Ti+s and A$$ - Angry feminist hates seeing ads with sexy women in current year. Even on liberal websites!

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Original (Archive)

I like to read the news online but, in the year 2023, in the time of “Me Too,” why do I constantly have to see other women’s bodies objectified like a slab of meat? We barely even notice this anymore because it’s so “normal” in our society but should it be?

CNN is one of the worst, but only one of many offenders. One minute I’m reading about a rare piece of art bought in a thrift shop and then I’m looking at a woman doing what? Why is the woman at the right leaning in that suggestive manner on a solar panel?! Does this make me want to buy solar panels? It’s so crazy that we just allow our news outlets to do this without questioning it! I never see attractive men bending over a solar panel with their butts in tight pants!

Why should I see this image at below when I want to find out about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine? They could easily control what kind of ads they allow on their site but why bother? It’s not like some man reading the news has to see a crotch shot of another man!

Below is a pic I was forced to see of a female athlete trying to warm up and some Ahole gets down on the floor to take a photo of her vulva! I was trying to check the weather!

And next up it the Orlando Sentinel. I pay to subscribe to that and I do want to know about Hurricane Idalia but how is a so-called respectable newspaper allowing ad pulls like this one and no one even questions it?

This ad pull has all the women-hating sexist hits we’ve become used to. What the “Perfect Female Body” looked like throughout time! Why are we still seeing Monica Lewinsky be publicly tortured for a stupid mistake she made as a young woman? Then the perennial favorite, some female movie star got old! THIS is what she looks like at 95!!! OMG! She got old!!! Jesus! Leave her alone! She was an actress; that doesn’t mean you should take mean photos of her and shame her for not getting enough plastic surgery!

And, finally, the endless — Gymnast gained WEIGHT! — photos. Gymnasts are incredible athletes. The hours and hours they spend in the gym every day for years are almost unbelievable, but they attracts perverted, sick, men like poop attracts dung beetles! Most of these are girls, not even women! i.e. they’re children! They’ve already been sexualized by creeps for years and now they can’t grow up and gain weight without being constantly shamed for it? It’s sickening.

Do we wonder why some many young girls and women get groped, raped, shamed and develop eating disorders? How can they not when this garbage is everywhere around them
Here I am on Weather Underground and I get served another ad for solar panels and have to wonder, “What is the subtext of this ad? Does buying solar panels make young, tightly clothed woman drape themselves on you and allow you to give a thumbs up that implies you’re getting “lucky” tonight, wink, wink?

Can women even BUY solar panels or do you have to be male? Are there Pink Solar Panels for women that cost twice the price and attract a tightly clothed young man to your boudoir?

I’m trying to read about Microplastics in the Ocean in Treehugger, TREEHUGGER! but, of course, I have to look at another woman’s breasts in order to do so. This one infuriates me even more because I loved Star Trek Voyager until they added “Seven” in her tight, tight cat suit and high heeled boots! We can’t have a middle-aged, Woman Starship Captain without some gratuitous T and A! From Yeoman Rand, to Counselor Troy to Seven of Nine to Dax in her swimsuit scene with a fully clothed Worf, we HAVE to have a sex object and a man-whore in every version of the “futuristic” Star Trek!

Florida Today does nasty, sexist ad-pulls — of COURSE they do! Our idiot governor doesn’t mind that kind of sexual grooming of children! You won’t see these newspapers and magazines get banned from our libraries! Also, I pay for that and it is a crappy, right-wing piece of garbage but how else do you know which restaurants have roaches?

Even the New York Times has some of these sexist ad-pulls but it isn’t quite as nasty as some of the others. I pay for that paper too but I have to see that effete, whiny, piece of garbage, Ross Douchehat’s face on that paper and it enrages me every single time! He has opinions on why young people should marry and be faithful to one another after he left his wife for a much younger woman right? He doesn’t see the hypocrisy in this. Ack! I have to go do something else now to quell the crone rage I’m feeling!

I love Daily Kos but they do sexist ad pulls too!

Oh yes! I do want a 3D printer, Facebook, but not served up with a side dish of “Look! A female movie star got OLD!”
I’ll pick one here instead: WomenIn3Dprinting
 
We live in a weird world where ugly and fat women are now over represented in advertisements and media nowadays than ever before. If she's still butthurt that sometimes some ads have the occasional normal non freakish women then she should an hero because clearly she has nothing else to do in life but nitpick every little thing that makes her butthurt.
 
Is she talking about overly sexualised inappropriate images or ‘pretty girl looking into camera leaning on item that’s being advertised.? There’s a difference. Let’s check the actual article. Oh.
I don’t like the twerking/wearing a thong to advertise stuff - there’s a minimum of clothing for public display of an advert. But none of the examples in her article are anything bad. The girl and guy with the solar panels - girl is wearing jeans and shirt ffs, she’s not naked draped on solar panels. It’s an image you could say was cheesy but it’s not overly sexual. The rest are clickbait. They wouldn’t run gymnast gets cat stories if no one clicked on them, and I will bet it’s not men clicking in them either
Attractive women sell items. Even to other women. I go online to buy clothes and some of the few brands that are halfway still decent all have obese women and awfully shot pics. I don’t want to see that. Not even ‘normal looking woman’ but actively gross. Go into somewhere like Zalando and see how fucking ugly the pictures are. The lingerie is sold modelled on fat women. I don’t want to see that. Honestly I’d rather see it as a flat lay or on a mannequin.
Also I hate the use of the word pull here . Ad pulls, it’s just lazy English.
 
Is she fat?
pez.jpg

Can't tell. Also, she's arguing with every single person who disagrees with her in the comments:
pez2.jpg

She also powerlevels as being a teacher in Florida, and being interested in birdwatching:
pez3.jpg

There's a wikipedia account with the same name that has a link to a blog about their old alpaca farm (someone should send their alpaca care DVD to the Tranch). There's also Flickr account:
22936153970_2af9de0d20_k.jpg

So she's an insecure old lady with a bad case of DeSantis Derangement Syndrome.
 
Last edited:
This is kiwi farms, there is no need to censor tits and arse.
There's not even a need to censor Ni***r but I still censor it as it is RACISM's favourite word
 
Absolutely Everything Should Be Catered Directly to Me - The Article by an aging woman who no longer gets men's attention and is bittered by this progression. This blog post has 36 exclamation marks, just in case you were wondering.

Here I am on Weather Underground and I get served another ad for solar panels and have to wonder, “What is the subtext of this ad? Does buying solar panels make young, tightly clothed woman drape themselves on you and allow you to give a thumbs up that implies you’re getting “lucky” tonight, wink, wink?
The subtext is "Hey, psst, look, it's a pretty lady. Now that I've gotten your attention, may I interest you in buying some solar panels?" That's it.

I pay for that paper too but I have to see that effete, whiny, piece of garbage, Ross Douchehat’s face on that paper
It's funny how feminists never fail to belittle men with derogatory terms commonly associated with women.
 
This is kiwi farms, there is no need to censor tits and arse.
There's not even a need to censor Ni***r but I still censor it as it is RACISM's favourite word
That's the original article title. He's not censoring anything.
 
I read the same publication and never see these ads even when my adblocker is off.

It's interesting how people reveal what they look at online when the algorithm is looking.

I'm terminally online and have never in my life seen a "gymnast gains weight" article.
 
Too bad. Sexy beautiful women push products. Same cannot be said of crippled and fat landwhales.
Not to mention that these kinds of people are the reason the Earth's resources are going to shit. But no it's the fault of people having kids, not some overconsumption fetishists who have zero self-control.
 
I for one can't tell why companies don't just all use 300kg stunning and brave genderfluid specimens with self inflicted skin diseases to push their hip new product. We need further research on the subject.
 
OMG WHO THE HELL CARES!

Oh and it's from that progressive blog site.

These types of people and their whining have already ruined so much of western (and quickly asian as well) media. They always claim it's about what "they" have to see but always fight hardest to shame, screech and force their wills onto everything and anything intended for men. The good old "I don't want to have to see it and your thing should be for me too!" excuse.
 
Back
Top Bottom