News is still comming in as i post this but this is indded intreating.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39629603
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39629603
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not sure it will work in the long term though since people will be advised to transfer their property (With caveats about letting them live in it until they die) instead of leaving it in a will and it'll make no diffrence to them since they'll get to stay in the same care home if need be.Putting aside the resentment, its the economically sensible thing to do. If they'd spent the money they tied up in housing on goods and services, the tax revenue might have made their care home place free as well.
We are a bit weird when it comes to "investing" in houses.
Such a dip seems incredibly unusual, but a number of polling figures were taken during the Manchester attack, so its possible that a good chunk of support has bled away temporarily. It seems rather odd to me that, when you check the figures, they've dropped 7-8% but those votes have seemingly disappeared.
It reminds me a lot of how Republicans were worried about Trump negatively effecting the GOP when he sailed through the primary's. They still thought he had almost no chance of winning the election, but they knew the base loved him so much that he would probably change the face of the party and make them un-electable.
If you check out the UK polling report list here the Tories were still holding a pretty solid lead even as talk of "dementia tax" ramped up in the BBC and Guardian halls. I wonder what next weeks polls will bring.
Kantar a few days earlier still put the tories a good 8 points ahead, but that one isn't being talked about because it doesn't seem to make as good news.
I have had leaflets from:
- Greens
- Labour
- Lib Dems x2
- UKIP
Not a single Tory leaflet or poster. And this is meant to be a safe seat.
Come on, lads. Get your fingers out.
“Privately, [pollsters] are terrified and befuddled,” said one senior industry figure. “What the polls are telling us is that seven, eight, nine million people flipped in the last 10 days or so. The real evidence is that campaigns make very little difference when you look at the settled picture before them and the result. It would be unprecedented for there to be this level of churn in a campaign.
“My personal view is I don’t think the Tories were ever 25 points ahead and I don’t think they are only 5% ahead now. I think changes to methodology made since 2015 have exacerbated the volatility.”
From an article in the Guardian giving pollsters opinion on Labour's bounce in the polls:
From what I've been able to sniff out, a number of voters are doing the old "fuck with the pollsters" trick as well, claiming to vote Labour when they'll pop off and vote Tory and they're doing it on purpose.
Any that show that kind of volatility usually have smaller sample sizes, 2,000 or less when these days polls of 4,000-20,000 give the most accurate pictures, as swing voter loyalty is incredibly soft.
Personally I think the tories are somewhere between 7-10% ahead, about what we saw during Thatcher's time when she was up against a comparable left wing fool.
Things to note of course is that smaller parties have become somewhat more electable, with groups such as the SNP, Plaid and the Greens taking more from the Lib Dems and Labour than they have done in the past, so there could be a lot of upsets as a result of small chunks of votes whittling into Labour support, with around 30 seats or so realising this they're doing electoral pacts and some of them are dodgy as fuck (the greens getting £250k to stand aside in Richmond, for example).
That being said, I think we'll be looking at a majority of 50-90 with the tories taking more seats in Scotland than expected thanks to Ruth Davidson, leaving the tories with much more representation around the country as a whole (and likely a deal with the DUP or UUP) to bolster numbers further should they need them.
I do love looking at Labour diehards on Twitter. Whenever a Labour related trend appears they're like 'it's just a little out of touch! It's still good! It's still good!'
Diane Abbot appeared on Marr today and apparently got 'smeared' (read 'arseblasted') while Amber Rudd got 'a cosy chat' (read 'she came off well, and the current trends of the police screaming around Manchester and kicking in the shit of goatfuckers is doing her well')
The standard tactic of any criticism of Facebook Momentum types is invariably, "why do you hate poor people."
Then again, they also reckon that this polling trend will continue and in a couple of weeks Labour will be in the lead. Chinny reckon, as we used to say when I was a kid.
I foresee a salt thread on them in their future.
I do love looking at Labour diehards on Twitter. Whenever a Labour related trend appears they're like 'it's just a little out of touch! It's still good! It's still good!'
Diane Abbot appeared on Marr today and apparently got 'smeared' (read 'arseblasted') while Amber Rudd got 'a cosy chat' (read 'she came off well, and the current trends of the police screaming around Manchester and kicking in the shit of goatfuckers is doing her well')