🐮 Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The issue is the warrant, the warrant seized the computer and all the files on the computer. According to court documents they were only supposed to search the computer, but instead they seize them. that's why in 2018 - 2019 we asked for the computers back after the warrant was quashed and the police refused to return them, because they were seized contraband. They had no right to search to the computers because the warrant for the computer was quashed. the basically found that image on my computer without a warrant. In the United States you have a warrant to search ANY electronic device, including cell phones and computers (Riley v California US Supreme Court).
kill yourself already.

By the way, You're in Illinois retarded pedo. Not California. Fuck off already.
Do you think they are gonna sit in your Stink Grotto in the back of your parents house and copy files from your computer? That's not how computer forensics work. I told Judge Spears about your thoughts over a mouthful of Golden Corral salad, and he just laughed and said 'Whatta stupid fucking pedophile'.
He doesn't know shit all about computer forensics.
By the way. They don't call it copying. They call it acquiring. So you would be acquiring a hard drive when making a duplicate of it.
 
Last edited:
I love how he thinks if he somehow convinces us that he is in the right that he wouldn't be facing jailtime.
It's funny to see a scumbag squirm mentally.
 
No, the officer who wrote the warrant is in trouble, because he doesn't qualified immunity. I AM GOING TO SUE THE POLICE AND STATE!

The officer didn't write the warrant, the Judge did and the judge signed it. The police only execute them.

Tell us MR KNOW IT NOW about all your legal training and experience in a court room versus that of a judge in good standing who has probably heard 1,000s of cases and went to law school.

Plus you can't, qualified immunity and the Statute of Limitations have long expired even if the warrant was completely wrong. Mr Daugherty has threatened 100s of lawsuits in his life, never having filed a single one, and he won't in this case either. Like this one and this one and he threatened to sue KiwiFarms as well.

Also notice Mr Daugherty does not show the 2nd warrant that was issued by the federal government. What are you hiding Toad?

Of course this is all a distraction by Mr Daugherty, he is indeed a pedophile, pervert and sexually attracted to children.
 
Do you think they are gonna sit in your Stink Grotto in the back of your parents house and copy files from your computer? That's not how computer forensics work. I told Judge Spears about your thoughts over a mouthful of Golden Corral salad, and he just laughed and said 'Whatta stupid fucking pedophile'.
They can take the computers off site to search, but once they are done searching, they are required to return them. They also have the ability to clone the hard drives and return the original computers back. The issue is they searched the warrant stated they search house and seized the computers, which is not what the court originally ordered. The original order was to search the computers (off site if need be) and seize three items off of them. The officer, who had only been a cop for a year wrote the warrant to search the house and seize the computers and everything in them. (which legal they are not allowed to do). Secondly the 2018 search warrant was made invalid by the judge, therefore whatever they found like the image they found 2 months after the warrant was made invalid, they can't use, because it was illegal search. They had no warrant to search the computer.

Funny you claim to have a salad with Judge Spears (who BTW has no involvement in this case) because he's on vacation in Europe right now. I also like how this site and its members obey their own rules "No trolling plans. We are not an autistic Illuminati. If you embarrass yourself or the forum trying to troll, we will ridicule you."

kill yourself already.

By the way, You're in Illinois retarded pedo. Not California. Fuck off already.

He doesn't know shit all about computer forensics.
By the way. They don't call it copying. They call it acquiring. So you would be acquiring a hard drive when making a duplicate of it.
IT'S A US SUPREME COURT CASE DUMBASS...it applies to the US.

nope the FBI has the ability to clone the Hard Drives, in the federal courts know this all too well. the fact they had no warrant, they had no rights to those computers, their search was illegal.
 
The issue is they searched the warrant stated they search house and seized the computers, which is not what the court originally ordered.

No, it is exactly what the court ordered, examined, and signed by a court judge. Are you this schizo where you can't even read basic English?? (Images inserted via thumbnail). No amount of endless flooding and changing the topic changes this fact.

Oh, we are still waiting for you to show the second search warrant the feds put out.

5.jpg

4.jpg
 
The officer didn't write the warrant, the Judge did and the judge signed it. The police only execute them.

Tell us MR KNOW IT NOW about all your legal training and experience in a court room versus that of a judge in good standing who has probably heard 1,000s of cases and went to law school.

Plus you can't, qualified immunity and the Statute of Limitations have long expired even if the warrant was completely wrong. Mr Daugherty has threatened 100s of lawsuits in his life, never having filed a single one, and he won't in this case either. Like this one and this one and he threatened to sue KiwiFarms as well.

Also notice Mr Daugherty does not show the 2nd warrant that was issued by the federal government. What are you hiding Toad?

Of course this is all a distraction by Mr Daugherty, he is indeed a pedophile, pervert and sexually attracted to children.
Nope, the warrant was written by a cop, not the judge. The cop writes an affidavit for a warrant, with probable cause, what law was broken, his experience in law enforcement, and qualification and expertise in the respected area of crime, what he wanting to search with particulars and what or whom he is wanting to seize with particulars. He then writes a warrant, to accompany the affidavit and the judge signs it. Judges are required to read the warrant, but as the US Supreme court stated in Groh v Ramirez judges aren't doing that, they are merely skimming through the warrant and signing it, something they are not supposed to be doing.

The officer doesn't get qualified immunity. qualified immunity the plaintiff must shows that the official violated "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known" It is a clearly established statutory or constitutional rights that general warrant is not constitutional, they have had never been legal, and there are a lot of court cases to prove it. (See Groh v Ramirez US Supreme court 2004) in that case ATF agent Jeff Groh argue that he should have qualified immunity which the US Supreme Court stated, "Because the particularity requirement is stated in the Fourth Amendment's text, "no reasonable officer could believe that a warrant that did not comply with that requirement was valid." Groh therefore did not have "qualified immunity" from suit." Mr. Groh basically created a general warrant by not having the particulars. General warrants are the ONLY place officers don't qualified immunity. because it is well established that General warrants are illegal in the United States under the Fourth Amendment.

There is no statute of limitation, because 2018 warrant was the warrant they found the image under and the warrant they are using in this case (although the warrant was quashed). There was no other warrant. I can challenge it because it is still play. Now if they had gotten a different warrant, then you have a valid argument, but they didn't.

No, it is exactly what the court ordered, examined, and signed by a court judge. Are you this schizo where you can't even read basic English?? (Images inserted via thumbnail). No amount of endless flooding and changing the topic changes this fact.

Oh, we are still waiting for you to show the second search warrant the feds put out.

View attachment 5972502

View attachment 5972499
BECAUSE THE JUDGE DIDN'T REVIEW THE WARRANT YOU FUCKING MORON!!! MOST JUDGES JUST SKIM THROUGH IT, ASSUMING IT VALID....GOD YOUR A FUCKING MORON
 
nope the FBI has the ability to clone the Hard Drives, in the federal courts know this all too well. the fact they had no warrant, they had no rights to those computers, their search was illegal.
Not called cloning either. It's legally called "acquiring". That's what examiners call it. Acquisition is the first step in the forensic process. I mentioned elsewhere on this site that I was going to get into computer forensics in my early years. Presentation is the last step. The examiner gives a history of their expertise, the tools used, how they were used, the methods and processes used to recover the data. Statements on what the examiner found. The actual data found to support their findings.

Keep coping pedo. Have fun dying in prison.
 
No, it is exactly what the court ordered, examined, and signed by a court judge. Are you this schizo where you can't even read basic English?? (Images inserted via thumbnail). No amount of endless flooding and changing the topic changes this fact.

Oh, we are still waiting for you to show the second search warrant the feds put out.

View attachment 5972502

View attachment 5972499
It is written by a police officer and signed by a neutral and detached magistrate judge. A judge cannot write it, if he does, then he is not neutral and detached magistrate.
 
I'm not going to argue with you, dumbass.

Well, that didn't even last an hour. Now back to the question...

N9OGL said:
BECAUSE THE JUDGE DIDN'T REVIEW THE WARRANT YOU FUCKING MORON!!!

Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature? Word for word please. If you can't understand, a KiwiFarmer will translate it for you in 2nd grade English.
 
Well, that didn't even last an hour. Now back to the question...



Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature? Word for word please. If you can't understand, a KiwiFarmer will translate it for you in 2nd grade English.
MOTHER FUCKER...YOU STUPID SON OF A BITCH....search warrants are basically applications that you fill out. that section is already printed. JUST BECAUSE IT SAYS HE READ IT, DOESN'T MEAN HE DID YOU FUCKING IDIOT!

it is a known fact according to the US Supreme court the vast majority of judges that sign search warrants; do not read them, they skim through them.
 
MOTHER FUCKER...YOU STUPID SON OF A BITCH

No, it does not say that above his signature in the referenced documents. Do you want to try again?

Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature? Word for word please. If you can't understand, a KiwiFarmer will translate it for you in 2nd grade English.
 
HOW ABOUT FUCK YOU, YOU FUCKING COCK SUCKER.....I HOPE THE FBI FIND YOUR FUCKING ASS BEFORE I DO...MOTHERFUCKER. WE KNOW YOU POSTED THOSE COMMENTS ON TWITTER ABOUT SCHOOL SHOOTINGS AND ME BEORE THE THREAT, AND I WOULD BET MONEY THAT THE TOR PROGRAM THAT YOUR USING WAS USED IN THE MAKING OF THAT THREAT. MY LAWYER AND THE STATE ALSO KNOWNS YOU MADE THOSE COMMENTS, JUST DAYS BEFORE THE SCHOOL THREAT, DIRTY HARRY AKA FCCBODYGUARD. BECAUSE IF WON'T I WILL AND YOU WILL NOT LIKE IT....I HAVE FEW IDEAS WHO YOU ARE AND WILL CAUSE YOU A LOT OF FUCKING PAIN!!

YOU LITTLE COCKSUCKERS ARE GOING TO BE PISSED WHEN THIS SHIT GETS DISMISSED.
 
Back
Top Bottom