Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remember Steamed Hams? It's back! In thread title form!KIWIS! THE THREAD TITLE HAS CHANGED!
Just like the SimpsonsRemember Steamed Hams? It's back! In thread title form!
But seriously this is like 3 months too late to be relevant.
It's still relevant to me.But seriously this is like 3 months too late to be relevant.
Be interesting to see what happens after this point.Hank Azaria Says He’s Willing to ‘Step Aside’ From Controversial Apu Role
On Tuesday’s episode of “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” Hank Azaria addressed the controversy over one of the “Simpsons” characters he voices, Apu Nahasapeemapetilon.
Apu’s portrayal came under scrutiny after the documentary “The Problem with Apu” brought attention to the stereotypical depiction of Indian immigrants that the character presents.
“I think the most important thing is to listen to Indian people and their experience with it,” Azaria said. “I really want to see Indian, South Asian writers in the writers room…including how [Apu] is voiced or not voiced. I’m perfectly willing to step aside. It just feels like the right thing to do to me.”
Azaria said he understood the controversy surrounding his character. “It’s come to my attention more and more over the past couple years,” he said.
“The idea that anyone young or old, past or present, being bullied based on Apu really makes me sad,” he continued. “It certainly was not my intention. I wanted to bring joy and laughter to people.”
“The Simpsons” attempted to respond to the criticism with the episode “No Good Read Goes Unpunished,” in which Marge tries to alter a book from a previous era that she’s reading to Lisa to be less offensive. Lisa addresses the camera, saying, “Something that started decades ago and was applauded and inoffensive is now politically incorrect. What can you do?”
After some criticized the episode’s handling of the issue, showrunner Al Jean tweeted that he’d “continue to try and find an answer that is popular & more important right.”
Of the “Simpsons'” response, Azaria said, “I had nothing to do with the writing or the voicing [in that episode]. I think if anyone came away from that segment thinking they need to lighten up…that’s definitely not the message that I want to send.”
Azaria indicated he was open to change regarding his role as Apu. “I’ve given this a lot of thought, and as I say my eyes have been opened.”
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/hank-azaria-apu-step-aside-1202786117/
It’s just a little delayed! It’s still good, it’s still good!Remember Steamed Hams? It's back! In thread title form!
But seriously this is like 3 months too late to be relevant.
Sometimes memes take a while to lose steam.It’s just a little delayed! It’s still good, it’s still good!
Honestly they could have just said nothing and let it blow over. Who even cares about The Simpsons in 2018?Be interesting to see what happens after this point.
Honestly they could have just said nothing and let it blow over. Who even cares about The Simpsons in 2018?
"Darn it, why won't you die?!" - that skywriter (who lives by the Skywriters' Code) on new Simpsons2) Just let the show die.
Hank Azaria Says He’s Willing to ‘Step Aside’ From Controversial Apu Role
On Tuesday’s episode of “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” Hank Azaria addressed the controversy over one of the “Simpsons” characters he voices, Apu Nahasapeemapetilon.
Apu’s portrayal came under scrutiny after the documentary “The Problem with Apu” brought attention to the stereotypical depiction of Indian immigrants that the character presents.
“I think the most important thing is to listen to Indian people and their experience with it,” Azaria said. “I really want to see Indian, South Asian writers in the writers room…including how [Apu] is voiced or not voiced. I’m perfectly willing to step aside. It just feels like the right thing to do to me.”
Azaria said he understood the controversy surrounding his character. “It’s come to my attention more and more over the past couple years,” he said.
“The idea that anyone young or old, past or present, being bullied based on Apu really makes me sad,” he continued. “It certainly was not my intention. I wanted to bring joy and laughter to people.”
“The Simpsons” attempted to respond to the criticism with the episode “No Good Read Goes Unpunished,” in which Marge tries to alter a book from a previous era that she’s reading to Lisa to be less offensive. Lisa addresses the camera, saying, “Something that started decades ago and was applauded and inoffensive is now politically incorrect. What can you do?”
After some criticized the episode’s handling of the issue, showrunner Al Jean tweeted that he’d “continue to try and find an answer that is popular & more important right.”
Of the “Simpsons'” response, Azaria said, “I had nothing to do with the writing or the voicing [in that episode]. I think if anyone came away from that segment thinking they need to lighten up…that’s definitely not the message that I want to send.”
Azaria indicated he was open to change regarding his role as Apu. “I’ve given this a lot of thought, and as I say my eyes have been opened.”
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/hank-azaria-apu-step-aside-1202786117/
Who would this even help at this point? The show is 29 goddamned seasons long in December!
The sad part is now there's more shitty seasons than good ones now.
The sad part is now there's more shitty seasons than good ones now.
Let's do a little math, because I really want to emphasize this.That was a fact, like, a decade ago.
That is very true. And even if it had stopped at 30, something like Apu being a problem right now just kinda feels like a wasted excuse despite how many episodes he's been in by this point. The worst they could do is pull a Derpy on us and never bring him out again for the remainder of the series, perhaps have him silently appear in the series finale and that's it, but the show will still continue to be in reruns for who know show long somewhere out there in TV land for years to come.Let's do a little math, because I really want to emphasize this.
Let's say the first 10 seasons were the good years. You don't have to agree with season 10 or even 9 being "good" but 10 gives us a nicer number.
The Simpsons is in its 29th season and is very likely to be renewed for a 30th. That means that The Simpsons has only been good for 1/3 of its run. That's even less if you modify it so there was only 8 good seasons.
But the real question would be "What would they do with the Kwik-E-Mart?" Sure, it doesn't appear much anymore, but it's still a very integral part of Springfield and the show's own lore.That is very true. And even if it had stopped at 30, something like Apu being a problem right now just kinda feels like a wasted excuse despite how many episodes he's been in by this point. The worst they could do is pull a Derpy on us and never bring him out again for the remainder of the series, perhaps have him silently appear in the series finale and that's it, but the show will still continue to be in reruns for who know show long somewhere out there in TV land for years to come.
That's my concern. It would be a shame to simply not go there anymore or having to create a whole new person who runs it (or just have that pimple-faced teen do it). Again, nobody sees the big picture in this.But the real question would be "What would they do with the Kwik-E-Mart?" Sure, it doesn't appear much anymore, but it's still a very integral part of Springfield and the show's own lore.