TV Tropes community

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
732616
 
This shit made me cringe and I undid it:

allthetropes.fandom.com

The Hunchback of Notre Dame (Disney film)/YMMV

This section refers to the original novel. Alternative Character Interpretation: This happens the most to Quasimodo and Frollo. In the book, Quasimodo is rather mean and hates most people. In the films, he is usually put in a more sympathetic light. The exact opposite usually happens to Frollo...
allthetropes.fandom.com allthetropes.fandom.com

Yes, this person actually argued "Frollo did nothing wrong".
 
NARPASSWORD said:
I just realized that Troper autism over the Vic Mignogna BS will reach critical overload when that Sanic racing game comes out (after all, we all know that Sanic is already a gigantic magnet of autism even without any controversy).
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8502328/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast
(Bonus funny points if Cream (whose voiced by Monica Rial) shows up)
Click to expand...
Let's be real, the tropers only are anti-Vic because they're favorite VA's said he sucks. If these VA's were saying this about Doug Walker, then the tropers wouldn't do jackshit.
 
Last edited:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/YMMV/Heathers
There's a lot of 'controversy' over the various versions of Heathers.Curiously i never see someone mention the fact that Heathers was always supposed to be a parody of high school realities.All the over the top scenes that wouldn't fly today or back then were part of the satire.It seems tropers missed that little detail.Also values dissonance because it treats the idea of a school massacre as a joke and that would be 'offensive'(???) or in poor taste today?Apparently satire has limits for some reason.
One thing i never got though is why tropers are weirded out that 'villains' in fiction tend to have fans despite them being villains the whole misaimed fandom trope is awkward to say the least.Apparently tropers don't understand that villains are almost always the most popular character in a work of fiction.Ironically the villain in the '89 movie version played by Christian Slater was a lot closer to how the two Columbine mass shooters were than all the crap that the media said about them being bullied.At the very least that would make the movie kind of prescient and deserving of praise i think.
 
iafiv said:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/YMMV/Heathers
There's a lot of 'controversy' over the various versions of Heathers.Curiously i never see someone mention the fact that Heathers was always supposed to be a parody of high school realities.All the over the top scenes that wouldn't fly today or back then were part of the satire.It seems tropers missed that little detail.Also values dissonance because it treats the idea of a school massacre as a joke and that would be 'offensive'(???) or in poor taste today?Apparently satire has limits for some reason.
One thing i never got though is why tropers are weirded out that 'villains' in fiction tend to have fans despite them being villains the whole misaimed fandom trope is awkward to say the least.Apparently tropers don't understand that villains are almost always the most popular character in a work of fiction.Ironically the villain in the '89 movie version played by Christian Slater was a lot closer to how the two Columbine mass shooters were than all the crap that the media said about them being bullied.At the very least that would make the movie kind of prescient and deserving of praise i think.
Click to expand...
Tropers tend to treat villains/antagonist characters as though they were real people and act like their fans are in favor of the actions done by those sort of characters.
 
iafiv said:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/YMMV/Heathers
There's a lot of 'controversy' over the various versions of Heathers.Curiously i never see someone mention the fact that Heathers was always supposed to be a parody of high school realities.All the over the top scenes that wouldn't fly today or back then were part of the satire.It seems tropers missed that little detail.Also values dissonance because it treats the idea of a school massacre as a joke and that would be 'offensive'(???) or in poor taste today?Apparently satire has limits for some reason.
One thing i never got though is why tropers are weirded out that 'villains' in fiction tend to have fans despite them being villains the whole misaimed fandom trope is awkward to say the least.Apparently tropers don't understand that villains are almost always the most popular character in a work of fiction.Ironically the villain in the '89 movie version played by Christian Slater was a lot closer to how the two Columbine mass shooters were than all the crap that the media said about them being bullied.At the very least that would make the movie kind of prescient and deserving of praise i think.
Click to expand...

There was this godforsakenly dumb article some place published about a millennial who had seen Heathers for the first time and was incredibly offended... Are they cribbing from that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom