Science The Neurological Differences Between Psychopaths and Sociopaths - Now you too can know how to properly insult a lolcow

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Both psychopaths and sociopaths are severe types of an antisocial behavior, capable of extreme violence and a disregard for the feelings and experiences of other individuals. While they both undoubtedly present a danger to society, they also have significant differences, which start to manifest at birth.

“The psychopath is born with a psychopathic brain, which … doesn’t function properly to allow for normal social experiences,” explains Scott Johnson, a psychologist and independent consultant who provides forensic mental health training to law enforcement and prosecutors. “The sociopath, on the other hand, we believe is born with normal brain, but something goes wrong during their nurturing.”

Childhood neglect and abuse is a major predictor for serious antisocial behaviors such as sociopathy in later life. That isn’t to say that everyone – or even most people – who were abused as a child go on to become a sociopath, but studies have consistently shown that sociopaths are more likely to have been a victim of child abuse than the general population. Psychological trauma as a child is thought to interfere with proper brain development, which may explain why this a link, says Johnson.

Brain Basis​

Though the cause may differ, psychopaths and sociopaths both have brain differences, particularly when it comes to their morality centers. This often shows up on CT and PET scans. They also tend to lack empathy and sympathy almost entirely, particularly psychopaths. “They often just seem like don’t care for other people at all,” says Johnson. They might enjoy the feeling of inflicting pain or exercising control over others, unincumbered by feelings of guilt, anxiety or remorse.
There are some significant differences between the two phenomena, however. Psychopaths are better at delaying gratification. Subsequently, they can meticulously plan their wrongdoings – not all of which are inevitably violent. Psychopaths also commonly commit financial fraud. “A psychopath doesn’t necessarily need to hurt someone physically, their motivation can be narcissism and a thrill of what they perceive as ‘the game’ and that can be achieved in different ways,” explains Johnson. “Approximately 70 percent of psychopaths cross the line into sexual or physical violence.”
Sociopaths, however, are even more likely to be violent, but less likely to be calculating. They struggle to delay their gratification and frequently lash out. “Almost all sociopaths cross over the line into violence. They’re not cunning enough to prepare an attack, they act on impulse.” Because of this, sociopaths are more likely to be caught than psychopaths.
Psychopaths are probably more dangerous the long run, says Johnson, precisely because they can hide it for longer – possibly why they get more mention in popular culture than sociopaths.

Hollywood Influence​

It seems, however, that Hollywood does a bad job in trying to portray these various traits. Karen Davis, an assistant professor of psychology at State University of New York College at Cortland, and colleagues recently examined whether 24 movie characters that have been described as psychopathic really deserve the label. In a 2020 study, she assessed the characters using a professional test commonly used by mental health professions in legal proceedings to come to a diagnosis. Just 21 percent of the sample passed the test to be legitimately called a psychopath.
Interestingly, if not surprisingly, she also found that mental health slurs were frequently used in the films’ dialogue. “The most common terms used in the movies to describe characters were derogatory,” she concluded in the study. “A large percentage of characters were referred to as “crazy”.”
While the silver screen may have a long way to go before it sets the right tone for its portrayals of psychopaths and mental illness more generally, law enforcement officials rely on a proficient assessment of whether a suspect is a psychopath or a sociopath. Knowing the answer can help inform interview techniques and even where to look for evidence, says Johnson. For example, a psychopath is more challenging to question; they’ll keep their cool and make sure to mimic what they think would be the normal and innocent response to an interrogation. “A sociopath, meanwhile, blows up under interview and that’s their downfall because that’s when they end up revealing something,” says Johnson.
 
Just a reminder that neither of those terms are actually accepted diagnoses and are typically used interchangeably as a colloquialism for "antisocial personality disorder."

The fringe psychologists that proclaim to be "experts" in "psychopathy" disagree widely on the definition and whether or not it's the same thing as "sociopathy."
 
tldr they're functionally the same but sociopaths are also retarded
That's a dangerous perspective, you can actually tame a sociopath, a psycopath will just make you believe you did and will keep leeching anything they can from you until they find something better.

A sociopath needs psychological support as much as every single "normal" person and are able to feel shame or regret, a psycopath literally doesn't need shit, they are and will be perfectly fine, no matter what kind of degenerate shit they do or see.

While psycopaths are not necessarily dangerous, for some reason they always live like parasites, 100% of the fucking time, they're so much worse.
 
No, the terms "psychopath" and "sociopath" are interchangeable. There is no formal distinction between them because these are not formal terms to begin with, but rather are vernacular terms of what in DSM is called "Antisocial Personality disorder". Scott Johnson fails to provide the citation to the below assertion:

“The psychopath is born with a psychopathic brain, which … doesn’t function properly to allow for normal social experiences,” explains Scott Johnson, a psychologist and independent consultant who provides forensic mental health training to law enforcement and prosecutors. “The sociopath, on the other hand, we believe is born with normal brain, but something goes wrong during their nurturing.”

Studying the brains of adult sociopaths tells us nothing about whether the disorder is inborn or not.

So, which one is Isabella Loretta Janke?
These terms apply only to human beings.
 
No, the terms "psychopath" and "sociopath" are interchangeable. There is no formal distinction between them because these are not formal terms to begin with, but rather are vernacular terms of what in DSM is called "Antisocial Personality disorder". Scott Johnson fails to provide the citation to the below assertion:



Studying the brains of adult sociopaths tells us nothing about whether the disorder is inborn or not.


These terms apply only to human beings.
True. In pop culture though, I think "sociopath" is associated with "low-functioning", and "psychopath" is associated with "high-functioning".
 
Interestingly, if not surprisingly, she also found that mental health slurs were frequently used in the films’ dialogue. “The most common terms used in the movies to describe characters were derogatory,” she concluded in the study. “A large percentage of characters were referred to as “crazy”.”
If a man is planning on stabbing someone then he's crazy. Crazy is not a slur you fucking pussy ass nitwits.
 
While psycopaths are not necessarily dangerous, for some reason they always live like parasites, 100% of the fucking time, they're so much worse.
I remember hearing or reading something years ago about an Inuit tribe that was being observed and interviewed by outsiders. At one point one of the researchers described psychopathy and asked if they had ever seen anything like that. The men laughed and said yes, sometimes you run into that, other men who try to sleep with your wife or steal no matter how many times they are caught and punished. They said there was no way to deal with them except to take them out on a hunting trip and drop them into a glacier ravine, which they did.
 
What is this pop psychology bullshit, I work in advertising psych but had to take psychopathology classes like everyone else in undergrad and it's absolutely baffling how these "experts" go to the media and just spew the most blatantly wrong and made-up nonsense to the oblivious public who clap like seals. As others have said these aren't proper medical terms at all, just interchangeable colloquialisms, it's like publishing an article on the critical differences between "tards" and "spergs".

Had a similar surreal feeling listening to that Christine Ford whack job talk about how Kavanaugh laughing was "indelible in the hippocampus," where do they find these people, we live in Clown Hell. :story:
 
I don't know what it is about it, but this post has the funniest subtitle I've seen in a while
 
Back
Top Bottom