US The Nick Fuentes Spiral - The reckoning with the white-nationalist influencer’s rise is only getting messier.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1.png
Nicole Hester / Ann Arbor News / AP

On Wednesday, I texted Nick Fuentes about being the center of an existential crisis in American conservatism. Fuentes, a white-nationalist influencer, appeared on The Tucker Carlson Show in October, which has enraged a number of prominent figures on the right and set off a spiraling conversation about where to draw the line on whom the party welcomes into its mainstream. “I don’t consider myself to be hateful or prejudiced,” he told me. “Just provocative and maybe tribalistic.”

Fuentes has repeatedly praised Hitler, likened “organized Jewry” to a “transnational gang,” said that women should be “subordinate” to their husband, and called Chicago “nigger hell.” In our text exchange, I reminded him of a clip from 2019 in which he said Jim Crow “was better for them; it’s better for us.” “What that 10 seconds clip from 7 years ago that is clearly a joke?” he responded. “You think thats a fair characterization of my body of work?”

I told him that he was free to disavow his comments right then. He responded with only a “HAHA” iMessage tapback.

This is characteristically Fuentes. His winking, joking-until-he-isn’t approach has helped him amass a loyal following—his fans call themselves “Groypers.” Carlson explained in his interview that he wanted to speak with the influencer because “I don’t think Fuentes is going away,” and that despite attempts to unseat him, “he’s bigger than ever.” Following the backlash, Carlson doubled down, telling Megyn Kelly last week that Fuentes is “the single most influential commentator among young men.”

The interview has become the defining subject of discourse on the right over the past month. A few prominent MAGA Republican voices, including Steve Bannon, have signaled support for Carlson. Many others, meanwhile, have been dealing with the fallout. Politicians including Ted Cruz, Mitch McConnell, and Lindsey Graham have spoken out against Fuentes’s anti-Semitic views. Representative Randy Fine, a Florida Republican, told me that Fuentes is a “complete and total lunatic” and that everything he says is “completely wrong.” (Fine also isn’t fond of Carlson: “I’ve concluded that he’s an anti-Semite.” Carlson did not respond to a request for comment.)

“No to the Groypers,” the political commentator Ben Shapiro said on his podcast at the beginning of this month. “No to their publicists, like Tucker Carlson. No to those who champion them. No to demoralization. No to bigotry and antimeritocratic horseshit.” After Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, initially supported Carlson, he faced a staff revolt that has thrown the preeminent think tank into chaos. Roberts later backpedaled and called Fuentes an “evil person.”

Republicans are so at odds about how to handle Fuentes’s encroachment into their ranks that many commentators have likened their infighting to a civil war and posed it as a battle for the soul of the conservative movement. The critics of the Groypers themselves tend to downplay the scale of the conflict. They have suggested that the deeply bigoted factions of the right are a vocal but tiny minority that can be excised. In my conversation with Fine, he described right-wing anti-Semites to me as a “small but growing” contingent that the right can still “nip in the bud.” The right-wing commentator Dinesh D’Souza posted on X that the rise of extreme racism on the right could be electorally ruinous “if this continues.”

This will continue. Fuentes is not the origin of prejudices metastasizing on the right, nor is he the end point. Today, many popular figures among young conservatives espouse some level of ethno-nationalist ideology. Consider the influencer Bronze Age Pervert, who has written that Black Africans are “so divergent from the rest of humanity,” they could be a separate subspecies. Charlie Kirk, who was heralded as a moderate against Fuentes, had drifted further rightward in the years leading up to his assassination. For instance, Kirk called Martin Luther King Jr. “awful” and once said that “we made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.”

“The Groyper thing is real,” Rod Dreher, a prominent right-wing writer who now lives in Hungary, wrote on Substack this week, after speaking with young conservatives during a trip to Washington. Even young Christians are “neck-deep in anti-Semitism,” he added. Recently leaked chats from Young Republican leaders suggest the same. In internal Heritage Foundation emails discussing the Fuentes controversy, published by the New York Post, one staffer for the think tank reportedly wrote: “Talking with some of the interns I think that there are a growing number of them who actually agree” with Fuentes.

In the rush to distance themselves from Fuentes, MAGA conservatives can easily downplay the extent to which Fuentes’s racist, trollish ideology has already embedded itself in the movement. It’s most apparent in younger groups, yet Groyper-speak also commonly seeps beyond those circles. Even Fuentes’s loudest critics on the right sometimes say things that sound as though they were ripped out of one of Fuentes’s notorious livestreams. Last summer, Senator Ted Cruz was among the many conservatives who amplified the claim that Haitian immigrants were eating cats—an unfounded notion that appears to have originated on a far-right social-media platform. At the Republican Jewish Coalition conference earlier this month, Fine called for New York City Mayor-Elect Zohran Mamdani to be deported—“the only thing I want to see him running for is his gate at JFK on the deportation flight to Uganda,” he said—and claimed that Mamdani is leading a “modern-day Hitler Youth.” In July, Fine implied that Representative Ilhan Omar was a “Muslim terrorist.”

When I suggested to Fine that these comments sound Fuentes-esque, he rejected the comparison. Mamdani and Omar should be denaturalized, he said, because they engaged in immigration fraud to become citizens. (There is no evidence for this.)

Carlson offered Fuentes his largest audience yet, but the door has been cracking open for Fuentes for years. Now MAGA Republicans, along with everyone else, has to contend with him.

Article Link

Archive
 
>I told him that he was free to disavow his comments right then. He responded with only a “HAHA” iMessage tapback.
Fuentes is a piece of shit, but fuck journalists; I would've done the same.
 
It still kills me shitlibs and redditors think the biggest and most dangerous Nazi in America is s homosexual named Fuentes.

Guys like William Luther Pierce are dead or serving life in prison. Groups like the Atomwaffen and 764 amount to a dozen maladjusted weirdos on Telegram who'd get stomped out on the yard if they go to prison for their numerous degenerate habits. Fuentes is the closest thing they can get to a "nazi" for their two minute hate.
 
By Ali Breland
Wait a second, this is the same faggot from Mother Jones.
 
Fuentes is so unpopular that he spoofed his numbers on his own site. He has at the absolute maximum high four-figures, low five-figures, of actual supporters and retards around the globe think the hundreds of thousands who view shows he's on to clip him for comedic or propaganda purposes are somehow his fans.

People forget he's been around since ~2017. His recent astroturfing is as blatant as it is odd.
 
Nick Fuentes is a fed and it has been obvious from the start that he is used to poison the well for conservatives. Outside of terminally online losers and hyperventilating liberals, I don't know anyone who likes him or takes him seriously.
 
Even though Fuentes technically is a white nationalist (he thinks America should be a mostly white nation), he never really calls himself that, and it just comes across as a smear when they use it. They write these long articles, but they've already told their readers what to think within the first few adjectives. It's very tiresome and disingenuous. Journalists who never bother trying to "come to terms" with anyone are propagandists, not reporters.
 
Journalists who never bother trying to "come to terms" with anyone are propagandists, not reporters.
Any Righties that libs may have to actually contend with for public office or public opinion are denouncing and distancing themselves from this catboy faggot. But he still has the power to brainwash them because... reasons?

Those "reasons" being libs always need a convenient Emmanuel Goldstein strawman to point to, instead of anything conservatives actually believe.
 
I for one want Nick Fuentes to win.

Catboy purrer president would be fucking hilarious and a golden gaytime for all. Fuck you Ben Shepardi.
 
I actually don't know much about Nick Fuentes (I'm kinda out of touch in general; I had never heard of Charlie Kirk until he was murdered for instance).

But this is the same crowd who calls Joe Rogan a Nazi. Joe Rogan, the pot smoking Austin liberal. A Nazi. Somehow.

So if they label Fuentes a "white nationalist" then that most likely means he's in reality a black tranny communist muslim.
 
I actually don't know much about Nick Fuentes (I'm kinda out of touch in general; I had never heard of Charlie Kirk until he was murdered for instance).

But this is the same crowd who calls Joe Rogan a Nazi. Joe Rogan, the pot smoking Austin liberal. A Nazi. Somehow.

So if they label Fuentes a "white nationalist" then that most likely means he's in reality a black tranny communist muslim.
They say it to make you think that he wants every single person in America to be white, but that's not the case. He himself is half-hispanic. He's best friends with Kanye West and at least half his entourage through all its iterations over the years has always been brown people such as Sneako and Ali Alexander.

There is much more solid stuff to hit him with, such as allegations of being a federal informant, or enabling gay child predators (the aforementioned Ali). But they hit him with wignat because their only goal is to code how their audience sees him, and their audience is primed to hate white people, not feds or gays so much.
 
Republicans are so at odds about how to handle Fuentes’s encroachment into their ranks that many commentators have likened their infighting to a civil war and posed it as a battle for the soul of the conservative movement
If you faggots could stop sucking Israel's dick for five minutes this would not be happening. How about no more money for Israel till Americans are taken care of.
 
I think Internet-addicted journalists regard Fuentes and Groypers as more culturally relevant than he actually is because he specifically fostered a following composed solely of people who have seventeen Twitter accounts and post nine thousand times a day. If I went to the supermarket in my mid-sized conservative-leaning American city and asked a hundred people if they've heard of Nick Fuentes I feel like I'd get affirmative responses from ten people tops.
 
I dislike Fuentes quite a bit, but he is speaking to a undercurrent in my generation which is why he has such success. Nigger fatigue and so on is building nation wide, once it reaches crit. mass the first politician to tap into it will skyrocket.
 
I think Internet-addicted journalists regard Fuentes and Groypers as more culturally relevant than he actually is because he specifically fostered a following composed solely of people who have seventeen Twitter accounts and post nine thousand times a day.
Okay. I think it's because they all suck off Israel and he has organic support because he consistently has said Fuck Israel his entire life, despite the mountain of flaws he has.
 
I love how the kikes are running an obviously coordinated media campaign expressing outrage at the idea of "organized Jewry".

I dislike Fuentes quite a bit, but he is speaking to a undercurrent in my generation which is why he has such success. Nigger fatigue and so on is building nation wide, once it reaches crit. mass the first politician to tap into it will skyrocket.
Yep-- the first person who runs as anti-black, in the sense of three strikes laws, prosecuting judges as co-conspirators in the crimes of niggers they let out early, cuts to welfare, getting rid of the disparate impact policies, etc. is going to win big.
 
Last edited:
The lugenpresse once again fails to comprehend the consequences of their side shooting the relatively reasonable guy and putting a video of it on the internet.

And then the complete lack the due diligence to research Fuentes enough to get good ammunition:
Fuentes has repeatedly praised Hitler, likened “organized Jewry” to a “transnational gang,” said that women should be “subordinate” to their husband, and called Chicago “nigger hell.” In our text exchange, I reminded him of a clip from 2019 in which he said Jim Crow “was better for them; it’s better for us.” “What that 10 seconds clip from 7 years ago that is clearly a joke?” he responded. “You think thats a fair characterization of my body of work?”

Fuentes' frequent use of the nigger word and his disdain for agents of Israel are two of the few things that improve my opinion on him.

This journonigger is yet another in a long line that fails to bring up the semen hunt, Ali Alexander, the fact that he is clearly a Federal asset, him having gay sex with Steven Bonnell, or the video of him macing that old woman (which to be fair, she went looking for trouble, it should be legal to mace random people who show up to your house to fuck with you, but it still looks really bad for Nick). Fuentes is a barely-sane homosexual retard, and if circumstances in this country weren't so bad for right wing men under 35, he would be a laughable sideshow.


The author is a fucking loser. A fat Canadian retard with a webcam and his cokehead clapping seal do a better job of reporting on Fuentes, and its not even close. How did we let dumb Karens like this end up in nearly total control of the discourse in this county? Crush journalists in the trash compactor.
 
Last edited:
You hate Nick Fuentes because he is mean to brown people and women.

I hate Nick Fuentes because he is a faggot.

We are not the same.
 
Back
Top Bottom