Trump 2016

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
SlayerOfTyranny said:
I want to like Ted Cruz but he is presently a bit suspect to me.

He has some suspicious ties and associations of which I do not approve.

Also I don't get why you are saying Ted Cruz is more anti-intervention in Syria than Donald is.They both seem to be on the same page on it rather the one being superior to the other.

Another thing that should be said about Ted Cruz is that to me he just doesn't have the type of ferocious charisma and sway that Donald has.He might make for a a good Texas Senator but as the president of the United States going up against the current state of the world today I just don't believe in him to have the kind of influence that is necessary.

It isn't just about the ideas of the person you have to consider their power of personality as well.

If there is anyone that has a chance to fight the establishment he would be it.I've never seen anything like it before in fact ever with any other person that I can think of.

There have been other people who have had great thoughts and ideas but they were never ever able to achieve mainstream popularity and recognition.They were always on the fringe and never taken seriously.Such as Ron Paul.They were just a big joke no matter how intelligent and correct they might be.They just couldn't capture the hearts and minds of the people which is just as important as having good ideas.

Something else is that Donald Trump is actually the influence for alot of what Ted Cruz is at this point.If Donald had never existed then Ted Cruz would be not have evolved in the way that he has.In a way he's been kind of like a political mentor for Ted.So there is also that.

Alot of the things that have become big issues like Syrian refugees and Mexican immigration are big issues because of Donald Trump bringing them up and making them one.

As things stand now Donald is a much much better option than Ted Cruz.



Maybe he is not perfect but really can you that any of the other candidates are any better at all?

Who is more selfless then and why?

In terms of what he is advocating he is the most people oriented candidate since everything he is promoting are all about empowering America and Americans.

Maybe you might make the argument that it's a whole lot of bluster that won't be put into motion once he's actually in office.And it's just a bunch of talk.

But you know what?That's been every other president we've had for over a decade along with everyone else who's currently running so if anything we have much to gain and nothing to lose.At best he just won't deliver.But it's hard for me to see him actually damaging the country.Certainly no worse than Hilary or Jeb would do.

And above and beyond you must realize the simple fact that such a mainstream and popular person is bringing the narrative that he is bringing to the public is huge.The mere fact that he is bringing this kind of thinking and consciousness to the American people alone makes him 100% worthwhile in my mind.Even if he doesn't get elected or doesn't deliver.



I still need to do alot more research on Trump in terms of his history and background and the totality of his past since that is something I do not have intimate knowledge of just surface level understanding.

But currently I am judging him based on his current behavior and more importantly what ideas and strategies he is presenting.

And all of them are pro American and anti establishment.

They are all things which would empower America and empower Americans.

That instead of the current crippling and destruction of it that you are currently witnessing.

Preserving America is important because traditional America represents so many great things.

You must understand why America is important and why it was created in the first place.

America is not just a country.It is an idea and a set of principles.

America was originally created as a response to tyranny and evil.It was created to protect the people from the monsters who always exist who seek to subjugate and control their fellow man.

The constitution and the bill of rights aren't just some archaic relics of the 18th century.They are a safe guard against the tyranny of evil men.That is why they were created.

They applied to protection from government corruption and human abuse of power then and they still apply now.

That by the way is what the establishment is at at this point.They are like the corrupted king of england back in the american revolutionary war.

America is the david to their goliath.

This is about anti assimilation to global power.

That is why America must be preserved and restored to strength.It must be revitalized.

Everything Donald Trump is proposing and promoting are in line with that purpose.

Have you not even noticed just how much the establishment hates him?Including almost all of the republican party?

The people like Donald Trump.The establishment and those in power do not.They hate him with an intense passion.That should tell you something.

He is wreaking havoc upon their agenda.



Is it wrong to dislike corruption and evil?

Do you really feel that the US government or the candidates you favor actually have your best interests at heart?

I'm sure we can both agree that a corrupt ruler is bad and should be removed from the power.

So the question then becomes are the "powers that be" corrupt or not?

Since you don't seem to think they are I'd be curious as to why you don't think so.



It's kind of silly that Trump is actually supposed to be a demon yet Hilary Clinton is some sort of angel.

If the government was not corrupted then Hilary would be facing legal action and criminal prosecution.

But of course she does not because she is after all the "powers that be".

She is just another human being like you and I so why should one human be elevated above others?If we did the same things we'd be in jail.

Lets not forget about all the sins of Bill Clinton yet he has never been prosecuted or gone to jail despite lying under oath to the whole American population while undertaking the highest responsibility of the united states-being the president.

Progressives and liberals love Hilary and Bill.So how come they won't call them out on their abuse and exploitation of women?

Hilary is the champion of equality right?

Is that why she has a net worth of $31.5 million dollars?

This is where progressivism gets cracked wide open.

They constantly rant about "equality" but their hypocrisy shows that they are for anything but true equality.

Progressivism has nothing to do with real equality at all.

It is literally the wolf in sheeps clothing.
Click to expand...

Do you get paid by the word? If not try to tl:dr at the end because id rather not read your tumblr posts.
 
KingGeedorah said:
I mean look at that face. She's up to something. Maybe hiding a bomb under the head wrap?
Click to expand...

No, I'm not thinking that. Maybe she was disrupting the event? I don't really care, all I can say is that I guarantee that this will turn into a story about a STRONG INDEPENDENT ISLAMIC WOMYN HERO WHO WAS SHUT DOWN BY THE PATRIARCHY AND ISLAMOPHOBIC AND RACIST TRUMP REGIME.
 
Do you get paid by the word? If not try to tl:dr at the end because id rather not read your tumblr posts.
Click to expand...

Short version:

How can you possibly not see the obvious corruption in our current government and officials and want to do something about it?

I mean look at that face. She's up to something. Maybe hiding a bomb under the head wrap?
Click to expand...

So what are your thoughts on Syrian refugees raping people?

Or creating a 100+ body count in mass shootings?

Would you also like it if a group of violent thugs moved in next door to you and started a meth lab?

What if all your neighbors called you "thugophobic" for rejecting the government creating a welfare house for a meth lab next to where you and your family live,paid for with your tax dollars from your hard work?
 
SlayerOfTyranny said:
So what are your thoughts on Syrian refugees raping people?

Or creating a 100+ body count in mass shootings?

Would you also like it if a group of violent thugs moved in next door to you and started a meth lab?

What if all your neighbors called you "thugophobic" for rejecting the government creating a welfare house for a meth lab next to where you and your family live,paid for with your tax dollars from your hard work?
Click to expand...

Lololol faggot I live in a dangerous area already. Gangs scare me more then Muslims because they personally affected my life. So no I don't agree with your shitty xenophobic view. Go shill somewhere else.
 
Lololol faggot I live in a dangerous area already. Gangs scare me more then Muslims because they personally affected my life. So no I don't agree with your shitty xenophobic view. Go shill somewhere else.
Click to expand...

So because you already live in a shitty place we should make everywhere a shitty place?

There is nothing wrong with wanting to preserve America and it's culture.

We already have one middle east after all.So why do we need a second one?

Germany already accepted 1 million refugees mostly young males in 2015 alone.

Why should America do the same?

And why should any nation be obligated to accept them?

Why can't young male refugees fight for their own country and make it good instead of come to others and destroy them?

They have already been causing substantial problems in every country that has accepted them.

Should I have to deal with a large group of muslim males loitering on the street corner catcalling my female family members and trying to grope them and possibly rape them because you live in a dangerous area?

Am I a "faggot" for not wanting that?

That's a serious question although you aren't obligated to give a serious answer.
 
Last edited:
SlayerOfTyranny said:
So because you already live in a shitty place we should make everywhere a shitty place?

There is nothing wrong with wanting to preserve America and it's culture.

We already have one middle east after all.So why do we need a second one?

Germany already accepted 1 million refugees mostly young males in 2015 alone.

Why should America do the same?

And why should any nation be obligated to accept them?

Why can't young male refugees fight for their own country and make it good instead of come to others and destroy them?

They have already been causing substantial problems in every country that has accepted them.

Should I have to deal with a large group of muslim males loitering on the street corner catcalling my female family members and trying to grope them and possibly rape them because you live in a dangerous area?

Am I a "faggot" for not wanting that?

That's a serious question although you aren't obligated to give a serious answer.
Click to expand...

" Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore"

Either embody American ideals or go fuck your xenophobic self.
 
KingGeedorah said:
" Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore"

Either embody American ideals or go fuck your xenophobic self.
Click to expand...
Easy on the insults.
 
SlayerOfTyranny said:
And why should any nation be obligated to accept them?
Click to expand...
Ok, so, let's say this is WWII, and a group of Jews are at your borders. Either you let them in, or they go to the ovens. You have to let them in.

There are various international agreements that formalize the rules concerning refugees.
SlayerOfTyranny said:
Why can't young male refugees fight for their own country and make it good instead of come to others and destroy them?
Click to expand...
Classing them as refugees is making the claim that that's impossible.
 
Marvin said:
Ok, so, let's say this is WWII, and a group of Jews are at your borders. Either you let them in, or they go to the ovens. You have to let them in.

There are various international agreements that formalize the rules concerning refugees.

Classing them as refugees is making the claim that that's impossible.
Click to expand...
No,they are not being roasted, unlike the yazidis and Christians that are being sold as sex slaves or outright killed.
 
AN/ALR-56 said:
No,they are not being roasted, unlike the yazidis and Christians that are being sold as sex slaves or outright killed.
Click to expand...
ISIS seems pretty OK with butchering other muslims who don't follow their specific teaching (like shiites, I believe) along with the non-muslims you mention.

Some people say that a large quantity of Syrian "refugees" are actually economic migrants, taking advantage of the chaos to improve their lives. While I can't blame them, western governments need to show some backbone and do their homework on which immigrants are merely opportunists, compared to the ones who are actually in some danger.
 
Marvin said:
ISIS seems pretty OK with butchering other muslims who don't follow their specific teaching (like shiites, I believe) along with the non-muslims you mention.

Some people say that a large quantity of Syrian "refugees" are actually economic migrants, taking advantage of the chaos to improve their lives. While I can't blame them, western governments need to show some backbone and do their homework on which immigrants are merely opportunists, compared to the ones who are actually in some danger.
Click to expand...

Most of the Syrian refugees aren't even Syrian refugees, 4 out of 5 are from other nearby countries. Anyhow, the majority of the people leaving Syria either lived in central Syria where ISIS rapidly expanded and destroyed their cities OR they're fighting age males who're leaving their countries because they're forced to enlist in the SAA (Syrian Arab Army) and fight against ISIS and hundreds of no-name rebels who all want their slice of the pie. Anyone actually leaving Syria isn't merely an economic migrant, there's virtually no safe place in Syria at the moment with rebel groups running around in every single corner in Syria. The safest place in Syria is considered Central Damascus, and even then just a few days ago the city was being shelled from rebels. I think what officials have to do is differentiate those who're actually Syrians and others who're pretending.
 
Marvin said:
Some people say that a large quantity of Syrian "refugees" are actually economic migrants, taking advantage of the chaos to improve their lives. While I can't blame them, western governments need to show some backbone and do their homework on which immigrants are merely opportunists, compared to the ones who are actually in some danger.
Click to expand...

The United States has a fairly dreadful but effective policy that makes asylum seekers unlikely to be a source of great civil unrest here, which is that we lock them up in prison while their applications are being processed, for however long that might take. While that probably falls rather short of our obligations under our refugee-related treaties, we don't have rape gangs roaming our streets.

Not that detaining them is, itself, necessarily a violation of their rights if done solely for security purposes, but that they are often housed in actual prisons along with violent inmates, or in refugee facilities that are in atrocious conditions.

The fact is that many people displaced in war situations are themselves terrible people unfit for even a shitty society, much less a civilized one, and simply unleashing them on the public willy nilly is going to lead to obvious disaster. For instance, the U.S. itself screens people from such countries to make sure they are not, themselves, personally responsible for the atrocities they claim to be trying to escape.
 
We have a new round of results, boys:
Iowa
1. Trump - 34
2. Cruz - 28
3. Carson - 9%
Source: OANN, Gravis Marketing
Not listing the rest because they are leuuuusers!

At this point, I'm going to retract my previous predictions (#851) since many things have shifted as of recently. It looks like Hillary is slipping away, so Sanders certainly has the spotlight at this point. At this point, it comes down to how well Sanders can appeal to more audiences, and to how well Trump can maintain his fire. The major issue with Sanders, of course, is that he is bound by his donors (mainly labor unions), so he cannot afford a balls-to-the-wall style like Trump. I can foresee a Sanders victory, but ONLY if Sanders is very patient, knows how to counter Trump's debate style effectively, and can keep a steady fire going. That said, Sanders better jump up his "energy level" or he'll never catch up to the Trump Train.
 
Of course Hillary is slipping away.

She's going to "the bathroom" for 40 minutes when she's supposed to be on television.

I dunno whats gonna be more fun, watching Trump simply win his nomination, or watching Bernie take away the precious nomination from the Hildabeast.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom