TV Tropes community

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
In regards to the female characters, need I remind you all what they have down on the Fair For Its Day trope page?

Fair for Its Day - TV Tropes.png

Fair for Its Day - TV Tropes (1).png

Fair for Its Day - TV Tropes (3).png

Fair for Its Day - TV Tropes (4).png

Cleary, all those beloved female protagonists in games don't count in the modern day, according to TV Tropes.
 
In regards to the female characters, need I remind you all what they have down on the Fair For Its Day trope page?

View attachment 5064099
View attachment 5064101
View attachment 5064106
View attachment 5064107
Cleary, all those beloved female protagonists in games don't count in the modern day, according to TV Tropes.
Imagine wanting to have strong female characters with a personality or charisma, and then replacing them with ugly, useless cunts. This was never about dealing with just toxic masculinity but what they deem to be toxic individuals regardless of gender, being loud with men and silent with women. Even someone who is bitch made would get fed up with those troper clowns.
 
Following down that line we get nasty stuff like systematic discrimination. The law might say otherwise but the descendants of slaves (and marginalized groups in general) find themselves in far worse standing than those whose ancestors were from the privileged class, both because they can't access the same educational/job opportunities and because the initial rationalizations of why it was okay to own slaves linger.
41C2A75F-38C7-4CD3-B81B-B63411BE5BE6.jpeg

Too much time reading CNN articles in the op-ed section will make you post things like this on TV Tropes.
 
Lol this is all shit their community college teachers told them to think.
I still find myself baffled whenever I read a fanfiction, and wouldn't you know it, I see the author leave in a note gushing how having a page there is such a glowing endorsement.

No, it isn't. It makes you look like a fag clinging to a bygone era when the site was only slightly better than it is now.
 
Maybe if the jannies weren't such vindictive cunts, the site would actually be worth something again. But that's just wishful thinking.
This a thousand times, a million times.

I've heard some say here or on other sites that TV Tropes was a mistake, and that the site shouldn't exist. That's certainly an opinion, but the truth is that a site like TV Tropes was always inevitable. Media nerds and geeks have been discussing the details of story crafting ever since humans came up with the idea of making fictional stories to begin with. Why, I wouldn't be surprised if C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien themselves had a friendly but excessively nerdy discussion between themselves about fantasy writing; they certainly took two different approaches. TV Tropes merely takes those nerdy ramblings and crystalize them into a semi-permanent form. It was always going to happen

So yes, while there are some who misuse the site as a writing crutch instead of just a fun way to categorize how stories can be told and look up other stories told similarly, it's less the site itself that's the problem and more both how the site is run and who uses it. The site always had a left-of-center vibe, but it has gotten worse over the years. The site used to have "we're just doing this for fun, please don't take this so seriously" as a rule to now you need a fucking vetting process before you can even dream of making a new page on anything, lest you get accused or rogue posting. Rogue posting! Don't get me started on the autism of the forums, where simply making a new thread in the wrong forum is considered a social faux pas instead of an innocent mistake.

Honestly, the site has had an administration problem since day one. Some of you know that the guy who created the site to begin with (I think his name is Speedy Eddie? I've tried to look it up but I'm not getting any results) left the site. What you might not know is that for years, he had this absolute asinine rule that no trope page could use a screenshot from an anime or manga as the page image. Even if it was an image that helped illustrate the trope the best. Even if the trope was found only in Japanese media and was never used in Western media, and therefore had no Western source to get an image!

There is still some value to the site. Looking up a trope you like can help you find other media you would enjoy. Their "You Know That Show..." section has helped me find media that I only half-remembered and never got to finish. But beyond that, I find myself using the site less and less over time and it has everything to do with the user base and even more with who runs the site.

TLDR: TV Tropes always had a jannie and userbase problem but it's gotten worse over the years.
 
So what would be the inverse of this entry? Scary Black Men(pl.)? Intimidating Colored Presence? Ghettofication?
Might as well be titled "Forbidden Knowledge" because there's so way an inverse of that "trope" will ever be acknowledged or have a page made.
 
This a thousand times, a million times.

I've heard some say here or on other sites that TV Tropes was a mistake, and that the site shouldn't exist. That's certainly an opinion, but the truth is that a site like TV Tropes was always inevitable. Media nerds and geeks have been discussing the details of story crafting ever since humans came up with the idea of making fictional stories to begin with. Why, I wouldn't be surprised if C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien themselves had a friendly but excessively nerdy discussion between themselves about fantasy writing; they certainly took two different approaches. TV Tropes merely takes those nerdy ramblings and crystalize them into a semi-permanent form. It was always going to happen

So yes, while there are some who misuse the site as a writing crutch instead of just a fun way to categorize how stories can be told and look up other stories told similarly, it's less the site itself that's the problem and more both how the site is run and who uses it. The site always had a left-of-center vibe, but it has gotten worse over the years. The site used to have "we're just doing this for fun, please don't take this so seriously" as a rule to now you need a fucking vetting process before you can even dream of making a new page on anything, lest you get accused or rogue posting. Rogue posting! Don't get me started on the autism of the forums, where simply making a new thread in the wrong forum is considered a social faux pas instead of an innocent mistake.

Honestly, the site has had an administration problem since day one. Some of you know that the guy who created the site to begin with (I think his name is Speedy Eddie? I've tried to look it up but I'm not getting any results) left the site. What you might not know is that for years, he had this absolute asinine rule that no trope page could use a screenshot from an anime or manga as the page image. Even if it was an image that helped illustrate the trope the best. Even if the trope was found only in Japanese media and was never used in Western media, and therefore had no Western source to get an image!

There is still some value to the site. Looking up a trope you like can help you find other media you would enjoy. Their "You Know That Show..." section has helped me find media that I only half-remembered and never got to finish. But beyond that, I find myself using the site less and less over time and it has everything to do with the user base and even more with who runs the site.

TLDR: TV Tropes always had a jannie and userbase problem but it's gotten worse over the years.
Plus, it's become so bloated that I doubt it could survive long, and is only getting bigger because of all the unnecessary kibble that might as well be useless pieces of trivia.
 
It does make me wonder what is the vetting process to let fanfiction works become recommended, or even gaining their own trope pages.
 
I expected many things from fullmetal alchemist pages on tvtropes. I did not expect BLM parallels. It doesn't even make sense. Is that somekind of self-validation exercise? You can't just say Ishvalans are stand-ins for arabs, you need to find connections to blacks somehow
blm.png
 
Back
Top Bottom