@Nayolfa I have some serious questions:
1) If things got rough with him, would you consider dropping Mr. Enter from the Growing Around project.
2) If things got rough with
you, would you consider leaving the Growing Around project.
3) What is Mr. Enter's reaction this thread and the wiki, assuming he is watching/you are showing him.
Actually, I think the first two questions depend on whose idea Growing Around was in the first place, though from the sounds of it that falls on Mr. Enter. As it's unlikley Mr. Enter would give anybody enough leverage to perform a coup and oust him from this (comparisons to the antagonist from
Ocean's 13 start coming to mind), if things got rough with
anybody then the only result would be their "dismissal" from the GA project as Enter's ego clearly shows he is incapable of admitting he is anything less than perfection and is only reinforced in that regard by his rabid fanclub.
And the third question? We already know the answer. He predictably went defcon fuckzone zero and banned anybody from linking to any outside sources for any reason (I.E. fixing a hole in the wooden fence by encasing the entire thing within a miniature Berlin Wall practically) because he wants to ignore us as he does to any voice that thinks exercising first amendment rights in his presence includes actual criticism.
I mean, it's
just like how The Golden Knight locked down his wiki to prevent anybody but himself being able to edit blatantly self-serving and obviously falsified information. Might turn into (50) Shades of Vade soon with this DeenSeventeen or whatever guy if he decides to confront us personally in the name of Enter.
So how would you guys save a premise like Growing Around? (assuming it can even be saved to begin with)
Challenge Mode: the parodies don't count.
Strip it the fuck down and rebuild the entire premise. After all, the
core idea of GA is that kids are in charge and the adults
aren't, right? Literally everything wrong with GA so far is that there is not even the slightest consistent reasoning behind this move in a setting otherwise identical to real life, so let's start from there.
Naturally, the
easiest way to do this?
It's all imagination. The way GA is set up already ideally supports this with how reality itself is kicked out the door to support clearly irrational and non-supported things like the family pet is A HORSE and kids being able to make the rules of government without civilization imploding like a large scale Black Monday. The key element, above all else, is that it has to be a certain-to-fail kid-central leadership model inside a
controled enviroment.
Well fuck, that's basically the entire premise of
Fantasy Island now that I think about it, as according to wikipedia's summary of Mr. Roarke's motivations:
Roarke had a strong moral code, but he was always merciful. He usually tried to teach his guests important life lessons through the medium of their fantasies, frequently in a manner that exposes the errors of their ways, and on occasions when the island hosted terminally ill guests he would allow them to live out one last wish. Roarke's fantasies were not without peril, but the greatest danger usually came from the guests themselves. In some cases people were killed due to their own negligence, aggression or arrogance. When necessary, Roarke would directly intervene when the fantasy became dangerous to the guest; for instance, when Tattoo was given his own fantasy as a birthday gift, which ended up with him being chased by hostile natives in canoes, Mr. Roarke suddenly appeared in a
motorboat, snared Tattoo's canoe with a grappling hook and towed it away at high speed to help him escape. Another instance was in the 1980 episode "With Affection, Jack the Ripper" when a female guest intent on researching
Jack the Ripper's crimes was sent back in time to 1888 London and would have became one of the Ripper's victims had not Mr. Roarke physically intervened. With only a few exceptions, Roarke always made it quite clear that he was powerless to stop a fantasy once it had begun and that guests must play them out to their conclusion.
So, basically, GA would need to be a little bit like that, except within an environment that wasn't as potentially fatal as Fantasy Island and much more light-hearted. The parents would easily be support roles only as they weren't really part of the imagined setting to begin with, but on the periphery of the children's active consciousness, popping in now and then to say lunch was ready or something, or if a child went overboard in some way be able to directly "cancel" the imagined setting for that of hard reality.