UK U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act - The UK Supreme Court says YWNBAW! (although the trans identity is still a protected characteristic)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Article | Archive
The New York Times. Published: 16 April 2025

U.K. Top Court Says Trans Women Do Not Meet Legal Definition of Women Under Equality Act​

Britain’s Supreme Court was asked to rule on whether trans women can be defined as female under a British law that aims to protect against discrimination.

The Supreme Court in Britain ruled on Wednesday that trans women do not fall within the legal definition of women under the country’s equality legislation.

The deputy president of the court, Lord Hodge, said in a summary of the decision: “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex.”

However, he added: “We counsel against reading this judgment as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another, it is not.” He said the ruling “does not cause disadvantage to trans people” because they have protections under anti-discrimination and equality laws.

The landmark judgment follows a yearslong legal battle over whether trans women can be regarded as female under the 2010 law, which aims to prevent discrimination on the basis of gender, sexuality, race and other protected characteristics.

The decision was highly anticipated because it could have potentially far-reaching consequences for how the law is applied to single sex spaces, equal pay claims and maternity policies as well as to some of the rights available to transgender people in Britain.



BBC live reporting; https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t
0.webp
1.webp 2.webp 3.webp 4.webp

Also, sex is binary:
5.webp 6.webp

👀
single-sex-spaces.webp



Related:
JK Rowling, the Queen of TERF Island who helped fund this lawsuit, is celebrating.
Queen-of-TERF-Island.webp GosUamSXUAAWcMW.webp
And the troons are melting down even more than usual over her. See:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21120381
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21129887
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/u-k-to...women-under-equality-act.217313/post-21135630
a.webp b.webp c.webp d.webp e.webp
 
Last edited:
UK Supreme Court says 'woman' refers to biological sex under equality laws (Reuters)

This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.





Twitter is already going nuts over the ruling. There are already demands to repeal the Gender Recognition Act, which made trannies a protected species and gives them a now largely useless certificate with "woman" stamped on it. Screenshots coming.

edit: Attached UKSC ruling.

Affirms previous rulings decisions that sex is binary and concludes that interpreting a GRC as "sex recognition" is deranged.

1744796228810.webp


edit: The seethe begins.

1744796450647.webp 1744796509648.webp1744796565583.webp1744796626317.webp
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Last edited:
This might cause more damage to the movement than anything else. Troons have been a "diversity point" for all sorts of organisations.Too white and male? Have your CFO put on a dress and get a GRC, now you're suddenly diverse and eligible for a bunch of government grants!

1744796885973.webp

The fallout from this ruling is going to be vast.
 
Dropped into reddit for a quick saltmine, but it seems delusion are more prevalent.
Once again, for those of us who do have a GRC stealth is the only way to go. Can’t exclude us if they don’t know about us.
So how are they going to tell? By making the list of transitioners public or stopping GRCs?
Cool, so a GRC is used only to tell people you're transgender now not to actually recognise protections.
 
Back