Imagine a world where we give China and Russia Taiwan and Ukraine in exchange for them 1) hollocausting India down to the last poo goblin 2) Cleaning it the fuck up, and 3) letting Ukes and Taiwanese resettle to actually fucking do something with the land.
The resource gains from clinging to Ukraine and Taiwan cannot possibly be worth the planet being jeeted and turned into a stagnant landfill full of rape golems. It seems like a fair trade to me. There won't be a planet left for any of us to lord over if India isn't razed to the ground.
(this is high fantasy, I realize, but there's no way that a jeet holocaust results in a net negative for the planet in the long run)
You will. In my late teens/early twenties I was a "nigger criminals just need a chance, maaaaan" hippieshit liberal. When you see how your goodwill, generosity, trust, and effort is repaid you will wake up. It doesn't make you a bad person. You'll feel like one at first, you'll tell yourself "I thought I was raised better than this", and you'll question the hate, just like I and many others did. But you'll keep being reminded how the goodness you have is taken for granted, chewed up, then shit-sprayed back at you.
And it's always fucking India: Children with tails, or with four legs, two faces, or one eye, or other fucking Spore type shit. They can't simply be normal retards.
Imagine a world where we give China and Russia Taiwan and Ukraine in exchange for them 1) hollocausting India down to the last poo goblin 2) Cleaning it the fuck up, and 3) letting Ukes and Taiwanese resettle to actually fucking do something with the land.
The resource gains from clinging to Ukraine and Taiwan cannot possibly be worth the planet being jeeted and turned into a stagnant landfill full of rape golems. It seems like a fair trade to me. There won't be a planet left for any of us to lord over if India isn't razed to the ground.
(this is high fantasy, I realize, but there's no way that a jeet holocaust results in a net negative for the planet in the long run)
All good, but Taiwan produces about 50% of semiconductors, also China is only marginally better than India because they don't shit in the streets. So, that could be done after deporting all chinks as communist spies and moving at least 25% of semiconductor fabrication to the States or to Europe.
I couldn't give less of a shit about Oinkraine, so half is good. Maybe we could get China on board the Poolocaust Train (pun intended) with recognizing Kashmir as righteous Chink clay instead. That will add the bonus of triggering the Pakis, and don't forget Bangladesh needs to be flushed too.
This happens every time they try to hold a shit for longer than 2 seconds. They always try to reach the toilet! They just never can do it before passing out! it's not fair saar!
Giving a certain country in the Middle East to the demographic who has relations with farm animals and minors would solve a lot more, a lot faster and eradicate the root cause of almost all of it
Anyway, I have come to a harrowing realization, saars, and decided to edit my post instead of making a new one: Nobody runs defense for fucking jeets. Not leftists, not other brownoids. Only jeets.
They also don't need anyone to run defense for them: Pajeets are more than 17% of the fucking world population:
World population (2026 estimate): 8,294,678,395. Worldometer
India population (projected July 1, 2026): 1,429,700,205. U.S. Census Bureau
Share of world population from India: (1,429,700,205 ÷ 8,294,678,395) × 100 = 17.23%
Just remember that every time a pajeet says or does something in their favor, even at the expense of other people, about 17% of the entire world population will automatically support them.
This is also why the globohomo is so fucking hellbent on pandering to the shit golems: Their single greatest contribution will be the click they give to a video, the like they give to a post, the single digit they contribute to the fucking advertisement statistics. They don't care that the plebs will be drowning in trash and diarrhea as long as they can get the bottom 17.23% of the world population on their side.
Some thoughts on this memorandum of affirmation (not a new policy) from USCIS, which directs case officers to more carefully scrutinize the intent of those applying for AOS (Adjustment of Status, aka "green card") while inside the US, questioning the intent of their visa when they could have just applied at a consulate abroad:
I noticed some on Twitter, in my opinion, incorrectly stating the implications of this memo.
Including, but not limited to, USCIS and DHS official accounts. This feels more like yet another political dance.
Of all categories, this appears to affect H-1B and L-1/L-2 the least, which are dual-intent visas. Though this new guidance does explicitly state "maintaining lawful status in a dual intent nonimmigrant category is not sufficient, on its own, to warrant a favorable exercise of discretion.", or in other words, just because you have an H-1B doesn't automatically make you get around this.
This seems to be aimed more towards those who file AOS/I-485 ("apply for green card") after arriving here on temporary visas like B-1, F-1, and J-1, as well as those who are parolees into the US. For example:
Enter under business or vacation visa, then apply for marriage-based green card (immediate relative of USC). You came here just to get a IR-6/CR-6 green card? Why didn't you just apply at a consulate back home to get it under IR-1/CR-1?
Enter under student visa (F-1), then during your first semester you apply for employment-based green card (alien worker). Did you actually come here to study? Did you work at uncle Rajit Poojar's 7-11 without work authorization?
And again, this is technically not a new rule at all. It's just a memo reminding case officers that AOS is discretionary, not automatic, and that they should weigh the applicant’s full immigration history, conduct, and available consular options before granting AOS.
Saying that all Indians should die and it would be pretty cool if someone shot some Indians in the head isn't shilling for India. I don't know why you "fellow human beings" in this thread seem to think so.
Nobody hates niggers more than niggers. Nobody hates white women more than white women. Nobody hates spics more than other Latinx. Why would a Kaling not follow the same pattern?
Just remember that every time a pajeet says or does something in their favor, even at the expense of other people, about 17% of the entire world population will automatically support them.
This is also why the globohomo is so fucking hellbent on pandering to the shit golems: Their single greatest contribution will be the click they give to a video, the like they give to a post, the single digit they contribute to the fucking advertisement statistics. They don't care that the plebs will be drowning in trash and diarrhea as long as they can get the bottom 17.23% of the world population on their side.
Only 5% of India is online. Counting the populations of Bangladesh and Pakistan, every 1 in 4 people on the Internet will soon be from the Subcontinent.
True, and then for an extra layer of #WINNING, the radioactive poo fallout would blanket Southeast Asia, killing the SEAmonkeys and thus making it so I can set my Steam profile to "Public" without constantly getting added by Thais trying steal my Steam account and sell my TF2 items to pay for their ladyboy surgery.
Judging by politics in London, despite hating each other South Asians would vote for any South Asian first, before a non-Saar.
Brahmin would rather hire a Muzzie Dalit then a non-Saar
Do not confuse their total lack of compassion to non-family members with liking us.
India had a 12 year window where they could delete Pakistan without retaliation. They chose not to commit genocide.
Don't wish for nuclear war, even if you hate Jeets, the big cities of both countries are relatively civilised and the hundreds of millions of rural people are on average even less sophisticated and could easily become our refugee problem.
