- Joined
- Jan 15, 2017
TTD (Total Tranny Death)
TTA (Total Tranny Annihilation)
📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet
- Thread starter Meiwaku
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
TTD (Total Tranny Death)
TTA (Total Tranny Annihilation)
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2019
This kid needs a father figure, not 'resources' or 'two very close older role models who are trans', Jesus fucking christ.
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2021
I find it hard to believe that this kid has been mentioning being a girl since learning to speak.
She's putting words into his mouth.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
@Mellow Malevolent
See, again with self-reporting, you run the risk of not getting honest answers. If you look at what took place during the AIDS epidemic of the 80's and early 90's, with entire friends groups of gay men dropping like flies within a span of a few years (no, I'm not a gay man (or any type of man LOL), but I am old enough to remember when it happened) and knowing how the HIV virus is passed on, I think we can draw the conclusion that more than 36% of gay men regularly receive anal.
Also, what are they really asking? If they're asking about the total percentage of encounters that involve anal, I'd be willing to believe 36% is somewhat accurate of the truth, considering gay men on average are way more promiscuous than straights or lesbians.
This is anecdotal, but I once asked a gay friend of mine (born in 1963, so old school, you might say) about the percentage of guys who did anal regularly, and he said about 90% did. He also said that "top" or "bottom" heavily depended on country or region (said friend is German); in central and northern Europe, most gay men are bottoms and tops are very sought after. However, amongst Turks and Arabs (his ex-husband is Turkish) most are tops and don't consider it "gay" to fuck another man, only to get fucked.
My friend is just one guy, but I got the impression he got around a lot. So take it as you will.
See, again with self-reporting, you run the risk of not getting honest answers. If you look at what took place during the AIDS epidemic of the 80's and early 90's, with entire friends groups of gay men dropping like flies within a span of a few years (no, I'm not a gay man (or any type of man LOL), but I am old enough to remember when it happened) and knowing how the HIV virus is passed on, I think we can draw the conclusion that more than 36% of gay men regularly receive anal.
Also, what are they really asking? If they're asking about the total percentage of encounters that involve anal, I'd be willing to believe 36% is somewhat accurate of the truth, considering gay men on average are way more promiscuous than straights or lesbians.
This is anecdotal, but I once asked a gay friend of mine (born in 1963, so old school, you might say) about the percentage of guys who did anal regularly, and he said about 90% did. He also said that "top" or "bottom" heavily depended on country or region (said friend is German); in central and northern Europe, most gay men are bottoms and tops are very sought after. However, amongst Turks and Arabs (his ex-husband is Turkish) most are tops and don't consider it "gay" to fuck another man, only to get fucked.
My friend is just one guy, but I got the impression he got around a lot. So take it as you will.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
Magicians call any device that's used to make an object produce the magical effect a gaff. So, a thumb tip, invisible thread, a topit or a hold out would all be gaffs. Presumably, the rigged sideshow display would have the same root?
(I remember being in Blackpool as a kid in the very early 60's and seeing a sideshow advertising a real African two-headed giant. He's actually inside! Come in and meet him. I couldn't wait to give the guy my money.
Inside, there was a glass case. Inside the glass case there was a huge black two headed giant. Sadly, it was obvious to me (and I think I would have been seven or eight at the time) that the giant was made from papier mache. I could read the newsprint through the brown paint.
Thus ended my career as a sideshow mark.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
Was it even a good papier mache sculpture?
Like this one? (that some people still fall for LMAO)
indigoisviolet
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2022
When my ignorant medical professor talks smack about revolutionary science, I cannot help myself.
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2021
You're right that self-reporting always carries risk, but at the risk of PL'ing myself a little I have personal experience with the gay community and there's a lot more variance than people external to it figure. In particular, gay men are definitely more promiscuous than straight men, probably as a function of female gatekeeping of sex, but there's subsets of promiscuity/sex drive in the community and they tend to hang out together. Even in your example, there is a lot of variance in the role MSM will take in encounters and a big part of that is cultural norms influencing presentation.
It's worth noting
Obviously, that's not analogous to the number of men engaging in anal sex over the same period, but there's a visibility bias in the way people remember the AIDS crisis. The infection and death rate was incredibly high; the rates of infection for chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis combined is sub 1% in the US, for comparison, but it was not traveling through the gay male population like a respiratory disease or anything. In general I think many gay men mistake the particular circles they travel in for a full representation of all the experiences of gay men in general. Big city gay men in particular.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
@Mellow Malevolent
I guess you're in the US? Maybe it's cultural differences. But in 80's Europe, if you were "in the community", or the "gay scene", you would pretty much have to move to the city in order to participate (no internet or hook-up apps existed, so you had to seek out the places where you could meet others who shared your tastes by actually going to places), so "big city gay man" and "gay man" were practically analogous. Same for lesbians, although our communities have always been smaller and more insular.
I remember one study from the 90's (or could have been the 00's maybe?) that said 20% of the gay male population in certain US urban areas were HIV+. I found that to be shocking and staggeringly high. That particular study has been quoted many times and used as ammo against the gay community by various right wing activists, and it's probably quite easy to find references to it even today, although I'm too lazy to go find it ATM.
In most of Europe, gay saunas were identified as vectors of the disease, and many countries (including mine) banned them, and that ban remains to this day.
Now, I am a health care worker, and while I haven't worked habitually with HIV+ people as a patient group, I have retained some basic knowledge of virology and the statistical rates of transmission.
Being transfused with HIV+ blood would result in infection 100% of the time, and the second most dangerous practice was sharing needles. Mind you, I learned these statistics nearly 30 years ago, but I remember that back then the estimated risk to catch HIV from unprotected receptive anal intercourse was roughly 1/100. Still pretty good odds. It was 1/1000 for vaginal and 1/100,000 for oral respectively (only six known cases of HIV by oral were known at that time). Catching it from topping is low unless you already have sores on the penis. Eating out a woman is a zero per cent risk. There was even a running joke in the gay community back then; they said dykes and cockroaches would be the only ones left on the earth after the virus was done sweeping through the population LOL
Now, HIV got into the heterosexual pool because married/partnered men were fucking men on the side, that much is certain. Statistically, these men were likely to have caught the disease from unprotected receptive anal sex. If they had stuck to mutual masturbation and blowjobs they would not have passed it on to their wives and girlfriends.
EDIT: Anyway, my point? Whether you're a man or a woman getting with a MSM (that is, men who have sex with men, not MainStream Media), for your own safety, you're best off to assume he is getting railed up the ass bareback by other dudes with some regularity. Male trannies who are AGP obviously included. There is a reason why this demographic is not allowed to donate blood in most countries. You can never trust people to be honest about their sexual practices, and especially not when other people's health is on the line.
I guess you're in the US? Maybe it's cultural differences. But in 80's Europe, if you were "in the community", or the "gay scene", you would pretty much have to move to the city in order to participate (no internet or hook-up apps existed, so you had to seek out the places where you could meet others who shared your tastes by actually going to places), so "big city gay man" and "gay man" were practically analogous. Same for lesbians, although our communities have always been smaller and more insular.
I remember one study from the 90's (or could have been the 00's maybe?) that said 20% of the gay male population in certain US urban areas were HIV+. I found that to be shocking and staggeringly high. That particular study has been quoted many times and used as ammo against the gay community by various right wing activists, and it's probably quite easy to find references to it even today, although I'm too lazy to go find it ATM.
In most of Europe, gay saunas were identified as vectors of the disease, and many countries (including mine) banned them, and that ban remains to this day.
Now, I am a health care worker, and while I haven't worked habitually with HIV+ people as a patient group, I have retained some basic knowledge of virology and the statistical rates of transmission.
Being transfused with HIV+ blood would result in infection 100% of the time, and the second most dangerous practice was sharing needles. Mind you, I learned these statistics nearly 30 years ago, but I remember that back then the estimated risk to catch HIV from unprotected receptive anal intercourse was roughly 1/100. Still pretty good odds. It was 1/1000 for vaginal and 1/100,000 for oral respectively (only six known cases of HIV by oral were known at that time). Catching it from topping is low unless you already have sores on the penis. Eating out a woman is a zero per cent risk. There was even a running joke in the gay community back then; they said dykes and cockroaches would be the only ones left on the earth after the virus was done sweeping through the population LOL
Now, HIV got into the heterosexual pool because married/partnered men were fucking men on the side, that much is certain. Statistically, these men were likely to have caught the disease from unprotected receptive anal sex. If they had stuck to mutual masturbation and blowjobs they would not have passed it on to their wives and girlfriends.
EDIT: Anyway, my point? Whether you're a man or a woman getting with a MSM (that is, men who have sex with men, not MainStream Media), for your own safety, you're best off to assume he is getting railed up the ass bareback by other dudes with some regularity. Male trannies who are AGP obviously included. There is a reason why this demographic is not allowed to donate blood in most countries. You can never trust people to be honest about their sexual practices, and especially not when other people's health is on the line.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
I know this is old, but this is the funniest shit ever.
I think this TERF actually fucked a dick for the first time, and wanted to be a normie. If she's real. I HOPE SHE IS.
bei_rav
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2024
A gem from ages yore in this thread which caught my eye, as I have recently encountered many people who meet this description. People who agree it is a thing although they say it is because "the community learned from AIDS" to take protective measures. Currently ISO any/all sperging on the subject because there's got to be more to it than identifying with medical caution. I think there is an element of stolen valour on the part of TiFs who have some excuse to mention "their" community and its struggle with AIDS as I haven't yet heard a man lay claim to this connection.
The math is mathing more with Mellow Malevolent, gotta say.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
Data from before successful anti-viral suppression, obviously. Given how difficult it actually is to catch HIV from any kind of sexual activity, it's still a staggeringly high percentage.
California Newt
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2024
@Mellow Malevolent
@Peaches Demure
Regarding the "do gay men have anal sex as a requirement" question, I think it's important to remember that "identified as gay" is a big factor here. If you're committed enough to the bit to identify as gay for the purposes of a study, you're much more likely to be taking it up the ass.
The kind of homosexual who is insecure about having "real sex" is going to be motivated to have anal sex, and that same kind of guy is likely to identify strongly with the "gay identity". I've gone into more detail on this subject here in the woman hate thread (I don't hate women, just wanted to ask the fellas for their thoughts on some things).
This kind of gay gets defensive when you question why anal is the big thing. After all, don't women have buttholes too? Wouldn't the gayest form of sex be the one with only the man parts? Anal sex havers will not answer these questions, and instead will sputter impotently and homosexually while they accuse you of being a "virgin" (when, ironically, they're doing what some women do to "preserve" their virginity). I have a hunch that some guy like Crowley started it; he called it the "eye of Horus" and had occult dudes sodomize him to get "magical powers".
A lot of guys like the idea of anal sex in the abstract, but wouldn't do it IRL. I've known people like this who were e-boyfriends for the better part of a decade before shacking up and realizing that neither of them was a furry rabbit or wolf-man, and that fantasy porn anatomy doesn't apply to the real world (they're still very close housemates). I think it's why pornographic material drawn by gay men who've actually committed sodomy IRL has a much darker tone to it. As I've said here: non-reproductive sexuality is only ever materially "potent" in a negative sense, as in the case of bug-chasing. Anal especially, in real life, appears to be just fundamentally aesthetically horrible. You have to develop a taste for the death-feeling behind it; it is very clearly not a sexual organ.
As far as whether there's "different kinds of gays", the answer is definitely yes. There's absolutely a kind of guy who has sex with men purely for auto-erotic ego and sexual validation; I've known some of these guys. There's also another kind that really and genuinely thirsts after dudes in a genuinely almost impressive (but moreso worrying) way. Guys who tread the line between lust and cannibalistic hunger. There's all kinds of behaviours and the "gay identity" is a 19th century fabrication.
You could argue that non-anal stuff is "better", and I'm sure that's true in a relative sense, but honestly I think it's better to aim beyond sexuality entirely.
In what other group of people would this kind of subject even come up, let alone be something that'd make you an "outcast"? Imagine being with your friends or community and feeling like an "outcast" because you don't like the same sex positions. Who in your community would even know that? Do these guys not have friends beyond cooming?
@Peaches Demure
Regarding the "do gay men have anal sex as a requirement" question, I think it's important to remember that "identified as gay" is a big factor here. If you're committed enough to the bit to identify as gay for the purposes of a study, you're much more likely to be taking it up the ass.
The kind of homosexual who is insecure about having "real sex" is going to be motivated to have anal sex, and that same kind of guy is likely to identify strongly with the "gay identity". I've gone into more detail on this subject here in the woman hate thread (I don't hate women, just wanted to ask the fellas for their thoughts on some things).
This kind of gay gets defensive when you question why anal is the big thing. After all, don't women have buttholes too? Wouldn't the gayest form of sex be the one with only the man parts? Anal sex havers will not answer these questions, and instead will sputter impotently and homosexually while they accuse you of being a "virgin" (when, ironically, they're doing what some women do to "preserve" their virginity). I have a hunch that some guy like Crowley started it; he called it the "eye of Horus" and had occult dudes sodomize him to get "magical powers".
A lot of guys like the idea of anal sex in the abstract, but wouldn't do it IRL. I've known people like this who were e-boyfriends for the better part of a decade before shacking up and realizing that neither of them was a furry rabbit or wolf-man, and that fantasy porn anatomy doesn't apply to the real world (they're still very close housemates). I think it's why pornographic material drawn by gay men who've actually committed sodomy IRL has a much darker tone to it. As I've said here: non-reproductive sexuality is only ever materially "potent" in a negative sense, as in the case of bug-chasing. Anal especially, in real life, appears to be just fundamentally aesthetically horrible. You have to develop a taste for the death-feeling behind it; it is very clearly not a sexual organ.
As far as whether there's "different kinds of gays", the answer is definitely yes. There's absolutely a kind of guy who has sex with men purely for auto-erotic ego and sexual validation; I've known some of these guys. There's also another kind that really and genuinely thirsts after dudes in a genuinely almost impressive (but moreso worrying) way. Guys who tread the line between lust and cannibalistic hunger. There's all kinds of behaviours and the "gay identity" is a 19th century fabrication.
You could argue that non-anal stuff is "better", and I'm sure that's true in a relative sense, but honestly I think it's better to aim beyond sexuality entirely.
Yeah and if I shoot up some heroin I bet it'll feel great too. No thank you. I don't need to start developing irresistible coom cravings in my butthole.
"I feel like a bit of an outcast from most trans femmes because usually they're more bottoms"
In what other group of people would this kind of subject even come up, let alone be something that'd make you an "outcast"? Imagine being with your friends or community and feeling like an "outcast" because you don't like the same sex positions. Who in your community would even know that? Do these guys not have friends beyond cooming?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
@California Newt
Funny that you would mention Alistar Crowley, because I am of the opinion that he was firmly AGP and very likely responsible, philosophically speaking, for much of today's troon menace.
I'm not taking a stand for or against anal or any other practice. My only point is that self-reported statistics ain't worth shit, because surprise surprise, people bullshit. You will learn very quickly as a nurse never to just take a patient's word for it in a medical context. The dude who was supposed to quit smoking preparing for his knee replacement? Oh, he totally quit. Oh, his test came back positive for nicotine? No, he's just smoking every now and then, most certainly not more than one cigarette every couple of days!
OK, maybe half a pack a day. But it's just half a pack now, not two packs like before. That's good enough, isn't it?
Funny that you would mention Alistar Crowley, because I am of the opinion that he was firmly AGP and very likely responsible, philosophically speaking, for much of today's troon menace.
I'm not taking a stand for or against anal or any other practice. My only point is that self-reported statistics ain't worth shit, because surprise surprise, people bullshit. You will learn very quickly as a nurse never to just take a patient's word for it in a medical context. The dude who was supposed to quit smoking preparing for his knee replacement? Oh, he totally quit. Oh, his test came back positive for nicotine? No, he's just smoking every now and then, most certainly not more than one cigarette every couple of days!
OK, maybe half a pack a day. But it's just half a pack now, not two packs like before. That's good enough, isn't it?
California Newt
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2024
I feel that not enough of the LGBTQ+ discourse focuses on the fact that our society is run by evil wizards.
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
Forgive me for bringing news from the land of Anime (or Manga, anyway), but this is definitely a tranny L.
The long and the short of it is, in the previous chapter of Chainsaw Man, the (Male) main character realizes his sexual frustration is clouding his judgement, and the other (Female) main character decides she's gonna cut off his dick so he won't be horny and distracted anymore. This was an obvious set up for both main characters getting into an awkward situation and getting flustered and maybe fucking or something. Yes, I know, shitty enough already.
But the trannies somehow convinced themselves this would mean the guy was gonna go tranny. For the couple weeks between chapters, they were already welcoming Chainsaw Trans.
The new chapter came out (the first one of Pride month, no less), and of course, they got into an awkward situation and got flustered and she kind of accidentally jerks him off. No Life Saving Gender Affirming Surgery tho.
And the reactions, well
They really believed it. Never ceases to surprise me how retarded and self-deluded they are.
The long and the short of it is, in the previous chapter of Chainsaw Man, the (Male) main character realizes his sexual frustration is clouding his judgement, and the other (Female) main character decides she's gonna cut off his dick so he won't be horny and distracted anymore. This was an obvious set up for both main characters getting into an awkward situation and getting flustered and maybe fucking or something. Yes, I know, shitty enough already.
But the trannies somehow convinced themselves this would mean the guy was gonna go tranny. For the couple weeks between chapters, they were already welcoming Chainsaw Trans.
The new chapter came out (the first one of Pride month, no less), and of course, they got into an awkward situation and got flustered and she kind of accidentally jerks him off. No Life Saving Gender Affirming Surgery tho.
And the reactions, well
They really believed it. Never ceases to surprise me how retarded and self-deluded they are.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2023
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
"LGBTQ+" isn't even a real thing. It's certainly not organic; I'm old enough to know that there is a gay and a lesbian community. They have/had little to no overlap, recreationally speaking. They often actively dislike each other. Sure, they've come together on some political and social issues, but they're certainly not a community, like today's activists have you believe.
"Trans" used to mean HSTS; until recently AGPs were simply referred to as cross-dressers, and if they went to seek surgery and tried to misrepresent themselves as homosexual when they were not, they were told to eat shit and pound the ground. Pooners, to my knowledge, didn't exist pre-internet (Lou Sullivan being the rare archetypical proto-pooner). Since today's dogma says that everybody who self-identifies as trans is trans, random perverts have been able to funnel themselves into the movement and into positions of power. It's really quite astounding.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2018
I like how this post and the reactions to it conclusively show faggotry and male homosexuality are orthogonal, even if correlated.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2023
SO misses the old dynamic of her boyfriend being a man.
Link | Archive
Troon in question:
Woman dumps her boyfriend years after he comes out. It turns out she was never supportive and has been trying to get out of the relationship for a long time, and did it while he was out of the country on a work trip so she wouldn't have to deal with drama and violence. Many such cases.
Link | Archive
"Dear Reddit, should I remove my own testicles with a rusty scalpel and a bottle of liquor?"
Link | Archive
Link | Archive
I miss our old dynamic 
(NSFW, non-detailed mentions of our sex life)Share Experience (self.TransLater)
submitted 13 hours ago by questioning_daisy to r/TransLater
I've been out to my SO (cis F) of 11 years for a little shy of a year. Last night she was feeling a little down about herself, body image issues, and the discussion turned to sexy stuff, and the she hit me with:
"I miss our old dynamic"
I'm sure she didn't mean to hurt me but Jesus that has sent me spinning.
I feel like she meant she wants me to be more "in control" in the bedroom again and I'm sure that is something I can work on. I have become much more passive in that department because it makes me feel more feminine but I'm not against topping (with toy), in fact we've had some real good fun doing so. I just don't know how to be the active partner without feeling really manly.
She also said that while she enjoys doing a bunch of things to help me feel girly (doing my nails, helping me with fashion and make-up) that they make her feel more like a big sister. Paraphrasing: They're fun and intimate but they don't make me want to f**k you.
Up until this she has been the paragon of supportive partner and I couldn't have asked for anything more. She has always identified as bi which I think has greatly helped this as it's not like my transition is forcing her to examine her sexuality but she's never dated a girl before so I don't know whether maybe a Sapphic romance is working for her......
I don't know. I'm just terrified of losing her because I can't give her what she needs anymore.
Not sure what I'm hoping for posting here. I guess I just needed to get it off my chest.
(NSFW, non-detailed mentions of our sex life)Share Experience (self.TransLater)submitted 13 hours ago by questioning_daisy to r/TransLater
I've been out to my SO (cis F) of 11 years for a little shy of a year. Last night she was feeling a little down about herself, body image issues, and the discussion turned to sexy stuff, and the she hit me with:
"I miss our old dynamic"
I'm sure she didn't mean to hurt me but Jesus that has sent me spinning.
I feel like she meant she wants me to be more "in control" in the bedroom again and I'm sure that is something I can work on. I have become much more passive in that department because it makes me feel more feminine but I'm not against topping (with toy), in fact we've had some real good fun doing so. I just don't know how to be the active partner without feeling really manly.
She also said that while she enjoys doing a bunch of things to help me feel girly (doing my nails, helping me with fashion and make-up) that they make her feel more like a big sister. Paraphrasing: They're fun and intimate but they don't make me want to f**k you.
Up until this she has been the paragon of supportive partner and I couldn't have asked for anything more. She has always identified as bi which I think has greatly helped this as it's not like my transition is forcing her to examine her sexuality but she's never dated a girl before so I don't know whether maybe a Sapphic romance is working for her......
I don't know. I'm just terrified of losing her because I can't give her what she needs anymore.
Not sure what I'm hoping for posting here. I guess I just needed to get it off my chest.
Woman dumps her boyfriend years after he comes out. It turns out she was never supportive and has been trying to get out of the relationship for a long time, and did it while he was out of the country on a work trip so she wouldn't have to deal with drama and violence. Many such cases.
Link | Archive
10 years gone. What a shame (self.TransyTalk)
submitted 14 hours ago by TAYLOR_THE_PLAYER to r/TransyTalk
So hello. Taylor (mtf 35) hope everyone is well
Um idk if this is the place for this. Just a quick rant really quick. Me and my fiancee had bin together forever. 10 years. And the last 7 I had transitioned and last 3 engaged. Through highs and lows. Me coming out and clothing, makeup, surgery she was always by my side. In return I would do anything for her all she had to do was name it. She was my rock and the love of my life.
Yesterday while I'm on a work trip abroad days before my birthday she tells me for the past 7 years she has bin trying to find a way to get out. That every day and every year she loved me less and less. And that I killed the man she loved.
I will return from this trip to an empty structure. It was a home when I left. Idk what to do now.
submitted 14 hours ago by TAYLOR_THE_PLAYER to r/TransyTalk
So hello. Taylor (mtf 35) hope everyone is well
Um idk if this is the place for this. Just a quick rant really quick. Me and my fiancee had bin together forever. 10 years. And the last 7 I had transitioned and last 3 engaged. Through highs and lows. Me coming out and clothing, makeup, surgery she was always by my side. In return I would do anything for her all she had to do was name it. She was my rock and the love of my life.
Yesterday while I'm on a work trip abroad days before my birthday she tells me for the past 7 years she has bin trying to find a way to get out. That every day and every year she loved me less and less. And that I killed the man she loved.
I will return from this trip to an empty structure. It was a home when I left. Idk what to do now.
"Dear Reddit, should I remove my own testicles with a rusty scalpel and a bottle of liquor?"
Link | Archive
Should I do my Orchie DIY or wait 7 Years for it. (self.TransDIY)
submitted 22 minutes ago by Ok-Fall4687 Hannah | 18 | Open DM's | Poly | Transbian
Hey everyone,
I’m facing a pretty tough decision and would love some advice from this community.
I’ve been considering an orchiectomy for a while now, but I’m stuck between two options: attempting a DIY procedure or waiting seven years to have it done professionally. Here’s a bit of context:
DIY Option:
Has anyone here faced a similar choice? What did you decide and how did it turn out? Any advice, experiences, or perspectives would be really appreciated.
Thanks for taking the time to read and respond.
Edit:
I stopped my 10mg EEn injection because of a problem with a Transphobic Family.
submitted 22 minutes ago by Ok-Fall4687 Hannah | 18 | Open DM's | Poly | Transbian
Hey everyone,
I’m facing a pretty tough decision and would love some advice from this community.
I’ve been considering an orchiectomy for a while now, but I’m stuck between two options: attempting a DIY procedure or waiting seven years to have it done professionally. Here’s a bit of context:
DIY Option:
- Pros: Immediate relief from dysphoria, no waiting period.
- Cons: High risk of complications, possible long-term health issues, and no professional support.
- Pros: Professional medical care, safer procedure, post-op support.
- Cons: Seven more years of dealing with dysphoria, potential impact on my mental health, and the financial cost involved.
Has anyone here faced a similar choice? What did you decide and how did it turn out? Any advice, experiences, or perspectives would be really appreciated.
Thanks for taking the time to read and respond.
Edit:
I stopped my 10mg EEn injection because of a problem with a Transphobic Family.