UK Trolls will be jailed for ‘psychological harm’

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Trolls will be jailed for ‘psychological harm’​

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/5cdadf7c-3a85-11ec-9bef-aa3112940013 (https://archive.ph/Ed6l2)

Trolls could face two years in prison for sending messages or posting content that causes psychological harm under legislation targeting online hate.

Ministers will overhaul communication laws by creating new offences in the forthcoming Online Safety Bill, the flagship legislation to combat abuse and hatred on the internet.

The Department for Culture, Media & Sport has accepted recommendations from the Law Commission for crimes to be based on “likely psychological harm”.

The proposed law change will shift the focus on to the “harmful effect” of a message rather than if it contains “indecent” or “grossly offensive” content, which is the present basis for assessing its criminality.

A new offence of “threatening communications” will target messages and social media posts that contain threats of serious harm. It would be an offence where somebody intends a victim to fear the threat will be carried out.

A “knowingly false communication” offence will be created that will criminalise those who send or post a message they know to be false with the intention to cause “emotional, psychological, or physical harm to the likely audience”. Government sources gave the example of antivaxers spreading false information that they know to be untrue.

The new offences will include sol-called “pile-ons” where a number of individuals join others in sending harassing messages to a victim on social media.

The Times was told that the plans had been sent to cabinet for approval. Nadine Dorries, the culture secretary, is intending to add them to the bill when it is introduced to parliament next month, government sources said.

The move is likely to be met with resistance from freedom of speech campaigners and civil libertarians.

David Davis, a former cabinet minister, said assessing based on the impact it has on the receiver was too subjective and urged the government to rethink the proposals, especially given it has hailed the legislation as “world-leading”. Jim Killock, executive director of the Open Rights Group, said the new harm-based offences were too broad.

A government spokesman said: “We are making our laws fit for the digital age. Our comprehensive Online Safety Bill will make tech companies responsible for people’s safety and we are carefully considering the Law Commission’s recommendations on strengthening criminal offences.”

Tool tackles online abuse
Players are being urged by the Football Association to use new social media tools to shield themselves from online abuse — particularly if they make on-field errors (Ross Kaniuk writes).

Any player — or member of the public — who experiences or expects abuse on Instagram can use a new feature called Limits. It allows users to still receive comments and messages from long-standing followers but can limit contact from new followers and anonymous trolls.

Another feature, Hidden Words, can censor certain words from appearing under posts. The tools are being launched in the wake of racist abuse aimed at England stars such as Bukayo Saka after the Euros.
 
Europe is so progressive for locking up people for speech. Not terrorism, not acid attacks, no. Speech. That’s the real crime. What could possibly go wrong?
 
Footballers are soft like charmin.

Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha
 
I made a joke in a previous thread about setting up a business to send Britlander's messages for them as an American. The more they do this shit, the more I think it would work.
 
My heart goes out to @Judge Holden and all the other british kiwis. Its only a matter of time before the rest of the kiwis in the world suffer the same fate.
1635763706466.png
 
The new offences will include sol-called “pile-ons” where a number of individuals join others in sending harassing messages to a victim on social media.

Twitter users on suicide watch
 
A “knowingly false communication” offence will be created that will criminalise those who send or post a message they know to be false with the intention to cause “emotional, psychological, or physical harm to the likely audience”. Government sources gave the example of antivaxers spreading false information that they know to be untrue.

Like having to have 2 jabs is a conspiracy theory, or that the jabbed will need a booster in 6 months? That those boosters will be boosters for life? Those kinds of false information?

I hope this cuts both ways tbh. Because Reddit, for example, is a cesspit of false information, with the intent of causing emotional and psychological harm - If you don't agree with the hivemind, which often talks shit, you are bullied ostracised and picked on for being [insert slur]
 
The police cant even stop people from flytipping and smoking weed openly in the streets and the prisons are operating near full capacity.
 

Love how deliberately vague "psychological harm" is. That's going to be a massive incentive for people to continue going down the victim-route and unburden themselves from anything resembling resilience.

This will create a generation that will somehow be even bigger faggots than Gen Z, whilst also creating exactly the right breeding-ground for a legitimately extreme-right / fascist resistance against it.

Enjoy watching society crumble, I guess.
 
The police cant even stop people from flytipping and smoking weed openly in the streets and the prisons are operating near full capacity.
This law provides abundant low hanging fruit for the police, that can be framed in statistics as resolved hate crimes and prevention of terrorism while actual tangible crimes, that require effort to solve, remain on the books as open cases, if they are even addressed at all.

The subjective nature of this legislation lends itself naturally to all manner of abuses. You could claim to be a British police officer who has been traumatised by the disparaging content in this post and I would potentially be on the hook legally.

One bright light is that the law opens up UK-residents like Vordrak (who throw around baseless accusations of paedophilia like gold leaf confetti at a New Jersey mob wedding) to criminal charges.
 
Could this law not be used against troons when they post their gross shit online? I'm sure someone could make a case for 'psychological harm' with some of the shit they post. They constantly post rape shit when women refuse to touch their shenises.
 
Could this law not be used against troons when they post their gross shit online? I'm sure someone could make a case for 'psychological harm' with some of the shit they post. They constantly post rape shit when women refuse to touch their shenises.

what about fake accounts on some forums that could by "happestance" "accidentally"result in doxing ? if you know personal info you can make tranny appear to be waicist and then just let them fight you do this enough and shit suddenly gets lot harder and no longer easy job to pad the stats meaning it pushes back against that law.
 
Back
Top Bottom