OkCupid profile

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
I prefer woman my age or a little older because I find them easier to talk to and to find common ground with. I wonder if he thinks a younger girl will share his enthusiasm for boring crap like His Little Pony?
I'm really surprised that he wants nothing to do with older women. Quite apart from the fact that beggars can't be choosers, I would have thought an older woman would tie in quite nicely with his borderline Oedipus complex.

It's also worth pointing out that while there are plenty of women who go for older men, what they're looking for is maturity. No 23-year-old is going to go weak at the knees for a man ten years older than her chronologically, twenty years older than her physically and fifteen years younger than her mentally.
 
The List of Lies Chris told in his OkCupid Profile.
While you raise a lot of valid points, some of Chris "lies" can be attributed to the multiple choice nature of OKCupid. I highlight some points where I think either clarification is useful or we might want to cut Chris some slack..

No Chris, you're a lesbian, remember? Lesbians are not 'straight'. You can't have your cake and eat it.
You can only list yourself as male or female. If you list yourself as a male, you have a series of sexualities to choose from. Straight, gay, bisexual, queer, etc. You pop up in other people's searches if you are a gender they are interested in and they are a gender you are interested in. So given that he listed himself as a male (which as you point out, doesn't reflect his current attitude), he should have listed himself as straight. Basically, given that he is interested in women only, his choices were straight male or gay female. Male lesbian is not an option.

Edit: Upon further inspection, I think I am wrong about some of the sexuality stuff. See my explanation a few posts down. Humble apologies and all that.

'Just as long as it's unhealthy, cheap, lazy and requires no effort in terms of preparation on my part'.
This was your response to Chris choosing "mostly anything" as his diet. The diet choices are "vegetarian", "vegan", "halal", "kosher" or "anything" so anything is clearly the option he should have taken. You can choose to modify your choice with "strictly" or "mostly". The logical thing would have been not to modify it, which is an option. All I can say is lots of people on OKCupid do this as well, whether as a joke or because they don't know they don't have to choose one.

This is simply false and nonsensical.
This was your response to "Pisces, and it's fun to think about". Chris is a Pisces. The other choices were "but it doesn't matter", "and it's fun to think about", and "and it matters a lot" or leaving it blank. So his response might be a little silly, but we should be aware he didn't have a ton of choices.
This one isn't a lie, I'm just wandering why he missed this opportunity to trumpet his HONOUR ROLL GRADES and how he made the Dean's List etc.
This was your response to "Graduated from two-year college". It was a multiple choice selection. He didn't have an option to elaborate.
I shouldn't have to explain this but I will anyway.

Sitting around with mommy at home playing video games and 'piddling' with building blocks sold to kiddies under the age of twelve whilst living off welfare is not, even in the loosest definitions of the word, a job.

Neither is making crappy medallions to sell to trolls, although admittedly that's the closest thing to a job he's had in years.
This was your response to "job: other". This was a multiple choice answer. "Unemployed" was an option, as was "Rather not say" and leaving it blank. He must be referring to his eBay business. I won't list all of the multiple choice options. There are a couple "Art/Music/Writing" and "Sales/Marketing" that probably describe it the best.

Technically a lie, as he (rather unusually) abstains from mentioning his tugboat. Maybe he's come to the realisation that leeching off the state at the age of 32 isn't a particularly attractive proposition to any potential suitors that he shouldn't really boast about.
This was your response to his leaving the income blank. This was a multiple choice question, where his only options were various income brackets. I have found that the majority of people leave it blank.

'Yeah I want a non-monogamous relationship, just as long as you don't go on a boat ride with a friend who isn't interested in you romantically because I consider that cheating.'
This was your response to "Relationship type:Non-monogamous". I agree with your criticism entirely. Just clarifying that this is multiple choice, and "monogamous" and "non-monogamous" are the two options.

The first proposition is mercifully true, but I'm calling bullshit on the second. Chris doesn't want kids. Not really. His inability and total unwillingness to even look after himself does not speak well of his theoretical capability and willingness as a father.
This was your response to "Doesn't have kids, but wants them". Once again, I agree entirely, but want to clarify that his options for the second clause were "but wants them", "and doesn't want any", and "and might want them".
I would dispute Chris's ability to speak English fluently given the content of his videos and writings. Also his Spanish sucks a fat one.
This was your response to "English:Fluently, Spanish:OK". The options for each language are "fluently", "OK", and "Poorly". I agree that "poorly" should be his description of his Spanish. "OK" is probably the best description of his English, but that would be hard to ask him to put.

The rest of your comments are about questions where he was able to fill in "essays" or answer questions with whatever he wanted, so none of the silliness in those can be attributed to OKCupid.


"Ages 23–32"

OK, who told Chris about the half your age plus seven rule?

I find that amusing too. I think OKCupid might default to that. Or at least that 23 might be the default lower bound for a 32 year-old. Of course he could have raised it or lowered it, if he wanted. But he had to list a lower bound, and 23 seems like as good a one as any.


It's because in his own words, he's too shy to even ask a girl online. He doesn't know how to approach a girl properly anyways and will use a shitty pickup line in his greeting first followed by demands in pressuring the girl to be with him.

We all like to point out that Chris shyness is ridiculous and problematic. But it is also a massive blessing for anyone female in his vicinity. We know he is incapable of acting at all appropriately, so the only thing protecting passersby from an offensive and gross interaction with Chris is his shyness. After reading the description of Chris' date with Catie, I have decided never to criticize Chris for being shy ever again, because his shyness is truly one of the greatest blessings the ursine deity has bestowed on the people of Virginia.
 
Last edited:
That's correct, but it's still corrupt and ridiculous. It enables more parasites to exist and it lowers the quantity of people who produce anything applicable to the physical world in terms of actual contributions to society. Chris himself is a parasite, but not the same type of parasite as those parasites on dating sites.
Chris says he wants a women to be in a relationship with, that makes $50,000+ a year and he wants to be a "house-husband" and not work. He currently does not work, really and without his ebay money taken into account, only makes $9,600 a year off disability. He is they type who is using online sites for sex AND money. I guess you don't think there are men out there who try to leech money out of women who are richer than them?
 
You can only list yourself as male or female. If you list yourself as a male, you have a series of sexualities to choose from. Straight, gay, bisexual, queer, etc. You pop up in other people's searches if you are a gender they are interested in and they are a gender you are interested in. So given that he listed himself as a male (which as you point out, doesn't reflect his current attitude), he should have listed himself as straight. Basically, given that he is interested in women only, his choices were straight male or gay female. Male lesbian is not an option.
To be fair, he could have registered as female and then choose the option of lesbian. Seeing how he (apparently) considers himself now of female soul, that's not that far out to pick.

I don't really know how pre-OP trans people would handle this, especially on OKCupid, though.
 
While you raise a lot of valid points, some of Chris "lies" can be attributed to the multiple choice nature of OKCupid. I highlight some points where I think either clarification is useful or we might want to cut Chris some slack..
Thanks, that was informative. I wasn't aware than the majority of OkCupid questions were multiple choice questions and that he wasn't given much/any room to elaborate. I will cut Chris a bit of slack on this one.
 
To be fair, he could have registered as female and then choose the option of lesbian. Seeing how he (apparently) considers himself now of female soul, that's not that far out to pick.

I don't really know how pre-OP trans people would handle this, especially on OKCupid, though.

You are right, he definitely could have. I am not sure I fault him for listing himself as male though. At worst it seems like a judgment call. And by listing himself as male, he will make his profile visible to a lot more females than if he listed himself as female. Although I really have no sense what type of woman would be interested in a male lesbian (a smart attractive one, not Chris). My sense it is probably a bisexual/queer/pansexual woman, who will see both genders on OKCupid.

I have searched and looked through female-seeking-male profiles on OKCupid a fair amount. On a couple occassions I have come across someone who describes themselves as a pre-op or post-op MTF transsexual. It is certainly very rare. What I can't tell you is whether there were some who didn't say it in their profile or if I would have found any more in male or female-seeking-female profiles. I haven't really found any FTM transsexuals in the female listings, although I think I recall someone who was born female and now does not identify with either gender.

Thanks, that was informative. I wasn't aware than the majority of OkCupid questions were multiple choice questions and that he wasn't given much/any room to elaborate. I will cut Chris a bit of slack on this one.

A profile is a mix of 10 or 11 basic info multiple choice and 4 or 5 longer answer questions where you can write whatever you want. The second part of the profile listed in the OP, which I didn't quote or respond to in your message was text he wrote all on his own.

I checked, and you can't read Chris profile without having an account. If you look at http://www.sonichu.com/cwcki/OkCupid, you will see a screenshot of the recent "LevelUpKing" version of the profile to see what I am talking about. The right-hand panel is all multiple choice.


Edit: One more thing I just noticed. Up until recently, your sexuality options were Straight OR Gay OR Bisexual. A recent change exanded the options. It seems now you can choose up to 5 of the following options: "Straight", "Gay", "Bisexual", "Asexual", "Demisexual", "Heteroflexible", "Homoflexible", "Lesbian", "Pansexual", "Queer", "Questioning", "Sapiosexual". I believe Chris could list himself as a male, then list himself as Lesbian, in addition to or instead of straight. Perhaps he hasn't seen this feature yet, it is fairly new. I had missed it myself.
 
Last edited:
Ready for another ingredient in Chris's gender stew?
 

Attachments

  • MAYULS.png
    MAYULS.png
    13.1 KB · Views: 405
Ready for another ingredient in Chris's gender stew?

I know it gets said alot but this kinda stuff really irks me. There is only a VERY narrow set of the lesbian culture that finds the whole "Men are scum!" thing endearing. The overwhelming majority of women find intentional sexism a massive turn off.

Yeah, Chris is a retard who doesn't understand women. But when he does this anti-male crap he doesn't realize that he is alienating 99% of the very gender he wants to ATTRACT
 
I know it gets said alot but this kinda stuff really irks me. There is only a VERY narrow set of the lesbian culture that finds the whole "Men are scum!" thing endearing. The overwhelming majority of women find intentional sexism a massive turn off.

Yeah, Chris is a exceptional individual who doesn't understand women. But when he does this anti-male crap he doesn't realize that he is alienating 99% of the very gender he wants to ATTRACT

Even worse, the main purpose of this question is "How homophobic are you?". Anyone LGBT-friendly at all is going to have answering "no" a fairly high priority.

(For those who don't know, OKCupid's match score is based on the questions. If you answer a question, you can choose how you want your matches to answer, and choose a priority to your match answering the way you want. Match questions are all multiple choice. You can only choose one answer, but you can have multiple answers as "acceptable" match answers.)
 
I know it gets said alot but this kinda stuff really irks me. There is only a VERY narrow set of the lesbian culture that finds the whole "Men are scum!" thing endearing. The overwhelming majority of women find intentional sexism a massive turn off.

Yeah, Chris is a exceptional individual who doesn't understand women. But when he does this anti-male crap he doesn't realize that he is alienating 99% of the very gender he wants to ATTRACT

Nearly 100%, because almost all radical separatist feminists think trans women (including post-op trans women who have lived as women for decades) aren't "real" women. So Chris's pointless misandry would only win points with people who would reject Chris for having XY chromosomes.
 
Ready for another ingredient in Chris's gender stew?
You know, my genetic parents are still together but I'll still see my Dad hug his childhood friends from decades and decades back when they meet and, even if it might take them a drink or two, to call themselves brothers as they look back upon the time where my Dad lived in that tiny, tiny space with his immigrant parent and sibling, lacking even a bathroom, while he worked extra just to enjoy shreds of the childhood he proudly but silently let my siblings and I take for granted.

Chris and many, many others like him (and all of them will refuse any connection) will never in their lives understand what a "bond" ever actually means.
 
Nearly 100%, because almost all radical separatist feminists think trans women (including post-op trans women who have lived as women for decades) aren't "real" women. So Chris's pointless misandry would only win points with people who would reject Chris for having XY chromosomes.

So Chris's target demographic is cis women who like trans women (who sometimes identify as male and would actually be closer to genderfluid, but lack the common sense to find out what that is) but also really hate cis men (but would be cool with their partner identifying as a cis man when it's convenient) and would be interested in being a stereotypical domestic housewife who also works full-time to support their partner.
 
So Chris's target demographic is cis women who like trans women (who sometimes identify as male and would actually be closer to genderfluid, but lack the common sense to find out what that is) but also really hate cis men (but would be cool with their partner identifying as a cis man when it's convenient) and would be interested in being a stereotypical domestic housewife who also works full-time to support their partner.

A complaint commonly leveled at online dating is that it's too specific: that by the time you've found that perfect person who loves dogs, brushes their teeth three times a day, is interested in the philosophical aspects of Buddhism, has chosen Some Velvet Morning as their desert island disc, prefers Dustin Hoffman to Al Pacino, and aligns with you in a thousand other minor ways, you won't end up with anyone worthwhile.

Chris has the reverse problem right out of the starting gate. His methods of gender representation (and self-representation) are so complex and contradictory that he has no target demographic at all. There is not a single person who will look at Chris's OKCupid profile and say "this person's gender and sexual orientation mesh with mine".
 
So Chris's target demographic is cis women who like trans women (who sometimes identify as male and would actually be closer to genderfluid, but lack the common sense to find out what that is) but also really hate cis men (but would be cool with their partner identifying as a cis man when it's convenient) and would be interested in being a stereotypical domestic housewife who also works full-time to support their partner.
Chris is looking for the "Ideal Damsel Infatuated with Obese Trannys" (or 'Idiot' for short).
 
I'm really surprised that he wants nothing to do with older women. Quite apart from the fact that beggars can't be choosers, I would have thought an older woman would tie in quite nicely with his borderline Oedipus complex.

Chris doesn't like cougars, eh? It's kind of funny when you consider that older women would be the perfect fuck mommy for Chris. They're more likely to have disposable income and job security than someone in their 20s, which is exactly what Chris is looking for. Also, not to a-log too much, but Chris does seem to take his fashion cues from middle aged bag ladies...
 
Hey, guess what, an above post by Inept Sissy made me realize that Chris has been answering more personality questions on OKCupid since the last time it was documented. The CWCki says he answered 1,333 questions, but now it's up to 1,811. I'm not doing a systematic check, but I'm using the search function to collect some of the more interesting ones. Last time, Marvin produced a program that could sort the answers. Anyhow, all the below answers are new, and his own words are italicized.


Is it equally bad for a man and woman to cheat on a partner?

2245535812241200573.jpeg
Yes. I would rather be mutually honest with my wife in the matter.



Are nudity and pornography the same thing?

2245535812241200573.jpeg
No. nudity is the person being naked; pornography is the IMAGE OR VIDEO content of naked people. You would be an idiot for thinking the two to be the same.



Would you sabotage contraceptives to have kids even though your mate doesn't want kids?

2245535812241200573.jpeg
No That is dishonest!



Do you think partial birth abortion should be banned?

2245535812241200573.jpeg
I'm conflicted/I don't know enough to say Partial Birth? What, the head isn't enough, you want the child to be a quadriplegic?


Does it bother you when people TyP3 LiK3 ThIS oN pUrPoSe? (Be honest.)

2245535812241200573.jpeg
Yes It's a good play on words, but too much of it would be annoying.


Would you ever film a sexual encounter without your partner knowing?

2245535812241200573.jpeg
No I would rather have her consent first.


Manners are:

2245535812241200573.jpeg
Important But not mandatory under some circumstances.


While walking down the street, you see an amazingly attractive member of the gender of your preference. He/she is completely naked and floating three feet in the air. Which do you find more intriguing?

2245535812241200573.jpeg
The fact that he/she is defying gravity What the hell?


When would you prefer to settle a disagreement?

2245535812241200573.jpeg
Now. I would have to think it over first.



Is it's better to have an open-relationship because there'll be cheating in monogamous relationships anyways.
2245535812241200573.jpeg
False I do not believe it as an inevitable, but I do feel an open relationship is healthy for the happiness of my woman partner, especially if she feels need to take a break from me for a while, or if I am unable to please her at the time. As long as we were mutually honest with each other. I would still be loyal and supportive to her.


Should sex education be given to children under 15?

2245535812241200573.jpeg
Yes With DATING EDUCATION!!!!!!!!!!!!


If you were otherwise willing to enter into a marriage or life-long partnership, would you consider signing a prenuptial or equivalent agreement at the request of your partner?

2245535812241200573.jpeg
Yes. I would want to read it first.


If you had an eighteen year old son or daughter who wanted to become an adult film star, how would you react?

2245535812241200573.jpeg
I would discourage him or her. But if that's what they feel of real want or need, I will support them.


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom