TV Tropes community

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Screenshots_2024-09-29-16-39-16.png
nigger does Trump even exist in the Futurama universe?
 
Brain Power said:
Calling a young Latino a "boy" is a racial slur! (wat)
Click to expand...
Since fucking when? That's solely a black people thing and solely when you're calling a black adult "boy," which will indeed possibly get you a sock in the jaw. Calling an adult male "boy" in a disparaging way might get you that too, but there wouldn't be a racial element.
 
AnOminous said:
Since fucking when? That's solely a black people thing and solely when you're calling a black adult "boy," which will indeed possibly get you a sock in the jaw. Calling an adult male "boy" in a disparaging way might get you that too, but there wouldn't be a racial element.
Click to expand...
You can't call people by name, gender, or anything else without potentially offending them. Why? Because the guys at TVT said so. Fuck them. Fuck all of them. Soon enough, there won't be a coherent way for people to communicate with each other at all (which is the actual end goal).
 
AnOminous said:
Since fucking when? That's solely a black people thing and solely when you're calling a black adult "boy," which will indeed possibly get you a sock in the jaw. Calling an adult male "boy" in a disparaging way might get you that too, but there wouldn't be a racial element.
Click to expand...
I know right? I would expect something like "spic", "beaner", "sudaca", "indio", or "wall jumper" for racial slurs towards Latinos, but "boy"? Really?
 
Gorillion others said:
Soon enough, there won't be a coherent way for people to communicate with each other at all (which is the actual end goal).
Click to expand...
Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. . . . The process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there's no reason or excuse for committing thought-crime. It's merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won't be any need even for that. . . . Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?
Click to expand...
 
So, scrolling through the ban appeal thread, I see that they're still being autistic over registering on an VPN or something. For security reasons, they're blaming it on phoneposters when it's really just Nate and an few other autists who was the only ones who was that persistent with the VPN shit.
 
NerdShamer said:
So, scrolling through the ban appeal thread, I see that they're still being autistic over registering on an VPN or something. For security reasons, they're blaming it on phoneposters when it's really just Nate and an few other autists who was the only ones who was that persistent with the VPN shit.
Click to expand...
Lol, first and last time I ban evaded was long before this VPN shit took off. I just used a different email address and none's the wiser.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom