- Joined
- Dec 10, 2018
I don't think a bunch of dweebs codifying things that occur in fiction is responsible for media sucking. Rather, I think media sucking is from the hubris of the mediocre and trend-following that's endemic of markets. Granted, they're annoying, but not influential.
One good example would be DC's movies just being kind of bad in general, because they were trying to ape Marvel, but whenever someone apes something 9 times out of 10 they miss a core element that made it successful in the first place. With the DC v Marvel example, DC lacks both the quality and the set up that Marvel benefits from. Iron Man was released in 08 and Avengers was released in '12, so that's 4 years and like 5(?) movies to get the characters introduced and ready for team up. Man of Steel was released in 2013, and then out of nowhere Batman v Superman gets released 3 years later, with some set up for Wonder Woman going directly into Justice League where we are introduced to characters with either literally no set up or set up in a TV series most people probably don't watch. So instead of introducing the new Batman before Batman v Superman and giving everyone else their own movies to introduce them and set them up, they basically jump straight into a smaller crossover with two new figures and one figure that was introduced 3 years ago to make a shortcut into a bigger crossover.
And look at how good Joker turned out, a film completely independent of this entire mess. Sure, it's plopping the Joker into a Scorsese movie, but that core theme of a lonely guy being pressed down on by the system is a very strong theme that people appreciate, and everyone involved did well at their roles, so you get a good movie out of a very basic concept over a corporate system failing to recreate a more complex one.
One good example would be DC's movies just being kind of bad in general, because they were trying to ape Marvel, but whenever someone apes something 9 times out of 10 they miss a core element that made it successful in the first place. With the DC v Marvel example, DC lacks both the quality and the set up that Marvel benefits from. Iron Man was released in 08 and Avengers was released in '12, so that's 4 years and like 5(?) movies to get the characters introduced and ready for team up. Man of Steel was released in 2013, and then out of nowhere Batman v Superman gets released 3 years later, with some set up for Wonder Woman going directly into Justice League where we are introduced to characters with either literally no set up or set up in a TV series most people probably don't watch. So instead of introducing the new Batman before Batman v Superman and giving everyone else their own movies to introduce them and set them up, they basically jump straight into a smaller crossover with two new figures and one figure that was introduced 3 years ago to make a shortcut into a bigger crossover.
And look at how good Joker turned out, a film completely independent of this entire mess. Sure, it's plopping the Joker into a Scorsese movie, but that core theme of a lonely guy being pressed down on by the system is a very strong theme that people appreciate, and everyone involved did well at their roles, so you get a good movie out of a very basic concept over a corporate system failing to recreate a more complex one.
