Culture Twitter admits overstating audience figures for 3 years - How many more lies will be exposed?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Archive

Twitter admitted to overstating its audience figures by nearly 2mn users for almost three years, as it reported its first quarterly results since the social media company agreed a $44bn buyout from Tesla chief Elon Musk.
It is the second time that Twitter has miscalculated its user numbers, after discovering in 2017 that a similar error had gone unnoticed for three years.
The latest mistake was revealed just days after Twitter agreed a leveraged buyout by Musk. The entrepreneur has hinted at plans to reshape Twitter’s business model, which currently relies on advertising for more than 90 per cent of its revenues.
Given the deal, Twitter’s first-quarter earnings report offered minimal commentary and did not include any guidance for the rest of the year. The company is also forgoing its usual conference call with analysts.
First-quarter revenues of $1.2bn came in slightly below Wall Street’s forecasts, which Twitter blamed on “headwinds associated with the war in Ukraine”.
However, Twitter’s monetisable daily active users (mDAU), its own unique metric for tracking its audience, came in better than investors expected at 229mn, with year-on-year growth of 6.4 per cent in the US and 18.1 per cent in the rest of the world.
Net income jumped to $513mn, thanks to a one-off benefit from the $1bn sale of its mobile advertising unit MoPub to AppLovin, which closed in January.

Shares in Twitter rose about 1 per cent to $49.05 in early trading, below the $54.20 per share price at which Musk has agreed to buy the company.
Twitter also revealed what it described as an “error” introduced in the first quarter of 2019 that “resulted in an overstatement of mDAU” that went undiscovered for almost three years.
The difference between the figures Twitter reported over the past year and the true count ranged between 1.4mn-1.9mn, it said, or just below 1 per cent of the total. It did not provide a reconciliation for 2019 or most of 2020.
Advertisers rely on accurate estimates of audience size when planning their campaigns.
“In March of 2019, we launched a feature that allowed people to link multiple separate accounts together in order to conveniently switch between accounts,” the company explained. “An error was made at that time, such that actions taken via the primary account resulted in all linked accounts being counted as mDAU.”
Fake or spam accounts represented “fewer than 5 per cent” of its mDAU during the quarter, Twitter said, after an internal review. Musk has said that he plans to crack down on “bots” or fake accounts when he takes over.
In 2017, Twitter had to lower its previously reported user figures since 2014 by as much as 2mn per quarter, after it discovered it had been mistakenly counting activity from third-party applications as unique users.
 
Well no duh, i have not known a single Twitter user that didn’t have multiple accounts.
 
Based on the fact that you should always multiply negative corporate figures by a full order of magnitude to cut through the bullshit, their figure of 5% probably translates to somewhere between 75-85% of accounts being fake.
 
It is the second time that Twitter has miscalculated its user numbers, after discovering in 2017 that a similar error had gone unnoticed for three years.
The latest mistake was revealed just days after Twitter agreed a leveraged buyout by Musk.
whoopsie daisy, welp nobody's perfect
 
Based on the fact that you should always multiply negative corporate figures by a full order of magnitude to cut through the bullshit, their figure of 5% probably translates to somewhere between 75-85% of accounts being fake.
I assume that these 5% are active accounts, what would be the point of bots and such if they're not? Even if they're not engaging in any malicious activity at the time it is in their interest to have a trail of tweets to seem like a legit account until they need to shill for someone or spread propaganda.
So when considering that 10% of users generate 80% of the tweets that 5% of total users being bots/scams becomes pretty fucking huge.
 
Wait so Elon will get some of his money back after he sues the executives that perpetuated fraud to keep the stock price artificially elevated? Stop it, I can only get so erect
 
I thought in the future sex robots would be cool. Not some faggot Chinese buck-toothed homosexual making nonstop bots asking for democrat votes and to visit tranny porn onlyfan sites.
 
"Woops, turns out we were lying about literally everything for our entire existence! Tee-hee!"
If this wasn’t Twitter and a company basically used for money laundering, voter manipulation, and data collection, this sort of thing would be grounds for fraud.

But it is Twitter and I’m much more interested in how the company has operated and run all these years.
 
Bro I swear Elon should just buy every company so these retards will all admit they've been running these companies like retards
 
Its amazing what disgusting dirt is coming out now that the people in charge arent in charge anymore.

And then there will be the bitches with the beer guts to say that Twitter was this amazing site of free speech until that mean old Musk bought it
 
It’s going to be twitter’s judgement day
 
We already knew there were bots capable of faking user engagement on Twitch. It's obvious Twitter would have people hiring bot farms to simulate the same thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom