The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
KasTheGikes said:
This is also him,
6859308-9a1d7453692195d9abec27562762618b.jpg

Looks pretty brown, but he claims he took this photo after doing manual labour

Also this,
6859307-8af50fb55729b320b735a74ff47bb36f.jpg

I've rarely seen an Indian this light skinned, although it's possible. The common denominator in both these photos is the untrimmed fingernails, he might not be Indian but he is definitely trying to get worms


Bonus reflection face doxx
6859313-02d92262bc0a10758222ac38cf82ae52.jpg
Click to expand...
No Indian has that pork hoof for a hand and no white Indian is going to be eating banquet. That is a honky.

IRL, when I hear people say "sir" in hear "sar" now.
 
Last edited:
I thought this would be worth sharing and I think this is the thread to do it. Scrolling youtube today and was suggested the 2006 animated film Paprika, but the thumbnail was incorrect.
Screenshot_20250120_150432.jpg

Paprika, Life in a Brothel (1991) is a softcore porn film.

I then searched paprika 1991 on youtube, got a slew of very recent pajeet videos trying to scam other pajeets of views. I'm not sure if there is something to it or it's just the algorithm creating coincidence.


Screenshot_20250120_160059.jpg

Screenshot_20250120_160126.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250120_160230.jpg
    Screenshot_20250120_160230.jpg
    461.5 KB · Views: 29
  • Screenshot_20250120_160159.jpg
    Screenshot_20250120_160159.jpg
    467.2 KB · Views: 25
H-1Bs can no longer create anchor babies:
Among the categories of individuals born in the United States and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, the privilege of United States citizenship does not automatically extend to persons born in the United States: (1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States at the time of said person’s birth was lawful but temporary (such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program or visiting on a student, work, or tourist visa) and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.
Click to expand...
Source (Archive)
 
how are the jeets on X reacting to the Trump citizenship EOs taking away anchor baby protections? doo the PQQTRIOTS have the (world famous) Indian impulse control to hold out before their massa gives them H1B status or are they seething?
 
KasTheGikes said:
Thailand?

VID_20250120_151733_704.mp4
Click to expand...
I wonder if Indians do the same creepy sex tourism that whites do over there. I imagine since they already rape at their current home country they don't need to travel abroad. Ladysar pls can show bob and penus?

quaawaa said:
H-1Bs can no longer create anchor babies:

Source (Archive)
Click to expand...
KasTheGikes said:
View attachment 6883985
Click to expand...
Im trying to be cautiously optimistic about something happening, but somewhere deep in me I feel this is just a ruse from Trump and nothing ever happens.
 
pollution jim said:
I wonder if Indians do the same creepy sex tourism that whites do over there. I imagine since they already rape at their current home country they don't need to travel abroad. Ladysar pls can show bob and penus?
Click to expand...
I don't think that they could afford it either. The reason as to why so many whites are involved in the SEAn child trafficking/explotation ring is because of their wealth, with which they essentially buy the kid from their parents, and the fact that many whites go to impoverished areas of the place to do charity/missionary work, making it so that the people there are more prone to trust them. Child rapists like Richard Huckle were able to get access to so many children because of that, and jeets are neither particulary wealthy nor particulary generous
 
pollution jim said:
I wonder if Indians do the same creepy sex tourism that whites do over there. I imagine since they already rape at their current home country they don't need to travel abroad. Ladysar pls can show bob and penus?
Click to expand...
Yes, all while haggling with hookers over every cent, spending nothing in nightclubs, and literally shitting up the beaches (where they often roost permanently in order to avoid paying for a hotel). To the point where actual paying johns are looking for less jeeted countries, and Thais are attacking jeets on the streets.

They've also started to infest Vietnam.
 
KasTheGikes said:
Thailand?

VID_20250120_151733_704.mp4
Click to expand...

That water won't stay blue, that's for sure. I know pajeets pissed off some local Thais when they drank beer inside a temple. Just like pajeets will make even the most woke libtard in the west turn into a hardcore nazi, this might as well be the last straw for Thai before they put an end once and for all to the degeneracy and sexual exploitation in their country and reclaim it.

This is what ladyboys, women, children, men, monkeys and lizards of all races see before they turn into National Socialists. This horrific view from the worst of nightmares will be the wake up call for all nations to end degeneracy and wokeness. You can tell that he has no soul and resembles a demon more than a human being.

Screenshot_20250121_111836_Gallery.jpg
 
Apteryx Retardi said:
Yes, all while haggling with hookers over every cent, spending nothing in nightclubs, and literally shitting up the beaches (where they often roost permanently in order to avoid paying for a hotel). To the point where actual paying johns are looking for less jeeted countries, and Thais are attacking jeets on the streets.

They've also started to infest Vietnam.
Click to expand...
Watch loy machedos videos about pooniggers in Thailand. The entire island hates them bigtime.
 
Crossposting from the US Politics thread:
Flaming Dumpster said:
H-1Bs shitting bricks that they can't pop out anchor babies anymore. Especially salty are the ones who are incubating would-be anchor babies but aren't expecting before that 30 day deadline.

Thread archive: https://archive.is/elyQw
Click to expand...
Your very intelligent immigrants folks:
1737460857652.png

The text of the executive order couldn't be any clearer:
(a) It is the policy of the United States that no department or agency of the United States government shall issue documents recognizing United States citizenship, or accept documents issued by State, local, or other governments or authorities purporting to recognize United States citizenship, to persons: (1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States was lawful but temporary, and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.
Click to expand...
Subsection (a) of this section shall apply only to persons who are born within the United States after 30 days from the date of this order.
Click to expand...
Elsewhere, the order defines what "lawful but temporary" means:
such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program or visiting on a student, work, or tourist visa
Click to expand...

If you can't understand that, then you can't possibly be a skilled programmer.
 
Last edited:
World peace will begin with the united front of India hate and expulsion. Finally, humanity has found common ground. 😇

bort420 said:
This is gonna get immediately challenged and turned over. The 14th amendment is very clear on this. It'd need another amendment to change.
Click to expand...
I was informed in the US Politics thread that this interpretation came to in 1982 from Plyler v. Doe and how they interpreted jurisdiction and the anchor babies were a side effect. Whether that actually amounts to anything to come or not, I have no idea.
 
Last edited:
bort420 said:
This is gonna get immediately challenged and turned over. The 14th amendment is very clear on this. It'd need another amendment to change.
Click to expand...
No its not. The 14th amendment was very clearly about slaves (i.e we can't deport children of slaves born in the US) and birthright was not a thing until the 1980s. It will get challenged but can go in multiple different ways.

Speaking off:

1737471628796.png

The Brown Tide is coming to DC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom