Trans community is being exploited for fundraising - Trannies are useful idiots

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

TRANS COMMUNITY IS BEING EXPLOITED FOR FUNDRAISING​

by Bobby Burack

The trans community is being exploited for a fundraising campaign.

Over the past decade, people who identify as transgender have slowly become the easiest people to make use of, replacing gay people and people of color.

It started with the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the most powerful gay rights lobby in the nation.

The HRC mainstreamed the trans movement about eight years ago. The frenzy has slowly crept further into American society, year after year.

The HRC formed in 1980 and gained wealth and influence after it pledged to help legalize same-sex marriage. Its budget continues to expand. It has received millions of dollars in donations from George Soros’ Open Society Foundation, making the lobby’s influence among politicians and corporations profound.

However, the lobby found itself in a predicament following the 2015 Supreme Court ruling Obergefell vs. Hodges, which forced all 50 states to recognize same-sex marriage.

While Hodges should have caused the HRC to celebrate, the ruling instead jeopardized the organization’s future.

“Once the HRC won on gay marriage, activists needed to use transgender rights as a new civil rights cause from which they could fundraise. After all, it’s a multi-billion dollar business,” Scarlett Johnson, a grassroots activist with Moms for Liberty-Wisconsin, tells OutKick.

Like any group in Washington, the HRC wasn’t about to close up shop and relinquish its influence. So instead, it developed a new mission to help it remain relevant: protecting so-called “trans rights.”

“We are at the frontlines fighting back against transphobia and pushing for pro-LGBTQ+ legislation that will ensure we have the same equal rights and protection as other protected classes,” the organization’s website says.

What rights do trans people lack? Unfortunately, the HRC never tells us. It just keeps insisting that trans-identifying people are somehow denied rights afforded to other Americans.

Trans-specific rights are not a real thing. There are no laws telling them they can’t get married or vote. There are no laws that limit their civil rights. Trans people have the same rights as everyone else.

In fact, the corporate media often labels anyone who dares to criticize a trans person as transphobic and then browbeats them into an apology. There is no group more “protected” than trans people.

Nonetheless, the HRC campaign pretending to save trans people from the bigoted bad guys continues to prove effective for one reason: bullying works.

Do you want to be a bigoted bad guy? Of course not. Washington and corporate America obviously don’t want to either.

Knowing that, the HRC developed a scoring system called the Corporate Equality Index, a lesser-known part of the “ethical investing” system called ESG, otherwise known as Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance. The group uses CEI as a weapon to bludgeon anyone who would dare challenge “trans rights” advocacy.

CEI scores specifically grade companies on their promotion of LGBTQIA+ people. In 2012, the HRC updated its index to score brands more aggressively regarding “partnerships and transgender inclusivity.”

CEI is how the HRC wields power over Wall Street. The top three investment firms in the country — BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street Bank — use CEI scores to help them distinguish the good brands from the bad, and thereby help them determine where to invest their money.

In April, the New York Post spoke to business insiders who detailed the power of CEI scores:

“American CEOs are more concerned about pleasing BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street Bank — who are among the top shareholders of most American publicly-traded corporations (including Nike, Anheuser-Busch and Kate Spade) — than they are about irritating conservatives, numerous sources told The Post.”

Translation: Put a trans person on your beer can if you want this investment.

That may have been the message that Anheuser-Busch received earlier this year when Dylan Mulvaney’s image magically appeared on a case of Bud Light.

But rather than reward the beer giant for its apparent loyalty to the transgender cause, the HRC responded by stripping Anheuser-Busch of its perfect 100 CEI score. Why? For not condemning critics of the Mulvaney partnership vociferously enough.

That’s right, Anheuser-Busch did not sufficiently castigate those who question why a man in a dress is worth celebrating. As a result, the beer brand may soon face consequences from BlackRock.

Dylan Mulvaney speaks at a HRC event.

HRC is the notorious LGBT lobby group behind the CEI score, pushing companies like BudLight and Target to promote transgenderism.

Dylan told the lobby group:

“Today we have organized the first ever HRC trans content creators summit in… pic.twitter.com/8ndYTpRyix
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) August 13, 2023

The HRC lobby demands fealty from its corporate subordinates. It asks companies to double down on gender ideology, like Target CEO Brian Cornell did when he defended the “tuck-friendly” swimwear marketed to little boys.

“When we think about purpose at Target, it’s really about helping all the families, and that ‘all’ word is really important,” Cornell said earlier this year.

Some may think what Cornell supported makes him some kind of a pervert. We don’t know the man. However, we can report that selling clothing to gender-confused kids helped Target maintain a 100 out of 100 CEI score.

Target got an A.

“HRC is pushing companies like Target and Bud Light to promote the LGBTQIA+ agenda. The HRC sponsors LGBTQ+ influencers in the same way Nike sponsors Michael Jordan. Mass-marketing on minors works as well on adults,” Scarlett Johnson adds.

And despite some setbacks, such as the remarkably successful Bud Light boycott, trans hysteria has momentum. In June, the HRC declared its first “state of emergency” for LGBT people living in the U.S. following a series of GOP-led bills to restrict children’s access to “care” which includes genital mutilation.

Democratic lawmakers responded accordingly by resurrecting the Equality Act, which would classify any restrictions on “gender-affirming care” as a violation of civil rights. Perhaps not so coincidentally, Democrats first tried to pass the measure back in 2015, the same year as the Obergefell ruling from SCOTUS.

The HRC’s recent declaration of a “state of emergency” regarding “trans rights” is obviously a farce. The lobby suggests the gay community is in more danger now than during the HIV epidemic, which killed more than 300,000 people in the United States between 1987 and 1998.

However, rights lobbyists have to create fear to increase their funding, just as politicians create crises to convince voters there’s a problem that only they can solve.

The dynamics of fear have always been at play. Yet unlike in the cases of gay marriage and racial equality, the elites pretending to support trans people are harming those they once vowed to protect.

1920x1080-02-728x409.jpg

The burdens women have endured in the name of transgenderism are obvious. Females no longer have their own sororities, bathrooms, sports teams, or state prisons. Their gender has been appropriated by men. Males now wear female identities like a mask.

Still, women aren’t the only ones harmed by HRC puppeteering. The incentive to normalize gender transition has also harmed the trans community.

Lying to people, and telling them that they can change their gender does not empower them. It damages them, both mentally and physically.

Lawmakers, billionaire influencers like George Soros, and the HRC don’t bear the consequences of normalizing gender ideology or downplaying the risks.

The members of the trans community suffering from confusion and depression do.

The “trans” people who later want to de-transition but realize they cannot undo permanent scars and chronic pain from genital mutilation will.

A child who can’t legally buy a pack of cigarettes but who can sever his penis certainly will.

The HRC helping enable children to access “gender-affirming care” and rewarding those who undergo transition doesn’t create happiness. It encourages gender dysphoria.

We can’t say for certain how the movement ends, but it’s hard to imagine how it could end well. The results thus far — and we still are only in the early stages — are eerie, if not insidious.

But the people in charge do not care. To them, a spike in suicide rates and the loss of female safe spaces is a small price to pay for power and fortune.

In fact, the only people benefiting from the trans movement are the people enabling it, the lobbyists, politicians, and corporate executives.

If you ever wondered why such institutions have recently begun to sell our nation the lie that gender is a choice and not a biological reality, now you know why.

Follow Bobby Burack on X.

Article | Archive
 
Trannies will never realize that their entire existence is solely devoted to perpetuate a monster of big pharma political machinations.
 
What happened to the HRC is what also happened to Mothers Against Drunk Driving. When they successfully decreased drunk driving deaths via an information campaign, many people left the org but the ones who stayed kept pushing for more extreme measures. The CEO of a few years ago openly told people she was an alcohol prohibitionist. The founder of MADD came out against the org.
IIRC, GreenPeace has something similar happen.
 
What happened to the HRC is what also happened to Mothers Against Drunk Driving. When they successfully decreased drunk driving deaths via an information campaign, many people left the org but the ones who stayed kept pushing for more extreme measures. The CEO of a few years ago openly told people she was an alcohol prohibitionist. The founder of MADD came out against the org.
IIRC, GreenPeace has something similar happen.
Jerry Pornelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy in effect:
Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy states that in any bureaucratic organization there will be two kinds of people":

First, there will be those who are devoted to the goals of the organization. Examples are dedicated classroom teachers in an educational bureaucracy, many of the engineers and launch technicians and scientists at NASA, even some agricultural scientists and advisors in the former Soviet Union collective farming administration.
Secondly, there will be those dedicated to the organization itself. Examples are many of the administrators in the education system, many professors of education, many teachers union officials, much of the NASA headquarters staff, etc.
The Iron Law states that in every case the second group will gain and keep control of the organization. It will write the rules, and control promotions within the organization.
 
Wait until they find out about being used to promote becoming forever customers of Bug Pharma.

Anyone who thinks a corporation promoting them cares about them is a legit retard
 
Democratic lawmakers responded accordingly by resurrecting the Equality Act, which would classify any restrictions on “gender-affirming care” as a violation of civil rights. Perhaps not so coincidentally, Democrats first tried to pass the measure back in 2015, the same year as the Obergefell ruling from SCOTUS.

This is what I warned everyone about a few months ago. The EA is no longer about abortion only, it's also going to be read as a blanket "right" for every single progressive cause and talking point. Starting with the "right" of children to medically/socially transition on demand. Which will also obviously include, being free from parents opinions or feelings on the matter. This is the hoped "get out of prison free" card for the child medical transition movement. No fighting, no proving, no defending, just everything they want without personal political risk. And it won't stop there since these people believe in positive rights. Including the "right" to learn about things like CRT and letter sex fetishes. explicit alt-sex education and god knows what else! With positive rights in play in fact, extending even to education subjects and specific nature, there is no limits.. yikes!
 
Last edited:
Ok, but WHY? Why troons?
There’s something deeper here. These are the tools used to achieve the goal but we don’t know what the goal is or why it’s pushed.
They could have used anything to score on - worker experience (lol what am I saying..) environmental stuff. Financial acumen.
WHY use something that’s at direct odds with making a profit ?
The things that are being pushed damage socoety and damage companies too. Yeah they make some companies a lot of money but not enough to make up for the overall damage. There’s some social agenda here
 
Ok, but WHY? Why troons?
There’s something deeper here. These are the tools used to achieve the goal but we don’t know what the goal is or why it’s pushed.
They could have used anything to score on - worker experience (lol what am I saying..) environmental stuff. Financial acumen.
WHY use something that’s at direct odds with making a profit ?
The things that are being pushed damage socoety and damage companies too. Yeah they make some companies a lot of money but not enough to make up for the overall damage. There’s some social agenda here
ESG money? Fuck if I know at this point, it's been a while since anything has made much sense.

I just miss when corpos were greedy monsters and we all knew it and didn't push "social change" and "environment awareness" into my face every waking second. I don't give a shit your fucking coffee is "ecofriendly" and I'm convinced some kids in Colombia are picking it and sorting it out for you anyway.
 
Ok, but WHY? Why troons?
There’s something deeper here. These are the tools used to achieve the goal but we don’t know what the goal is or why it’s pushed.
They could have used anything to score on - worker experience (lol what am I saying..) environmental stuff. Financial acumen.
WHY use something that’s at direct odds with making a profit ?
The things that are being pushed damage socoety and damage companies too. Yeah they make some companies a lot of money but not enough to make up for the overall damage. There’s some social agenda here
Money? But there's also the darker but more schizo theories. One of the tertiary goals of achieving 'trans rights' is giving children the ability to decide their gender. If a child is capable of deciding their gender I.E. a really big decision which follows them for the rest of their life - then what else are they capable of deciding? You could jump straight to the throat and argue sexual consent, but if a child becomes trans they essentially become active in the politico-sphere, and because they're active in politics why should they be deprived the right of choosing who leads them? Why shouldn't they get the right to vote? Like I side it's schizo and the simplest answer - money - is probably the reason why.

Edit: Forgot to add: Things don't need to make a profit anymore to make money, if that makes any sense. All that matters is the valuation on the market, which catering to troons helps with, somehow.
 
Ok, but WHY? Why troons?
There’s something deeper here. These are the tools used to achieve the goal but we don’t know what the goal is or why it’s pushed.
They could have used anything to score on - worker experience (lol what am I saying..) environmental stuff. Financial acumen.
WHY use something that’s at direct odds with making a profit ?
The things that are being pushed damage socoety and damage companies too. Yeah they make some companies a lot of money but not enough to make up for the overall damage. There’s some social agenda here
What's that word for someone who wants to destroy society and replace it where they can play god? 🤔
 
Ok, but WHY? Why troons?
There’s something deeper here. These are the tools used to achieve the goal but we don’t know what the goal is or why it’s pushed.
They could have used anything to score on - worker experience (lol what am I saying..) environmental stuff. Financial acumen.
WHY use something that’s at direct odds with making a profit ?
The things that are being pushed damage socoety and damage companies too. Yeah they make some companies a lot of money but not enough to make up for the overall damage. There’s some social agenda here
Several theories exist. There's the popular one about Baphomet being an actual deity worshipped by TPTB, which is why long before troon shit there were many Hollywood men forced to crossdress for various events and causes. Baphomet apparently is both sexes at the same time so crossdressing is seen as a form of worship to him or something. I don't know, I'm not a degenerate.

A similar vein is that Jews really like trooning because apparently there's an example of a sex change in the Torah? So they push it on white people like everything else they do, and it happens to have an easier time taking hold in America compared to the rest of the world because blacks have been trooning out in prison to help prison gays for decades.

The final answer is that it's an easy way to control the population, which is my personal belief because there's also a big push for people not to have kids because of climate change. If you sterilize yourself, that's 2 more people in the world that aren't going to have kids, you and your partner. Same reason homosexuality was pushed before it.
 
The article should have mentioned the likes of Martine Rothblatt, the Pritzkers, and Jon Stryker who all seem to be intent on creating synthetic sex identities so that the pharmaceutical industry has lifelong patients, with Rothblatt believing that changing one's sex is the first step to towards abandoning our bodies all together so that our consciousnesses can be preserved, allowing us to live forever.
 
Ok, but WHY? Why troons?
There’s something deeper here. These are the tools used to achieve the goal but we don’t know what the goal is or why it’s pushed.
They could have used anything to score on - worker experience (lol what am I saying..) environmental stuff. Financial acumen.
WHY use something that’s at direct odds with making a profit ?
The things that are being pushed damage socoety and damage companies too. Yeah they make some companies a lot of money but not enough to make up for the overall damage. There’s some social agenda here
My personal theory its a combination of things. Troons were the next big thing after gay marriage was legalized. I saw it start to happen and had a feeling they were gonna be the next big social cause. Fresh off the gay rights campaign troons used all the same talking points gays used. So the average progressive was easily swayed to their side. pharma corpos saw this happening and knew they could make money off it, troons are life long patients. This aligned with politicians as a way to get easy votes from the propagandized, and money from corpos. Not to mention the fact they are bug fuck evil and want to decrease the population so they can import millions of third world people and make everyone not in the elite part of a slave underclass. They also want to diddle kids in the open. They are paving the way for this by saying kids can consent to dangers drugs and genital mutilation. As Sam Hyde once said "When we win, do not forget that these people want you broke, dead, your kids raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny."
 
Last edited:
Ok, but WHY? Why troons?
There’s something deeper here. These are the tools used to achieve the goal but we don’t know what the goal is or why it’s pushed.
They could have used anything to score on - worker experience (lol what am I saying..) environmental stuff. Financial acumen.
WHY use something that’s at direct odds with making a profit ?
The things that are being pushed damage socoety and damage companies too. Yeah they make some companies a lot of money but not enough to make up for the overall damage. There’s some social agenda here
Perhaps the people fueling the fire still believe in the overpopulation myth. Nothing stops procreation like rendering a percentage of a generation sterile with drugs and butchery.
 
Back
Top Bottom