“Tree equity”: Ottawa wants race-based tree planting - Canada's most treed urban city is looking for solutions to a problem that has taken root: tree racism

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link

“Tree equity”: Ottawa wants race-based tree planting​

By
Cosmin Dzsurdzsa, True North Wire

June 20, 2024


The City of Ottawa hopes to dictate which neighbourhoods deserve more trees based on race and other identity factors, ensuring that even the urban forest canopy aligns with its diversity, equity, and inclusion priorities.

A report by Ottawa’s climate change and forestry officials is headed to City Council on Jun. 26. The report calls on the city to undertake a “tree equity analysis” across all urban areas to govern Ottawa’s tree planting strategy.

“The distribution of urban tree canopy is frequently associated with socio-economic factors, with lower canopy cover neighbourhoods often having a strong representation of equity-deserving communities,” the report reads.

“The City requires a methodology to identify areas of tree inequity and to prioritize tree planting in areas of the city that need it the most.”

The proposed methodology is called a “Tree Equity Score” and was established by the U.S. non-profit American Forests.

“The Tree Equity Score method uses tree canopy cover data in conjunction with socio-economic and health measures of inequity. This approach produces a score that will identify neighbourhood-level gaps in the urban forest,” the report reads.

The identity factors that the score takes into account are race, age, language, employment, health and income, among other things.

“Neighbourhoods with lower Tree Equity Scores will be priority areas for tree planting. The lower Tree Equity Score for these areas indicates a need for increased tree planting to provide urban forest services and benefits,” the report reads.

While the report asserts that neighbourhoods won’t be denied access to tree planting initiatives the “Tree Equity Score” will “guide the prioritization of tree planting and the development of neighbourhood-specific planting plans and programs, helping to ensure trees are planted where they are needed the most.”

Other proposed scoring mechanisms include one proposed by Nature Canada that maps “the relationship between tree cover and income, as well as tree cover and proportion (of) racialized populations.”

Meanwhile, the “Nature Score” was also floated which is based on public health measures.

If the proposal is approved by council, the resulting analysis will be used to determine priority areas for future tree planting.
 
So DIE... with trees. This is just retarded. If you want to plant trees, do so. All this is doing is unneeded bureaucracy. Which is DIE and BRIDGE has always been all about.
 
I don't really have a problem with planting more trees in areas that have a poorer canopy. Increasing tree canopy helps save utility costs for everyone and keeps things more comfortable year round.

Just don't make it sound like justice for some ludicrous plot to deny trees to black people or whatever.

It also needs to make sense, don't plant a bunch of trees in a bad spot so they die or come in stunted and look like shit. Some of these areas are pretty polluted in cities, especially the eastern US and Canada.
 
Surprisingly, I am not really opposed to this as it might make the ghetto slightly better.
The blackest area of the city has some of the most tree cover. The city is the most treed city in Canada. China Town and downtown lacking, sure, but the Neighbor Neighborhood is dense with trees.
 
Sometimes I wonder how people come up with this bullshit. Genuinely, where does this fucking nonsense come from?
 
The City of Ottawa hopes to dictate which neighbourhoods deserve more trees based on race and other identity factors, ensuring that even the urban forest canopy aligns with its diversity, equity, and inclusion priorities.
The city didn't bother to look up the fact this kind of thing is prohibited by federal law then I take it. Not that it'll be enforced and whoever complains won't get accused of being racist and prosecuted instead but thats not the point
 
Sometimes I wonder how people come up with this bullshit. Genuinely, where does this fucking nonsense come from?
In want of a job existing where the prerequisite is your skin colour/queerness and while also being for the ever expanding of the government, demand the creation of a department that's existance and creation is racist to even question. That's called job security, friend.
 
This here is a proud Maple tree forest and I'll have to be turned to toilet paper before I let my saplings bring any of those goddamn Spruce Niggers (spriggers as I like to call'em) around these parts. Before you know it those prickly all season bastards will suck away our sap and ruin our long rooted heritage.
 
For those who need a quick explanation of why the term "Equality" has been completely replaced with the term "Equity" in the Kike-co-opted States of the nigger'd west...
 
"Tree equity"? Oh no, that goddamn Loch Ness monster has gone woke!

Seriously though, this is some of the dumbest shit I've ever heard and I can't wait to see how bad it gets fucked up.
 
Counter argument:
A landmark report conducted by University of Michigan environmental sociologist Dorceta Taylor in 2014 warned of the “arrogance” of white environmentalists when they introduce green initiatives to black and brown communities.
“In this case, the women felt that [after the race rebellion] the city just came in and cut down their trees, and now they want to just come in planting trees,” said Carmichael. “But they felt they should have a choice in this since they’ll be the ones caring for the trees and raking up the leaves when the planters leave. They felt that the decisions regarding whether to cut down trees or plant new ones were being made by someone else, and they were going to have to deal with the consequences.”
No matter what, someone's gonna cry an 'ism
 
"So, waddaya in for?"

"Planted one sugar maple too many, how about you?"

"Douglas Firs"

"Ouch, man. How long?"

"Life"
 
Last edited:
"We need to plant more trees to save the world from climate change!"
"Oh wait, we need to make sure we plant the trees in an equitable way."
I don't get it.
 
Back
Top Bottom