💬 Off-Topic Transgender Legislation and Litigation

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
He's put himself where he's put himself and I've never been one to feel bad for people like that.

McBride has obvious mental issues and should never have been allowed into a position where he has any sort of influence over peoples lives in the first place.

Him making out he's "reasonable" is just repeating exactly the routine that allowed troons to infest society and institutions in the first place.
 
He's put himself where he's put himself and I've never been one to feel bad for people like that.

McBride has obvious mental issues and should never have been allowed into a position where he has any sort of influence over peoples lives in the first place.

Him making out he's "reasonable" is just repeating exactly the routine that allowed troons to infest society and institutions in the first place.
Wasn't McBride the one who was responsible for getting their ideas into Obama and Biden's ears?
 
Wasn't McBride the one who was responsible for getting their ideas into Obama and Biden's ears?
Yeah, he’s known Biden (or people who are close to Biden) since he was a teen. Biden wrote a forward to his autobiography.

I’ll have to go find the pages in his book that corroborate this, but I’m like 99% sure he got his vaginoplasty surgery while his pooner wife was doing chemo (RIP)

ETA:

Here is an excerpt from Biden’s forward to McBride’s book:

IMG_4252.webp IMG_4253.webp

And here are some bits about him getting his dick chopped off while his partner was recovering from oral cancer:

IMG_4249.webp IMG_4250.webp IMG_4251.webp
Totally off topic from what was being discussed, but I think it’s so disgusting that he went and got his dick chop while his partner was still recovering. His partner had to get his tongue partially amputated!!! Recovery from that is so, so rough.
 
Last edited:
"What they are doing" is ensuring adequate compliance with the directives of congress in Title IX and preventing mentally ill men like Alex from cosplaying in sex segregated spaces that only belong to biological women.

Screenshot 2025-08-12 143642.webp

Screenshot 2025-08-12 143717.webp
 
bizarre and obviously false idea that it is IMPOSSIBLE for a troon to use the bathroom unless it is the specific bathroom that aligns with their mental illness and cosplay
Listen man, I'll have you know I accidentally used a women's bathroom once and halfway through my business I realized where I was and the pee went right back up into my body. It's more common than you think
 
Tim was close to Beau Biden- that was his in. Knowing Joe, after losing Beau, any connection to his dead son in that addled brain was treated as precious beyond measure.

Do NOT feel pity for Tim McBride- that guy is a wannabe political animal, the kind who decides in junior high that he wants to be senator/governor/president and calibrates every aspect of his life into achieving said goal. If he hasn’t been a troon in this very particular period of history, he would’ve found another hook to garner attention and power. He’s a real Tracy Flick.
 
The loudest voices in the room have been those of troons for way too many years now and, if there's a "win" then other potential detransitioners will feel emboldened to follow on I'm sure.

As they are purveyors of nothing more than unscientific malpractice, I can see a time where insurance policies will become astronomical for the butchers who perform these surgeries.
 
The loudest voices in the room have been those of troons for way too many years now and, if there's a "win" then other potential detransitioners will feel emboldened to follow on I'm sure.

Not to mention the grifters who hopped on the transgender bandwagon for the gibs switching to the other side because there's an opportunity to sue the pants off people.
 
The loudest voices in the room have been those of troons for way too many years now and, if there's a "win" then other potential detransitioners will feel emboldened to follow on I'm sure.

As they are purveyors of nothing more than unscientific malpractice, I can see a time where insurance policies will become astronomical for the butchers who perform these surgeries.
So, the very first detransitioner lawsuit win will start to snowball everything? May they win their lawsuits then.
 
So, the very first detransitioner lawsuit win will start to snowball everything? May they win their lawsuits then.
Well it has to start somewhere and maybe a win will give others the courage to speak up over the screeching and bullying that seems to happen whenever someone tries to leave the cult.

Fighting together is far less disconcerting than fighting by yourself.
 
UK’s first transgender judge seeks rehearing of supreme court case on biological sex (The Guardian)

1755509377789.webp

The Guardian isn't firewalled but here is the full text:
The UK’s first transgender judge has launched a case against the UK in the European court of human rights challenging the process that led to the supreme court’s ruling on biological sex.

The retired judge Victoria McCloud, who is now a litigation strategist at W-Legal, is seeking a rehearing of the case, arguing that the supreme court undermined her article 6 rights to a fair trial when it refused to hear representation from her and did not hear evidence from any other trans individuals or groups.

The move comes as For Women Scotland, the gender-critical campaign group that brought the supreme court case, announced it was suing the Scottish government, accusing it of refusing to abide by April’s judgment, in particular around schools and prison policy.

The UK supreme court ruled in April that the legal definition of a woman in the Equality Act 2010 did not include transgender women who hold gender recognition certificates (GRCs). Subsequent guidance from the equality watchdog amounted to a blanket ban on trans people using toilets and other services of the gender they identify as.

Last year, McCloud sought leave to join the litigation in the supreme court case brought by For Women Scotland against the Scottish government, arguing it could significantly affect legal protections for transgender women with GRCs, but the application was rejected.

The court took interventions from a number of gender-critical groups including Sex Matters and a group of three campaigning organisations comprising LGB Alliance, The Lesbian Project and Scottish Lesbians.

McCloud, who is supported by Trans Legal Clinic and W-Legal, said the application was brought under articles 6, 8 and 14 of the European convention on human rights, “essentially the rights to respect for who I am, my family, my human existence, my right to a fair trial in matters determining my own freedoms and obligations without discrimination.

“No representation or evidence had been included from us in the 8,500 group [the estimated UK population of people with GRCs who are diagnosed as transsexual]. I was refused. The court gave no reasoning.

“The court reversed my and 8,500 other people’s sex for the whole of equality law … We are now two sexes at once. We are told we must use dangerous spaces such as male changing rooms and loos when we have female anatomy. If we are raped we must go to male rape crisis. We are searched by male police, to ‘protect’ female police from, I assume, our female anatomy.”

April’s ruling has wide-ranging implications for service providers, public bodies and businesses, with most awaiting an updated code of practice for public bodies from the equalities watchdog, the Equality and Human Rights Commission. This has attracted criticism from leading charities and services providers over the brevity of its consultation period.

Elsewhere, For Women Scotland and Sex Matters have criticised the Scottish government for failing to implement the supreme court ruling swiftly enough, citing “extraordinary pushback” against the judgment.

The Scottish government has repeatedly stated it is awaiting the updated EHRC code, but the Sunday Times reported that For Women Scotland had applied to the court of session for permission to proceed with an action that, if successful, would quash schools guidance that states trans pupils can use toilet and changing facilities that align with their lived gender, and prisons policy that continues to allow some trans women to be housed in the female estate, based on risk assessment.

According to sources with knowledge of the process, the revised code is expected to be delivered to the equalities minister, Bridget Phillipson, this week. After she has approved it, the new code will be laid before parliament for 40 days, as happens with all statutory instruments, during which time MPs or peers may pass a motion to prevent it from having legal effect, although in practice such intervention happens rarely.

Earlier this month the EHRC chief executive, John Kirkpatrick, took the unusual step of posting a blog in response to critical media reports, rejecting allegations that the commission was dragging its feet and defending the use of AI to assess consultation responses.

“Our use of supervised AI technology alongside expert legal analysis is a responsible and widely used approach that ensures we can give proper consideration to all responses while delivering the guidance that public bodies urgently need,” he said.

I'm no legal eagle but this sounds like a LOLsuit to me. How was this goon ever allowed to be a judge?

(Love the snotty highlights though)
 
There was no need to hear his "evidence", or indeed anything from the alphabet mafia.

It'd just be the same tired rhetoric -

  • trans women are women
  • trans people aren't rapists
  • trans women have been in history forever
  • we aren't trying to groom kids
  • trans rights are human rights
  • there'll be mass suicides if the rest of humanity aren't kind.

It was all bullshit the first time we heard it and it'll still be bullshit the last time we hear it.

The For Women Scotland case confirmed biological reality and I can't see how any court is going to be able unconfirm reality, so this is just a publicity stunt from a washed up freak whose insanity should have excluded him from any position of authority in the first place.
 
trans people aren't rapists
They can point to Isla Bryson to refute that point.
we aren't trying to groom kids
They can point to all the schools advice about gender and sexuality.
there'll be mass suicides if the rest of humanity aren't kind.
At this point with the amount of humans; is that really a bad thing? They'd be screwed when people start thinking that preventing suicides might be a bad thing rather something that is a morally good thing to do. Can't suicide bait when people think it's a net good for society. Really, where were all these mass suicides if they have historically been around for forever?
 
Some troon sued the NCAA to try and get back on the girls team.

The claim states the NCAA is not a governmental organization and doesn’t have jurisdiction over Pennsylvania state law or Title IX.

Troon NCAA Lawsuit

Transgender runner Evie Parts sues NCAA and Swarthmore College for removal from track team

Your first link is borked.

Also, he's not trying to get back on the team. He was already "reinstated" and was allowed to keep up the charade on the women's team until he graduated. What he wants now is gibs. And that sentence, "it’s not a governmental organization and therefore does not have jurisdiction over Pennsylvania state law or the Title IX federal statute" makes no fucking sense, fucking hell journalists are truly the scum of the earth.
 
This should be amusing.

5 Virginia school districts stand firm against federal transgender bathroom policy demands

Prince William County Schools, Fairfax County Public Schools, Alexandria City Public Schools, Arlington Public Schools and Loudoun County Public Schools are all opting to keep their current bathroom policies.

This means students can choose to use the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity.


Ultimately, the school districts cited differing interpretations of the Department of Education’s requirements and current state law. The Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights asserts that letting students use bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond with their gender identity instead of their biological gender violates Title IX.

The backstory:

Several years ago, a Virginia-based federal appeals court ruled transgender students can use restrooms consistent with their gender identity.

But this past January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that essentially called on the Department of Education to block federal funds to schools that support students who identify as transgender.

Days later, a conservative group filed a complaint with the Department of Education against five Northern Virginia school districts over their bathroom policies.

In late July, the DOE came back and said its investigation found the following districts are in fact in violation of Title IX: Alexandria City Public Schools, Arlington Public Schools, Fairfax Public schools, Prince William County Public Schools and Loudoun County Public Schools.

The DOE said specifically its Office for Civil Rights "determined that the Divisions’ policies, which allow students to access intimate, sex-segregated facilities based on the students’ subjective ‘gender identity,’ violate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972."

The DOE announced if the school districts don't reverse their policies by August 15, they "risk imminent enforcement action including referral to the U.S. Department of Justice."

Prince William County's bathroom policy​

What we know:

The OCR's proposed resolution, according to PWCS, would force the school division to violate an existing Virginia law, and they are now seeking further dialogue with federal officials to find a resolution.

The central issue, however, revolves around the OCR's proposed resolution, which PWCS believes would force it to violate an existing Virginia law regarding the treatment of transgender and gender-non-conforming students and their access to school facilities. PWCS’s stance is informed by the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board.

The Office of Civil Rights' (OCR) proposed resolution would require Prince William County Public Schools (PWCS) and other Northern Virginia school districts to take the following actions:

Rescind Policies: The districts would need to rescind policies and regulations that allow students to access intimate facilities, such as restrooms and locker rooms, based on their "gender identity" rather than their sex.

Separation by Sex: The OCR's resolution would require that any future policies related to facility access must separate students "strictly on the basis of sex" to comply with Title IX.

Address Concerns: The investigation found that students in the divisions were avoiding using school restrooms because of the existing policies, and there were reports of inappropriate behavior by male students in female locker rooms.

The OCR's investigation, announced on July 25, concluded that five Northern Virginia school districts were in violation of Title IX. The OCR determined that the districts' policies, which allow students to access sex-segregated facilities based on "gender identity" rather than their sex, violate federal civil rights law.

According to a press release from the U.S. Department of Education, the proposed resolution agreement would require the districts to rescind these policies and ensure that any future policies related to access to intimate facilities must separate students strictly on the basis of sex. The department offered the districts 10 days to voluntarily agree to the changes or risk enforcement action, which could include a referral to the U.S. Department of Justice.

PWCS has requested further dialogue with the U.S. Department of Education to ensure that any resolution aligns with federal law and the needs of its student community. PWCS remains "open to working with OCR to find a path forward that honors both our legal obligations and our values as a school division."

Fairfax County Public School's bathroom policy​

FCPS issued the following statement Friday afternoon:

"Today, FCPS submitted a follow-up request to the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) outlining why our policy is consistent with controlling state and federal law. We have asked OCR to stop further action while this legal issue is clarified by the courts – the branch of government charged under our U.S. Constitution to interpret and state what the law is. While this case is pending, FCPS policies and regulations will stay aligned with Virginia law and the rulings of the federal Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. FCPS remains dedicated to creating a safe, supportive, and inclusive school environment for all students and staff members, including our transgender and gender-expansive community. Any student who has a need or desire for increased privacy, regardless of the underlying reason, shall continue to be provided with reasonable accommodations. We look forward to a strong start to our school year, resolute in our commitment to academic excellence and opportunity for each and every student in a safe and welcoming environment."
 
Back
Top Bottom