Uber Drivers Must Switch to EVs by 2030 - Ride-hailing service Uber says it will go fully-electric and phase out gas-burning cars by 2030.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
By José Rodríguez Jr.
9/20/22 1:00PM

Uber is expanding its EV options to more cities across the U.S., and is setting a deadline for drivers to transition to electric cars by 2030. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi tells CBS that drivers who haven’t made the switch to an EV by then won’t be allowed back on its platform.

The latest expansion to Uber’s Comfort Electric service is a part of its goal to phase out gas-burning cars from its platform within the next few years. The Comfort Electric option is different from Uber Green in terms of vehicle eligibility; Uber Green includes hybrid and fully-electric models, but Comfort Electric requires drivers to operate fully-electric cars, exclusively.

1664374132581.png
Screenshot: Uber

It’s supposed to be a premium option, according to Car and Driver, providing rides in EVs from Tesla, Polestar and the Ford Mustang Mach-E. When Comfort Electric launched in May of 2022, it was available in select California cities and Dubai, but it’s now available throughout the U.S. and Canada in these cities:
Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore-Maryland, Boston, Charlotte, Chicago, Connecticut, Dallas, Denver, Houston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New Jersey, NYC Suburbs, Philadelphia, Portland, Sacramento, San Antonio, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, St Louis, Vancouver (Canada), Washington D.C.
Now that Uber has expanded Comfort Electric and committed to phasing out gas-burning cars, multiple outlets say the ride-hailing service is transitioning to a fully-electric fleet, but that’s a misnomer; Uber doesn’t have a fleet.

If it did, that would mean Uber has employees to pilot its so-called fleet, but Uber doesn’t have employees. Uber hosts “users” on its platform, which connects people driving their own cars with people who need a ride.

That’s how Uber has evaded the responsibilities of a traditional employer, and, now, that’ll to apply to the “fleet’s” EV transition, too. Uber won’t foot the bill for drivers to switch from ICE-equipped cars to EVs; instead, it’ll be offering incentives to convince drivers to go electric, per CBS:
Uber is trying to slash its carbon footprint by incentivizing its drivers to switch to EVs.
But they are not cheap. Electric vehicles cost an average of $60,000. Uber plans to spend $800 million to help offset the cost for its drivers.
The company is also paying drivers a dollar for every EV trip they make and providing discounts on charging. Uber is partnering with Hertz to allow drivers to have the option of renting Teslas on a weekly or monthly basis.
At best, Uber will provide a Hertz rental for drivers to continue picking up fares after the 2030 EV deadline, and a few other incentives. Admittedly, these have made a difference, with one driver citing a $200 increase in fares per week.

But then again, the price of these Hertz EV rentals ranges from $299 to $334 per week, so what’s the net gain? What’s worse, with the price of EVs not going down any time soon, I wonder if the extra money Uber drivers make will ever actually be enough to afford the same EV they’ll depend on, and become just another business — sorry, personal expense.

1664374221184.png
Screenshot: Uber

Source (Archive)
 
Nah, 2030 is still a long time away.

By announcing this, they make headlines and get accolades from all the fashionable eco-fags without actually having to do anything at all. Then they can quietly rescind the infeasible policy at any time.
Or, as others have pointed out, just as likely expire as a company from other market forces before the point where you have to make good on it.

"Local Man personally promises to single-handedly invent sustainable fusion power by 2399, or die trying"
 
I'd say it's bold of Uber assuming they'll still be around in seven years.
They won't be if they're stupid enough to follow though on this

This amounts to telling people to buy an insanely expensive vehicle, with terrible mileage, that costs a fortune to repair and maintain, that isn't even logistically feasible to have in most of the country, based on a technology that is currently utter shit with serious roadblocks toward achieving future feasibility for large scale use, all for the privilege of driving for a company that treats you like shit and barely pays you

Whoever came up with this idea is legitimately, certifiably stupid. This is not feasible on a number of levels, let alone in the next 8 years. This is the kind of move that will kill the company outright when 2030 comes around. They'll get outcompeted by their competitors, and at least a few more will spring up to take advantage of this around that time and will not have a such a restriction on their employees. This will result in them poaching virtually ubers entire workforce outright
 
ok now someone explain to me why we don't have shared van taxis in the US
 
"Just go out and buy an EV, ya poors!"

Yeah I don't think that Jamal who is barely keeping up with the payments on his 2015 nissan maxima is going to have the financial capacity for that, just so he can get back to eating the french fries out of your uber eats order
 
Alternatatively: How to ensure your company swiftly goes out of business due to lack of new hires who meet your impossible standards.

These fucks seriously assume everyone's got $50K to rush out and go buy a new Tesla just to work a gig job that is barely above most state minimum wages? Do not fucking make me laugh.
 
Back
Top Bottom