TV Tropes community

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Or an coomer defending underaged magical girls being raped?
I've read that manga before, all of the chapters pre-hiatus and that's absolutely and utterly factually incorrect, probably even overthinking it. It's not that deep, it's just ridiculous grimderp. Both the one writing the review and the ones voting it to be deleted are inane. It's very clear that the age is just a number in that manga because none of the characters act like children, they all act like some sort of odd hybrid between Keyaru and a very evil magical girl that would make every other Precure or Nanoha Magical girl go vomit the moment they start walking around.

Bro, that's an Sunday for Japan.

Yeah, and it was somehow still allowed on TV Tropes despite magnitudes even worse than GoTM. I also read that manga, and if GoTM would not be allowed that one would be easily annihilated from the surface of the planet.
 
Last edited:
I've read that manga before, all of the chapters pre-hiatus and that's absolutely and utterly factually incorrect, probably even overthinking it. It's not that deep, it's just ridiculous grimderp. Both the one writing the review and the ones voting it to be deleted are inane. It's very clear that the age is just a number in that manga because none of the characters act like children, they all act like some sort of odd hybrid between Keyaru and a very evil magical girl that would make every other Precure or Nanoha Magical girl go vomit the moment they start walking around.



Yeah, and it was somehow still allowed on TV Tropes despite magnitudes even worse than GoTM. I also read that manga, and if GoTM would not be allowed that one would be easily annihilated from the surface of the planet.
Well that's the problem isn't it? If you're going to declare one anime a no go zone based on vague rules about "child porn" then everything else should go too. They'd never do that though because they'd have to purge half their website and userbase.

Literally 2 pages ago we had an example of a guy try and argue that Alice in Wonderland got stuck in a hole ebcause she has a dumptruck ass. The actual pedos aren't being affected by these dumbass rules and I wonder if they know that.
 
Now I see why that subforum was set to private
Not exactly privated. They just made it so that you need an account just to access the Content Violation Discussions subforum (and the "morgue" variant which hosted the locked discussions threads of past content violations stuff). It is surprising considering that even without account you can go around looking at the forums as a whole, but not those two.

Either they really don't like people taking out of context stuff or they have something to hide.

That said, nothing much has been going on, apart of the fact that at least one of them hoping that people will forget this whole debacle, "like the Snoot Games." when discussing about the need to lock the Cuties article/discussion page.
 
Either they really don't like people taking out of context stuff or they have something to hide.
You know, a lot of this "drama" could have easily been avoided if they stuck with "18+" and banned the coomers. But according to this out of context quote, the lowest that they'll go is 13-15 for nonsexualized nudity and allegedly 16+ for everything else.

Idk, I'm getting some serious pedo vibes from watching them defend that kind of shit.

They just made it so that you need an account just to access the Content Violation Discussions subforum (and the "morgue" variant which hosted the locked discussions threads of past content violations stuff). It is surprising considering that even without account you can go around looking at the forums as a whole, but not those two.
Well, there's an way of bypassing of one of those subforums. But I won't share it with anyone, atm.
 
Not exactly privated. They just made it so that you need an account just to access the Content Violation Discussions subforum (and the "morgue" variant which hosted the locked discussions threads of past content violations stuff). It is surprising considering that even without account you can go around looking at the forums as a whole, but not those two.

Either they really don't like people taking out of context stuff or they have something to hide.

That said, nothing much has been going on, apart of the fact that at least one of them hoping that people will forget this whole debacle, "like the Snoot Games." when discussing about the need to lock the Cuties article/discussion page.
Aw that's cute.
1715120980228.png


He thinks this is just going to go away because he says so.
 
View attachment 5960058

Man, it’s a good thing TVTropes is protecting us against fictional anime girls. They probably even extend this to real life girls too!

View attachment 5960062

Oh.
The irony is that MahouAko is more tame compared to other ecchi manga you could read.
  1. Nipples and vaginas are always completely censored either by speech bubbles or diagetically (positioning of environment and characters).

  2. There isn't a single panel where the 'loli' Nero Alice becomes a fanservice subject of any kind. She's never sexually humiliated or gets aroused. The story treats her as a wholesome innocent girl and draws the line there while other ecchi lewd their loli characters.

  3. MahouAko has a story and cast which it builds upon. The characters have clearly defined personalities and goals, and change throughout the story. The ecchi element exists within that framework; the characters don't defy their characterization for fanservice.
So, if the work page for this one could be cut for very little, then what's next on the chopping block, Negima, and Bakemonogatari? Kill la Kill? Are these moralfagging hypocrites just going to ignore everything else a work has to offer just because it's fanservicey?
 
Last edited:
The irony is that MahouAko is more tame compared to other ecchi manga you could read.
  1. Nipples and vaginas are always completely censored either by speech bubbles or diagetically (positioning of environment and characters).

  2. There isn't a single panel where the 'loli' Nero Alice becomes a fanservice subject of any kind. She's never sexually humiliated or gets aroused. The story treats her as a wholesome innocent girl and draws the line there while other ecchi lewd their loli characters.

  3. MahouAko has a story and cast which it builds upon. The characters have clearly defined personalities and goals, and change throughout the story. The ecchi element exists within that framework; the characters don't defy their characterization for fanservice.
So, if the work page for this one could be cut for very little, then what's next on the chopping block, Negima, and Bakemonogatari? Kill la Kill? Are these moralfagging hypocrites just going to ignore everything else a work has to offer just because it's fanservicey?
I was pleasantly surprised by MahouAko when I read it. It was very refreshing to see a Loli character who was not sexualized (I'm looking at you, To Love Ru).
 
Last edited:
The irony is that MahouAko is more tame compared to other ecchi manga you could read.
  1. Nipples and vaginas are always completely censored either by speech bubbles or diagetically (positioning of environment and characters).

  2. There isn't a single panel where the 'loli' Nero Alice becomes a fanservice subject of any kind. She's never sexually humiliated or gets aroused. The story treats her as a wholesome innocent girl and draws the line there while other ecchi lewd their loli characters.

  3. MahouAko has a story and cast which it builds upon. The characters have clearly defined personalities and goals, and change throughout the story. The ecchi element exists within that framework; the characters don't defy their characterization for fanservice.
So, if the work page for this one could be cut for very little, then what's next on the chopping block, Negima, and Bakemonogatari? Kill la Kill? Are these moralfagging hypocrites just going to ignore everything else a work has to offer just because it's fanservicey?
I just thought that it was Meguca level depression until I read it personally and no it was just slightly less unhinged than Redo Of Healer. And no, Neroalice is pretty much anything but wholesome and innocent, she literally proxy-rapes people. Emphasis on proxy since she forces Magenta and Sulfur to outright breastfeed Sayo at one point and at another forced Haruka into babyplay.
 
Back
Top Bottom