Crime Tiny Knife Wielding Tranny Shot By Cops

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Yes and there's a flip side to this shame-based approach to law and order: https://www.economist.com/news/lead...s-are-far-too-vulnerable-abuse-forced-confess
https://www.economist.com/news/asia...s-undermining-faith-courts-extractor-few-fans


https://youtube.com/watch?v=yFINmgSzK6E(Even the guy in this video still "apologizes to the People of Japan" FFS.)
The ninety-nine percent conviction rate is fake news, and the articles admitted those wrongfully accused and forced to confess are rare. As there's less crime, it's logical there's less of a chance being convicted over something you didn't do in the first place.

Like in the West, some of the real crime is hard to prosecute. Japanese police won't even touch Nigerians and Somalis (yes these fucks are everywhere, even in Japan) and Chinese and Koreans at suspected Yakuza-controlled nightclubs in Roppongi and Kabukichō respectively, over fear of being called racist.

Why is this even a topic for discussion? No matter what type of criminal justice system a country has, suicidal troons wouldn't care. The retard was just too much of a pansy to kill himself, so he provoked a police officer.
 
Yes and there's a flip side to this shame-based approach to law and order: https://www.economist.com/news/lead...s-are-far-too-vulnerable-abuse-forced-confess
https://www.economist.com/news/asia...s-undermining-faith-courts-extractor-few-fans


https://youtube.com/watch?v=yFINmgSzK6E(Even the guy in this video still "apologizes to the People of Japan" FFS.)

That's probably an excessively high conviction rate and includes at least some bogus confessions, possibly due to cultural reasons, but I wouldn't overestimate that. Most jurisdictions in the U.S. have conviction rates easily in excess of 90% too. The simple fact is the vast majority of criminal defendants are, in fact, guilty.
 
Also, prosecutors can choose who to bring charges against, and who to decline to do so.

Essentially, a high conviction rate is expected, since the DA gets to choose who he/she is going to try, they have no obligation to try EVERYONE.

And, given finite resources and time, they will only prosecute those where there's enough evidence to reasonably get a conviction.

I'm not saying they're lazy, or dishonest, but the fact is, most people who warrant a trial are overwhelmingly guilty and are hoping for a 1 in a million shot at a fluke acquittal.

The conviction rate doesn't really give any valuable insight into the effectiveness of the law in a given society on crime, just the effectiveness of the system at staying internally efficient.
 
After their memorial, the local AntiFa decided to riot.
qOqaSmB.jpg

And of course, they found some suicide notes
TrDxlX5.png
2T4pZMr.png
 
So he wanted to get killed, deliberately created a situation where it got killed, but it's the cops' fault.

Not his shitty antifa loser of a dad whose response to the death of his son was to make a cheap political point.

Not the troons who enabled his mental illness.

It's the fault of the people who were unwillingly dragged into the mess.

And these antifa bitches are rioting. Fuck those people with a rusty chainsaw.
 
Literally none of these idiots would be reacting this way if the guy weren't a genderspecial.

But then again none of us would care either.

BLM would if he were black.

But frankly BLM at this point is nowhere near as bad as antifa, at least if you exclude out the actual violent nuts like the guy who shot cops in Dallas. And he wasn't even BLM as such. He was probably going to go off at some point with or without BLM. (Sort of like the "Nazi" at Charlottesville. He was ideologically sympathetic to the white nationalists but had no known substantive connection to any of them.)
 
That's probably an excessively high conviction rate and includes at least some bogus confessions, possibly due to cultural reasons, but I wouldn't overestimate that. Most jurisdictions in the U.S. have conviction rates easily in excess of 90% too. The simple fact is the vast majority of criminal defendants are, in fact, guilty.
It can't help that you can be held for 23 days without charge, which is like 10 times what you can be held in the US.
 
Last edited:
That's probably an excessively high conviction rate and includes at least some bogus confessions, possibly due to cultural reasons, but I wouldn't overestimate that. Most jurisdictions in the U.S. have conviction rates easily in excess of 90% too. The simple fact is the vast majority of criminal defendants are, in fact, guilty.

Well, depends on how you look at it.

In Japan, you can hold a suspect of a crime for up to 23 days (48 hours at the very least), during which you either have them spill they did it or find proof that doesn't require their confession they did it, so long as you have enough burden of proof you can present to their version of a prosecutor that presents probable cause to consider them a suspect worthy of detainment for questioning, in which case the detainment can last up to ten days to the max of 23.

This means they can legally leave you in a cell for about a month, with the only breaks being interrogations, during which they must let you go at the end of that interval if you don't crack and they can't hang any flesh on the accusation without your cooperation.

Your ability to retain legal counsel is somewhat worse than in the U.S, as in their culture if you are accused of a crime, it's generally assumed you did it and the defense attorney is trying to get you a fair plea bargain most of the time, unless you can present ironclad proof of your innocence.

Generally speaking, while in both Japan and the U.S. they can pick you up for questioning, they only hold anyone 48 hours for any reason whatsoever in Japan, only up to 10-23 days if they can convince a prosecutor of the solidity of their case against you after that.
 
Generally speaking, while in both Japan and the U.S. they can pick you up for questioning, they only hold anyone 48 hours for any reason whatsoever in Japan, only up to 10-23 days if they can convince a prosecutor of the solidity of their case against you after that.

They can hold you here longer on a material witness warrant, but this doesn't necessarily involve you being a defendant.

One difference here is if you say "lawyer" they pretty much have to end it immediately and not resume until you have one.
 
The cops didn't have tasers and a suicidal man was moving towards them with a knife. They had no non-lethal recourse. Suicidal people are unstable and sometimes people who 'suicide by cop' try to kill the cops since they want to die and many are willing to go to such lengths.

The cops did everything they possibly could to try and diffuse the situation, but when a suicidal person is coming towards you and wants you to shoot him, he might actually stab you to make you do it.

What needs to be examined is the failure of his support systems up to this point. If you want to examine the LEOs, find out why they weren't armed with tasers and then arm them with them.
 
My main problem with this thread is still that despite everyone's best efforts, there isn't a tranny midget wielding a knife and fighting cops. Because that would be pretty awesome.
 
I wonder if the other suicide by cop troons will reconsider after hearing him scream in agony after being shot?
 
I wonder if the other suicide by cop troons will reconsider after hearing him scream in agony after being shot?

They're literally fucking retarded and will probably be standing up in line to be the next screaming gutshot troons "murdered" by evil pig cops.
 
Back
Top Bottom