The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Reading this thread really makes you understand why the folks at Sentinel Island don't want anything to do with the rest of the world. Imagine jeets being your only neighbour.
 
Bloodrage said:
Reading this thread really makes you understand why the folks at Sentinel Island don't want anything to do with the rest of the world. Imagine jeets being your only neighbour.
Click to expand...
I saw a video about the Andaman Islands and an Indian tourist called the people “uncivilized”. I get that the Andamanese are prehistoric, but why do Indians think that they are automatically better?
 
Shiki Ouji said:
It’s worth clicking the link just to see how this woman looks like a troon


I see jeets often claim that abbos were descended from jeets who were able to navigate their boats? Ships? All the way from India to Australia thousands of years ago. They cite DNA as evidence, which I don't know anything about. Still, it seems dubious (maybe not, though. Why would anyone want to claim to be the abbos' ancestors?). And if they were a sea-faring culture, why are they not renowned for it? The claims don't add up for me
Click to expand...

Just realized that there are a lot of jeets, especially females, working as journalists or columnists for Anglophone (USA, Canada, The U.K.) news sites and stations.
 
ZsaZsaBinks said:
I saw a video about the Andaman Islands and an Indian tourist called the people “uncivilized”. I get that the Andamanese are prehistoric, but why do Indians think that they are automatically better?
Click to expand...
I got board and was watching some Brit visit post-Assad Syria and Iraq, and somehow, despite being consumed by constant war and conflict, have cleaner streets and areas than any random spot in India. Theres rubble and some garbage in certain parts but its mostly contained to minor areas. India is consumed by it. Im convinced its a failure of the hindoo culture.
 
Shiki Ouji said:
I see jeets often claim that abbos were descended from jeets who were able to navigate their boats? Ships? All the way from India to Australia thousands of years ago. They cite DNA as evidence, which I don't know anything about. Still, it seems dubious (maybe not, though. Why would anyone want to claim to be the abbos' ancestors?). And if they were a sea-faring culture, why are they not renowned for it? The claims don't add up for me
Click to expand...
The claiming ancestry thing, is probably for the same reason some black nationalists claim that Native Americans/Hebrews/Egyptians/etc were originally black. Regardless of whether the group they are claiming to be was actually successful, it makes the race look more widespread/significant by being in more places. Yes, dumb logic, I know.

As to the seafaring Abbo thing, I don't buy it. I think they walked to Australia back when sea levels were lower, and were isolated once sea levels rose. Most evidence suggests that Abbos have been in Australia for 50k+ years, with their culture/gene pool being more or less unchanged. Meanwhile the actual seafaring Polynesians are thought to have reached their various islands within the last 2k years or less, and IIRC they are descended from a different ethnicity than the Abbos.
 
Althalus said:
IIRC they are descended from a different ethnicity than the Abbos.
Click to expand...
The abbos are IIRC the second oldest genealogical group in the world right behind the Kalahari. With that said I think that they aren't homo sapien and are instead a cousin species. Convergent evolution.
 
Sleazy Car Salesman said:
The abbos are IIRC the second oldest genealogical group in the world right behind the Kalahari. With that said I think that they aren't homo sapien and are instead a cousin species. Convergent evolution.
Click to expand...
Absolutely. You're not the first person to say this, but I honestly think that if they had died out before Europeans discovered them, they would scientifically be considered non-Homosapiens akin to Neanderthals or Denisovans. Heck, even the early colonists considered the Abbos to be "fauna" and only changed the classification because "muh racism"
 
Cnidarian said:
"Thank you" must be translating to something that doesn't mean "I recognize what you've done and I want you to know that it matters to me" in Hindu, if it demeans their own loved ones so badly. They're theistic, so they've got to have a concept of showing gratitude to an authority... holy moly, they think that dalits randomly worship each other?
Click to expand...
This is my uninformed guess after ruminating on it for some more. It means "this is what I want from you" to them, and the inhumane bluntness is an intentional part of that translation. The words "thank you" nail somebody's actions into their identity with inarguable validity. Everyone else just focuses on the moral impact of the thanked action, Jeets care more about its prestige. The most selfish American alive can be rewarded with nothing but "thanks" and still understand that you just gave him some social currency, which is a use that's important to how this happens, since gratitude is often expressed when the value of an action is too big or too small to reward in material terms. The former case usually makes a show of the subject's dominance or bravery, the latter are servile tasks of little importance, they're hearing "you matter!" as "you're a waterboy". It's possible for this to work the other way too, I'd guess, you'd probably be ashamed if you were thanked for helping a robbery because you're going to care more about its morality than the fat stacks of izzat.
 
Last edited:
zeroapexpeak said:
Mungo skeletons were dna proof somehow that there was an existing indigenous population before the abbos that exist today which is proof that they migrated and then killed them all.
Click to expand...
When there were later waves of human migration to Australia, there was more than one, they interbreed with people already there until over time they became the same people. Like with the Anglo and Saxons being two distinct people becoming a single anglo-saxon people. Which means the Aboriginals are still the descendants of the first people to migrate to Australia so there's no political change at all. Skeleton re-burial is from well intentioned but fucking dumb and backwards attempts and reconcillation towards Aboriginal people not to cover up anything.
Even accepting there was a pre existing indigenous population that existed 42,000 years ago and were wiped out later it would still mean Aboriginals have been in Australia for at least 30,000 years which is basically as long as first humans have been in Europe. And nobody argues that Europeans are not indigenous to Europe even though we know that neanderthals were living there for tens of thousands of years before them.
 
Althalus said:
As to the seafaring Abbo thing, I don't buy it. I think they walked to Australia back when sea levels were lower, and were isolated once sea levels rose. Most evidence suggests that Abbos have been in Australia for 50k+ years, with their culture/gene pool being more or less unchanged. Meanwhile the actual seafaring Polynesians are thought to have reached their various islands within the last 2k years or less, and IIRC they are descended from a different ethnicity than the Abbos.
Click to expand...
Are you sure? How did they get from Sunda to Sahul without building some kind of raft?
Screenshot_3007.png
 
DSHK said:
Im a lifter, I could bench press 100 pounds before I started training. top 3% is 225 pounds, the top 1% is like 400 pounds or something. A jeet lifter is as weak as an untrained white couch potato, holy fuck.
Click to expand...
Jeetlet mogged by white ubermensch. Maybe he should try eating some beef.
 
DSHK said:
Im a lifter, I could bench press 100 pounds before I started training. top 3% is 225 pounds, the top 1% is like 400 pounds or something. A jeet lifter is as weak as an untrained white couch potato, holy fuck.
Click to expand...

Does that mean their weakness is based on genetics, diet, culture (no emphasis on sports) or all of the above? For example, Black-Americans and Polynesians are considered to be stronger than White people due to genetics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom