The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Ser Prize said:
And yet nobody will say it as it is: an invasion.

Actual africans are quite fast but blacks on the whole are not the race that dominates weight lifting. That's a misconception.
Click to expand...
Everyone knows it is an invasion, it’s just a matter of finding leadership for an eventual revolt and the government that protects these people collapsing.
 
Ser Prize said:
Actual africans are quite fast but blacks on the whole are not the race that dominates weight lifting. That's a misconception.
Click to expand...
There's no one Black African race.
Humanity almost died out outside of Africa during the iceage, except for ~50,000 people. This past bottleneck drastically reduces European/Asian/Islander/Desi diversity in comparison to those who stayed behind.

For example, in long distance running, the question isn't if you are Black or non-Black, it's whether you are Kalenjin or non-Kalenjin (worksafe). Also, Africa is relatively undeveloped so who knows how many potential champion skiers or weight lifters never saw snow or a bar bell.

One interesting thing is Black people do tend to have earlier puberties*, so the later a country select's child athletes for special training, the less Black people end up on their teams.
*pygmies doubly so, they actually have the tallest 9 year olds in the world.
Evilronald said:
India wants restrictions eased so they can infest those countries too.
Click to expand...
Canada is a special case, it's not Indians per se, but what I suspect is a mass migration of Sikhs helping Sikhs to a country they could have more control over. Sikhs in Canada have caused a lot of diplomatic headaches with India.
 
Cane Skretteburg said:
Quite the contrary. Indians have no positive racial stereotypes as far as I know of. Blacks are strong, Asians are smart, Mexicans are hard workers, etc. Indians are generally regarded as an inferior in pretty much every aspect. The only vaguely positive perception I have on Indians is that they are shrewd and unscrupulous about advancing themselves and their co-ethnics. Other than that they are short, brown, horny, ugly, smelly liars with shitty food and a shittier attitude who are not only weak and averse to manual labor, but also unintelligent and less capable than white people in every area other than shameless self-promotion. I have never had an interaction with an Indian that caused me to think more highly of them as a race.
Click to expand...
SAAR SAAR DO NO REDEEN DO NOT REDEEM
 
Indians are perhaps the most annoying and smelly people to deal with on the planet. Every single interaction with them is "saar we own you saar your people serve us" and it's a non stop torrent of retarded sperg ranting about how amazing they are and muh "more money than whites in America" shit. I had the misfortune of shaking an Indian's hand once this past week, the fucker was wearing so much cologne that the smell stained my hand until I could get home and wash it with shaving cream because hand soap didn't work.

Why are they like this? They either smell like shit or overpower it with enough body spray to add another digit to the holocaust. I have so many Indians in Japan stories about how just shit and inbred they are I could fill a book.
 
Type 10 MBT said:
Indians are perhaps the most annoying and smelly people to deal with on the planet. Every single interaction with them is "saar we own you saar your people serve us" and it's a non stop torrent of retarded sperg ranting about how amazing they are and muh "more money than whites in America" shit. I had the misfortune of shaking an Indian's hand once this past week, the fucker was wearing so much cologne that the smell stained my hand until I could get home and wash it with shaving cream because hand soap didn't work.

Why are they like this? They either smell like shit or overpower it with enough body spray to add another digit to the holocaust. I have so many Indians in Japan stories about how just shit and inbred they are I could fill a book.
Click to expand...
How is it that they either start the day with a literal gas grenade of Axe body spray or smell like pure unmasked fecal matter. It's a mystery that 75 IQ Indian scientists have been scratching their heads at for decades.
 
I was idly browsing the LinkedinLunatic subreddit, Linkedin as we all know is infested with insane jeetery. It's crazy how normal it's becoming to talk about the problem of Indians online, to the point it's on the front page of a subreddit with 4.1k likes. People are even making joke Indian scripts and memeing in the comments. Even people in the comments are admitting it, with comments to the tune of "Racism is bad..... but fucking Indians man."

1732271494320.png
Original Post

1732271668357.png

Some of the features of Jeetery and Linkedin boomers has been making me want to experiment and see how adopting some of those qualities go. I've been tempted to ask companies if I can do some kind of internship type thing for free for them, because that's advice I hear a lot, that I imagine will not get me any call backs.

Edit:

1732271964663.png
I don't think you could get away with posting this on Reddit a year ago.
 
Is it just me, or were Indians thought of a lot more positively 10-15 years ago? I feel like the stereotype was they were good at tech, assuming you could understand them (I remember a bunch of movies a decade ago had the smart tech guy be an Indian). And they were also good at math like Asians, and also made good doctors. They were thought of as good businessmen since all the 7/11s and hotels and Subway franchises were all ran by Patels and shit. At worst they made food that smelled funny or they were that one TA/adjunct professor in college you couldn't understand a word of (and probably also smelled funny).

Sure, everybody always knew India was a filthy, awful place. But nobody ever thought that Indians themselves were turning the rest of the world into India. Did we just only take the Indians who weren't absolute human turds, like the literal doctors and scientists? Sad part is I can honestly see the powers that be thinking that the top 0.01% of Indians were representative of their nation and its potential and then came the H1Bs (sheer incompetence) followed by the literal rapists and street shitters (third world subhumans) that now infest Canada and soon other countries.
 
Save the Loli said:
Is it just me, or were Indians thought of a lot more positively 10-15 years ago? I feel like the stereotype was they were good at tech, assuming you could understand them (I remember a bunch of movies a decade ago had the smart tech guy be an Indian). And they were also good at math like Asians, and also made good doctors. They were thought of as good businessmen since all the 7/11s and hotels and Subway franchises were all ran by Patels and shit. At worst they made food that smelled funny or they were that one TA/adjunct professor in college you couldn't understand a word of (and probably also smelled funny).

Sure, everybody always knew India was a filthy, awful place. But nobody ever thought that Indians themselves were turning the rest of the world into India. Did we just only take the Indians who weren't absolute human turds, like the literal doctors and scientists? Sad part is I can honestly see the powers that be thinking that the top 0.01% of Indians were representative of their nation and its potential and then came the H1Bs (sheer incompetence) followed by the literal rapists and street shitters (third world subhumans) that now infest Canada and soon other countries.
Click to expand...
It all started with cellular networking allowing Indians onto cyberspace...
 
Save the Loli said:
Is it just me, or were Indians thought of a lot more positively 10-15 years ago?
Click to expand...
India for the past few decades has had perhaps the best PR a country could ever have, considering the reality of India.

Save the Loli said:
Sure, everybody always knew India was a filthy, awful place. But nobody ever thought that Indians themselves were turning the rest of the world into India. Did we just only take the Indians who weren't absolute human turds, like the literal doctors and scientists?
Click to expand...
I wrote something about this a while back, probably closer to the beginning of the thread than the end. I think India's change in reputation is a byproduct of the internet. Before the internet, and during the rise of the internet people's vision of the world was much more informed by established media and people from India. You'd have the odd thing pop up like scam callers as a stereotype, but you wouldn't have an endless stream of videos about the reality of India.

People from India were mostly people who could afford to immigrate to America. So they gave a skewed perspective. Now the average American can interact with a much larger, more representative sample size of Indians. Indians were smart doctors and engineers in peoples mind, because that's who the Indians who would come to America were.

I feel bad for Kitboga, the guy who really took scambaiting to the popularity it reached. It's clear he didn't set out on destroying the reputation of one of the largest (by population) countries on earth. But he really seems to have an impact, eventually with enough talk about India you will hear someone say "DO NOT REDEEM!". He and so many other Youtubers, mostly scambaiters are introducing audiances to a new perspective on India.
 
Save the Loli said:
Is it just me, or were Indians thought of a lot more positively 10-15 years ago
Click to expand...
Yes, because we only imported the top 0.01%. H-1B was created in 1990 and it only started to be exploited by the Indians after the Dot Com crash in the early 2000s (there were almost no Indians in the US from the invention of the transistor through the invention of the smartphone, so it’s laughable when they talk about how they’re critical for America’s technology). It wasn’t until the 2010s that we got city-sized ethnic enclaves full of retarded “tech workers” who spend their entire day trying to get their boss to hire more of their people.
 
Save the Loli said:
Is it just me, or were Indians thought of a lot more positively 10-15 years ago? I feel like the stereotype was they were good at tech, assuming you could understand them (I remember a bunch of movies a decade ago had the smart tech guy be an Indian). And they were also good at math like Asians, and also made good doctors. They were thought of as good businessmen since all the 7/11s and hotels and Subway franchises were all ran by Patels and shit. At worst they made food that smelled funny or they were that one TA/adjunct professor in college you couldn't understand a word of (and probably also smelled funny).

Sure, everybody always knew India was a filthy, awful place. But nobody ever thought that Indians themselves were turning the rest of the world into India. Did we just only take the Indians who weren't absolute human turds, like the literal doctors and scientists? Sad part is I can honestly see the powers that be thinking that the top 0.01% of Indians were representative of their nation and its potential and then came the H1Bs (sheer incompetence) followed by the literal rapists and street shitters (third world subhumans) that now infest Canada and soon other countries.
Click to expand...
97efe39ea71b64ac04c124eb1eaf13bc.jpg
This guy completely snowed Americans on the reality of Indians for decades. He was the model immigrant. A smart, capable business owner who loved America. Then racial politics became a thing in America again thanks to Obama and with it came race grifting. A stinky pajeet "comedian" saw an opportunity and pretended to be offended by Apu, so the Simpsons stopped using him. What was left to fill the void? Well, Kitboga exposing pajeet scammers and the millions of pajeets flooding Internet dating sites with requests for bobs and vagene. Without the protection of Apu's glowing example of what an Indian could theoretically be, Americans were left with what Indians generally are. Smelly, entitled sex-pests who lie about their credentials in order to take over your IT department or professional, clock-punching scammers who steal your grandma's pension money.
 
Save the Loli said:
Did we just only take the Indians who weren't absolute human turds, like the literal doctors and scientists?
Click to expand...
Yes, this has been the case with brownoids who have been in the West since the 70s or 80s compared to brownoids who have invaded since the turn of the 21st century. Another good example is Sweden, the first brownoids they imported in large numbers were Persians who were escaping the Islamic revolution in Iran. They were educated and wealthy or at worst middle class, so they were a net positive to Sweden as soon as they arrived, and I think only 20k of them in total went to Sweden. Since they were escaping the Islamic revolution, they weren't inbred jihadi tards. Now they let literally every brownoid in and they are a heavy strain on every part of the Swedish gov't and society. Same with Poojeets, I'm sure the ones who lived in the US or Canada since the 70s were legitimately "the good ones"™ but now that every piece of trash can easily scam their way to the West their public perception nosedived.
 
Maverick Vile said:
This guy completely snowed Americans on the reality of Indians for decades. He was the model immigrant. A smart, capable business owner who loved America. Then racial politics became a thing in America again thanks to Obama and with it came race grifting. A stinky pajeet "comedian" saw an opportunity and pretended to be offended by Apu, so the Simpsons stopped using him.
Click to expand...
Rest easy knowing that no one will remember him for his "comedy", but for the thin skinned streetshitter that deep down he still is.
 
Save the Loli said:
Is it just me, or were Indians thought of a lot more positively 10-15 years ago? I feel like the stereotype was they were good at tech, assuming you could understand them (I remember a bunch of movies a decade ago had the smart tech guy be an Indian). And they were also good at math like Asians, and also made good doctors. They were thought of as good businessmen since all the 7/11s and hotels and Subway franchises were all ran by Patels and shit. At worst they made food that smelled funny or they were that one TA/adjunct professor in college you couldn't understand a word of (and probably also smelled funny).

Sure, everybody always knew India was a filthy, awful place. But nobody ever thought that Indians themselves were turning the rest of the world into India. Did we just only take the Indians who weren't absolute human turds, like the literal doctors and scientists? Sad part is I can honestly see the powers that be thinking that the top 0.01% of Indians were representative of their nation and its potential and then came the H1Bs (sheer incompetence) followed by the literal rapists and street shitters (third world subhumans) that now infest Canada and soon other countries.
Click to expand...
Here in the UK, they still have that good reputation, especially Sikhs who are seen as being loyal to the British Empire and having fought in the world wars alongside us.

IMO the biggest reason for this is the proliferation of cheap internet in India, they've absolutely infested every single website with their jeetery, as has been documented here for the past year. I remember when Quora used to be a good website before subcons took it over and started answering questions and pushing their low IQ drivel to the top by sheer numbers alone rather than by merit of quality.

IMG_20241122_145725_807.jpg


China has the decency of creating a firewall, otherwise we would have to endure another group of haughty Asians online (and believe me, there is a lot of fucked up shit in the Chinese heartland away from the big flashy cities)

Teaching pajeets English was really the biggest crime of the British Empire against the world.
 
quaawaa said:
That really pissed off a certain community:
Click to expand...
I understand a construction worker feeling pride in their contribution to a building, or railway. However the physical construction is such a small piece of the overall process; it's a contribution, not the entire thing. "America was built on slaves", is akin to saying skyscrapers were built by construction workers while forgetting that the construction workers themselves alone can't build the skyscraper; they need the contributions of the entire economic hierarchy.

It's a similar deal with the repeat argumentation we see here of "we were the greatest then we were colonised, it's the colonisers fault we are behind now, wait and see"; is a non-sequitur response that feigns ignorance of if they weren't behind in the first place, they wouldn't have been colonised; they would have been able to defend themselves and protect or leverage their resources for internal use or external trade, like other civilisations were able to: colonised countries had underutilised resources from underperforming economies that other countries needed more to prevent greater harm; colonisation is expensive, it only makes sense if profitable/viable, and furthermore there is no need for it once the system underneath had been supplanted with capitalism unlocking international trade with the empire; myths of revolutions and freedom fighters don't change economic practicalities.

Same deal with slavery, slavery ends en masse once an economy is no longer necessitated upon unskilled labor and starts unlocking educated labor instead, making slavery optional, unlocking a new moral question of slavery.

Same deal with vegetarianism and veganism, they open up as alternatives only once the economy unlocks them, then the moral question arises.

Morality follows the economics. Unavoidable necessary harm happens until the system evolves to a point where a harm can become unnecessary and avoidable; a choice. Before it's a choice, traditions even perceive such harm as sacred (without question) and pure (without alternative) and consequently compassionate (without ultimate harm).

That said, the average Australian is also ignorant of the imperatives for empire; they are just haemophiliac bleeding hearts to the useless with no philosophy. There is no practice of steel-man debate in Australia, so no one there has contrasted positions.
 
Last edited:
Vivek, one of Trump's picks fortunately for Department of Government Effeciency and not foreign policy, speaking at a Zionist conference to applause of his bloodlust for Palestinian destruction and call for USA-style and backed impunity for Israel's genocide of Palestine:
https://odysee.com/@MintPressNews:9/trump's-new-cabinet-member-wants:1

Regardless what you think of the conflict and of Muslims, his bloodlust mirrors the same Indian-Muslim bloodlust that I've seen increasing with Indians since Modhi.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom