UN UK Snap election 8th June 2017 - Oh boy another U turn.

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
You know The Sun is going to have a Hell of a time with that pic!
 
Ponderous Pillock said:
Pictured: A surprisingly well looking Dianne Abbot

41281FA000000578-4574822-image-a-58_1496742224573.jpg


Also pictured, a fucking mong.

412799DD00000578-4574822-image-a-57_1496737069580.jpg
Click to expand...
Now the Guardian are on the "Stop making fun of Abbot, it's racist and sexist!" train:
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...abbott-bullying-shadow-home-secretary-attacks

Comment section closed of course.
 
zxMK7K.gif



EDIT: Sun and Mail Front Pages:

splash.png


They're running hard on the fact Jezza's been speaking at rallies he very probably shouldn't have and wittering away about "dialogue" probably won't save him.

In the political pages, The Sun and Mail are hammering Abbot yet again after the email slip up.

Those two papers between them account for over 5.5 million issues sold per day with each paper read by an average of 2/3 people.
 
Last edited:
Dianne's Doubled Down on the illness story and is stepping down due to ill health.

The day before the election.

She's been replaced by Lynn Brown who resigned from Corbyn's front bench after calling his leadership "untenable."

Jesus, this is suddenly a fun election on the day before we all vote. Two national newspapers calling them terrorist supporting dicks and then an emergency reshuffle for all the world to see.
 
I took a break from politics this month and did not follow this as closely as I did the elections in France and the Netherlands. What's at stake and who are the anti-globalists? From the looks of things, Theresa May is using the attacks as an excuse to police the Internet more tightly, which is unacceptable.
 
Null said:
I took a break from politics this month and did not follow this as closely as I did the elections in France and the Netherlands. What's at stake and who are the anti-globalists? From the looks of things, Theresa May is using the attacks as an excuse to police the Internet more tightly, which is unacceptable.
Click to expand...

Nobody in the wider UK public has really signed up to the whole "rargh globalists" crap and mostly rails against the EU. I went into detail about why the new internet laws are coming in over here. Basically May's government style is "If you won't fucking do it by yourselves despite demonstrably having all the tools then I'll pass laws to boody well make you."

She's also going to rip up Human Rights Laws that keep getting in the fucking way of us fighting these bastards and endlessly prevent us from deporting them to be rightfully shot in the back of the head and thrown in a ditch in their home countries.

To be honest there's really no choice in this election.

The Lib Dems are a joke who want to cancel the biggest democratic vote in british history (or make us endlessly vote again and again until we give an answer they're satisfied with) but are due to be cut down to 3 seats or less this election.

Labour is run by a terrorist sympathizer who backed calls for a united Ireland while attending IRA funerals, voted against every single piece of anti-terror legislation ever (56 votes against and one abstention when he was Leader of the opposition) and also called against Hamas becoming a banned group in the UK.... along with Islamic State supporters.

He has a Militant Marxist Chancellor who's been missing in action through the entire campaign because he's a far easier target than Corbyn.

He's currently holding a reshuffle the day before the election because his choice for a Home Secretary was an incompetent dunderhead who rams her entire leg down her throat when she's not choking down KFC bargin buckets.

So it's either a vaguely competent team that, while it has some valid criticism laid against it has demonstrated it can make a go of solutions.

Or a personality cult lead by a bearded weirdo who loathes this country with every fibre of his being.
 
Null said:
I took a break from politics this month and did not follow this as closely as I did the elections in France and the Netherlands. What's at stake and who are the anti-globalists? From the looks of things, Theresa May is using the attacks as an excuse to police the Internet more tightly, which is unacceptable.
Click to expand...

A lot of things.

Corbyn is an old school socialist, like straight from the 70's. He counts Hezbollah and Hamas as friends and has continuously refused to condemn the IRA. Labour are notoriously anti-Semitic under him as well as fractured as fuck. Jeremy is also promising a lot of costly shit but refuses to say where the money's coming from besides 'corporations'

May is a bit of an authoritarian wench, and loves to flip flop on everything, yet she is able to run a tight ship on the Tories, they all know their place. The question with her is 'Where is the money going?' as services continue to be cut.
 
Ponderous Pillock said:
Nobody in the wider UK public has really signed up to the whole "rargh globalists" crap and mostly rails against the EU.
Click to expand...

Ponderous Pillock said:
I'm sorry, you forget this man represents regressive liberalism at its absolute finest. He beleives in flooding out nations with third world mouth breathers so there can never be more men "like him" namely 'race traitors', nationalists, patriots anything of the sort. He's trying to create a world in which there are no Hungarians, no Germans, no Americans, no Brits, no history. Just "humanity" or worse "global citizens" people with no loyalty or concept of loyalty to anything but themselves and whatever flight of fancy their feeble minds happen to latch on to at times.

He's a globalist billionaire shit heel who hurls money around like water to cause the maximum social damage to ensure there's major division between majority white populations and minorities.

He helps fund groups that permit division because of his own fucking guilt because rather than sensibly realising humanity did learn from the sodding Nazis and actually was doing pretty damn well, with some stumbles, towards accepting people for who they were rather than "what" this dick cheese and his regressive useful fools are undoing, damaging, if not outright annihilating race relations to try and paint "whitey" as the perpetual badguy which is why we see so many white morons saying we should be bred out of existence. The funniest part of this is the fact that, aside from BLM, it's mostly white liberal morons doing it to show how "with it" and "progressive" they are because they can't hold a useful fucking job so have the time to do this bullshit.

The problem is, Soros knows he's dying and whoever inherits his throne might have zero fucking interest in this sort of idiotic politics playing, so he's gone for a hail mary play. Funding divisive weirdo bitches like Clinton, getting all the tumblr tards and twitterati idiots out in force from their echo chambers, raises the dead, fixes both the Dems and tries to fix it where it matters.

He failed with rumoured involvement with Brexit, and he's failed here with Trump's election, so now we have the "burn everything" phase in which he will quite happily shell out for more useful morons to run into freeways, block roads, or chant about how they're "not x, but y instead!" as if they're somehow better people for it.

Basically, fuck you Soros you old vile, nasty cunt. You are why people are increasingly voting for the more "out there" candidates in their fucking droves.
Click to expand...

lol
 
Null said:
I took a break from politics this month and did not follow this as closely as I did the elections in France and the Netherlands. What's at stake and who are the anti-globalists? From the looks of things, Theresa May is using the attacks as an excuse to police the Internet more tightly, which is unacceptable.
Click to expand...
The thing with this election is the Conservative party (With Theresa May as leader) are the only political party who can win that are serious about leaving the EU and have prioritised controlling immigration/getting rid of open border freedom of movement with the EU.

The second biggest party Labour basically grudgingly accept Brexit but want to prioritise trade but a big issue is they've made clear getting a deal is paramount (While May has said "No deal is better than a bad deal") and those who voted remain and dislike Brexit are pushing for the option of having a referendum on either accepting the final deal or refusing the deal and rejoining the EU which would mean the EU could purposely give a terrible in hopes we'd vote to rejoin.

They're also saying stuff like "It's time we took in our fair share of refugees" and despite it being a time of economic uncertainties with Brexit are aiming to renationalise rail, mail and energy companies, give free tuitions and pay off student fees and that kind of thing.

It's not to say Conservatives are much better with their internet plans (May's government have always been draconian in this way, they've previously banned certain types of porn) and most of their budget isn't costed either so it's assumed they'll be stealth cuts in public services but it's pretty much a two party system so it's either Labour with Corbyn or Conservatives with May.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom