- Joined
- May 20, 2013
Probably autism...
TheMysteriousMrEnter
- Thread starter Dilbertmann
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Status
Probably autism...
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2014
Even when I was little, I saw it as a funny episode because of the irony. Santa Clause always has a jolly and peaceful theme. Better put in chaotic violence!
Mr Enter doesn't understand the idea of absurdity as a joke.
Stay safe
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
Sometimes it feels like he doesn't even know what a joke is.
Segue
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2014
Mr. Enter does sometimes bring a valid point to the table, but then after he maks it he feels the need to constantly sperg about it and hammer it in. Sometimes it doesn't feel like his videos are even scripted.
Gonna reply to some older posts
I think he does have a valid point with this particular episode. Just replace Canadian with Muslim or something and it would sound way more horrible.
Call me autistic as fuck but I still haven't figured it out.
You have to keep in mind that these cartoons were made a very long time ago, stuff like this was probably more acceptable to show in cartoons. And at the time cartoons weren't mostly a kids thing and were geared towards everybody as opposed to being mostly a kids thing.
Gonna reply to some older posts
I think he does have a valid point with this particular episode. Just replace Canadian with Muslim or something and it would sound way more horrible.
Call me autistic as fuck but I still haven't figured it out.
You have to keep in mind that these cartoons were made a very long time ago, stuff like this was probably more acceptable to show in cartoons. And at the time cartoons weren't mostly a kids thing and were geared towards everybody as opposed to being mostly a kids thing.
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2014
So, not sure if it's been asked yet, but what do you think Mr Enter's view on women is? He sorta sees himself as an asexual, yeah? And anytime he does a review that involves a romance he treats it with disgust. What if he had a bad experience with a lady one time and he decided never to fall in love again?
What if he's a suido MRA?
What if he's a suido MRA?
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
I'm surprised that he sometimes knows what emotions are. Even if all he seems to emit is fake anger.
Probably hates them. Seeing as he's autistic and all, it's probably brought on by a thought of "They'll never want to fuck me".
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2014
You know - I was going to say something about how his cartoon idea is actually worse than some lesser shows I like and then make a list of those shows that are better than this shitty idea of his, but I won't. The truth speaks for itself here immensely. This guy needs to go his ass to school and learn himself some shit if he's going to go along with this shit after all. After all, you need certification (And a shit ton of it, too!) if you're going into this field.
...And seeing as I really enjoy all those (otherwise popular) shows among other that almost, if not equally capture that same level (though not always, hence why they are lesser than those examples, IMHO!), I see a problem here. Actually, multiple - the biggest one being delusions of grandeur and misplaced pride that needs to be challenged.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
You know the phrase "Kidding Around"? The title's essentually that phrase, but with the kidding replaced with growing (as in "growing up").
Yeah, that's got to be a stupid as fuck title. And there's already tons of those.
Kabobs
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2014
Mr. Enter feels the need to share his rules for reviewing content:
1.) I only review animated things. Or things mostly animated (Truth or Square pushed this rule HARD. Don't expect anything less animated than that to ever be reviewed).
2.) Foreign properties need to have been aired in their country of origin at least once, and have an official English dub.
3.) For Admirable Animation, when it comes to the internet I can review anything I want. Any restrictions there only applies to atrocities.
4.) For me to review fiction internet animation, the creator needs to be above 18 years of age, have a pay wall/sell their show on DVD (something like that), and declare some degree of professionalism UNLESS they are associated with online distributors like Cartoon Hangover or Channel Fredirator
5.) The previous restriction is removed if the creators are specifically making non-fiction (bad tutorials or awareness videos).
6.) A film must have a budget of at least 5,000,000 dollars for me to review it. And it can't be Foodfight!
7.) I reserve the right to not talk about specific series, but in those cases I cannot do either admirable or atrocity videos.
8.) I cannot review anything that I have personally had involvement in.
9.) While other, larger critics significantly lowers the chance of me to review something, if I have a new angle on it I can review it.
10.) I cannot review products of their time when I was not around during that time. The merchandise-driven cartoons of the 80's was a time where I wasn't around, therefore I cannot review them. The Ren & Stimpy grossout rip-offs of the 90's was a time where I WAS around, therefore I CAN review them.
(Mr. Enter was born in 1992 so that rules out him reviewing much older animation)
http://mrenter.deviantart.com/art/My-Rules-of-Selecting-Reviews-511005264
1.) I only review animated things. Or things mostly animated (Truth or Square pushed this rule HARD. Don't expect anything less animated than that to ever be reviewed).
2.) Foreign properties need to have been aired in their country of origin at least once, and have an official English dub.
3.) For Admirable Animation, when it comes to the internet I can review anything I want. Any restrictions there only applies to atrocities.
4.) For me to review fiction internet animation, the creator needs to be above 18 years of age, have a pay wall/sell their show on DVD (something like that), and declare some degree of professionalism UNLESS they are associated with online distributors like Cartoon Hangover or Channel Fredirator
5.) The previous restriction is removed if the creators are specifically making non-fiction (bad tutorials or awareness videos).
6.) A film must have a budget of at least 5,000,000 dollars for me to review it. And it can't be Foodfight!
7.) I reserve the right to not talk about specific series, but in those cases I cannot do either admirable or atrocity videos.
8.) I cannot review anything that I have personally had involvement in.
9.) While other, larger critics significantly lowers the chance of me to review something, if I have a new angle on it I can review it.
10.) I cannot review products of their time when I was not around during that time. The merchandise-driven cartoons of the 80's was a time where I wasn't around, therefore I cannot review them. The Ren & Stimpy grossout rip-offs of the 90's was a time where I WAS around, therefore I CAN review them.
(Mr. Enter was born in 1992 so that rules out him reviewing much older animation)
http://mrenter.deviantart.com/art/My-Rules-of-Selecting-Reviews-511005264
Dilbertmann
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
I don't think most reviewers share rules other than choosing something at random, praising or blamming it and giving it a award or something.
But Mr. Enter thinks he's all holy and all, like "IF YOU WANT YOUR SHIT REVIEWED FOLLOW MY GUIDELINES FOR I AM TOO AWESOME TO PICK SOMETHING AT RANDOM". So I assume that's why he set up those rules; to show he's the greatest cartoon reviewer around.
Yeah...humor is a lot more harder to attempt. You can't pull jokes out of your ass and expect them to be funny. And given his video about "never assume it's funny", that's such slanted hypocrisy beyond recognition. But of course, Enter is all ego and less brains. He thinks his jokes are automatically funny when they're so cliche. I wouldn't be surprised if he added a fart joke or two in there, considering his hate for gross-out humor.
I should know. As someone that's a comedy writer, you need to use what you feel is funny, and present it as a one-liner, sight gag, situation, etc. Shock humor is a little easier to do, like using violence or jokes that are meant to rustle jimmies, so people use that as a cop-out. I use shock humor, but in the form of violence and nudity. Alright enough rambling.
Enter thinks that "hey I'm famous so I'mma make the greatest toon ever". It takes time to make a toon - he's gotta take a animation school if he wants to get into tooning and the final product takes weeks, even months or a year to complete. But of course, Enter won't give a shit and expects his stuff to be worth an Annie award.
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2014
I get a bit of a Social-Justicey vibe from his vids. I think that he may be a feminist (at least somewhat), which isn't a bad thing at all. He's probably been "friend zoned" before though.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
I have so many issues with this list (including why it needs to exist in the first place). But I'm gonna' list my three biggest gripes (ie the ones in bold):
1. I see his double standards are kicking in. No, no, in order for this to work, you'd need to have ground rules in general. Not for one of the other. Then again, why you even need ground rules to begin with puzzles me.
2. Saying this after reviewing Hunchback of Notre Dame 2, a movie that obviously had a budget of less than $5 million.
3. If several members from TGWTG can come out and review their awful excuse for movies like Kickassia. I fail to see that logic.
I hear ya, speaking as someone who riff videos ala MST3K (I'm sure some of you know about The Anotated Series). It can get pretty hard trying to come up with jokes to match the situation and be funny at the same time. Mr. Enter's script looks so cold and reads so bland that if he didn't write it. I'd be certain that it was done by a robot.
Kabobs
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2014
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
Judging by this, not long at all.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
From past bouts with other people who dared to think differently about Enter, I'd say it won't be very long at all...
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Quality and content are eternal.
It is an aberration of the moment that we live in a hypersensitive society that seeks to shield its members from anything remotely "offensive." Those old Looney Tunes that are now often censored are the pinnacle of our civilization. Tex Avery is our Shakespeare. Bugs Bunny is our Robin Hood. We censor and bowdlerize at the peril of our culture.
That may sound autistic as fuck, but I believe it to be true.
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2014
Damn
That's a whole lot of projecting right there
I guess even Mr Enter's own youtube fanbase isn't exempt from youtube comment syndrome
- Status