- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
When you say CGI, do you mean 3D art like they did for all the spaceships?
I meant the same crappy look that Zombie Simps is animated in now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When you say CGI, do you mean 3D art like they did for all the spaceships?
I believe all of Futurama was done on a computer, especially the movies and last five seasons.I meant the same crappy look that Zombie Simps is animated in now.
As damning as P&TP is, it's got just enough funny bits scattered throughout it to hold off the rot for what it's worth. Compare it to Homer's Enemy, which has no real redeeming moments but that you can argue that turning Homer into a monster (IE Jerkass Homer) didn't 100% drag the show down since by that point it was an ensemble and the non-Homer centric episodes still occasionally were decent.I noticed that Ralph was Flanderized pretty hard by season 6. He was kind of dumb up until this point, but everything Ralph has to say for a full episode revolves around his cat, regardless of context. He has now metamorphized into a full on smooth brain. This obviously isn't zombie territory yet, but there are notable omens/symptoms of it early on.
This is an interesting case study of where exactly the show starts its decline. The Principal and the Pauper is the one everyone points to as the turning point, but I'm of the opinion that decline begins in bits and pieces rather than as a whole, since if something performs good overall you're not likely to notice the small things beginning to slip.
GJWTHS is still in rotation; it even aired on FXX recently.Has "Girls Just Want to Have Sums" been pulled from syndication yet? (TW: hate speech) Back in season 17 the show had already been bad about as long as it had been good. Now it's at roughly the midpoint of The Simpsons' run thus far. It's like looking into another dimension. 2006 really is a very very long time ago, isn't it?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=aL0MuT0v6ds
Is Gil the last recurring character that even counts? If they tried to throw in any more during the last 20 years or so, I don't think they stuck.
Isn't Homer's Enemy famous for being one of the best episodes?Compare it to Homer's Enemy, which has no real redeeming moments
I take TPatP and Homer's Enemy as signs that the writers had exhausted the show's format and maybe didn't even like the characters anymore, to the point that meta material was the only thing to really interest them. At best they make sense as episodes of a show nearing the end of its run, but then it didn't die.This is an interesting case study of where exactly the show starts its decline. The Principal and the Pauper is the one everyone points to as the turning point, but I'm of the opinion that decline begins in bits and pieces rather than as a whole, since if something performs good overall you're not likely to notice the small things beginning to slip.
A lot of people would tell you that post-cancellation Futurama already sucked anyway. They had great episodes until the end, but they did drop the ball more often as the series went on, and some heavy-handed current year politics started to bleed in. If you want to know what Futurama would be like if it continued airing uninterrupted you can just (god have mercy on you) watch Disenchanted, which is woke, boring, soap opera-ish, and about as funny as an ISIS beheading. It's possibly worse than the lowest points of Zombie Simpsons, and I only say "possibly" because Disenchanted always sucked so you can't get invested enough to be mad about it.I think Futurama would've become "Zombie Futurama" had it continued.
Especially in Current Year Clown World.
Also the newest episodes would've been all CGI and HD.
Certainly one of the most enjoyable.Isn't Homer's Enemy famous for being one of the best episodes?
Who even wrote disenchanted anyway? What point does it have? It almost reads like Matt Groening wanted to make his own Game of Thrones but nobody would throw money at one of his projects unless it was "comedy".A lot of people would tell you that post-cancellation Futurama already sucked anyway. They had great episodes until the end, but they did drop the ball more often as the series went on, and some heavy-handed current year politics started to bleed in. If you want to know what Futurama would be like if it continued airing uninterrupted you can just (god have mercy on you) watch Disenchanted, which is woke, boring, soap opera-ish, and about as funny as an ISIS beheading. It's possibly worse than the lowest points of Zombie Simpsons, and I only say "possibly" because Disenchanted always sucked so you can't get invested enough to be mad about it.
yeah I finally saw this a little while back and forgot how Nelson yelling TRANNY would have been considered acceptable in the long-long ago beyond CURRENT YEARHas "Girls Just Want to Have Sums" been pulled from syndication yet? (TW: hate speech) Back in season 17 the show had already been bad about as long as it had been good. Now it's at roughly the midpoint of The Simpsons' run thus far. It's like looking into another dimension. 2006 really is a very very long time ago, isn't it?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=aL0MuT0v6ds
Is Gil the last recurring character that even counts? If they tried to throw in any more during the last 20 years or so, I don't think they stuck.
Nelson is based.yeah I finally saw this a little while back and forgot how Nelson yelling TRANNY would have been considered acceptable in the long-long ago beyond CURRENT YEAR
GOTTA NUKE SOMETHIN'Nelson is based.
That's sort of what happened. Bill Oakley and Josh Weinstein, who wrote most of the episodes for seasons 8 and 9, admitted they didn't think the show would be on for much longer and stated on the DVD commentaries that they were getting experimental.I take TPatP and Homer's Enemy as signs that the writers had exhausted the show's format and maybe didn't even like the characters anymore, to the point that meta material was the only thing to really interest them. At best they make sense as episodes of a show nearing the end of its run, but then it didn't die.
A lot of people would tell you that post-cancellation Futurama already sucked anyway.
Who even wrote disenchanted anyway?
Post-Fox Futurama is pretty good, I'd skip the movies because fuck watching that. Look out for the "end of the universe" episode.I really watched Futurama only up to the original finale (the one where Fry gets the robot devil's hands). Then Futurama moved to Comedy Central and I lost access to cable TV, so I couldn't see it anymore. But I did see a bit of the movies, and a new episode here or there. What I saw didn't seem too bad, but then again, I didn't see much of post-original-finale Futurama.
I'm of the opinion that the show has potential still but the people behind the wheel are just garbage writers. A competent writer would tear Zombie Simpsons apart.That's sort of what happened. Bill Oakley and Josh Weinstein, who wrote most of the episodes for seasons 8 and 9, admitted they didn't think the show would be on for much longer and stated on the DVD commentaries that they were getting experimental.
The show was running out of gas and the writers knew this. It's just that the series, for one reason or another, didn't end when they thought it would.
Nope. It's not only the most reviled episode of the series, but the only people who claim to like it are edgelord contrarians within the entertainment business who stan it for the same reason you have faggots inside Hollywood stan "The Last Jedi". Purely due to the fact that the the Hollywood elite can't fucking stand that fans hate said episode and that said episode (combined with the "Homer gets raped by a panda" episode and Principal and the Pauper) did serious damage to the Simpsons brand and that no fans should be allowed to harm a major franchise in such a way to make it less profitable for the Hollywood elite.Isn't Homer's Enemy famous for being one of the best episodes?
Here I see overwhelming positive reviews with only four low star reviews.Nope. It's not only the most reviled episode of the series, but the only people who claim to like it are edgelord contrarians within the entertainment business who stan it for the same reason you have faggots inside Hollywood stan "The Last Jedi". Purely due to the fact that the the Hollywood elite can't fucking stand that fans hate said episode and that said episode (combined with the "Homer gets raped by a panda" episode and Principal and the Pauper) did serious damage to the Simpsons brand and that no fans should be allowed to harm a major franchise in such a way to make it less profitable for the Hollywood elite.
Note that Homer's Enemy came out around the time that Simpsons pretty much became a whorehouse bringing on big name celebrities for gratuitous guest spots to anyone considered "hip". Not to mention that it signified the beginning of the "Jerkass Homer" era where Mike Scully explicitly wanted Homer to be more or less evil and abusive and expected people to fucking cheer him on and not care that Homer was no longer likable or a good father and that the writers on the show (as with P&TP) were extremey pissy that fans were not taking damage the two episodes did lying down like good little doormats and actively voicing their complaints.
Several reasons:Actually, here's a thunk, what about the Simpsons comics? Those were considered the most popular comics on the market while they were still in the running, aren't they considered to be significantly better than 2000's Simpsons? Why not just adapt those as episodes?