The Truth About Interracial Intimacy

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link/Archive
1770813377267.png

I grew up in Chicago believing the book on interracial marriage my father, a white anthropologist, worked on throughout my childhood sprang from his love for my Black Jamaican mother. But when I finally opened the boxes of papers I had inherited, I discovered he had begun interviewing Black-white couples as a 21-year-old graduate student in the 1930s, long before he met her. In notes from his bachelor-era interviews in the 1950s, he described a wild party for mixed-race couples only. Reading these papers left me uneasy about desire that’s racialized—when race itself becomes the attraction.

I can picture clearly the first time I was unsettled by this type of attraction. The moment plays back like a haunting scene from a movie.

It is the month before my eighth-grade graduation from my integrated school in Kenwood, as the chilly Chicago spring slowly warms into summer. I am barely thirteen years old. During recess or when school lets out, I notice two white girls in my grade leaning casually against the school wall as Black boys bend toward each one, playfully chatting.

The girls pose with an unaccustomed demeanor as they look up at the boys, seeming to hold their attention effortlessly. They are dressed in miniskirts that had become shorter than the year before, knee-high socks, and fitted blouses. I can tell they fancy themselves more mature than our classmates for talking with the boys in this manner. In hindsight, I suspect that the boys were students at the high school, who crossed the park separating our schools for a chance to share this momentary exchange.

That was my first awareness of the dynamic of white girls and Black boys expressing a distinctive attraction toward each other. The sight of those boys and girls interacting was unlike anything I had seen or experienced before. It felt unfamiliar, a sharp contrast to the behavior I was used to from my classmates.

In my little autograph book, with a blue cover and multicolored pages, where my classmates wrote playful farewells as we departed for high school, a common inscription from the girls was “2 cool 2 go 4 boys,” a phrase that hinted at a collective innocence—or perhaps a shared resistance to interest in romance. In that moment, I sensed that those white girls and Black boys had crossed a line. And I knew race played a part in what I was seeing.

At that point, the closest I’d gotten to flirting was a phone call from one of the Black boys in my class. He told me he liked me and asked me “to go with” him. Maybe if I had agreed, I might have been one of the girls with her back against the wall, with him smiling down at me that day. But even a second phone call was out of the question. My mother wouldn’t allow it.

Maybe those white girls were the only ones who were willing, not the only ones who were desired. The Black southern writer Kiese Laymon explains in his memoir, Heavy, that the reason the first girl he had sex with was white—even though he was attracted to a Black girl—was because the white girl was the first to ask him. In any case, the dynamic surely would have been radically different if I, a Black girl, were in the scene.

Questions swirled in my mind. Did their flirting extend beyond the schoolyard? I wondered. Was there more to it than the playfulness I was witnessing? My mother had worked hard to shield me from any sexual experience of my own, but I could still detect the charged energy emanating from the scene. I felt a knot form in my stomach. My face burned with intense and confusing emotions I couldn’t fully articulate at the time. I resented the girls for the power they held over the boys. I felt disgusted with the boys for being captivated by it. I felt betrayed by all of them.

I never felt similarly offended by my parents’ relationship, however. Daddy frequently praised my mother’s beauty while I was growing up. He admired my mother’s many dazzling traits, her intelligence and grace, along with her appearance, and he made a habit of saying so.

Looking back on his attraction to her, I can see that it stemmed at least in part from her African features. As if to leave no doubt, Daddy was fond of repeating the saying “The blacker the berry, the sweeter the juice.” I understood perfectly when I was little that he meant that he found Mommy’s dark skin—and the charms that went along with it—appealing. I also knew he meant the saying as a rebuke of the white-beauty standard, the dominant societal preference for light skin.

Far from hearing anything unseemly in my father’s words, I was grateful for his adoration of my mother’s Blackness. At the time, I had no idea that he had pursued Black women long before he met my mother. Still, knowing that now doesn’t tarnish my view of their relationship. (Even if that means I am judging my classmates in my recurring memory more harshly than I am my parents.)

Statistics bear out the strong influence race has on intimate relationships. The most obvious impact is that people in the United States tend to marry within their own race.

The US Supreme Court struck down bans on interracial marriage in 1967, but no law regulates personal preferences when choosing a partner. While interracial marriages have steadily increased in recent decades—along with popular approval—they remain relatively uncommon.

As my father noted in his 1940 master’s thesis, mixed-race marriages are far less frequent than we would expect if couples were randomly matched without regard to race. According to a 2008 study, if pairings were random, 44 percent of all US marriages would be interracial. In reality, that number is just about 20 percent—a clear sign that race continues to shape marital choices.

For me, interracial intimacy can’t be disentangled from the larger forces of race, gender, and power that continue to govern our world.

Soon after I opened my father’s boxes for the first time, I was introduced to the unsettling world of digital dating research by my sociology PhD student, Sarah Adeyinka-Skold. Her work explores how young women from different racial backgrounds navigate the search for long-term romantic partners. Based on dating app data and interviews with 111 Asian, Black, Latina, and white college-educated women, Sarah found that Black women face the greatest number of barriers in the modern dating landscape.

Most online dating platforms allow users to set racial preferences, including filtering potential matches by race, and the patterns that emerge are striking. While most users, to varying degrees, show a preference to date within their own racial group, what’s more telling is who they won’t even consider.

Black users are 10 times more likely to message white users than the reverse. In fact, 80 percent of white users send messages exclusively to other white users, and only 3 percent reach out to Black users. One man, reflecting on these dynamics, described the trend as sexual racism masked as preference. He recalled sending a photo on a dating app and receiving a blunt reply: “I don’t like black guys, sorry.”

Conversely, whiteness—or even partial European ancestry—provides a noticeable advantage in the dating market. While white people are the least likely to date outside their racial group, non-white people are most likely to choose white people as the group they would date interracially.

One finding from the dating app data that Sarah shared with me was especially infuriating: Black women are the only group of women frequently excluded as potential dating partners by men of their own race. To put it bluntly, some Black men reject Black women categorically—simply because they are Black.

The history of sexual violation of Black women and lynching of Black men casts a long shadow over the politics of interracial intimacy. It makes Black women’s relationships with white men seem as if the women are capitulating to a white supremacist and patriarchal hierarchy, while Black men’s relationships with white women are countering it. But I can also see the opposite. Those exceptional white men who love, admire, and commit to Black women are nothing like exploitative enslavers—and the Black women who love them in return aren’t victims of exploitation. By contrast, those Black men who see having romantic relationships with white women as a badge of liberation, a prize that no Black woman can offer, do nothing to oppose the racial hierarchy. In these admittedly skewed scenarios, the white men are contesting white supremacist disparagement of Black women, whereas the Black men are playing into it.

I can’t deny my bias—both as a Black woman and as the daughter of a Black woman who married a white man, my father. Yet, what matters most to me is my fierce loyalty to Black women and my opposition to the stereotypes, policies, dating apps, jokes, social media, TV shows, and movies that demean us. Few things ignite my anger more than the notion that Black women are inherently less attractive, less capable, less nurturing, or less valuable. Everything I have written and worked toward as an adult has been dedicated to celebrating and uplifting Black women’s sexuality, childbearing, and motherhood.

I wish I could believe that sexual attraction, desire, and love exist untouched by race. Romantic attraction is supposed to be a magical force, something beyond our control that transcends the influence of society. “Why can’t you just be happy for people who love each other?” my husband often insists when I bring up the sociological dimensions of interracial intimacy. “Why does everything have to be political?”

I would never discuss these thoughts at the interracial weddings of friends and family—I respect those moments and their marital decisions as deeply personal. I try not to make this about individual choices. But I can’t ignore what I’ve spent years studying: the undeniable ways unequal structures shape our preferences, even the most intimate ones.
 
So the author is married but she doesn't mention the race of her husband? Seems an oversight in a screed about race, no?
 
I didn't notice until someone pointed it out to me but kikes are obsessed with niggers. From controlling them, breeding them, and experimenting on them. What the fuck is going on there?

that was always the point
I think they are trying to breed a subservient class but it's currently backfiring on them. I'm just speculating here, but I think they figured the passiveness of white people would override the aggressive behavior of the other races.
 
It makes Black women’s relationships with white men seem as if the women are capitulating to a white supremacist and patriarchal hierarchy, while Black men’s relationships with white women are countering it. But I can also see the opposite. Those exceptional white men who love, admire, and commit to Black women are nothing like exploitative enslavers—and the Black women who love them in return aren’t victims of exploitation. By contrast, those Black men who see having romantic relationships with white women as a badge of liberation, a prize that no Black woman can offer, do nothing to oppose the racial hierarchy. In these admittedly skewed scenarios, the white men are contesting white supremacist disparagement of Black women, whereas the Black men are playing into it.

She is right about this but she wears SJW blinders and cant understand the male mind or history well enough to comprehend why.

When a male sleeps with a foreign female he is a conquerer, when a foreigner sleeps with your native females you are conquered.

Women of all races makes my peepee hard, except for Black women.

This. Unless they get the perfect ad-mixture or are a lot closer to 50% (and as the author demonstrates the 50/50 comes with a lot of baggage). I can get with a plain Jane Euro girl or Asain, a black woman of the same tier does nothing for me. Im not competing for a top tier negress and then dealing with the race baggage on top of it.

Honestly it must suck to find out you're the product of someone's fetish

I dunno, would my hypothetical brunnette wife want to find folder with 50gigs of blonde girls on my hypothetical HDD or 50gigs of brunettes? Where is the line between fetish and 'type'?

If it was just a fetish, he lived it to the end regardless.
 
I grew up in Chicago believing the book on interracial marriage my father, a white anthropologist, worked on throughout my childhood sprang from his love for my Black Jamaican mother. But when I finally opened the boxes of papers I had inherited, I discovered he had begun interviewing Black-white couples as a 21-year-old graduate student in the 1930s, long before he met her. In notes from his bachelor-era interviews in the 1950s, he described a wild party for mixed-race couples only. Reading these papers left me uneasy about desire that’s racialized—when race itself becomes the attraction.
This paleo-coomer's story sounds more interesting than anything the author had to say. It seems like a lot of people in those days were living the "Niggers could be here" copypasta on loop - whether they meant that in a bad way or a good way.
 
I dunno, would my hypothetical brunnette wife want to find folder with 50gigs of blonde girls on my hypothetical HDD or 50gigs of brunettes? Where is the line between fetish and 'type'?

If it was just a fetish, he lived it to the end regardless.
I don't think it's about "fetish". Obviously, if she's race-mixed, it's because her parents wanted to fuck someone from an other race. She just realized her parents aren't sexless creatures but humans with preferences, and she's mad about it.
 
I don't think it's about "fetish". Obviously, if she's race-mixed, it's because her parents wanted to fuck someone from an other race. She just realized her parents aren't sexless creatures but humans with preferences, and she's mad about it.
Yeah, he obviously had a fetish that was a contributing factor in him pursuing her mother in the first place, but fetish alone isn't a strong enough factor for a moderately intelligent and successful person to marry the woman and stay with her and raise children, and it's silly the way these people demonize it like this. It would be like if a girl's mother had huge breasts and one day she discovered, to her horror, her dad liked big titties before he ever met her, meaning all the childhood memories of them being happy together must have been perverted and fake!
 
Some white women prefer black men because it pisses off their fathers. Many white women also have degradation/humiliation fetishes.
Maybe... I think in many cases where it's a higher-status woman doing it, like one who has plenty of other options, it's actually virtue signaling, essentially "conspicuous consumption" as Veblen described it. The black boyfriend is a product they consume because it indicates surplus fitness. If she's with a black guy, it projects:

1. Absolute proof that she's not "racist"
2. Her personal ability to control a violent gorilla
3. Lack of fear for social consequences / rumor mill

Remember that women go like 4x as hard into these kinds of status games as men ever do.
 
Maybe... I think in many cases where it's a higher-status woman doing it, like one who has plenty of other options, it's actually virtue signaling, essentially "conspicuous consumption" as Veblen described it. The black boyfriend is a product they consume because it indicates surplus fitness. If she's with a black guy, it projects:

I see the argument, it's the same reason that pixie dream girl can pull off a bob cut but if your wife asks if she should get one you scream "NOOO!" You can have a stupid attention grabbing haircut if you are a 20 year old sex vixen in a mesh top and every one of your other features is perfect... but when you are an average middle aged woman it's just going to make you look frumpy, old, desperate. Men value purity though and that offsets this performative consumption strategy, any prior mate decreases your value. As a female your mate is your status (or at least should be from an evo-psych perspective). This strategy only makes sense from the rim of the behavioral sink where status has become diffuse and meaningless, where women compete with each other, instead of men competing with each other...which may well be the case.

There are so many layers to the onion, too many to reconcile from the political to the psychological to even the logistical... "The bull should be black because you are from different worlds and you reduce the chance of your wife leaving you or anyone finding out."

Mostly I think women love consensus but consensus has been replaced with propaganda. Your number one cited reason cannot exist in a vacuum. Someone brought these people here, someone made those ads, those schoolbooks.... and I think those of us with a pulse know who is responsible. The same people who are producing a metric fuck ton of free porn because they understand that men only think about sex with the downstairs head.
 
Last edited:
Maybe... I think in many cases where it's a higher-status woman doing it, like one who has plenty of other options, it's actually virtue signaling, essentially "conspicuous consumption" as Veblen described it. The black boyfriend is a product they consume because it indicates surplus fitness. If she's with a black guy, it projects:
Most of the guys from my pattern noticing are super cucks or closeted and the women are all doing it to spite someone, whether that someone is their actual dad or a completely made up straw man. The high status women are also doing it out of spite. Yes to signal to the usual suspects their virtue but they most relish spiting the other side of the equation.
 
Race mixing is disgusting and anyone that participates in it needs to die. Then these retards produce retarded offspring with identity issues and an even greater hatred of White people than their pure-blooded black parent.
 
Black men prefer white women because black women are generally insufferable, obnoxious, aggressive chimpanzees. You can learn this by spending 15 minutes on worldstar.

Some white women prefer black men because it pisses off their fathers. Many white women also have degradation/humiliation fetishes.


White men want nothing to do with black women for the same reason as black men.

Come on, it’s not rocket science.
Maybe... I think in many cases where it's a higher-status woman doing it, like one who has plenty of other options, it's actually virtue signaling, essentially "conspicuous consumption" as Veblen described it. The black boyfriend is a product they consume because it indicates surplus fitness. If she's with a black guy, it projects:

1. Absolute proof that she's not "racist"
2. Her personal ability to control a violent gorilla
3. Lack of fear for social consequences / rumor mill

Remember that women go like 4x as hard into these kinds of status games as men ever do.
Most of the guys from my pattern noticing are super cucks or closeted and the women are all doing it to spite someone, whether that someone is their actual dad or a completely made up straw man. The high status women are also doing it out of spite. Yes to signal to the usual suspects their virtue but they most relish spiting the other side of the equation.
All this also answers why black man/White woman relationships also have horrific outcomes. It must be absolutely soul crushing to realize your love is only with you to spite someone else, or earn good girl points with misanthropic leftists. I'm also willing to bet the average mudshark's personality isn't too far removed from the average black woman's personality. From that black man's perspective he's waking up to the fact he hasn't escaped the matriarchal longhouse he was running from in the first place. His "victory" over the White man, or his "victory" over the black female is as rotten as a politicians soul.

I swear mixed race kids always end up cuckoo, they either go hard on trying to be white or black when they aren't either.
The inherent contradiction of their parentage must drive them crazy.
I don't think its the being mixed race that's the problem. I think its the continued existence of both groups independent of each other.
As the author points out:
As my father noted in his 1940 master’s thesis, mixed-race marriages are far less frequent than we would expect if couples were randomly matched without regard to race. According to a 2008 study, if pairings were random, 44 percent of all US marriages would be interracial. In reality, that number is just about 20 percent—a clear sign that race continues to shape marital choices.
Mixed race couples are rare. Rarer than even random chance.

This is an abnormal occurrence in nature. When two groups inter-marry historically, its been a product of conquest. The entirety of one group is subsumed into the whole of the other. Think Anglo-Saxon conquest of the roman Britons were the end result wasn't Anglo-Saxon-Britons, but simply Anglo-Saxons. There was no population of Britons living as a minority within Anglo-Saxon lands. The men were killed, made into slaves, or joined the AS. The women were made wives and concubines. The end product was three kingdoms. Welsh are the unconquered, unassimilated survivors. They even still face discrimination by Englishmen for not being so destroyed.

Honestly it must suck to find out you're the product of someone's fetish.
It is when you are a race communist for a lackluster minority. If she embraced her White half, she could avoid this entirely.
 
I'm gonna be honest, black men are fucking hideous gahDAMN. I would be disgusted kissing those massive freakish fish lips. Yes, I'm racist, and your dad has a fetish if we're going by the idea of it being a misguided sexual signal. Humans are naturally attracted to their in-group, both socially and romantically. If you're from the Other, you are automatically less trustworthy.

I could see some small percentage of black women who manage to be attractive, but often that is makeup and filters at work. Any black man or woman I've seen irl has been god awful ugly. Mulattos can be lucky if their white half overpowers the black and they manage to come out with decent features and a functional brain, but again, I've not seen many that don't look kinda off.

Long story short: I have not met a single woman who talked about hot black men, and I operate in many liberal hobby groups (the price you pay for engaging in female autism fixations). All of them lust after white or asian men due to kpop brainwashing. And some of them were mullato too lol but blacks were not on the menu for those girls either.

Also, the one time I dared to go jogging in a park down south I was accousted by like five niggers trying to ask for my number. This is not bragging, I am mid at best, but black men genuinely are that desperate to secure a whitey they will swarm a lone woman like flies. Probably lucky I didn't get jumped, I was so freaked out I turned to alternative exercise measures.
 
Long story short: I have not met a single woman who talked about hot black men
I'm a woman who finds many black men attractive (at least from a looks perspective) but I would absolutely never marry, date or sleep with one. Just because someone is good looking doesn't mean they're eligible for sex. Blacks are untouchable.
 
Back
Top Bottom