Plus, you got shit like SIV floating around.
Actually, tomatoes can be toxic if you're eating them prematurely or just eating the vines and leaves like an complete retard. But you're far more likely to have those alkaloids hit you a lot harder if you've just ate an pile of potatoes
Sounds like a skill issue, really. Give the Italians props for being bold enough to turn eggplants and tomatoes into a dish together, doubling down on nightshade can be fun.
The pajeets have a triple nightshade special curry (eggplants and potatoes in tomato sauce, with a hint of hot peppers for nightshade number four). Maybe that's why they're all born with 65 IQ?
Won't lie, that actually sounds kind of good. Sounds more like it's wasted on its creators.
Imagine getting this upset about Bratz in 2026
Some Tropers just seem to live in alternate realities where something that was obscure back in 2007 was actually widely loved and needs to be defended.
And it shows. I don't even know people my age that grew up when Bratz was a thing that cares
I had a Bratz phone as a child around that time
Didn't those things stopped being relevant for at least 2 decades ago? At least Barbie had an bit of an excuse on how much content that they've shat out
Tbh, a lot of games with creatures have atleast jokes about them being eaten, like pegasus pot pie tavern line in Heroes Of Might & Magic III or some stuff in Azure Dreams GBC
It would have been titled "Everybody Hates Zeus" if they were really trope savvy.
Looks like a robot. But why it's programmed to mention an obscure or nonexistent nick show is disturbing.
It's the same type of nonexistent media that some autist would invent and insist that it'll happen by a certain date and other tards would believe it. I see all the time on those "fanon" wikis that Fandom hosts. Only thing that caught my eye is that it was on other sites.
If you can actually transfer things between players, it really is gambling, because it's wagering money in hopes of obtaining something of value. If you can sell it, and someone can buy it, it is something of value. Now, personally I'm pretty libertard on gambling, as bad as it can be, but if we're going to have such laws at all, game companies directing their products at children shouldn't be able to evade them.
Pokemon got rid of the Game Corners because in-game slot machines with no real-world monetary input was considered bad enough to make a game 18+ by PEGI. As much as I feel that the digital hat economy should be allowed to exist as it is, microtransation-based loot boxes do probably qualify as gambling by similar principles, so it needs to be subject to some form of scrutiny.
Bro, it's just an slot machine with an easily farmable bonus mode. Not even Dragon Quest isn't that generous when it comes to their casinos.