Correct. Rabbinic law recognizes several categories other than make and female, but these are all what we would call DSDs (or also being barren for women, or a a eunuch for men). The four not-man-or-woman categories are:
-Androgynos (self-explanatory)
-Tumtum (lit. Hidden) used for individuals with ambiguous genitalia
-Aylonit - women who are barren, including women with what we would recognize as DSDs that prevent sexual maturity
-Saris - like Ayelonit but for men, also including men made into eunuchs.
The definitions had to do with practical matters of ritual, marriage and inheritance, and as always the categories to do with classifying people based on observations and practical outcomes, not what they felt inside or any innate identity. As with every other queer revisionism, it takes the fact that human cultures were indeed able to make sense of edge cases within their frameworks to argue for the thoroughly post-modern concept of identity, which has no historical parallels.