Disaster Thomas Cook collapses, triggering largest peacetime repatriation efforts. - Consider the books Cooked.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Thomas Cook has collapsed after last-minute negotiations aimed at saving the 178-year-old holiday firm failed.

The UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) said the tour operator has "ceased trading with immediate effect".

It has also triggered the biggest ever peacetime repatriation aimed at bringing more than 150,000 British holidaymakers home.

Peter Fankhauser, Thomas Cook's chief executive, said the firm's collapse was a "matter of profound regret".

Commenting as the company entered compulsory liquidation, Mr Fankhauser also apologised to the firm's "millions of customers, and thousands of employees".

The tour operator's failure puts 22,000 jobs at risk worldwide, including 9,000 in the UK.

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said the company's collapse was "very sad news for staff and holidaymakers".

He urged holidaymakers to be "understanding with staff" amid the "enormous" task of bringing people home.

Mr Shapps has announced that the government and CAA has hired dozens of charter planes to fly customers home free of charge.

The emergency operation, codenamed Operation Matterhorn, is aiming to bring home Britons currently on holiday with the firm.

On Sunday, empty aircraft had already started to be flown overseas, ready to bring British tourists home on Monday.

One of the world's best known holiday brands, the business was founded in 1841 in Leicestershire by cabinet-maker Thomas Cook.

Presentational grey line
How will holidaymakers get home?
All customers currently abroad with Thomas Cook who are booked to return to the UK over the next two weeks will be brought home "as close as possible" to their booked return date, the Department for Transport (DfT) has said.

Customers will be brought home to the UK on special free flights or booked onto another scheduled airline at no extra cost.

Flights will start operating from Monday, with details of each flight to be posted on a dedicated website as soon as they are available.

The DfT added that a "small number" of passengers may need to book their own flight home and reclaim the costs.

Customers have been urged not to cut short their holiday or go to the airport without checking the website for more information about their return journey.

The CAA is also contacting hotels accommodating Thomas Cook customers, who have booked as part of a package, to tell them that the cost of their accommodation will be covered by the government, through the Air Travel Trust Fund and Air Travel Organiser's Licence scheme (Atol).

Presentational grey line

The CAA said in a statement: "All Thomas Cook bookings, including flights and holidays, have now been cancelled.

"We know that a company with such long-standing history ceasing trading will be very distressing for its customers and employees and our thoughts are with everyone affected by this news."

Tim Johnson, policy director of the CAA, told BBC News it has chartered "more than 40" aircraft, which are already in position, to bring passengers home.

He urged customers in the UK who were due to travel not to go to the airport "because very sadly your flight has been cancelled".

Mr Johnson added: "For those who have not yet started their holiday, we will be publishing details of how they can claim a refund on the website, no later than next Monday."

Business Secretary Andrea Leadsom has said she will write to the Insolvency Service urging them to "fast-track" their investigation into the circumstances surrounding Thomas Cook going into liquidation.

The DfT said the investigation will also consider the conduct of the directors.

p07p20y0.jpg



Media captionTravel expert Simon Calder on the collapse of "the mightiest brand in travel"
Speaking to BBC News from Manchester airport, travel expert Simon Calder said Thomas Cook "wasn't ready for the 21st Century".

He said: "It was using a model that was great for the second half of the 20th Century where people would obediently go into their local travel agency and book a package holiday.

"Now everybody can pretend they are a travel agent. They've got access to all the airline seats, hotel beds, car rentals in the world and they can put things together themselves.

"Thomas Cook simply wasn't differentiating enough."

Mr Calder, travel editor at The Independent, added that planes at the airport began to be impounded shortly after 00:00 BST.

What went wrong?
Thomas Cook had secured a £900m rescue deal led by its largest shareholder Chinese firm Fosun in August, but a recent demand from its lending banks to raise a further £200m in contingency funding had put the deal in doubt.

Fosun said in a statement it was "disappointed" following news of the collapse.

It added: "Fosun confirms that its position remained unchanged throughout the process, but unfortunately other factors have changed.

"We extend our deepest sympathy to all those affected by this outcome."

The holiday company had spent all Sunday in talks with lenders trying to secure the additional funding and salvage the deal, but to no avail.

It had also asked the government for financial aid, a solution also urged by Labour and union groups.

But on Sunday Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab told the BBC the government did not "systematically step in" when businesses went under unless there was "a good strategic national interest".

Customers on a package holiday have Atol protection - a fund paid for through industry levies - which will cover the cost of their holiday and repatriation.

Thomas Cook has blamed a series of issues for its problems including political unrest in holiday destinations such as Turkey, last summer's prolonged heatwave and customers delaying booking holidays because of Brexit.

But the firm has also faced fierce competition from online travel agents and low-cost airlines.

In addition, many holidaymakers are putting together their own holidays and not using travel agents.

What are your rights?
Benidorm, Spain
Image copyrightREUTERS
If you are on a package holiday you are covered by the Atol scheme.

The scheme will pay for your accommodation abroad, although you may have to move to a different hotel or apartment.

Atol will also pay to have you brought home if the airline is no longer operating.

If you have holiday booked in the future you will also be refunded by the scheme.

If you have booked a flight-only deal you will need to apply to your travel insurance company or credit card and debit card provider to seek a refund.

When Monarch Airlines collapsed in 2017, the government organised to bring home all the stranded passengers, whether they were covered by Atol or not.

The world's oldest tour operator has gone under, it would be sad if they weren't so shit.
 
I’m actually surprised that it wasn’t owned by the Chinese yet. Their “main” counterpart in Europe - Club Med - is.

Edit: unsurprising bankruptcy. “All-inclusive” overpriced holiday packages aren’t exactly very popular with the middle class these days.
 
Why the fuck should would a government be involved in shuttling one from one's private vacation, especially from well traveled tourist locations? Literally everything I hear about the Brits trumpets utter inadequacy, stupidity or dictatorial handholding.
 
I don't think the Brits have pride in a a tour operator. Twinnings (British Tea Company) is around 3 centuries old, but I doubt the British public would be clamouring for the government to step in, if it were to collapse. Their workers and employees, on the other hand...

You'd have to have a British public that was British first....
 
The company has had years to update its business model to match things like Jet2 or Ryanair and now look what happened.

Most people don’t book package holidays any more they just go online and book everything themselves paying upfront with a credit card.
 
You know what a good strategic national interest may be? I don't know, but just maybe it could be keeping a British business afloat, that's been in business for 178 years. You just know it will be replaced by some kind of MuhammadAir set up. This is why Japan has all of the oldest businesses in the world - national pride.

That'd be like the government stepping in to keep Blockbuster video or a fax machine company afloat. It's just not the way people travel anymore. Yeah they've been in business for 178 years, but their business plan has been obsolete for the last 20 of them and they've shown no signs of moving with the times.
 
There were a few things that really amused me last night before the announcement and then right after.

Seeing the Tunisian hotel hold the tourists hostage was the most amusing. There were a few tourists, who were locked inside, complaining that the hotel owners were demanding more money than what they paid for the holiday. The UK government told the tourists not to pay any money.

Of course, some people did and were set free. It appears that the people who paid the ransom were able to make their flight; I don’t know if the others did.

I wonder if any of these tourists will go on another holiday to Tunisia or North Africa again?

The next humorous thing was a person complaining that he was going to be flown home to a different airport than the one he flew from. He was upset about the coach ride to the original airport. He was complaining right next to someone who didn’t qualify for the ATOL program and they were searching for available flights back home and were going to have to pay full price for the ticket.

The last amusing gem that occurred just after the announcement. It was noted that 600,000 individuals had their holidays canceled. Someone said, on the bright side, this would reduce carbon emissions.

I hope someone repeats that at an airport pub.
 
Haha, so the UK government is paying for all the people to be returned?

Massive clusterfuck.
Why the fuck should would a government be involved in shuttling one from one's private vacation, especially from well traveled tourist locations? Literally everything I hear about the Brits trumpets utter inadequacy, stupidity or dictatorial handholding.

No. Tour operators in the UK are required to hold an ATOL licence to sell air travel. It is like an insurance or bond program to protect travellers from situations just like this. Everyone will be brought home and those with future ressies will be reimbursed.
 
Uh, what? Why would anyone agree to that?
EU laws are created by the elite. They don’t care how the common people feel. They also lack the ability to see the long term consequences of allowing their businesses to collapse when those businesses can’t compete against other businesses that are being financially supported by foreign governments.

In the case of steel, it has been sold at a loss by more than one country. Hopefully there will still be suppliers of high quality steel 50 years from now.
 
Speaking to BBC News from Manchester airport, travel expert Simon Calder said Thomas Cook "wasn't ready for the 21st Century".

"Now everybody can pretend they are a travel agent. They've got access to all the airline seats, hotel beds, car rentals in the world and they can put things together themselves.

Mr Calder, travel editor at The Independent, added that planes at the airport began to be impounded shortly after 00:00 BST.
The only thing travel agents have ever done that's useful, apart from use their monopoly power to negotiate cheaper deals.

Shadow chancellor John McDonnell told the BBC the government should have bailed out Thomas Cook "if only to stabilise the situation while a real plan for the future of the company could be addressed".
Labor Party promises to establish 'Strength Through Joy (by Thomas Cook)' program, turns out to only cover vacations back home for North African 'Syrians'.
 
No. Tour operators in the UK are required to hold an ATOL licence to sell air travel. It is like an insurance or bond program to protect travellers from situations just like this. Everyone will be brought home and those with future ressies will be reimbursed.

Yes, that babysitting is insane to me, why don't they just buy a ticket home like the adults they are and then be compensated afterward?
 
Yes, that babysitting is insane to me, why don't they just buy a ticket home like the adults they are and then be compensated afterward?
A lot of the people who take these package holidays are already maxed out. They can't afford them but think it's a modern human right to holiday every 6 months.

I've never understood people who get a week off but then want to spend 2-3 days of it travelling which of course means they get super mad if any delays further eat into their already small relaxation time.
 
Uh, what? Why would anyone agree to that?
Back in the 80's and 90's Europe was awash with dying heavy industry that not only couldn't compete with Asia, but couldn't compete with Northern Europe, Germany, Finland, Sweden etc who had made tough reforms in the 60's.

There was no market for what those industries were producing, they couldn't sell at below cost because of WTO rules, and were rife with strikes and causing knock on industrial unrest.

The EU's subsidy rules were meant to take the tough decisions out of national governments hands. ie 'It's not us, we'd love to keep shoveling money into zombie industries but the evil EU commission won't let us'.

Back in the 70's the UK government whether Conservative or Labour would have automatically stepped in to take over Thomas Cook. As well as airlines they owned hotels, removal companies, and travel agencies, all taken into public ownership when they failed. All a complete fucking nightmare for anyone that tried to compete with them.
 
Powerlevel here: I work in the travel industry. We knew this was coming for a while. TC refused to adapt to a changing market - people do still use travel agents, but more people do it online. Combine TUI’s better web presence and smarter shop usage, plus new entrants to the package market like Jet2 and Ryanair who don’t have store costs to cover, plus an airline near entirely dependent on that package business, and they were always doomed.

What’s less reported but arguably more important is the huge knock on effect this has on businesses in the destinations themselves. Thomas Cook was huge - hotels would have contracts solely with them, which they now won’t be paid for.
 
You know what a good strategic national interest may be? I don't know, but just maybe it could be keeping a British business afloat, that's been in business for 178 years. You just know it will be replaced by some kind of MuhammadAir set up. This is why Japan has all of the oldest businesses in the world - national pride.
Not if foreign (((activist investors)))) have their way. Daniel Loeb is attempting to rip Sony apart, which is Japan's last legit tech giant that develops its own consumer products in house rather than let some Taiwanese suicide factory use their name under license. It's all the components and technologies which are of national interest anyway, hence situations like when Trump told Huawei to go fuck itself.

I don't think the Brits have pride in a a tour operator. Twinnings (British Tea Company) is around 3 centuries old, but I doubt the British public would be clamouring for the government to step in, if it were to collapse. Their workers and employees, on the other hand...
Associated British Foods was founded by a Canukistani, and its most lucrative business is an Irish department store.
 
That'd be like the government stepping in to keep Blockbuster video or a fax machine company afloat. It's just not the way people travel anymore. Yeah they've been in business for 178 years, but their business plan has been obsolete for the last 20 of them and they've shown no signs of moving with the times.

If a company has had a long standing history, before your country was turned into a shithole melting pot, there should be some attachment to cultural identity. Not that I expect that from the UK tbh, because they don't have any unique identity anymore. They're a satellite state for Pakistan.

This is basically why in Australia, the Kogan guy bought the Dick Smith brand. It may not operate in the same way, but the name is preserved in the market for the sake of identity. The identity is important.


Not if foreign (((activist investors)))) have their way. Daniel Loeb is attempting to rip Sony apart, which is Japan's last legit tech giant that develops its own consumer products in house rather than let some Taiwanese suicide factory use their name under license. It's all the components and technologies which are of national interest anyway, hence situations like when Trump told Huawei to go fuck itself.


Associated British Foods was founded by a Canukistani, and its most lucrative business is an Irish department store.

Surprisingly, I didn't mean global companies like Sony, but more deeply rooted ones. Sony signed their own deathnote when they became a global entity.
 
This is basically why in Australia, the Kogan guy bought the Dick Smith brand. It may not operate in the same way, but the name is preserved in the market for the sake of identity. The identity is important.
What good is the identity if nobody even remembers it exists? As far as the broader Australian public is concerned, Dick Smith no longer exists outside of their memory. It's been supplanted by JB Hi-FI. While history is all well and good, if a business doesn't have a brand identity that distinguishes it from its competitors, there won't be any cultural attachment at all.

Also, it's a travel firm. Not exactly something you'd have a cultural attachment to, irrespective of 'evil' multiculturalism or not. It's not a company that's prominent in the public sphere the same way as Aston Martin or Rolls Royce.
 
Back
Top Bottom