🐮 Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
HOW ABOUT FUCK YOU, YOU FUCKING COCK SUCKER.....I HOPE THE FBI FIND YOUR FUCKING ASS BEFORE I DO...MOTHERFUCKER. WE KNOW YOU POSTED THOSE COMMENTS ON TWITTER ABOUT SCHOOL SHOOTINGS AND ME BEORE THE THREAT, AND I WOULD BET MONEY THAT THE TOR PROGRAM THAT YOUR USING WAS USED IN THE MAKING OF THAT THREAT. MY LAWYER AND THE STATE ALSO KNOWNS YOU MADE THOSE COMMENTS, JUST DAYS BEFORE THE SCHOOL THREAT, DIRTY HARRY AKA FCCBODYGUARD. BECAUSE IF WON'T I WILL AND YOU WILL NOT LIKE IT....I HAVE FEW IDEAS WHO YOU ARE AND WILL CAUSE YOU A LOT OF FUCKING PAIN!!

YOU LITTLE COCKSUCKERS ARE GOING TO BE PISSED WHEN THIS SHIT GETS DISMISSED.
New copypasta
 

Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004)​


listen to the oral arguments
Which of course does not translate to

"it is a known fact according to the US Supreme court the vast majority of judges that sign search warrants; do not read them, they skim through them."

except in the mind of someone is certified lolcow schizophrenic like Todd Daugherty... How does one change the lolcow for schizocow for this retard?
 

Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004)​


listen to the oral arguments
Timestamp you nigger. I'm not listening to an hour of legal bs to humor you. Where does the SCOTUS rule that the majority of judges don't read warrants? I doubt that's in oral arguments. Barring that, I'll accept evidence of a majority of sitting justices saying that the majority of judges don't read warrants. I also doubt that is in oral arguments.
 
HOW ABOUT FUCK YOU, YOU FUCKING COCK SUCKER.....I HOPE THE FBI FIND YOUR FUCKING ASS BEFORE I DO...MOTHERFUCKER. WE KNOW YOU POSTED THOSE COMMENTS ON TWITTER ABOUT SCHOOL SHOOTINGS AND ME BEORE THE THREAT, AND I WOULD BET MONEY THAT THE TOR PROGRAM THAT YOUR USING WAS USED IN THE MAKING OF THAT THREAT. MY LAWYER AND THE STATE ALSO KNOWNS YOU MADE THOSE COMMENTS, JUST DAYS BEFORE THE SCHOOL THREAT, DIRTY HARRY AKA FCCBODYGUARD. BECAUSE IF WON'T I WILL AND YOU WILL NOT LIKE IT....I HAVE FEW IDEAS WHO YOU ARE AND WILL CAUSE YOU A LOT OF FUCKING PAIN!!

YOU LITTLE COCKSUCKERS ARE GOING TO BE PISSED WHEN THIS SHIT GETS DISMISSED.
Yes, people are going to be so afraid of some retard that can't leave his home without his senior citizen parents accompanying him. :story:

Judges have to read the forms to make sure everything is correct. When a warrant is made it goes to a senior officer for review before it goes to a judge to sign. The judge then reads it to make sure it follows all the proper procedures. Normally it always does and gets signed.
 
Last edited:
*,*.*.211

xmldata Fitem Dall
xmldata item Cpqkey
verify.php id confirmhash
service Wsdl
server-status
install profile default
getFavicon host burpcollaborator.net
data get prodServerGen
.htpasswd.bkp
.htpasswd.old
.htaccess.old

etc

someone can't secure a server right
 
*,*.*.211

xmldata Fitem Dall
xmldata item Cpqkey
verify.php id confirmhash
service Wsdl
server-status
install profile default
getFavicon host burpcollaborator.net
data get prodServerGen
.htpasswd.bkp
.htpasswd.old
.htaccess.old

etc

someone can't secure a server right
What's his website? I want to join the forum
 
N9OGL said:
UNDER ILLINOIS LAW the person must be aware that the image was that of a person under the age of 18.

Todd Daugherty has stated he knows the victim was born in 2006 and now is 18 years of age. So when they seized his computers six years ago via a legal warrant, the age of the victim was only 12 at the absolute most and probably less than that.
 
Citation needed.
here you go!
7.jpg 8.jpg
I am a dumbass who cannot thumbnail. Thank you @Trombonista for cleaning my shit up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Todd's lawyer stipulated that the search of his computers could continue (first Toad said 90 days). as part of the Nolle Presqui. The FBI had the computers before the Nolle Presqui was issued, did a search and before the 90 days were up found child porn on his computer in plain sight. They immediately then stopped the search and got a 2nd warrant (which Toad won't show by the way) to continue the search for child porn. Toad never talks about the 2nd warrant

Add the fact Todd never asked for his computers back until at least 2022 (he posted here in Kiwifarms that he thought the local police still had his computers in 2020 which shows he didn't ask for them back or he would have known the FBI had them).

The judge never issued an order for the seized items to be returned.

SA, DEF IN CUSTODY W/PD GRIGSBY. STATES MOTION TO DISMISS W/LEAVE TO REINSTATE GRANTED W/OUT OBJECTION. DEFENDANT ADVISED STATE RETAINS RIGHT TO RE-FILE AS INVESTIGATION CONTINUES. NFS.
 
The warrant was quashed, plain and simple, they had no right to maintain control over the computers. BTW again you're getting that information off a commercial website has no connection with the courts.
 
1. Your own lawyer is having none of your nonsense, in 19 months she hasn't mentioned that one time. Which indicates she doesn't believe that shit either. You can of course fire her at anytime and present this yourself to the judge.

2. In reference to the document you produced, please quote what line 6 says.

3. Please show us the 2nd warrant they acquired. If you want people to believe you, you have to post everything, not selective bits and parts

N9OGL said:
The charges were dropped, but the state asked for an additional 90 days to investigate it. the FBI BTW found NOTHING on my computer.

Confirmed by your own words and obviously the FBI did some SOMETHING on his computer
 
Last edited:
Stop lying Show us the 2nd warrant that that the FBI got please after they found the child porn. Here is your own words about it

N9OGL said:
When they found the image which Daugherty was arrested for, they then got a second warrant so to be “back in compliant with the 4th amendment”

Also answer questions #3 and also explain why your own lawyer is not using a word you say. You even stated she is not keeping in contact with you nor responding to your endless amounts of emails.

2. In reference to the document you produced, please quote what line 6 says.

3. Please show us the 2nd warrant they acquired. If you want people to believe you, you have to post everything, not selective bits and parts
 
DANCE COCKROACH DANCE

Now for the 3rd time, are you going to answer the questions and show us the second warrant, or just going to keep proving to the world you are autistic and schizophrenic.

We are also waiting for this answer from Toad. Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature on the search warrant?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom