🐱 Things To Know About Small Penises

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty
Status
Not open for further replies.

Although porn would have us believe otherwise, the average penis size, when erect, is only 4.7 to 6.3 inches in length. That’s right friends, a five-inch penis isn’t small, but literally average. Minds, everywhere, are being blown, I know. I think some of us live under the delusion that penises, even average ones, were somewhere around the seven-inch mark, but that’s not the case. The average penis is smaller than you think.

But, honestly, as much as men seem to be all about their penis size, women aren’t too concerned. According to a study published in the British Journal of Urology International, while 45% of men think their penis is too small, 85% of women are totally satisfied with the size of their partner’s dick. But what even counts as a small penis?

"There isn't a precise definition," Dr. Clare Morrison, of online pharmacy MedExpress, tells Bustle. "But the Journal of Urology recommends that penis-lengthening procedures shouldn't be considered if the flaccid penis length is 4 cm (1.6 inches) or more, and erect penis length is 7.5 cm (3 inches) or more. Therefore it would be fair to say that less than these measurements [could] be considered a small penis."

Still, no matter what size a person's penis is, chances are what they're doing with it can bring both them and their partners pleasure (and, it's non-pleasure-related functions should be working just fine). If you find yourself in bed with someone with a smaller penis, here's what you should know.

1. Small Penises Suit Long-Term Relationships Just Fine


A 2014 study found that when it comes one night stands, size actually might matter— but it found that girth, not length, was the most important metric. One reason for this is that the pleasure derived from a penis-in-vagina (PIV) one night stand typically has to do with the, erm, intensity of the hookup (that's code for wanting to really get pounded), while sex in long-term relationships benefits from deeper communication about each partner's likes and dislikes. For any partnership that involves a penis, it takes practice and finding the right positions, therefore making it better suited for a long-term relationship where emotions and feelings are involved, too.

"Even when making love, there is a lot you can do to ensure that your partner enjoys the experience," Dr. Morrison says. "This generally involves being romantic, making time for foreplay, and including sufficient clitoral stimulation."

“Only a small percentage of women orgasm from stimulation of the cervix,” Dr. Stanton Honig, MD, a Yale Medicine urologist and director of Male Urology, tells Bustle. For most women, “[Size] probably doesn’t matter. It likely be just as good in most cases.”

2. Circumcision Can Change How A Penis Is Perceived
Although circumcision is popular in the United States, in the rest of the world (aside from those who are circumcised for religious reasons), it’s much less common. While the pros and cons of circumcision is an ongoing debate, when we’re talking about penis size, at least in regards to appearance, it does make a difference.

“Circumcision is the removal of the foreskin, leaving the 'glans' exposed,” Dr. Morrison says. “When flaccid, a circumcised penis may look slightly smaller than a non-circumcised one, because there isn't the extra layer of tissue covering the glans. However, when erect, the foreskin retracts and is almost invisible, so in regards to size, there isn't any appreciable difference in how the penis looks.”

While it would be great if men were given the option to be circumcised or not circumcised, especially considering how many nerves are lost in the removal of the foreskin, that’s typically not the case.

3. Penis Anxiety Happens At All Sizes


“There is a tendency for men to think their penis is smaller than it actually is, because it will look smaller from above,” Dr. Morrison says. “Also, having a relatively small penis is actually very common, and indeed, more common than having a very large penis.”

In fact, a 2013 study found that 30% of men who have average or even above-average penises are disappointed in its size, too. If size anxiety is affecting your partner or your sex life, you can talk to a couple's counselor about ways to move past it together.

4. Less Than 1% Of Men Have A Micropenis
When we’re talking about small penises, it’s hard to not address the micropenis. According to research, the smallest of all small penises is medically known at a micropenis — but they're incredibly rare.

"About 0.6% of men have a micropenis," Dr. Morrison says. "This condition is generally recognized at birth or during infancy, and it means that the penis is unusually small.”

According to Dr. Morrison, once a man reaches adulthood and his penis has essentially stopped growing, having reached its “biggest” size, a micropenis is then “characterized by an erect penile length of less than 7 cm (2 3/4 inches)."

5. Specific Positions Can Make Sex Pleasurable For Both Partners


With only 20% of women being able to have an orgasm from penetration alone, you might say that the penis, at any size, is the least important part of penis-in-vagina sex.

“To increase penetration with a short penis, it can help to make love from behind,” Dr. Morrison says. “For example, doggy style. On the other hand, if you prefer face-to-face, try elevating the woman's legs towards her chest, to allow maximum penetration. It's worth experimenting with different positions to see what works best.”

In addition to doggy style, there are other specific sex positions that can feel nice for the receiving partner. For starters, “X Marks the Spot,” and “The Splitter,” allow for deeper penetration, as does “Tighter Doggy,” “Lowered Doggy,” and “Sofa Brace." Basically, any position that involves penetration from the back or, if it’s face-to-face, includes elevated hips or legs, as Dr. Morrison points out, a small penis can feel amazing.

6. Small Penises Aren't Always Small
An interesting fact about penises, is that they’re not always the same size. “Depending on your race, ethnicity, and age, your penis can change in lengths during the day,” Dr. Shaw says. “The penile chambers that fill up with blood during erections are called the corpus cavernosum. People will lose length due to age, diabetes, cholesterol, blood pressure, and hypertension. The arteries, veins and smooth muscle can atrophy (shrink!) secondary to these medical issues.”

This is important to know, since it could point to bigger health issues. “If you’re losing length, it could be a sign of cardiovascular disease,” Dr. Shaw says. While one shouldn’t rely solely on the length of their penis to determine whether or not they have any form of heart disease — regular checkups are best for that — it's a good reminder to stay in touch with your body.

At the end of the day, we need to remember that size isn’t everything. “Women need to know that men are often rather insecure about the size of their penis,” Dr. Morrison says. “This isn't helped by the fact that porn films often show men who are unusually well-endowed. Men may need reassurance that you find them attractive. Don't be embarrassed to tell them what turns you on, and make sure that you are getting enough clitoral stimulation.”

Ultimately, no matter what size the penis, sex is about thinking outside the box. When it comes to penises of all kinds, it’s all about being creative to make sure it’s enjoyable for all partners.
 
I don't like Psychology Today itself either, but that article is very good. I've read each of the studies mentioned in the article to see if there was any misrepresentation and the case presented is very accurate.

If it's such a poor article, give one example of a mistake in it.



I see that you haven't read the article.



There's also the fact that babies that are circumcised have worsened sleep patterns and that it interferes with breastfeeding.
I'm against routine infant circumcision personally, but this is embarrassing. Boys will almost always be completely fine with being circumcised or uncircumcised. It is a matter of competing health risks/benefits, it goes like this:

Circumcision benefits:
-lower rates of infant UTI
-harder to contract HIV as a heterosexual adult
-if circumcision is performed in infants they won't remember any of it

Circumcision risks:
-low risk of accident during procedure or infection afterwards
-risk of lowered sexual sensitivity (sometimes leading to sexual dysfunction)
-procedure is not truly reversible

benefits of not circumcising:
-retention of all sexually responsive tissue
- circumcision can be performed later if a medical need arises

risks of not circumcising:
-higher rate of infant uti (not a moderate or high risk, but a higher rate)
-higer risk of getting HIV as a heterosexual adult
-circumcision may need to be performed later if the foreskin is too tight or chronically irritated/infected (although there are now alternative procedures that can be chosen, though they will also be remembered and painful for the patient because of their age)

which one of these issues is more important than the other is a parenting decision. Some parents believe that they should not make these decisions for their children and choose not to circumcise, others think that they are making the best decision for their child's health by choosing to circumcise. Everyone has the best of intentions and the outcomes are great in both camps.

the smegma issue isn't really a health problem except in extreme cases, when hygiene problems are that severe then a foreskin is the least of that person's concerns. It could be considered a social risk factor I suppose, but so is thinking you don't have to wash your dick because you're circumcised.
 
>Quoting the Bible to day Christians need to be circumcised when Christians have been uncircumcised since Christianity was a religion
 
>Quoting the Bible to day Christians need to be circumcised when Christians have been uncircumcised since Christianity was a religion
Real Christians are circumcised like Jewsus was.

Keeps you safe from marauding old school Jews looking to make necklaces to present to the king, too. Those take like 100 foreskins, you know.
 
The suggestion that doctors would spend time doing studies and writing papers to try to get out of doing paid procedures out of lazyness is ridiculous.

These men you met would not be able to compare a before-and-after, you only get that comparison by comparing large sets of circumcised and uncircumcised men. So they may not know which of their issues are a result of infant circumcision.

Serious question, do you have autism?
Have you not noticed that there is not one person in this thread that has been responding to your seriously this entire time? I'm just curious.
 
I'm against routine infant circumcision personally, but this is embarrassing. Boys will almost always be completely fine with being circumcised or uncircumcised. It is a matter of competing health risks/benefits, it goes like this:

Circumcision benefits:
-lower rates of infant UTI
-harder to contract HIV as a heterosexual adult
-if circumcision is performed in infants they won't remember any of it

Circumcision risks:
-low risk of accident during procedure or infection afterwards
-risk of lowered sexual sensitivity (sometimes leading to sexual dysfunction)
-procedure is not truly reversible

benefits of not circumcising:
-retention of all sexually responsive tissue
- circumcision can be performed later if a medical need arises

risks of not circumcising:
-higher rate of infant uti (not a moderate or high risk, but a higher rate)
-higer risk of getting HIV as a heterosexual adult
-circumcision may need to be performed later if the foreskin is too tight or chronically irritated/infected (although there are now alternative procedures that can be chosen, though they will also be remembered and painful for the patient because of their age)

which one of these issues is more important than the other is a parenting decision. Some parents believe that they should not make these decisions for their children and choose not to circumcise, others think that they are making the best decision for their child's health by choosing to circumcise. Everyone has the best of intentions and the outcomes are great in both camps.

the smegma issue isn't really a health problem except in extreme cases, when hygiene problems are that severe then a foreskin is the least of that person's concerns. It could be considered a social risk factor I suppose, but so is thinking you don't have to wash your dick because you're circumcised.
I'd add that surgery in general that isn't absolutely necessary is really stupid and pretty much amounts to an upsell for hospitals and doctors in non-socialized systems. Elective surgery on infants in particular is "oh shit nigger what are you doing" tier.

But gotta get that collagen for beauty creams somewhere, right?
 
I think if you're going to get cut for religion's sake you should man up and do it at 13 years old, no anesthesia the way the Lord intended. Cutting babies is just the coward's way out.
 
epic, just how I remember my PSN days.
>consoles
1560918857245.jpg
 
I like that you summarize the cost/benefit analysis. That's valuable.

I'd like to know how you come to some of your conclusions though.
I'm against routine infant circumcision personally, but this is embarrassing. Boys will almost always be completely fine with being circumcised or uncircumcised. It is a matter of competing health risks/benefits, it goes like this:

Circumcision benefits:
-lower rates of infant UTI
What study are you basing the claim on that infants have lower rates of UTI?

I think you're refferencing this 1982 study. It is true that 95% of the infants brought in at the Parkland Memorial hospital Dallas with UTI were uncircumcised. But then, this isn't surprising, as barely any babies were circumcised at that hospital. 95% uncircumcised was an average sample of their patients and as such not evidence for lower rates of UTI at all.

Or are you basing it on another study?
-harder to contract HIV as a heterosexual adult
This is only true for studies done in africa. Studies done in the western world show the exact opposite, with circumcised heterosexual men having a bigger chance of contracting HIV.
-if circumcision is performed in infants they won't remember any of it
I've already addressed it. The high cortisol spike and pain for babies has negative effects that last into adulthood.
Circumcision risks:
-low risk of accident during procedure or infection afterwards
-risk of lowered sexual sensitivity (sometimes leading to sexual dysfunction)
-procedure is not truly reversible
Mostly accurate.

It's not a risk of lowered sensitivity; that's a default result. The foreskin is among the most sensitive body parts on the male body and you're removing a good part of it.

As pointed out earlier, your HIV risk rises with circumcision, unless you live in Africa. (PS: they only taught the circumcised group how to use condoms in those studies, lol).

You're also ignoring all the data we have on psychological negative results, the heightened pain sensitivity in adults, the heightened behavioural problems as teens, the worsened sleep rhythm and difficulty breastfeeding and bonding as babies.
Serious question, do you have autism?
Have you not noticed that there is not one person in this thread that has been responding to your seriously this entire time? I'm just curious.
If you cannot pound on the argument, pound on the person; if you cannot pound on the person, pound on the table.

~ @Senior Lexmechanic

You had no problem with @sperginity 's serious post, so I can only assume that it's the content rather than the seriousness of what I type that you object to.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, circumcision is kind of my metiere so I'll graciously admit to the fact that some poor bastards are pretty cut up about it.
 
You had no problem with @sperginity 's serious post, so I can only assume that it's the content rather than the seriousness of what I type that you object to.
Honestly, not shitposting here, I'm personally against infant circumcision but not my kid, not my business.
And please don't pound me. :c

But you are autistic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom