TV Tropes community

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Gotta love the reasoning given for this Metroid WMG.
Metroid WMG - TV Tropes.png

Because a joke from the creator totally means he was being serious. Then again, they see that as a "no-take-backsies" statement, so yeah.
 
LightDragonman1 said:
Gotta love the reasoning given for this Metroid WMG.
View attachment 3344972
Because a joke from the creator totally means he was being serious. Then again, they see that as a "no-take-backsies" statement, so yeah.
Click to expand...
I really love how a lot of tropers really want to basically enforce gender roles when they say someone is trans. Like yeah because women who are actually strong or independent are clearly trans.
 
Kept looking around TVT for any sign of the Amber-Depp court case and yet here are the closest to it:
1654182919177.png
1654182980351.png
1654183011025.png
These were all in the Sexism thread but notice how all of Depp-Amber comments have been thumped.
 
Frank D'arbo said:
You know there was a reason why they were hated for centuries, right?
Click to expand...
They still are, ask any European. I think most of the people who defend them are clueless Americans who haven't been aggressively harassed on the street by gyps who are trying to scam them.
 
Last edited:
NerdShamer said:
A bunch of people from the Villains Wiki tried their hands at ballot stuffing and they've pissed off our favorite boomer to the point where he actually called for a witchhunt and made a statement towards the internet about it.

Note that the subject of listing a random villain as completely irredeemable is a sore spot between TVT and the spastics who edit the various villains wikis on Fandom.
Click to expand...
'An' is only used for words that start with a vowel (ie: She saw an elevator, he jumped out of an airplane), sorry for the grammarsperg.

But a war between two equally autistic sites is interesting, I'd like to see how it'll turn out.
 
NerdShamer said:
An bunch of people from the Villains Wiki tried their hands at ballot stuffing and they've pissed off our favorite boomer to the point where he actually called for an witchhunt and made an statement towards the internet about it.

Note that the subject of listing an random villain as completely irredeemable is an sore spot between TVT and the spastics who edit the various villains wikis on Fandom.
Click to expand...
As someone who use to vote on the Pure Evil villains proposals before losing my account for some reason.

The feud is pretty weird in nature. Villains wiki had the category named after TV Tropes complete monster page and would list the villains who were on that page in the category. But for some austic reason TV Tropes were mad that they were using their Tropes name and told villains wiki to get raid of their category. So villains wiki change the name to pure evil villains and would vote on villains themselves. Yet it still pisses off TV Tropes for some reason. Both sites have been at it since.

What's even weirder is that both TV Tropes and villains wiki constantly remind people to not treat this category as a badge of honor. But it clearly is if people have to vote the characters into the category and can't randomly add them like other categories.

Again the whole thing is weird especially how both sites feel like they need to throw shade at each other.

Honselty villains wiki wasn't too bad years ago. Mostly because it was a wiki you could read about villains. but now it's gotten retarded and especially if a villain is gay.
 
Last edited:
Oats12345 said:
As someone who use to vote on the Pure Evil villains proposals before losing my account for some reason.

The feud is pretty weird in nature. Villains wiki had the category named after TV Tropes complete monster page and would list the villains who were on that page in the category. But for some austic reason TV Tropes were mad that they were using their Tropes name and told villains wiki to get raid of their category. So villains wiki change the name to pure evil villains and would vote on villains themselves. Yet it still pisses off TV Tropes for some reason. Both sites have been at it since.

What's even weirder is that both TV Tropes and villains wiki constantly remind people to not treat this category as a badge of honor. But it clearly is if people have to vote the characters into the category and can't randomly add them like other categories.

Again the whole thing is weird especially how both sites feel like they need to throw shade at each other.

Honselty villains wiki wasn't too bad years ago. Mostly because it was a wiki you could read about villains. but now it's gotten retarded and especially if a villain is gay.
Click to expand...
And now every "real" entry must be the length of a literal essay
 
From The Uncanny Valley said:
And now every "real" entry must be the length of a literal essay
Click to expand...
Yeah it just got too ignoring for me. The fact that they were act weird towards gay villains. But also having to vote on literally essays on way a villain should be listed as pure evil. Like how hard is it to decide a villain is a complete bastard?

Alot of times if a villain is proven popular in the alphabet community most of them will add pointless trivia about why the gay fanbase thinks said villain should be redeem even if said character shows no redeeming qualities.

Also the fact that they wanted people to write essay lengths for one villain page is what made me leave.

Also deleting patrick star's page was a crime in its self in my opinion.
 
NerdShamer said:
It was already shit to begin with.
Click to expand...
Hey it may have been shit. But at least it was still fun when I first joined. Around the time I left did I relaize it was no longer fun and the users would get pissy over the easiest stuff. As well as the fact that they started to delete the fun categories that I liked. They also started to take this stuff way to serious. I made the right call leaving it seems
 
Oats12345 said:
As someone who use to vote on the Pure Evil villains proposals before losing my account for some reason.

The feud is pretty weird in nature. Villains wiki had the category named after TV Tropes complete monster page and would list the villains who were on that page in the category. But for some austic reason TV Tropes were mad that they were using their Tropes name and told villains wiki to get raid of their category. So villains wiki change the name to pure evil villains and would vote on villains themselves. Yet it still pisses off TV Tropes for some reason. Both sites have been at it since.

What's even weirder is that both TV Tropes and villains wiki constantly remind people to not treat this category as a badge of honor. But it clearly is if people have to vote the characters into the category and can't randomly add them like other categories.

Again the whole thing is weird especially how both sites feel like they need to throw shade at each other.

Honselty villains wiki wasn't too bad years ago. Mostly because it was a wiki you could read about villains. but now it's gotten retarded and especially if a villain is gay.
Click to expand...
What do they do with villians that are gay?
 
Sekirodiealot said:
What do they do with villians that are gay?
Click to expand...
They will usually overfill the trivia section with pointless information about the character and mention how said villain has grown a fanbase among the alphabet community and how said fanbase wants the villain to redeem. Even if said villain shows no redeeming qualities at all.

They used to have a LGBTQ category but delete it. Because they didn't want it to be misread as homophobic. Despite it clearly wouldn't be. I mean since you just listing villains who are chronically gay. I mean it wouldn't be homophobic listing the main villain of the fantastic beasts under it since he is apparently confirm to have had a thing with Dumbledore now wouldn't it. It makes absolutely no since and makes me happy i left when I did.
 
Oats12345 said:
They will usually overfill the trivia section with pointless information about the character and mention how said villain has grown a fanbase among the alphabet community and how said fanbase wants the villain to redeem. Even if said villain shows no redeeming qualities at all.

They used to have a LGBTQ category but delete it. Because they didn't want it to be misread as homophobic. Despite it clearly wouldn't be. I mean since you just listing villains who are chronically gay. I mean it wouldn't be homophobic listing the main villain of the fantastic beasts under it since he is apparently confirm to have had a thing with Dumbledore now wouldn't it. It makes absolutely no since and makes me happy i left when I did.
Click to expand...
Wow. So they're giving those villians special treatment.
Oh and i found this on the kenobi ymmv page Screenshot_20220603-213209_Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited:
Sekirodiealot said:
Wow. So they're giving those villians special treatment.
Click to expand...
Basically yes. If a straight white male villain burn down a orphanage they weren't give them such a trivia section. But if it was a female lesbian villain who did that they would have a trivia long page on why said villain has fans who want to see her redeem despite showing no qualities like that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom