"Lgb rights" already were undoing western society's progress. Especially gays. I don't care how much they try to sell the "we just want to get married and adopt and have a family like straights do". The entire "gay culture" revolves around fucking around and getting nutted inside by as many strange men as possible, having to take a pill to not get aids because conscious abstinence is clearly too difficult, and being groomed as a child as a rite of passage of sorts.
Lesbians abuse and beat the shit out of each other.
Bis seem to be the most sane ones but they still largely participate in the retarded "pride" mindset.
I have no doubt some normal lgb exist but they are way WAY less of a percentage of the populations than they want you to believe.
Bro, this is both off topic for this thread
and dumb as shit. The allegation against lesbians you refer to is completely fake shit that was deliberately misinterpreted by right wing homophobes (to push their "gays are evil" agenda) and trannies (to push their "our abuse rates aren't that bad!" agenda). The survey in question asked lesbian women whether they had ever been the
victim of IPV (intimate partner violence), not whether they'd ever perpetrated it, and ~40% of the lesbian women surveyed reported that they had only ever been victimized by previous
male partners before they had come out; The study did not in any way ask about or clarify the sexuality of these women's abusive partners, either. So it would be more accurate to say that lesbian women are often
victims of domestic violence. But the surveys in question do not in any way prove that lesbians are prone to abusing more than other sexualities or groups.
This speaks to my brain cramping aspect to trying to understand this. As I'm someone who views the world by how I make sense of it. Not blind ideology. If they are referring to themselves as transgender, doesn't that mean they don't actually consider themselves a woman? That they acknowledge there's a difference between a trans women and a women.
Trans women are women. Yet, what about non trans women? Are they not a thing?
I had a buddy who is a straight cis guy, married. Somehow he got radicalised on trans issues. Smart guy. I stumped him on this. So trans women are women, but that doesn't mean there still isn't a group of women who aren't trans. Aren't they still their own group within women? When talking about women's sport.
He was literally yelling at me for gentle pushback on trans. Mentioning this was brain-stumping to him. Whatever cult wormhole he fell though, he had never even considered that point. Just adopted a bunch of slogans and ideas as true uncritically.
It seems so many issues Trans people have is this detachment from reality. If you want to cut off your dick or not, dress as a girl. Whatever. Just stay grounded with basic reality and not make believe. This attachment to wanting to live in a fantasy land seems to be the cause of so many of their mental anguish.
The answer, according to troons, is absolutely always that sure, "cis" women do exist, but they don't matter and shouldn't be considered their own separate group with their own needs, accommodations, desires, etc. because that is hurtful to trans-identified males. "Cis" women have "cis privilege" and as such don't get to be a distinct group anymore.
(
Strangely, somehow, the same doesn't apply to men at all - they aren't expected to blur all boundaries and drop all their accommodations and needs to make trans-identified females feel comfortable and like they belong. Hmm. Wonder what
that's all about.)
I have no idea what the fuck you're going on about considering I loathe pride stuff.
But have you had the formative normie lgb experience of thinking about going to Pride, getting within a mile of the local Pride fest and turning around and going home? Because that's super important.
(Sorry for OT!)