Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
People exaggerate what the chatbots can do.
I don’t disagree but as pointed out, people are already starting to get laid off because of it. I heard first hand about a heccin’ ceo excited to no longer need to fill vacancies. People will learn the hard way but until then, business leadership is excited to start laying off accountants, analysts, engineers, etc. so they book extra profits for themselves. These next years are going to get very interesting.
View attachment 7666394
View attachment 7666396

Well, shit. Forty percent is on deck for Trump like it's still 2016, so I guess it wasn’t a Harris problem.

View attachment 7666465

There’s already new mold forming in the Petri dish, but it got paused, so Trump’s the key to their survival.
Maybe I’m just old but I’ve seen Republican grifts now for 25+ years and MAGA doesn’t really faze me. I saw the Rush Limbaugh groupies of the 90s, the “I’d rather have a beer with Dubya than John Kerry” fags of the 2000s, the teabaggers of the late 2000s/early 2010s, the pseudolibertarians of the 2010s, and now maga. There will be a new grift for the change in direction of the GOP. When Vance gets annihilated, that’ll be the end of MAGA and something will be there to take its place.
 
I think the poster is right that all the covid lockdown stuff helped dems. But it's not a conspiracy. Like republicans were telling their own voters not to vote absentee and all that stuff, and a lot of them just stayed home. Republicans basically sabotaged themselves. I think looking back, Trump could have easily won.
I think a bigger component was that you basically had ballot harvesting made legal in a lot of areas where it normally hadn't/wouldn't have been and Democrats have made an effort over the years to really have groups that they'd fund to facilitate it.

That's never been a thing Republicans have done well on as they're not even good at canvasing. Republican groups will end up hiring just about anyone to do their canvassing work for instance and end up with a bunch of Democrats that will laugh with people about how ridiculous it is to send them out to get votes for Republicans.

Caught a lot of people off guard who didn't realize these laws were being changed across the country for 2020 by all variety of billionaires that felt they were doing it for the common good. But Democrats have groups that make a living off tracking stuff like this and were happy to mobilize when they were able to.

Republicans meanwhile, often treat it like it's grifting to work anything that resembles an activist group, so they'll even actively shun those trying to get them to just change what companies they use for canvassing. Makes getting them to mobilize their own activist groups to pressure politicians or to help with getting people to vote for elections a pipe dream. Means they never can react well in politics when their opposition is willing to actually 'do' things and is part of why they're in disbelief when they see Democrats protesting regularly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soulless4510
Americans with morals despise the modern Right. Basically, the modern Right's worship of Trump has become anathema to Americans who remember what it was like to serve and protect:


I don’t disagree but as pointed out, people are already starting to get laid off because of it. I heard first hand about a heccin’ ceo excited to no longer need to fill vacancies. People will learn the hard way but until then, business leadership is excited to start laying off accountants, analysts, engineers, etc. so they book extra profits for themselves. These next years are going to get very interesting.
The fact that Microsoft of all people started off with these mass AI-related layoffs (I'm sure they weren't the first, but this was the first public instance of a massive layoff now that they can replace these people with AI) goes to show that even the most secure places to work are not immune to AI-related layoffs. Microsoft is probably the biggest software company on the world, and yet they had no problems laying off thousands of people who probably studied and worked hard to get there, just because they thought AI could pick up the slack. If a big firm like Microsoft ain't safe from such layoffs, smaller companies are definitely not safe, either.

Maybe I’m just old but I’ve seen Republican grifts now for 25+ years and MAGA doesn’t really faze me. I saw the Rush Limbaugh groupies of the 90s, the “I’d rather have a beer with Dubya than John Kerry” fags of the 2000s, the teabaggers of the late 2000s/early 2010s, the pseudolibertarians of the 2010s, and now maga. There will be a new grift for the change in direction of the GOP. When Vance gets annihilated, that’ll be the end of MAGA and something will be there to take its place.
I grew up as part of the Dubya-era Religious Right, and ironically enough, I prefer that version of the Right compared to what we have now. We had people from different races along with whites, we wanted to keep America safe from terrorism and keep it strong, and we debated with atheists whenever they blasphemed against our Faith. If the Right stopped changing and stayed at that level, I'd still be a part of it. The only thing I'd roll back are those over-concerned censors who whined about movies and video games, whom the clergy saw as superstitious morons. I knew some priests who were big fans of fantasy and sci-fi stories and comics. The bishops gave the OK signal for Catholic parents to let their kids read the Harry Potter books, which many religious censors despised due to their magic-centered story.

The new version of the Right that emerges in the future is going to have to ditch the racial aspect of MAGA and embrace the brown-skinned peoples. Not only is racism not popular among most whites (who recognize the heat it brings on them from other races) but it cuts the Right off from enlisting brown and yellow-skinned people into the coalition, most of whom still breed, and do not agree with the values of the Left.

The New Right in 10-20 years from now is probably going to be some Reaganite, "family values" shit relying on Muslims, Jews, Latinos, Africans, and Asians who still breed, led by some Christian White ethnicities who also breed, (think Slavs, Irish, and Italians, or hillbilly Anglos) and they would use religion as a common thread to promote similar values and create a common cause.

Appealing to religion has never failed. Especially since people on both sides respect religion. Some of Trump's strongest followers are TradCaths, new Orthodox, and dyed-in-the-wool Evangelicals, and some of the biggest members of the Left are also Christians, mostly mainline Catholics and Orthodox, or old-school Protestants, who are more oriented towards charity. (the new Pope is one of the latter) The only people making religion cringe right now are the censor-happy puritans who are acting like feminist SJWs for the Right, calling for the censorship of explicit materials, but having such censor-happy morons didn't lead to the Left collapsing, so I think the Right will survive them as well. If Pornhub goes down, for instance, there'll be a lot of whining and bitching, but they will eventually get over it.
 
Last edited:
I’ve seen Republican grifts now for 25+ years and MAGA doesn’t really faze me. I saw the Rush Limbaugh groupies of the 90s, the “I’d rather have a beer with Dubya than John Kerry” fags of the 2000s, the teabaggers of the late 2000s/early 2010s, the pseudolibertarians of the 2010s, and now maga. There will be a new grift for the change in direction of the GOP. When Vance gets annihilated, that’ll be the end of MAGA and something will be there to take its place.
You know, maybe that old fruit Aristotle was onto something when he said some people are just born slaves.
 
I don’t disagree but as pointed out, people are already starting to get laid off because of it. I heard first hand about a heccin’ ceo excited to no longer need to fill vacancies. People will learn the hard way but until then, business leadership is excited to start laying off accountants, analysts, engineers, etc. so they book extra profits for themselves. These next years are going to get very interesting.
In the software company where I last worked, they started using AI for coding. They haven't replaced the engineers yet, but one of them commented that t isn't up to high-level, new feature type stuff, but it can do routine maintenance. But remember, technology moves fast.

The company got a new CEO this year. At his introduction meeting, he was REALLY hyped up about AI. I immediately thought "there goes my job." The following week, four of the five technical writers in my group got laid off, and I was one of them. I have long known that AI would eventually take over my profession, I was just hoping it wouldn't happen before I retired. Now I'm not so sure.
 
Republicans meanwhile, often treat it like it's grifting to work anything that resembles an activist group, so they'll even actively shun those trying to get them to just change what companies they use for canvassing.
Republicans hate putting in any kind of effort to organize voters.
In the software company where I last worked, they started using AI for coding. They haven't replaced the engineers yet, but one of them commented that t isn't up to high-level, new feature type stuff, but it can do routine maintenance. But remember, technology moves fast.

The company got a new CEO this year. At his introduction meeting, he was REALLY hyped up about AI. I immediately thought "there goes my job." The following week, four of the five technical writers in my group got laid off, and I was one of them. I have long known that AI would eventually take over my profession, I was just hoping it wouldn't happen before I retired. Now I'm not so sure.
It’s already happening. Like I said, the heccin’ c-suites are excited to start laying people off. They’ve always treated the rank and file like parasites, wanting shit like paid time off, maternity leave, job training, and health insurance. Now they can just have AI give them what they need, they can start laying off the white collar workforce, and pay themselves more money while doing so. They really do treat AI like it’s an easy button.

I feel bad for anyone born after 2000. Most of them aren’t going to have a viable career beyond 2030. Trillions aren’t being invested in AI so people can create photos of what their dog would look like if they were people.
 
Yes, praise Trump for investing in the technology that will take more jobs away from American citizens. Like how Microsoft fired a shit ton of people from its Xbox gaming division recently when they realized those jobs can go to AI and they can save a lot of money.

Instead of Mexicans taking your jobs, it's robots taking your jobs. XD
They're not going to AI, like 1 day later they filed for an allowance of several thousand H1B jeet visas
 
1000066012.webp

1000066018.webp


The Never Trumpers aren’t even a real bloc. They’re haunting the WSJ op-ed page, but the GOP isn’t being dog-walked by pundits anymore.

1000066011.webp
 
Last edited:
I refuse to believe pro Trumpers are real people and not just bots.
The narrative has changed so much around the Epstein list in the last week or so, and they are gladly eating up the opinion changes delivered hot and fresh from Fox News.
But the only people left supporting Trump with his disastrous second term so far seem to be the ones who can't think for themselves.

e: Grammar, I should stop tiredposting :(
 
Last edited:
I refuse to believe never Trumpers are real people and not just bots.
The narrative has changed so much around the Epstein list in the last week or so, and they are gladly eating up the opinion changes delivered hot and fresh from Fox News.
But the only people left supporting Trump with his disastrous second term so far seem to be the ones who can't think for themselves.
The only thing MAGA hates more than Democrats going after Trump is Republicans going after Trump. That’s why no one’s really anxious to replace him, whoever steps in is gonna get mulched like Pence.
 
Or how people forgot that Trump started Operation Warp Speed during the COVID pandemic, then have Biden take credit for stopping the virus.
This is what confuses me. If there was any time to go after his own base for being stupid, it would have been then, not now. Trump really could have leaned into "My admin created the Covid Vaccine while the Democrats all cried and shit themselves." Instead he gave into the "jab is evil" narrative when he was the one who fucking ordered it to be created. It was such an easy win, one the democrats would have had no counter for and something legitimately impressive historically that he could have used to show American Power.
 
I refuse to believe never Trumpers are real people and not just bots.
The narrative has changed so much around the Epstein list in the last week or so, and they are gladly eating up the opinion changes delivered hot and fresh from Fox News.
But the only people left supporting Trump with his disastrous second term so far seem to be the ones who can't think for themselves.
Also compromised shill influencers like balldo Tim Pool or community college flunker Charlie Kirk (tho he seemed to wobble a bit on the Epstein stuff). The White House, Qatar, Saudis or Kremlin pays them and if somehow they grew a spine, people would discover their love for taking it the choco highway. Others of them are just poors and no marks (eg failed cop Gunther Eagleman aka David Freeman) who'll be zero without their mostly botted social media. The weirdo Jackson Hinkle or that Malaysian failed genetics experiment are largely that.

Indeed, very little of it is real. That Trump has a portrait of Ronald Reagan among all the stuck on fake gold Temu vulgarity in the Oval Office is really a reminder that MAGA has no connection to conservatism or anything beyond a Trump Cult of Personality.
 
1000066019.webp


Image speaks for itself, what's remarkable though is that anyone who even looks at Trump the wrong way has to smell the glove eventually. (Gabbard muttered something about the 12-day war and now she’s stuck in her office spinning in her chair, wasting her time on absolute horseshit.)
This is what confuses me. If there was any time to go after his own base for being stupid, it would have been then, not now.
Well, he needed those mouthbreathers. Now, he could be polling at 1%, and he’d still go, “Fuck you I’m not leaving.”

He's flatly saying Republican voters are stuck with him, and he's right, they have nowhere else to go.
 
Last edited:
Indeed, very little of it is real. That Trump has a portrait of Ronald Reagan among all the stuck on fake gold Temu vulgarity in the Oval Office is really a reminder that MAGA has no connection to conservatism or anything beyond a Trump Cult of Personality.

I don't know, there's really not much difference between what Trump says and believes and any Republican politician of the last 20 years. His public image is that of an iconoclast, though, so millions of people out there force themselves to believe that a Republican who bombs Muslims and cuts taxes for the mega wealthy is actually a maverick who's fighting the establishment.
 
I don't know, there's really not much difference between what Trump says and believes and any Republican politician of the last 20 years. His public image is that of an iconoclast, though, so millions of people out there force themselves to believe that a Republican who bombs Muslims and cuts taxes for the mega wealthy is actually a maverick who's fighting the establishment.
He's a Hollywood turncoat. Reagan’s schtick was that he used to be a Democrat (even though he acted like a Republican in the '50s and thought Eisenhower was a dangerous leftist) so he knew how the Democrats worked from the inside and could now use those tricks for good.
 
I don't know, there's really not much difference between what Trump says and believes and any Republican politician of the last 20 years. His public image is that of an iconoclast, though, so millions of people out there force themselves to believe that a Republican who bombs Muslims and cuts taxes for the mega wealthy is actually a maverick who's fighting the establishment.
Which is why Republicans need a fresh grift every few years. People wisen up to it and then it’s time to repackage it. There is very little difference between Newt Gingrich’s 1994 Contract for America, Dick Armey’s Freedomworks of 2010, and Trump’s 2025 Big Bullshit Bill. Except each iteration is less competent than the last, it’s still the same rehashed bullshit people get tired of after a couple years.
 
This is what confuses me. If there was any time to go after his own base for being stupid, it would have been then, not now. Trump really could have leaned into "My admin created the Covid Vaccine while the Democrats all cried and shit themselves." Instead he gave into the "jab is evil" narrative when he was the one who fucking ordered it to be created. It was such an easy win, one the democrats would have had no counter for and something legitimately impressive historically that he could have used to show American Power.
The vaccine was created in spite of Trump, not because of him. Moderna was already in the process of developing it. Actually, he was urged to support it because he could call it "The Trump Vaccine." Remember the dumb comment he made about injecting disinfectant instead? Pence led that task force and Trump never attended the meetings. He also thumbed his nose at social distancing and wearing masks.

I shudder to think how much worse it would have been if he had the current crew of incompetent ass-kissers in his administration back then.
 
Back