Opinion The Mongol Empire Never Existed

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
L | A

Until the end of the 19th century, there was no such thing as a so-called “Mongol Empire” or “Golden Horde” in the history books. This myth was invented very recently by the court “historians” (sci-fi writers) of the disgustingly corrupt Romanov dynasty in order to validate the Scalergian Chronology (the false historical timeline that we are taught today).

5C3ECC55-0A2E-4DB3-BD48-C9D879B9.jpg

In reality, that what we know of as the Mongol Empire, was in fact a country named Great Tartaria which existed for thousands of years until Summer 7284 (1775) when it was almost completely eradicated following a nuclear winter. Ethnic cleansing of inhabitants who remained took place thereafter up until WW1. Numerous military campaigns were led in order to destroy Tartaria for centuries.

The “French Invasion of Russia” was really, in fact, a joint military operation between Napoleon of France and Alexander I of Russia, who were both Roman generals working together to exterminate Tartaria. In fact, all wars of the middle ages only occurred between Tartary and the Roman Empire — with the goal of the Romans being a total crusade and eradication of the Vedic Aryans — to usher in control of the parasites in their lands through Abrahamic religion which they were defending against.

5C633F7E-F80C-439E-B21C-2475AFB7.jpg

The “Mongols” (Tartarians) so called “invaders” were nothing more than Pagan Slavs, Balts, Turks, Bulgars, Huns, Finns, Uralics, among many other ethnic groups, who had banded together to defend against the Christian invaders of Rome in order to protect the eternal Vedic truth against those who seek total annihilation of the Aryans.

64964909-F07C-4811-895F-A9AFD1E0.jpg

Why didn’t the “Mongols” (Tartarians) attack Novgorod? Because there were many Pagans in Novgorod that were never persecuted. Same story in Smolensk and Pskov, amongst a few other principalities who were all Pagan. This was a civil war not an invasion. It’s also pretty clear that all the most important urban centers were solely founded, built and populated by Slavic Aryan people.

All these facts are taken from western sources. The reason why the people of Novgorod, Smolensk, Pskov and a few other principalities weren’t invaded is because they were never involved in the brutally forcible Christianization of Pagans.

The name of the Russian branch of Christendom used to be called “Pravo-Verya”, simply translating into “right to believe”, and was very much different from Byzantine Orthodoxy. This is why the supposed “conquerors” completely bypassed the very wealthy kingdom of Novgorod and went straight to Catholic Poland and Hungary.

The fact that this was a religiously motivated conflict is very clear by analyzing simple authentic chronicles/letters, such as one written by Riccoldo da Monte di Croce (1243 – 1320) where he states that the intentions of the “Tartars/Moguls” is to destroy Christianity. Sounds like a pretty strange aspiration for simple minded central Asian nomads.

325011AC-6D18-4BE5-BB71-6E5E87FF.jpg

So how come we call them Mongols and not Tartars? First of all, the original word for Mongol was “Mogul”, which did not mean a designation for a single tribe or people at all. The word mogul simply meant a person or a group of people in position of power, even this etymology has deeper origins. In Russian we have an adjective “Moguchii” which means powerful, the Greek word “Mega” is also a cognate.

For instance, the Maghuls (mongols) of India were ethnically Turko-Iranic and had nothing to do with Mongolia. The first edition of Encyclopedia Britannica also mentions the Tibetan “moguleans”. The word mogul simply meant a person or a group of people who in position of power. The N in “MoNgol” was probably the result of the nasal vowels in Old Russian.

41FD60AF-A696-482F-AEC0-C9300316.jpg

Finally, modern day Mongolians have never called themselves “Mongols” in recorded history. What people know today as present day Mongols (who actually always called themselves only by their tribal names such as Oirat/Khalka) never had any folklore connecting them either Genghis Khan or any empire. The reason why the name Batu Khan might sound non-Russian to some is because it’s an old Russian Pagan title/nickname.
 
Looked at the author's page on the article. Author appears Russian. This is the picture he uses to represent himself.
View attachment 6365831
He has linked this wonderful website (Archive).
I'm not sure if the author is a flat earther like the picture above suggests, or he follows the "inside-out earth" suggested on the website.

He appears to follow the works of Nikolai Levashov, a Russian cult leader
He also has linked this forum. https://stolenhistory.net/
The Stolen History forum is one of my all-time favorite schizo hubs. If you've never browsed it, you should. What's strange about this fella is that while he believes in Tartaria he is not espousing the usual mudflooder nonsense. I should dig deeper to see where his theory diverges.
 
I'd like to see this guy debate the other Tataria whacko who made the "The Roman Empire Never Existed" article that got posted here a bit ago. Since Rome seems to feature heavily in this guy's history of Tataria.

Also I got fooled out again with the headline, same as the Rome article. I was like "Interesting thesis, on what basis is he going to discredit the classification of the Mongol regime as an empire?" Turns out its just Tataria again.
 
Tell that to all the cultures who have been traumatized by Genghis Khan's shenanigans.
 
I'd like to see this guy debate the other Tataria whacko who made the "The Roman Empire Never Existed" article that got posted here a bit ago. Since Rome seems to feature heavily in this guy's history of Tataria.

Also I got fooled out again with the headline, same as the Rome article. I was like "Interesting thesis, on what basis is he going to discredit the classification of the Mongol regime as an empire?" Turns out its just Tataria again.
Tartarian speds claim both and far more totally incompatible shit.

Tartaria is literally just the russia/russia-simp knockoff of the venerable "WE WUZ KANGZ!" concept of the upstanding african american community, in which the histories of rome, the mongols, the chinks, the turks, the pajeets (I dont know why...I really dont) and even burgerland pre 1900 were all achtchully that of this glorious and turbo-based russian techno barbarian mega-empire, with the evidence almost entirely consisting of a fundamental inability to comprehend architecture as a subject or its history (i.e. declaring that common architectural techniques around the world all came from the same source rather than shit that convergently evolved, and thinking buildings intentionally built to ape those of older civilisations were infact from said older civilisations) and the use of the word "tartary" on old maps to describe eurasia/asia past European borders.

And dont even get me started on the "orphan train" shit, which came about because some sped found the wikipedia article for how a bunch of orphans in the US were shipped away from cities to rural areas as part of some two bit philanthropic/cheap farm labor programme by the government, and decided to turn this into the tartarian holocaust where gorillions of innocent aryan tartarians were slaughtered by the jewangloids and their children enslaved to destroy any evidence of tartaria or digging the empire state building out the mud flood or whatever the fuck their defective brains conjure up today.
 
So the Tartarians were just another bunch of barbarian mudhut-dwellers btfo by the dream that was Rome?

Based
 
Tartaria fags are just the weirdest bunch around. I would say stop giving them attention, but it is funny like
 
Back
Top Bottom