TV Tropes community

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Troopers are obsessed with characters being properly "punished" for their bad behavior. Whining about that makes up at least half of the dethroning moment of suck entries.
Tropers are infected with the social justice virus so from their POV a character escaping punishment is viewed as somehow that work in question is endorsing that kind of behaviour.Apparently tropers don't understand that in real life bad people escape punishment.Or maybe they understand it and can't accept works of fiction following reality????Either way its a result of them wanting to 'purify' society of anything 'wicked' and punishing the 'bad guys'.
 
Tropers are infected with the social justice virus so from their POV a character escaping punishment is viewed as somehow that work in question is endorsing that kind of behaviour.Apparently tropers don't understand that in real life bad people escape punishment.Or maybe they understand it and can't accept works of fiction following reality????Either way its a result of them wanting to 'purify' society of anything 'wicked' and punishing the 'bad guys'.

Hence why 99% of adult fiction severely triggers them.
 
Tropers are infected with the social justice virus so from their POV a character escaping punishment is viewed as somehow that work in question is endorsing that kind of behaviour. Apparently tropers don't understand that in real life bad people escape punishment.Or maybe they understand it and can't accept works of fiction following reality????Either way its a result of them wanting to 'purify' society of anything 'wicked' and punishing the 'bad guys'.

Which is idiotic. Not all bad people suffer consequences.

If they did, over half the threads on this site wouldn't exist.
 
Tropers are infected with the social justice virus so from their POV a character escaping punishment is viewed as somehow that work in question is endorsing that kind of behaviour.Apparently tropers don't understand that in real life bad people escape punishment.Or maybe they understand it and can't accept works of fiction following reality????Either way its a result of them wanting to 'purify' society of anything 'wicked' and punishing the 'bad guys'.
Wouldn't be surprised if they're pissed that they can't get away with anything while everyone else does.
 
Troopers are obsessed with characters being properly "punished" for their bad behavior. Whining about that makes up at least half of the dethroning moment of suck entries.

Are these the same people who made those grounded or the dumb "punishment day" videos on goanimate?
 
Is no one going to comment about the fact some troper labelled someone being forced to eat their own shit a Cool and Unusual Punishment? As if to say it's actually not that bad?

Like I know they're obsessed with bad people getting what they deserve, but this is intensely creepy.
 
Is no one going to comment about the fact some troper labelled someone being forced to eat their own shit a Cool and Unusual Punishment? As if to say it's actually not that bad?

Like I know they're obsessed with bad people getting what they deserve, but this is intensely creepy.
Scat fetishism from them, that's new.

...But I think the Fetish Fuel wiki had something like that, so I'm not really surprised.
 
There's apparently a thriving Chip n Dale Rescue Rangers fandom. It's been a thing since the 90s. And the autism is glorious.

Fan Disservice: Monty totally naked in the mini-bath. Chip and Dale in drag varies between this and Fanservice.

Popular with Furries: The fandom contains a lot of furries, many who consider the cartoon their Gateway Series. Especially Gadget who is a fan-favorite (Disney was honestly surprised with her popularity).

Ship-to-Ship Combat: The debate over the Chip/Gadget ship led to two flame wars known as the Ranger Wars (one in 1997 and the other in 1998), and it will probably never be settled.

 
Is no one going to comment about the fact some troper labelled someone being forced to eat their own shit a Cool and Unusual Punishment? As if to say it's actually not that bad?

Like I know they're obsessed with bad people getting what they deserve, but this is intensely creepy.
This is TV Tropes, where they're divided between wanting to fuck that baby Stand user or be the baby Stand user.
 
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/UnintentionalPeriodPiece/SpecialCases I still don't understand how it can fall in the 'unintentional period piece' label things from the real world.They mention things like highway design has changed.The trope itself is said to be about works set in the 'present' that overdose on references to whatever was 'hip' at the time and so ends up 'dated' and hard to understand 10-15 years down the line.Saying a highway design is dated to whatever time period it was built in is redundant.Its like going to a museum and watching medieval armor and then talking about how no one wears this today.Its like tropers don't understand the difference between a 'parody' and real life.
 
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/UnintentionalPeriodPiece/SpecialCases I still don't understand how it can fall in the 'unintentional period piece' label things from the real world.They mention things like highway design has changed.The trope itself is said to be about works set in the 'present' that overdose on references to whatever was 'hip' at the time and so ends up 'dated' and hard to understand 10-15 years down the line.Saying a highway design is dated to whatever time period it was built in is redundant.Its like going to a museum and watching medieval armor and then talking about how no one wears this today.Its like tropers don't understand the difference between a 'parody' and real life.
They don't know the difference between reality and fiction.
They probably think fictional characters exist in an alternate dimension.
 
Back when I actually read TV Tropes articles, I could never get over how generally awful YMMV pages were. Unfortunate Implications is one of the worst offenders, as it seems to exist primarily for tropers to overanalyze stuff in an attempt to find something offensive.

I think the idea of "subjective tropes isn't bad in the sense that some might be "controversial" say calling someone a Mary Sue. However, it seems like instead of them being about "tropes", in reality, they are really just an excuse to blog under the guise of a "trope".

"They wasted a perfectly good plot"= Tropers ranting about authors not doing what they wanted.

Les Yay and ho yay or whatever they are called are even worse: It's just tropers making gay ships. Two characters of the same gender happen to be friendly with each other? That must mean they are gay and they are totally in love you guys! Who Cares if they are heterosexual in canon?
 
Last edited:
That this is the x number of pages you've viewed this month without ads popup is the most passive aggressive thing I've ever seen a website do.
 
That this is the x number of pages you've viewed this month without ads popup is the most passive aggressive thing I've ever seen a website do.
Not to mention that people will start bitching at you for using an adblocker.
 
Back
Top Bottom